Theorem lindsind 21857

Description: A linearly independent set is independent: no nonzero element multiple can be expressed as a linear combination of the others. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Feb-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lindfind.s	⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
lindfind.n	⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)
lindfind.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
lindfind.z	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐿)
lindfind.k	⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐿)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lindsind	⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → ¬ (𝐴 · 𝐸) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})))

Proof of Theorem lindsind

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑒 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simplr 778	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐹)
2		eldifsn 4743	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 ))
3	2	bilanri 510	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }))
4		elfvdm 6896	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊) → 𝑊 ∈ dom LIndS)
5		eqid 2761	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Base‘𝑊) = (Base‘𝑊)
6		lindfind.s	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
7		lindfind.n	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)
8		lindfind.l	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐿 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
9		lindfind.k	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐿)
10		lindfind.z	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐿)
11	5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10	islinds2 21853	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ dom LIndS → (𝐹 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊) ↔ (𝐹 ⊆ (Base‘𝑊) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐹 ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · 𝑒) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝑒})))))
12	4, 11	syl 17	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊) → (𝐹 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊) ↔ (𝐹 ⊆ (Base‘𝑊) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐹 ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · 𝑒) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝑒})))))
13	12	ibi 269	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊) → (𝐹 ⊆ (Base‘𝑊) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐹 ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · 𝑒) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}))))
14	13	simprd 499	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊) → ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐹 ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · 𝑒) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝑒})))
15	14	ad2antrr 736	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐹 ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · 𝑒) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝑒})))
16		oveq2 7399	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (𝑎 · 𝑒) = (𝑎 · 𝐸))
17		sneq 4589	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → {𝑒} = {𝐸})
18	17	difeq2d 4078	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}) = (𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))
19	18	fveq2d 6866	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝑒})) = (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})))
20	16, 19	eleq12d 2855	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → ((𝑎 · 𝑒) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝑒})) ↔ (𝑎 · 𝐸) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))))
21	20	notbid 320	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (¬ (𝑎 · 𝑒) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝑒})) ↔ ¬ (𝑎 · 𝐸) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))))
22		oveq1 7398	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝑎 · 𝐸) = (𝐴 · 𝐸))
23	22	eleq1d 2846	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ((𝑎 · 𝐸) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})) ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐸) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))))
24	23	notbid 320	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (¬ (𝑎 · 𝐸) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})) ↔ ¬ (𝐴 · 𝐸) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))))
25	21, 24	rspc2va 3592	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐸 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 })) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐹 ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · 𝑒) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}))) → ¬ (𝐴 · 𝐸) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})))
26	1, 3, 15, 25	syl21anc 848	1 ⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → ¬ (𝐴 · 𝐸) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1559   ∈ wcel 2141   ≠ wne 2956  ∀wral 3075   ∖ cdif 3899   ⊆ wss 3902  {csn 4579  dom cdm 5643  ‘cfv 6516  (class class class)co 7391  Basecbs 17236  Scalarcsca 17280   ·_𝑠 cvsca 17281  0_gc0g 17459  LSpanclspn 21026  LIndSclinds 21845

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1814  ax-4 1828  ax-5 1929  ax-6 1986  ax-7 2027  ax-8 2143  ax-9 2151  ax-10 2174  ax-11 2190  ax-12 2211  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5243  ax-nul 5253  ax-pow 5319  ax-pr 5387  ax-un 7713

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1099  df-tru 1562  df-fal 1572  df-ex 1799  df-nf 1803  df-sb 2090  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3076  df-rex 3086  df-rab 3414  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4284  df-if 4478  df-pw 4554  df-sn 4580  df-pr 4582  df-op 4586  df-uni 4863  df-br 5098  df-opab 5160  df-mpt 5179  df-id 5538  df-xp 5649  df-rel 5650  df-cnv 5651  df-co 5652  df-dm 5653  df-rn 5654  df-res 5655  df-ima 5656  df-iota 6472  df-fun 6518  df-fn 6519  df-f 6520  df-f1 6521  df-fo 6522  df-f1o 6523  df-fv 6524  df-ov 7394  df-lindf 21846  df-linds 21847

This theorem is referenced by: (None)