P. 177 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 17601-17700   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	ismri2d 17601*	Criterion for a subset of the base set in a Moore system to be independent. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∖ {𝑥}))))
Theorem	ismri2dd 17602*	Definition of independence of a subset of the base set in a Moore system. One-way deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ¬ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∖ {𝑥})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)
Theorem	mriss 17603	An independent set of a Moore system is a subset of the base set. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)
Theorem	mrissd 17604	An independent set of a Moore system is a subset of the base set. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)
Theorem	ismri2dad 17605	Consequence of a set in a Moore system being independent. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∖ {𝑌})))
Theorem	mrieqvd 17606*	In a Moore system, a set is independent if and only if, for all elements of the set, the closure of the set with the element removed is unequal to the closure of the original set. Part of Proposition 4.1.3 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 83. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∖ {𝑥})) ≠ (𝑁‘𝑆)))
Theorem	mrieqv2d 17607*	In a Moore system, a set is independent if and only if all its proper subsets have closure properly contained in the closure of the set. Part of Proposition 4.1.3 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 83. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ ∀𝑠(𝑠 ⊊ 𝑆 → (𝑁‘𝑠) ⊊ (𝑁‘𝑆))))
Theorem	mrissmrcd 17608	In a Moore system, if an independent set is between a set and its closure, the two sets are equal (since the two sets must have equal closures by mressmrcd 17595, and so are equal by mrieqv2d 17607.) (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝑁‘𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 = 𝑇)
Theorem	mrissmrid 17609	In a Moore system, subsets of independent sets are independent. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐼)
Theorem	mreexd 17610*	In a Moore system, the closure operator is said to have the exchange property if, for all elements 𝑦 and 𝑧 of the base set and subsets 𝑆 of the base set such that 𝑧 is in the closure of (𝑆 ∪ {𝑦}) but not in the closure of 𝑆, 𝑦 is in the closure of (𝑆 ∪ {𝑧}) (Definition 3.1.9 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 57 to 58.) This theorem allows to construct substitution instances of this definition. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∪ {𝑌})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑍 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑆 ∪ {𝑍})))
Theorem	mreexmrid 17611*	In a Moore system whose closure operator has the exchange property, if a set is independent and an element is not in its closure, then adding the element to the set gives another independent set. Lemma 4.1.5 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 84. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑆))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∪ {𝑌}) ∈ 𝐼)
Theorem	mreexexlemd 17612*	This lemma is used to generate substitution instances of the induction hypothesis in mreexexd 17616. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ≈ 𝐾 ∨ 𝐺 ≈ 𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑡∀𝑢 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑋 ∖ 𝑡)∀𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑋 ∖ 𝑡)(((𝑢 ≈ 𝐾 ∨ 𝑣 ≈ 𝐾) ∧ 𝑢 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝑣 ∪ 𝑡)) ∧ (𝑢 ∪ 𝑡) ∈ 𝐼) → ∃𝑖 ∈ 𝒫 𝑣(𝑢 ≈ 𝑖 ∧ (𝑖 ∪ 𝑡) ∈ 𝐼)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝒫 𝐺(𝐹 ≈ 𝑗 ∧ (𝑗 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼))
Theorem	mreexexlem2d 17613*	Used in mreexexlem4d 17615 to prove the induction step in mreexexd 17616. See the proof of Proposition 4.2.1 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 86 to 87. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐹)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 (¬ 𝑔 ∈ (𝐹 ∖ {𝑌}) ∧ ((𝐹 ∖ {𝑌}) ∪ (𝐻 ∪ {𝑔})) ∈ 𝐼))
Theorem	mreexexlem3d 17614*	Base case of the induction in mreexexd 17616. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 = ∅ ∨ 𝐺 = ∅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑖 ∈ 𝒫 𝐺(𝐹 ≈ 𝑖 ∧ (𝑖 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼))
Theorem	mreexexlem4d 17615*	Induction step of the induction in mreexexd 17616. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ ω)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀ℎ∀𝑓 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑋 ∖ ℎ)∀𝑔 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑋 ∖ ℎ)(((𝑓 ≈ 𝐿 ∨ 𝑔 ≈ 𝐿) ∧ 𝑓 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝑔 ∪ ℎ)) ∧ (𝑓 ∪ ℎ) ∈ 𝐼) → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝒫 𝑔(𝑓 ≈ 𝑗 ∧ (𝑗 ∪ ℎ) ∈ 𝐼)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ≈ suc 𝐿 ∨ 𝐺 ≈ suc 𝐿))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑗 ∈ 𝒫 𝐺(𝐹 ≈ 𝑗 ∧ (𝑗 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼))
Theorem	mreexexd 17616*	Exchange-type theorem. In a Moore system whose closure operator has the exchange property, if 𝐹 and 𝐺 are disjoint from 𝐻, (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) is independent, 𝐹 is contained in the closure of (𝐺 ∪ 𝐻), and either 𝐹 or 𝐺 is finite, then there is a subset 𝑞 of 𝐺 equinumerous to 𝐹 such that (𝑞 ∪ 𝐻) is independent. This implies the case of Proposition 4.2.1 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 86 where either (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) or (𝐵 ∖ 𝐴) is finite. The theorem is proven by induction using mreexexlem3d 17614 for the base case and mreexexlem4d 17615 for the induction step. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) Remove dependencies on ax-rep 5237 and ax-ac2 10423. (Revised by Brendan Leahy, 2-Jun-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑋 ∖ 𝐻))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ⊆ (𝑁‘(𝐺 ∪ 𝐻)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ Fin ∨ 𝐺 ∈ Fin))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝒫 𝐺(𝐹 ≈ 𝑞 ∧ (𝑞 ∪ 𝐻) ∈ 𝐼))
Theorem	mreexdomd 17617*	In a Moore system whose closure operator has the exchange property, if 𝑆 is independent and contained in the closure of 𝑇, and either 𝑆 or 𝑇 is finite, then 𝑇 dominates 𝑆. This is an immediate consequence of mreexexd 17616. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (𝑁‘𝑇))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ Fin ∨ 𝑇 ∈ Fin))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≼ 𝑇)
Theorem	mreexfidimd 17618*	In a Moore system whose closure operator has the exchange property, if two independent sets have equal closure and one is finite, then they are equinumerous. Proven by using mreexdomd 17617 twice. This implies a special case of Theorem 4.2.2 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 87. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧})))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐼)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Fin)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≈ 𝑇)
7.2.3  Algebraic closure systems
Theorem	isacs 17619*	A set is an algebraic closure system iff it is specified by some function of the finite subsets, such that a set is closed iff it does not expand under the operation. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝒫 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋(𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ∪ (𝑓 “ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝑠))))
Theorem	acsmre 17620	Algebraic closure systems are closure systems. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → 𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))
Theorem	isacs2 17621*	In the definition of an algebraic closure system, we may always take the operation being closed over as the Moore closure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋(𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ 𝑠)))
Theorem	acsfiel 17622*	A set is closed in an algebraic closure system iff it contains all closures of finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ 𝑆)))
Theorem	acsfiel2 17623*	A set is closed in an algebraic closure system iff it contains all closures of finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑦) ⊆ 𝑆))
Theorem	acsmred 17624	An algebraic closure system is also a Moore system. Deduction form of acsmre 17620. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))
Theorem	isacs1i 17625*	A closure system determined by a function is a closure system and algebraic. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝒫 𝑋) → {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∪ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝑠} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))
Theorem	mreacs 17626	Algebraicity is a composable property; combining several algebraic closure properties gives another. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 → (ACS‘𝑋) ∈ (Moore‘𝒫 𝑋))
Theorem	acsfn 17627*	Algebraicity of a conditional point closure condition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ Fin)) → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ (𝑇 ⊆ 𝑎 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑎)} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))
Theorem	acsfn0 17628*	Algebraicity of a point closure condition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑋) → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ 𝐾 ∈ 𝑎} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))
Theorem	acsfn1 17629*	Algebraicity of a one-argument closure condition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑋 𝐸 ∈ 𝑋) → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 𝐸 ∈ 𝑎} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))
Theorem	acsfn1c 17630*	Algebraicity of a one-argument closure condition with additional constant. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑋 𝐸 ∈ 𝑋) → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 𝐸 ∈ 𝑎} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))
Theorem	acsfn2 17631*	Algebraicity of a two-argument closure condition. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Apr-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑋 𝐸 ∈ 𝑋) → {𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 𝐸 ∈ 𝑎} ∈ (ACS‘𝑋))
PART 8  BASIC CATEGORY THEORY
8.1  Categories
8.1.1  Categories
Syntax	ccat 17632	Extend class notation with the class of categories.
class Cat
Syntax	ccid 17633	Extend class notation with the identity arrow of a category.
class Id
Syntax	chomf 17634	Extend class notation to include functionalized Hom-set extractor.
class Homf
Syntax	ccomf 17635	Extend class notation to include functionalized composition operation.
class compf
Definition	df-cat 17636*	A category is an abstraction of a structure (a group, a topology, an order...) Category theory consists in finding new formulation of the concepts associated with those structures (product, substructure...) using morphisms instead of the belonging relation. That trick has the interesting property that heterogeneous structures like topologies or groups for instance become comparable. Definition in [Lang] p. 53, without the axiom CAT 1, i.e., pairwise disjointness of hom-sets (cat1 18066). See setc2obas 18063 and setc2ohom 18064 for a counterexample. In contrast to definition 3.1 of [Adamek] p. 21, where "A category is a quadruple A = (O, hom, id, o)", a category is defined as an extensible structure consisting of three slots: the objects "O" ((Base‘𝑐)), the morphisms "hom" ((Hom ‘𝑐)) and the composition law "o" ((comp‘𝑐)). The identities "id" are defined by their properties related to morphisms and their composition, see condition 3.1(b) in [Adamek] p. 21 and df-cid 17637. (Note: in category theory morphisms are also called arrows.) (Contributed by FL, 24-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Cat = {𝑐 ∣ [(Base‘𝑐) / 𝑏][(Hom ‘𝑐) / ℎ][(comp‘𝑐) / 𝑜]∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑥)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦ℎ𝑥)(𝑔(⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝑜𝑥)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑦)(𝑓(⟨𝑥, 𝑥⟩𝑜𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦ℎ𝑧)((𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩𝑜𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑘 ∈ (𝑧ℎ𝑤)((𝑘(⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩𝑜𝑤)𝑔)(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩𝑜𝑤)𝑓) = (𝑘(⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩𝑜𝑤)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩𝑜𝑧)𝑓))))}
Definition	df-cid 17637*	Define the category identity arrow. Since it is uniquely defined when it exists, we do not need to add it to the data of the category, and instead extract it by uniqueness. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Id = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ ⦋(Base‘𝑐) / 𝑏⦌⦋(Hom ‘𝑐) / ℎ⦌⦋(comp‘𝑐) / 𝑜⦌(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ (℩𝑔 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑥)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦ℎ𝑥)(𝑔(⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩𝑜𝑥)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑦)(𝑓(⟨𝑥, 𝑥⟩𝑜𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓))))
Definition	df-homf 17638*	Define the functionalized Hom-set operator, which is exactly like Hom but is guaranteed to be a function on the base. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Homf = (𝑐 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑐), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ (𝑥(Hom ‘𝑐)𝑦)))
Definition	df-comf 17639*	Define the functionalized composition operator, which is exactly like comp but is guaranteed to be a function of the proper type. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ compf = (𝑐 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ ((Base‘𝑐) × (Base‘𝑐)), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑥)(Hom ‘𝑐)𝑦), 𝑓 ∈ ((Hom ‘𝑐)‘𝑥) ↦ (𝑔(𝑥(comp‘𝑐)𝑦)𝑓))))
Theorem	iscat 17640*	The predicate "is a category". (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑥)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑥)(𝑔(⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩ · 𝑥)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)(𝑓(⟨𝑥, 𝑥⟩ · 𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓) ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑧)((𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ · 𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑘 ∈ (𝑧𝐻𝑤)((𝑘(⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ · 𝑤)𝑔)(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ · 𝑤)𝑓) = (𝑘(⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ · 𝑤)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ · 𝑧)𝑓))))))
Theorem	iscatd 17641*	Properties that determine a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (comp‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 1 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑥))) → ( 1 (⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩ · 𝑥)𝑓) = 𝑓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦))) → (𝑓(⟨𝑥, 𝑥⟩ · 𝑦) 1 ) = 𝑓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑧))) → (𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ · 𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑧))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵)) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑧) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑧𝐻𝑤))) → ((𝑘(⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ · 𝑤)𝑔)(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ · 𝑤)𝑓) = (𝑘(⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ · 𝑤)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ · 𝑧)𝑓)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	catidex 17642*	Each object in a category has an associated identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑋)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑋)(𝑔(⟨𝑦, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑋)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑦)(𝑓(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓))
Theorem	catideu 17643*	Each object in a category has a unique identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑔 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑋)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑋)(𝑔(⟨𝑦, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑋)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑦)(𝑓(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓))
Theorem	cidfval 17644*	Each object in a category has an associated identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (℩𝑔 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑥)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑥)(𝑔(⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩ · 𝑥)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)(𝑓(⟨𝑥, 𝑥⟩ · 𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓))))
Theorem	cidval 17645*	Each object in a category has an associated identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 ‘𝑋) = (℩𝑔 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑋)∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑋)(𝑔(⟨𝑦, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑋)𝑓) = 𝑓 ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑦)(𝑓(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑦)𝑔) = 𝑓)))
Theorem	cidffn 17646	The identity arrow construction is a function on categories. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Id Fn Cat
Theorem	cidfn 17647	The identity arrow operator is a function from objects to arrows. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → 1 Fn 𝐵)
Theorem	catidd 17648*	Deduce the identity arrow in a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (comp‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 1 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑥))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑥))) → ( 1 (⟨𝑦, 𝑥⟩ · 𝑥)𝑓) = 𝑓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦))) → (𝑓(⟨𝑥, 𝑥⟩ · 𝑦) 1 ) = 𝑓)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Id‘𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 1 ))
Theorem	iscatd2 17649*	Version of iscatd 17641 with a uniform assumption list, for increased proof sharing capabilities. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (comp‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦) ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑧) ∧ 𝑘 ∈ (𝑧𝐻𝑤))))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → 1 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑦))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ( 1 (⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ · 𝑦)𝑓) = 𝑓)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑔(⟨𝑦, 𝑦⟩ · 𝑧) 1 ) = 𝑔)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → (𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ · 𝑧)𝑓) ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑧))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) → ((𝑘(⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ · 𝑤)𝑔)(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ · 𝑤)𝑓) = (𝑘(⟨𝑥, 𝑧⟩ · 𝑤)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ · 𝑧)𝑓)))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ∧ (Id‘𝐶) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 1 )))
Theorem	catidcl 17650	Each object in a category has an associated identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ( 1 ‘𝑋) ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑋))
Theorem	catlid 17651	Left identity property of an identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (( 1 ‘𝑌)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑌)𝐹) = 𝐹)
Theorem	catrid 17652	Right identity property of an identity arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑌)( 1 ‘𝑋)) = 𝐹)
Theorem	catcocl 17653	Closure of a composition arrow. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑍)𝐹) ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑍))
Theorem	catass 17654	Associativity of composition in a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑊))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾(⟨𝑌, 𝑍⟩ · 𝑊)𝐺)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑊)𝐹) = (𝐾(⟨𝑋, 𝑍⟩ · 𝑊)(𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑍)𝐹)))
Theorem	catcone0 17655	Composition of non-empty hom-sets is non-empty. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 18-Sep-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌𝐻𝑍) ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑍) ≠ ∅)
Theorem	0catg 17656	Any structure with an empty set of objects is a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ∅ = (Base‘𝐶)) → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	0cat 17657	The empty set is a category, the empty category, see example 3.3(4.c) in [Adamek] p. 24. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ Cat
Theorem	homffval 17658*	Value of the functionalized Hom-set operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 1-Mar-2024.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (Homf ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥𝐻𝑦))
Theorem	fnhomeqhomf 17659	If the Hom-set operation is a function it is equal to the corresponding functionalized Hom-set operation. (Contributed by AV, 1-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (Homf ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐻 Fn (𝐵 × 𝐵) → 𝐹 = 𝐻)
Theorem	homfval 17660	Value of the functionalized Hom-set operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (Homf ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐹𝑌) = (𝑋𝐻𝑌))
Theorem	homffn 17661	The functionalized Hom-set operation is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (Homf ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹 Fn (𝐵 × 𝐵)
Theorem	homfeq 17662*	Condition for two categories with the same base to have the same hom-sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥𝐻𝑦) = (𝑥𝐽𝑦)))
Theorem	homfeqd 17663	If two structures have the same Hom slot, they have the same Hom-sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐶) = (Base‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Hom ‘𝐶) = (Hom ‘𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷))
Theorem	homfeqbas 17664	Deduce equality of base sets from equality of Hom-sets. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Base‘𝐶) = (Base‘𝐷))
Theorem	homfeqval 17665	Value of the functionalized Hom-set operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (Hom ‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋𝐻𝑌) = (𝑋𝐽𝑌))
Theorem	comfffval 17666*	Value of the functionalized composition operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 1-Mar-2024.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (compf‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵), 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝐻𝑦), 𝑓 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑥) ↦ (𝑔(𝑥 · 𝑦)𝑓)))
Theorem	comffval 17667*	Value of the functionalized composition operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (compf‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩𝑂𝑍) = (𝑔 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍), 𝑓 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ (𝑔(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑍)𝑓)))
Theorem	comfval 17668	Value of the functionalized composition operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (compf‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩𝑂𝑍)𝐹) = (𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑍)𝐹))
Theorem	comfffval2 17669*	Value of the functionalized composition operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (compf‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵), 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ ((2nd ‘𝑥)𝐻𝑦), 𝑓 ∈ (𝐻‘𝑥) ↦ (𝑔(𝑥 · 𝑦)𝑓)))
Theorem	comffval2 17670*	Value of the functionalized composition operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (compf‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩𝑂𝑍) = (𝑔 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍), 𝑓 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ (𝑔(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑍)𝑓)))
Theorem	comfval2 17671	Value of the functionalized composition operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (compf‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩𝑂𝑍)𝐹) = (𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑍)𝐹))
Theorem	comfffn 17672	The functionalized composition operation is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (compf‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑂 Fn ((𝐵 × 𝐵) × 𝐵)
Theorem	comffn 17673	The functionalized composition operation is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (compf‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩𝑂𝑍) Fn ((𝑌𝐻𝑍) × (𝑋𝐻𝑌)))
Theorem	comfeq 17674*	Condition for two categories with the same hom-sets to have the same composition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑓 ∈ (𝑥𝐻𝑦)∀𝑔 ∈ (𝑦𝐻𝑧)(𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ · 𝑧)𝑓) = (𝑔(⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∙ 𝑧)𝑓)))
Theorem	comfeqd 17675	Condition for two categories with the same hom-sets to have the same composition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (comp‘𝐶) = (comp‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷))
Theorem	comfeqval 17676	Equality of two compositions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ ∙ = (comp‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑍))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑍)𝐹) = (𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∙ 𝑍)𝐹))
Theorem	catpropd 17677	Two structures with the same base, hom-sets and composition operation are either both categories or neither. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ∈ Cat ↔ 𝐷 ∈ Cat))
Theorem	cidpropd 17678	Two structures with the same base, hom-sets and composition operation have the same identity function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Id‘𝐶) = (Id‘𝐷))
8.1.2  Opposite category
Syntax	coppc 17679	The opposite category operation.
class oppCat
Definition	df-oppc 17680*	Define an opposite category, which is the same as the original category but with the direction of arrows the other way around. Definition 3.5 of [Adamek] p. 25. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ oppCat = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ ((𝑓 sSet ⟨(Hom ‘ndx), tpos (Hom ‘𝑓)⟩) sSet ⟨(comp‘ndx), (𝑢 ∈ ((Base‘𝑓) × (Base‘𝑓)), 𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑓) ↦ tpos (⟨𝑧, (2nd ‘𝑢)⟩(comp‘𝑓)(1st ‘𝑢)))⟩))
Theorem	oppcval 17681*	Value of the opposite category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑂 = ((𝐶 sSet ⟨(Hom ‘ndx), tpos 𝐻⟩) sSet ⟨(comp‘ndx), (𝑢 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐵), 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ tpos (⟨𝑧, (2nd ‘𝑢)⟩ · (1st ‘𝑢)))⟩))
Theorem	oppchomfval 17682	Hom-sets of the opposite category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 14-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ tpos 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝑂)
Theorem	oppchom 17683	Hom-sets of the opposite category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋(Hom ‘𝑂)𝑌) = (𝑌𝐻𝑋)
Theorem	oppccofval 17684	Composition in the opposite category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝑂)𝑍) = tpos (⟨𝑍, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑋))
Theorem	oppcco 17685	Composition in the opposite category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(comp‘𝑂)𝑍)𝐹) = (𝐹(⟨𝑍, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑋)𝐺))
Theorem	oppcbas 17686	Base set of an opposite category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 18-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑂)
Theorem	oppccatid 17687	Lemma for oppccat 17690. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (𝑂 ∈ Cat ∧ (Id‘𝑂) = (Id‘𝐶)))
Theorem	oppchomf 17688	Hom-sets of the opposite category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ tpos 𝐻 = (Homf ‘𝑂)
Theorem	oppcid 17689	Identity function of an opposite category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Id‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (Id‘𝑂) = 𝐵)
Theorem	oppccat 17690	An opposite category is a category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → 𝑂 ∈ Cat)
Theorem	2oppcbas 17691	The double opposite category has the same objects as the original category. Intended for use with property lemmas such as monpropd 17706. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘(oppCat‘𝑂))
Theorem	2oppchomf 17692	The double opposite category has the same morphisms as the original category. Intended for use with property lemmas such as monpropd 17706. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘(oppCat‘𝑂))
Theorem	2oppccomf 17693	The double opposite category has the same composition as the original category. Intended for use with property lemmas such as monpropd 17706. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 3-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘(oppCat‘𝑂))
Theorem	oppchomfpropd 17694	If two categories have the same hom-sets, so do their opposites. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘(oppCat‘𝐶)) = (Homf ‘(oppCat‘𝐷)))
Theorem	oppccomfpropd 17695	If two categories have the same hom-sets and composition, so do their opposites. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘(oppCat‘𝐶)) = (compf‘(oppCat‘𝐷)))
Theorem	oppccatf 17696	oppCat restricted to Cat is a function from Cat to Cat. (Contributed by Zhi Wang, 29-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (oppCat ↾ Cat):Cat⟶Cat
8.1.3  Monomorphisms and epimorphisms
Syntax	cmon 17697	Extend class notation with the class of all monomorphisms.
class Mono
Syntax	cepi 17698	Extend class notation with the class of all epimorphisms.
class Epi
Definition	df-mon 17699*	Function returning the monomorphisms of the category 𝑐. JFM CAT1 def. 10. (Contributed by FL, 5-Dec-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Mono = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ ⦋(Base‘𝑐) / 𝑏⦌⦋(Hom ‘𝑐) / ℎ⦌(𝑥 ∈ 𝑏, 𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ↦ {𝑓 ∈ (𝑥ℎ𝑦) ∣ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 Fun ◡(𝑔 ∈ (𝑧ℎ𝑥) ↦ (𝑓(⟨𝑧, 𝑥⟩(comp‘𝑐)𝑦)𝑔))}))
Definition	df-epi 17700	Function returning the epimorphisms of the category 𝑐. JFM CAT1 def. 11. (Contributed by FL, 8-Aug-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)
⊢ Epi = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ tpos (Mono‘(oppCat‘𝑐)))