Theorem lindfind 22069

Description: A linearly independent family is independent: no nonzero element multiple can be expressed as a linear combination of the others. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Feb-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lindfind.s	⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
lindfind.n	⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)
lindfind.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
lindfind.z	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐿)
lindfind.k	⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐿)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lindfind	⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → ¬ (𝐴 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))))

Proof of Theorem lindfind

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑒 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simplr 781	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹)
2		eldifsn 4748	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 ))
3	2	bilanri 512	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }))
4		simpll 779	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → 𝐹 LIndF 𝑊)
5		lindfind.l	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐿 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
6		lindfind.k	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐿)
7	5, 6	elbasfv 17340	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 → 𝑊 ∈ V)
8	7	ad2antrl 741	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → 𝑊 ∈ V)
9		rellindf 22061	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Rel LIndF
10	9	brrelex1i 5704	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
11	10	ad2antrr 739	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
12		eqid 2760	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Base‘𝑊) = (Base‘𝑊)
13		lindfind.s	. . . . . 6 ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
14		lindfind.n	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)
15		lindfind.z	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐿)
16	12, 13, 14, 5, 6, 15	islindf 22065	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ V) → (𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ↔ (𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶(Base‘𝑊) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}))))))
17	8, 11, 16	syl2anc 596	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → (𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ↔ (𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶(Base‘𝑊) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}))))))
18	4, 17	mpbid 235	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → (𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶(Base‘𝑊) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒})))))
19	18	simprd 501	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → ∀𝑒 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}))))
20		fveq2 6874	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (𝐹‘𝑒) = (𝐹‘𝐸))
21	20	oveq2d 7425	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) = (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝐸)))
22		sneq 4594	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → {𝑒} = {𝐸})
23	22	difeq2d 4074	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}) = (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))
24	23	imaeq2d 6051	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒})) = (𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})))
25	24	fveq2d 6878	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}))) = (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))))
26	21, 25	eleq12d 2854	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → ((𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}))) ↔ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})))))
27	26	notbid 321	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}))) ↔ ¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})))))
28		oveq1 7416	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) = (𝐴 · (𝐹‘𝐸)))
29	28	eleq1d 2845	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ((𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))) ↔ (𝐴 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})))))
30	29	notbid 321	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))) ↔ ¬ (𝐴 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})))))
31	27, 30	rspc2va 3588	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 })) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒})))) → ¬ (𝐴 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))))
32	1, 3, 19, 31	syl21anc 851	1 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → ¬ (𝐴 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145   ≠ wne 2955  ∀wral 3076  Vcvv 3450   ∖ cdif 3896  {csn 4584   class class class wbr 5103  dom cdm 5648   “ cima 5651  ⟶wf 6524  ‘cfv 6528  (class class class)co 7409  Basecbs 17334  Scalarcsca 17378   ·_𝑠 cvsca 17379  0_gc0g 17557  LSpanclspn 21193   LIndF clindf 22057

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7735  ax-cnex 11213  ax-1cn 11215  ax-addcl 11217

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-pss 3919  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-tr 5213  df-id 5543  df-eprel 5548  df-po 5556  df-so 5557  df-fr 5601  df-we 5603  df-xp 5654  df-rel 5655  df-cnv 5656  df-co 5657  df-dm 5658  df-rn 5659  df-res 5660  df-ima 5661  df-pred 6294  df-ord 6355  df-on 6356  df-lim 6357  df-suc 6358  df-iota 6484  df-fun 6530  df-fn 6531  df-f 6532  df-f1 6533  df-fo 6534  df-f1o 6535  df-fv 6536  df-ov 7412  df-om 7862  df-2nd 7986  df-frecs 8278  df-wrecs 8309  df-recs 8358  df-rdg 8397  df-nn 12291  df-slot 17307  df-ndx 17319  df-base 17335  df-lindf 22059

This theorem is used by:  lindfind2  22071  lindfrn  22074  f1lindf  22075