Theorem neiss 23482

Description: Any neighborhood of a set 𝑆 is also a neighborhood of any subset 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆. Similar to Proposition 1 of [BourbakiTop1] p. I.2. (Contributed by FL, 25-Sep-2006.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
neiss	⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑁 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑅))

Proof of Theorem neiss

Dummy variable 𝑔 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2763	. . . 4 ⊢ ∪ 𝐽 = ∪ 𝐽
2	1	neii1 23479	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆)) → 𝑁 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽)
3	2	3adant3 1150	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑁 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽)
4		neii2 23481	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆)) → ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑁))
5	4	3adant3 1150	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆) → ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑁))
6		sstr2 3920	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆 → (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑔 → 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑔))
7	6	anim1d 623	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆 → ((𝑆 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑁) → (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑁)))
8	7	reximdv 3181	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆 → (∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑁) → ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑁)))
9	8	3ad2ant3 1153	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆) → (∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑆 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑁) → ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑁)))
10	5, 9	mpd 16	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆) → ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑁))
11		simp1 1154	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝐽 ∈ Top)
12		simp3 1156	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆)
13	1	neiss2 23474	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆)) → 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽)
14	13	3adant3 1150	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑆 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽)
15	12, 14	sstrd 3923	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑅 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽)
16	1	isnei 23476	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽) → (𝑁 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑁 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽 ∧ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑁))))
17	11, 15, 16	syl2anc 596	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆) → (𝑁 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑅) ↔ (𝑁 ⊆ ∪ 𝐽 ∧ ∃𝑔 ∈ 𝐽 (𝑅 ⊆ 𝑔 ∧ 𝑔 ⊆ 𝑁))))
18	3, 10, 17	mpbir2and 726	1 ⊢ ((𝐽 ∈ Top ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑆) ∧ 𝑅 ⊆ 𝑆) → 𝑁 ∈ ((nei‘𝐽)‘𝑅))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   ∈ wcel 2147  ∃wrex 3090   ⊆ wss 3900  ∪ cuni 4872  ‘cfv 6566  Topctop 23266  neicnei 23470

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5238  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5266  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5398

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4841  df-uni 4873  df-iun 4958  df-br 5109  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5553  df-xp 5664  df-rel 5665  df-cnv 5666  df-co 5667  df-dm 5668  df-rn 5669  df-res 5670  df-ima 5671  df-iota 6520  df-fun 6568  df-fn 6569  df-f 6570  df-f1 6571  df-fo 6572  df-f1o 6573  df-fv 6574  df-top 23267  df-nei 23471

This theorem is used by:  neips  23486  neissex  23500