Theorem oprabex3 7980

Description: Existence of an operation class abstraction (special case). (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2004.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
oprabex3.1	⊢ 𝐻 ∈ V
oprabex3.2	⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻)) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅))}

Assertion

Ref	Expression
oprabex3	⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧,𝑤,𝑣,𝑢,𝑓,𝐻   𝑥,𝑅,𝑦,𝑧

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑅(𝑤, 𝑣, 𝑢, 𝑓)   𝐹(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧, 𝑤, 𝑣, 𝑢, 𝑓)

Proof of Theorem oprabex3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		oprabex3.1	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐻 ∈ V
2	1, 1	xpex 7758	. 2 ⊢ (𝐻 × 𝐻) ∈ V
3		moeq 3672	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∃*𝑧 𝑧 = 𝑅
4	3	mosubop 5496	. . . . 5 ⊢ ∃*𝑧∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)
5	4	mosubop 5496	. . . 4 ⊢ ∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣(𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ ∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅))
6		anass 474	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅) ↔ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)))
7	6	2exbii 1882	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)))
8		19.42vv 1990	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ (𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)) ↔ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ ∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)))
9	7, 8	bitri 278	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅) ↔ (𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ ∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)))
10	9	2exbii 1882	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅) ↔ ∃𝑤∃𝑣(𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ ∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)))
11	10	mobii 2578	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅) ↔ ∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣(𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ ∃𝑢∃𝑓(𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩ ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)))
12	5, 11	mpbir 234	. . 3 ⊢ ∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅)
13	12	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻)) → ∃*𝑧∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅))
14		oprabex3.2	. 2 ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝐻 × 𝐻)) ∧ ∃𝑤∃𝑣∃𝑢∃𝑓((𝑥 = ⟨𝑤, 𝑣⟩ ∧ 𝑦 = ⟨𝑢, 𝑓⟩) ∧ 𝑧 = 𝑅))}
15	2, 2, 13, 14	oprabex 7979	1 ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2146  ∃*wmo 2567  Vcvv 3457  ⟨cop 4597   × cxp 5661  {coprab 7420

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-rep 5240  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7742

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-reu 3372  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3747  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-iun 4960  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-f1 6545  df-fo 6546  df-f1o 6547  df-fv 6548  df-oprab 7423

This theorem is used by: (None)