Theorem eltskm 10955

Description: Belonging to (tarskiMap‘𝐴). (Contributed by FL, 17-Apr-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Sep-2014.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
eltskm	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ (tarskiMap‘𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Tarski (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝐵

Allowed substitution hint:   𝑉(𝑥)

Proof of Theorem eltskm

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tskmval 10951	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (tarskiMap‘𝐴) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ Tarski ∣ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥})
2	1	eleq2d 2850	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ (tarskiMap‘𝐴) ↔ 𝐵 ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ Tarski ∣ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥}))
3		elex 3475	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ Tarski ∣ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥} → 𝐵 ∈ V)
4	3	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ Tarski ∣ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥} → 𝐵 ∈ V))
5		tskmid 10952	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ (tarskiMap‘𝐴))
6		tskmcl 10953	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (tarskiMap‘𝐴) ∈ Tarski
7		eleq2 2853	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = (tarskiMap‘𝐴) → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐴 ∈ (tarskiMap‘𝐴)))
8		eleq2 2853	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = (tarskiMap‘𝐴) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝐵 ∈ (tarskiMap‘𝐴)))
9	7, 8	imbi12d 347	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = (tarskiMap‘𝐴) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ (tarskiMap‘𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ (tarskiMap‘𝐴))))
10	9	rspcv 3576	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((tarskiMap‘𝐴) ∈ Tarski → (∀𝑥 ∈ Tarski (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥) → (𝐴 ∈ (tarskiMap‘𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ (tarskiMap‘𝐴))))
11	6, 10	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ Tarski (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥) → (𝐴 ∈ (tarskiMap‘𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ (tarskiMap‘𝐴)))
12	5, 11	syl5com 32	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ Tarski (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝐵 ∈ (tarskiMap‘𝐴)))
13		elex 3475	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ (tarskiMap‘𝐴) → 𝐵 ∈ V)
14	12, 13	syl6 36	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑥 ∈ Tarski (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥) → 𝐵 ∈ V))
15		elintrabg 4924	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ V → (𝐵 ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ Tarski ∣ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Tarski (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥)))
16	15	a1i 11	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ V → (𝐵 ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ Tarski ∣ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Tarski (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥))))
17	4, 14, 16	pm5.21ndd 382	. 2 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ ∩ {𝑥 ∈ Tarski ∣ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥} ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Tarski (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥)))
18	2, 17	bitrd 282	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ (tarskiMap‘𝐴) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Tarski (𝐴 ∈ 𝑥 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑥)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ∀wral 3080  {crab 3416  Vcvv 3454  ∩ cint 4910  ‘cfv 6558  Tarskictsk 10860  tarskiMapctskm 10949

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7775  ax-groth 10935

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-int 4911  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6512  df-fun 6560  df-fn 6561  df-f 6562  df-f1 6563  df-fo 6564  df-f1o 6565  df-fv 6566  df-er 8745  df-en 9002  df-dom 9003  df-tsk 10861  df-tskm 10950

This theorem is used by: (None)