Theorem oprabex3 7987

Description: Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
oprabex3.1	⊢ 𝐻 ∈ V
oprabex3.2	⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻)) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
oprabex3	⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑣,𝑢,𝑓,𝐻   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑅(𝑤, 𝑣, 𝑢, 𝑓)   𝐹(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑤, 𝑣, 𝑢, 𝑓)

Proof of Theorem oprabex3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		oprabex3.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ V
2	1, 1	xpex 7765	. 2 ⊢ (𝐻 × 𝐻) ∈ V
3		moeq 3665	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∃*𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑅
4	3	mosubop 5483	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∃*𝑧∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)
5	4	mosubop 5483	. . . 4 ⊢ ∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣(𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ ∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅))
6		anass 474	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅) ↔ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)))
7	6	2exbii 1882	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)))
8		19.42vv 1990	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)) ↔ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ ∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)))
9	7, 8	bitri 278	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅) ↔ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ ∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)))
10	9	2exbii 1882	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑤∃𝑣(𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ ∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)))
11	10	mobii 2574	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅) ↔ ∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣(𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ ∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)))
12	5, 11	mpbir 234	. . 3 ⊢ ∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)
13	12	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻)) → ∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅))
14		oprabex3.2	. 2 ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻)) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅))}
15	2, 2, 13, 14	oprabex 7986	1 ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2145  ∃*wmo 2563  Vcvv 3451  ⟨cop 4590   × cxp 5649  {coprab 7419

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7749

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-oprab 7422

This theorem is used by: (None)