Theorem lindfind 21977

Description: A linearly independent family is independent: no nonzero element multiple can be expressed as a linear combination of the others. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Feb-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lindfind.s	⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
lindfind.n	⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)
lindfind.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
lindfind.z	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐿)
lindfind.k	⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐿)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lindfind	⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → ¬ (𝐴 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))))

Proof of Theorem lindfind

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑒 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simplr 780	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹)
2		eldifsn 4752	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 ))
3	2	bilanri 511	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }))
4		simpll 778	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → 𝐹 LIndF 𝑊)
5		lindfind.l	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐿 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
6		lindfind.k	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐿)
7	5, 6	elbasfv 17281	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 → 𝑊 ∈ V)
8	7	ad2antrl 740	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → 𝑊 ∈ V)
9		rellindf 21969	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Rel LIndF
10	9	brrelex1i 5716	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
11	10	ad2antrr 738	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
12		eqid 2762	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Base‘𝑊) = (Base‘𝑊)
13		lindfind.s	. . . . . 6 ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
14		lindfind.n	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)
15		lindfind.z	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐿)
16	12, 13, 14, 5, 6, 15	islindf 21973	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ V) → (𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ↔ (𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶(Base‘𝑊) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}))))))
17	8, 11, 16	syl2anc 595	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → (𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ↔ (𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶(Base‘𝑊) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}))))))
18	4, 17	mpbid 235	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → (𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶(Base‘𝑊) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒})))))
19	18	simprd 500	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → ∀𝑒 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}))))
20		fveq2 6881	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (𝐹‘𝑒) = (𝐹‘𝐸))
21	20	oveq2d 7428	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) = (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝐸)))
22		sneq 4598	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → {𝑒} = {𝐸})
23	22	difeq2d 4080	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}) = (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))
24	23	imaeq2d 6061	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒})) = (𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})))
25	24	fveq2d 6885	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}))) = (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))))
26	21, 25	eleq12d 2856	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → ((𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}))) ↔ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})))))
27	26	notbid 321	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}))) ↔ ¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})))))
28		oveq1 7419	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) = (𝐴 · (𝐹‘𝐸)))
29	28	eleq1d 2847	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ((𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))) ↔ (𝐴 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})))))
30	29	notbid 321	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))) ↔ ¬ (𝐴 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})))))
31	27, 30	rspc2va 3592	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 })) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒})))) → ¬ (𝐴 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))))
32	1, 3, 19, 31	syl21anc 850	1 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → ¬ (𝐴 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2142   ≠ wne 2957  ∀wral 3078  Vcvv 3454   ∖ cdif 3901  {csn 4588   class class class wbr 5108  dom cdm 5660   “ cima 5663  ⟶wf 6532  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7412  Basecbs 17275  Scalarcsca 17319   ·_𝑠 cvsca 17320  0_gc0g 17498  LSpanclspn 21103   LIndF clindf 21965

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1824  ax-4 1838  ax-5 1939  ax-6 1996  ax-7 2037  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5256  ax-nul 5268  ax-pow 5335  ax-pr 5403  ax-un 7734  ax-cnex 11162  ax-1cn 11164  ax-addcl 11166

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1103  df-3an 1104  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1809  df-nf 1813  df-sb 2096  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-reu 3369  df-rab 3416  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3744  df-csb 3853  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-pss 3924  df-nul 4286  df-if 4487  df-pw 4563  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4595  df-uni 4872  df-iun 4957  df-br 5109  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5192  df-tr 5218  df-id 5555  df-eprel 5560  df-po 5568  df-so 5569  df-fr 5613  df-we 5615  df-xp 5666  df-rel 5667  df-cnv 5668  df-co 5669  df-dm 5670  df-rn 5671  df-res 5672  df-ima 5673  df-pred 6302  df-ord 6363  df-on 6364  df-lim 6365  df-suc 6366  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7415  df-om 7861  df-2nd 7985  df-frecs 8276  df-wrecs 8307  df-recs 8356  df-rdg 8395  df-nn 12240  df-slot 17248  df-ndx 17260  df-base 17276  df-lindf 21967

This theorem is used by:  lindfind2  21979  lindfrn  21982  f1lindf  21983