Theorem neifval 23397

Description: Value of the neighborhood function on the subsets of the base set of a topology. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Nov-2013.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
neifval.1	⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽

Assertion

Ref	Expression
neifval	⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (nei‘𝐽) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑣,𝑔,𝑥,𝐽   𝑔,𝑋,𝑣,𝑥

Proof of Theorem neifval

Dummy variable 𝑗 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		neifval.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽
2	1	topopn 23204	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐽)
3		pwexg 5340	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐽 → 𝒫 𝑋 ∈ V)
4		mptexg 7219	. . 3 ⊢ (𝒫 𝑋 ∈ V → (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}) ∈ V)
5	2, 3, 4	3syl 19	. 2 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}) ∈ V)
6		unieq 4878	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝐽 → ∪ 𝑗 = ∪ 𝐽)
7	6, 1	eqtr4di 2814	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝐽 → ∪ 𝑗 = 𝑋)
8	7	pweqd 4574	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝐽 → 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 = 𝒫 𝑋)
9		rexeq 3316	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝐽 → (∃𝑔 ∈ 𝑗 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)))
10	8, 9	rabeqbidv 3430	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝐽 → {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝑗 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)} = {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)})
11	8, 10	mpteq12dv 5192	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝐽 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝑗 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}))
12		df-nei 23396	. . 3 ⊢ nei = (𝑗 ∈ Top ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝑗 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}))
13	11, 12	fvmptg 6983	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}) ∈ V) → (nei‘𝐽) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}))
14	5, 13	mpdan 700	1 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (nei‘𝐽) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∃wrex 3087  {crab 3413  Vcvv 3451   ⊆ wss 3899  𝒫 cpw 4557  ∪ cuni 4867   ↦ cmpt 5186  ‘cfv 6531  Topctop 23191  neicnei 23395

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-iota 6487  df-fun 6533  df-fn 6534  df-f 6535  df-f1 6536  df-fo 6537  df-f1o 6538  df-fv 6539  df-top 23192  df-nei 23396

This theorem is used by:  neif  23398  neival  23400