Theorem neifval 23293

Description: Value of the neighborhood function on the subsets of the base set of a topology. (Contributed by NM, 11-Feb-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 11-Nov-2013.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
neifval.1	⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽

Assertion

Ref	Expression
neifval	⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (nei‘𝐽) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑣,𝑔,𝑥,𝐽   𝑔,𝑋,𝑣,𝑥

Proof of Theorem neifval

Dummy variable 𝑗 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		neifval.1	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑋 = ∪ 𝐽
2	1	topopn 23100	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐽)
3		pwexg 5354	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐽 → 𝒫 𝑋 ∈ V)
4		mptexg 7226	. . 3 ⊢ (𝒫 𝑋 ∈ V → (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}) ∈ V)
5	2, 3, 4	3syl 19	. 2 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}) ∈ V)
6		unieq 4888	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝐽 → ∪ 𝑗 = ∪ 𝐽)
7	6, 1	eqtr4di 2819	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝐽 → ∪ 𝑗 = 𝑋)
8	7	pweqd 4584	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝐽 → 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 = 𝒫 𝑋)
9		rexeq 3322	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝐽 → (∃𝑔 ∈ 𝑗 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)))
10	8, 9	rabeqbidv 3437	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝐽 → {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝑗 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)} = {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)})
11	8, 10	mpteq12dv 5203	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑗 = 𝐽 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝑗 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}))
12		df-nei 23292	. . 3 ⊢ nei = (𝑗 ∈ Top ↦ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 ∪ 𝑗 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝑗 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}))
13	11, 12	fvmptg 6994	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}) ∈ V) → (nei‘𝐽) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}))
14	5, 13	mpdan 700	1 ⊢ (𝐽 ∈ Top → (nei‘𝐽) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ↦ {𝑣 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋 ∣ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑥 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑣)}))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  ∃wrex 3092  {crab 3419  Vcvv 3458   ⊆ wss 3908  𝒫 cpw 4567  ∪ cuni 4877   ↦ cmpt 5197  ‘cfv 6543  Topctop 23087  neicnei 23291

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-rep 5243  ax-sep 5262  ax-nul 5274  ax-pow 5341  ax-pr 5409

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2570  df-eu 2600  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-reu 3373  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-sbc 3748  df-csb 3857  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4493  df-pw 4569  df-sn 4595  df-pr 4597  df-op 4601  df-uni 4878  df-iun 4963  df-br 5115  df-opab 5179  df-mpt 5198  df-id 5561  df-xp 5672  df-rel 5673  df-cnv 5674  df-co 5675  df-dm 5676  df-rn 5677  df-res 5678  df-ima 5679  df-iota 6499  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-f1 6548  df-fo 6549  df-f1o 6550  df-fv 6551  df-top 23088  df-nei 23292

This theorem is used by:  neif  23294  neival  23296