Theorem lindfind 22149

Description: A linearly independent family is independent: no nonzero element multiple can be expressed as a linear combination of the others. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Feb-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
lindfind.s	⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
lindfind.n	⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)
lindfind.l	⊢ 𝐿 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
lindfind.z	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐿)
lindfind.k	⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐿)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
lindfind	⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → ¬ (𝐴 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))))

Proof of Theorem lindfind

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑒 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		simplr 781	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹)
2		eldifsn 4748	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ↔ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 ))
3	2	bilanri 512	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }))
4		simpll 779	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → 𝐹 LIndF 𝑊)
5		lindfind.l	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐿 = (Scalar‘𝑊)
6		lindfind.k	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐿)
7	5, 6	elbasfv 17419	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 → 𝑊 ∈ V)
8	7	ad2antrl 741	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → 𝑊 ∈ V)
9		rellindf 22141	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ Rel LIndF
10	9	brrelex1i 5711	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 → 𝐹 ∈ V)
11	10	ad2antrr 739	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → 𝐹 ∈ V)
12		eqid 2763	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Base‘𝑊) = (Base‘𝑊)
13		lindfind.s	. . . . . 6 ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)
14		lindfind.n	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)
15		lindfind.z	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐿)
16	12, 13, 14, 5, 6, 15	islindf 22145	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ V) → (𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ↔ (𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶(Base‘𝑊) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}))))))
17	8, 11, 16	syl2anc 596	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → (𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ↔ (𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶(Base‘𝑊) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}))))))
18	4, 17	mpbid 235	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → (𝐹:dom 𝐹⟶(Base‘𝑊) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒})))))
19	18	simprd 501	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → ∀𝑒 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}))))
20		fveq2 6905	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (𝐹‘𝑒) = (𝐹‘𝐸))
21	20	oveq2d 7456	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) = (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝐸)))
22		sneq 4594	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → {𝑒} = {𝐸})
23	22	difeq2d 4066	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}) = (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))
24	23	imaeq2d 6063	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒})) = (𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})))
25	24	fveq2d 6909	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}))) = (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))))
26	21, 25	eleq12d 2858	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → ((𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}))) ↔ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})))))
27	26	notbid 321	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑒 = 𝐸 → (¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒}))) ↔ ¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})))))
28		oveq1 7447	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) = (𝐴 · (𝐹‘𝐸)))
29	28	eleq1d 2849	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → ((𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))) ↔ (𝐴 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})))))
30	29	notbid 321	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝐴 → (¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))) ↔ ¬ (𝐴 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸})))))
31	27, 30	rspc2va 3591	. 2 ⊢ (((𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 })) ∧ ∀𝑒 ∈ dom 𝐹∀𝑎 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 }) ¬ (𝑎 · (𝐹‘𝑒)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝑒})))) → ¬ (𝐴 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))))
32	1, 3, 19, 31	syl21anc 851	1 ⊢ (((𝐹 LIndF 𝑊 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ dom 𝐹) ∧ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 0 )) → ¬ (𝐴 · (𝐹‘𝐸)) ∈ (𝑁‘(𝐹 “ (dom 𝐹 ∖ {𝐸}))))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147   ≠ wne 2959  ∀wral 3080  Vcvv 3454   ∖ cdif 4048  {csn 4588   class class class wbr 5106  dom cdm 5655   “ cima 5658  ⟶wf 6551  ‘cfv 6555  (class class class)co 7440  Basecbs 17413  Scalarcsca 17457   ·_𝑠 cvsca 17458  0_gc0g 17636  LSpanclspn 21273   LIndF clindf 22137

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7772  ax-cnex 11280  ax-1cn 11282  ax-addcl 11284

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-pss 4017  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-tr 5216  df-id 5550  df-eprel 5555  df-po 5563  df-so 5564  df-fr 5608  df-we 5610  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-pred 6319  df-ord 6380  df-on 6381  df-lim 6382  df-suc 6383  df-iota 6509  df-fun 6557  df-fn 6558  df-f 6559  df-f1 6560  df-fo 6561  df-f1o 6562  df-fv 6563  df-ov 7443  df-om 7899  df-2nd 8023  df-frecs 8324  df-wrecs 8355  df-recs 8404  df-rdg 8443  df-nn 12360  df-slot 17386  df-ndx 17398  df-base 17414  df-lindf 22139

This theorem is used by:  lindfind2  22151  lindfrn  22154  f1lindf  22155