Theorem lindsind 21997

Description: A linearly independent set is independent: no nonzero element multiple can be expressed as a linear combination of the others. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Feb-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lindfind.s	⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
lindfind.n	⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)
lindfind.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
lindfind.z	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐿)
lindfind.k	⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐿)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lindsind	⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → ¬ (𝐴 · 𝐸) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})))

Proof of Theorem lindsind

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑒 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simplr 781	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐹)
2		eldifsn 4755	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 ))
3	2	bilanri 512	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }))
4		elfvdm 6919	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊) → 𝑊 ∈ dom LIndS)
5		eqid 2765	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Base‘𝑊) = (Base‘𝑊)
6		lindfind.s	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
7		lindfind.n	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)
8		lindfind.l	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐿 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
9		lindfind.k	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐿)
10		lindfind.z	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐿)
11	5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10	islinds2 21993	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ dom LIndS → (𝐹 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊) ↔ (𝐹 ⊆ (Base‘𝑊) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐹 ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · 𝑒) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝑒})))))
12	4, 11	syl 18	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊) → (𝐹 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊) ↔ (𝐹 ⊆ (Base‘𝑊) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐹 ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · 𝑒) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝑒})))))
13	12	ibi 270	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊) → (𝐹 ⊆ (Base‘𝑊) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐹 ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · 𝑒) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}))))
14	13	simprd 501	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊) → ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐹 ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · 𝑒) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝑒})))
15	14	ad2antrr 739	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐹 ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · 𝑒) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝑒})))
16		oveq2 7424	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (𝑎 · 𝑒) = (𝑎 · 𝐸))
17		sneq 4601	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → {𝑒} = {𝐸})
18	17	difeq2d 4081	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}) = (𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))
19	18	fveq2d 6889	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝑒})) = (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})))
20	16, 19	eleq12d 2859	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → ((𝑎 · 𝑒) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝑒})) ↔ (𝑎 · 𝐸) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))))
21	20	notbid 321	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (¬ (𝑎 · 𝑒) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝑒})) ↔ ¬ (𝑎 · 𝐸) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))))
22		oveq1 7423	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝑎 · 𝐸) = (𝐴 · 𝐸))
23	22	eleq1d 2850	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ((𝑎 · 𝐸) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})) ↔ (𝐴 · 𝐸) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))))
24	23	notbid 321	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (¬ (𝑎 · 𝐸) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})) ↔ ¬ (𝐴 · 𝐸) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))))
25	21, 24	rspc2va 3595	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐸 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 })) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ 𝐹 ∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · 𝑒) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}))) → ¬ (𝐴 · 𝐸) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})))
26	1, 3, 15, 25	syl21anc 851	1 ⊢ (((𝐹 ∈ (LIndS‘𝑊) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → ¬ (𝐴 · 𝐸) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146   ≠ wne 2960  ∀wral 3081   ∖ cdif 3903   ⊆ wss 3906  {csn 4591  dom cdm 5663  ‘cfv 6540  (class class class)co 7416  Basecbs 17287  Scalarcsca 17331   ·_𝑠 cvsca 17332  0_gc0g 17510  LSpanclspn 21122  LIndSclinds 21985

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7738

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3747  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-f1 6545  df-fo 6546  df-f1o 6547  df-fv 6548  df-ov 7419  df-lindf 21986  df-linds 21987

This theorem is used by: (None)