Theorem neifval 23450

Description: Value of the neighborhood function on the subsets of the base set of a topology. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Nov-2013.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
neifval.1	⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽

Assertion

Ref	Expression
neifval	⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (nei‘𝐽) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑣,𝑔,𝑥,𝐽   𝑔,𝑋,𝑣,𝑥

Proof of Theorem neifval

Dummy variable 𝑗 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		neifval.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽
2	1	topopn 23257	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐽)
3		pwexg 5345	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐽 → 𝒫 𝑋 ∈ V)
4		mptexg 7253	. . 3 ⊢ (𝒫 𝑋 ∈ V → (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}) ∈ V)
5	2, 3, 4	3syl 19	. 2 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}) ∈ V)
6		unieq 4881	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝐽 → ∪ 𝑗 = ∪ 𝐽)
7	6, 1	eqtr4di 2816	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝐽 → ∪ 𝑗 = 𝑋)
8	7	pweqd 4577	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝐽 → 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 = 𝒫 𝑋)
9		rexeq 3319	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝐽 → (∃𝑔 ∈ 𝑗 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)))
10	8, 9	rabeqbidv 3433	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝐽 → {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝑗 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)} = {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)})
11	8, 10	mpteq12dv 5196	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝐽 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝑗 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}))
12		df-nei 23449	. . 3 ⊢ nei = (𝑗 ∈ Top ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝑗 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}))
13	11, 12	fvmptg 7017	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}) ∈ V) → (nei‘𝐽) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}))
14	5, 13	mpdan 700	1 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (nei‘𝐽) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ∃wrex 3090  {crab 3416  Vcvv 3454   ⊆ wss 3900  𝒫 cpw 4560  ∪ cuni 4870   ↦ cmpt 5190  ‘cfv 6561  Topctop 23244  neicnei 23448

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5236  ax-sep 5253  ax-nul 5264  ax-pow 5332  ax-pr 5396

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5107  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5551  df-xp 5662  df-rel 5663  df-cnv 5664  df-co 5665  df-dm 5666  df-rn 5667  df-res 5668  df-ima 5669  df-iota 6515  df-fun 6563  df-fn 6564  df-f 6565  df-f1 6566  df-fo 6567  df-f1o 6568  df-fv 6569  df-top 23245  df-nei 23449

This theorem is used by:  neif  23451  neival  23453