P. 481 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 48001-48100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	gpgiedgdmel 48001*	An index of edges of the generalized Petersen graph GPG(N,K). (Contributed by AV, 2-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽) → (𝑋 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑋 = {⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨0, ((𝑥 + 1) mod 𝑁)⟩} ∨ 𝑋 = {⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, 𝑥⟩} ∨ 𝑋 = {⟨1, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, ((𝑥 + 𝐾) mod 𝑁)⟩})))
Theorem	gpgedgel 48002*	An edge in a generalized Petersen graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 29-Aug-2025.) (Proof shortened by AV, 8-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽) → (𝑌 ∈ 𝐸 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑌 = {⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨0, ((𝑥 + 1) mod 𝑁)⟩} ∨ 𝑌 = {⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, 𝑥⟩} ∨ 𝑌 = {⟨1, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, ((𝑥 + 𝐾) mod 𝑁)⟩})))
Theorem	gpgprismgriedgdmel 48003*	An index of edges of the generalized Petersen graph GPG(N,1). (Contributed by AV, 2-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → (𝑋 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑋 = {⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨0, ((𝑥 + 1) mod 𝑁)⟩} ∨ 𝑋 = {⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, 𝑥⟩} ∨ 𝑋 = {⟨1, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, ((𝑥 + 1) mod 𝑁)⟩})))
Theorem	gpgprismgriedgdmss 48004	A subset of the index of edges of the generalized Petersen graph GPG(N,1). (Contributed by AV, 2-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → ({{⟨0, 0⟩, ⟨0, 1⟩}, {⟨0, 0⟩, ⟨1, 0⟩}} ∪ {{⟨1, 1⟩, ⟨0, 1⟩}, {⟨1, 1⟩, ⟨1, 0⟩}}) ⊆ dom (iEdg‘(𝑁 gPetersenGr 1)))
Theorem	gpgvtx0 48005	The outside vertices in a generalized Petersen graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 30-Aug-2025.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (⟨0, (((2nd ‘𝑋) + 1) mod 𝑁)⟩ ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ⟨0, (2nd ‘𝑋)⟩ ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ⟨0, (((2nd ‘𝑋) − 1) mod 𝑁)⟩ ∈ 𝑉))
Theorem	gpgvtx1 48006	The inside vertices in a generalized Petersen graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 28-Aug-2025.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (⟨1, (((2nd ‘𝑋) + 𝐾) mod 𝑁)⟩ ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ⟨1, (2nd ‘𝑋)⟩ ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ⟨1, (((2nd ‘𝑋) − 𝐾) mod 𝑁)⟩ ∈ 𝑉))
Theorem	opgpgvtx 48007	A vertex in a generalized Petersen graph 𝐺 as ordered pair. (Contributed by AV, 1-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^𝑁)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽) → (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ 𝑉 ↔ ((𝑋 = 0 ∨ 𝑋 = 1) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐼)))
Theorem	gpgusgralem 48008*	Lemma for gpgusgra 48009. (Contributed by AV, 27-Aug-2025.) (Proof shortened by AV, 6-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (0..^𝑁)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽) → {𝑒 ∈ 𝒫 ({0, 1} × 𝐼) ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 (𝑒 = {⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨0, ((𝑥 + 1) mod 𝑁)⟩} ∨ 𝑒 = {⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, 𝑥⟩} ∨ 𝑒 = {⟨1, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, ((𝑥 + 𝐾) mod 𝑁)⟩})} ⊆ {𝑝 ∈ 𝒫 ({0, 1} × 𝐼) ∣ (♯‘𝑝) = 2})
Theorem	gpgusgra 48009	The generalized Petersen graph GPG(N,K) is a simple graph. (Contributed by AV, 27-Aug-2025.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))) → (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾) ∈ USGraph)
Theorem	gpgprismgrusgra 48010	The generalized Petersen graphs G(N,1), which are the N-prisms, are simple graphs. (Contributed by AV, 31-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → (𝑁 gPetersenGr 1) ∈ USGraph)
Theorem	gpgorder 48011	The order of the generalized Petersen graph GPG(N,K). (Contributed by AV, 29-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽) → (♯‘(Vtx‘(𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾))) = (2 · 𝑁))
Theorem	gpg5order 48012	The order of a generalized Petersen graph G(5,K), which is either the Petersen graph G(5,2) or the 5-prism G(5,1), is 10. (Contributed by AV, 26-Aug-2025.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ (1...2) → (♯‘(Vtx‘(5 gPetersenGr 𝐾))) = ;10)
Theorem	gpgedgvtx0 48013	The edges starting at an outside vertex in a generalized Petersen graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 29-Aug-2025.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (1st ‘𝑋) = 0)) → ({𝑋, ⟨0, (((2nd ‘𝑋) + 1) mod 𝑁)⟩} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑋, ⟨1, (2nd ‘𝑋)⟩} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑋, ⟨0, (((2nd ‘𝑋) − 1) mod 𝑁)⟩} ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	gpgedgvtx1 48014	The edges starting at an inside vertex in a generalized Petersen graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (1st ‘𝑋) = 1)) → ({𝑋, ⟨1, (((2nd ‘𝑋) + 𝐾) mod 𝑁)⟩} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑋, ⟨0, (2nd ‘𝑋)⟩} ∈ 𝐸 ∧ {𝑋, ⟨1, (((2nd ‘𝑋) − 𝐾) mod 𝑁)⟩} ∈ 𝐸))
Theorem	gpgvtxedg0 48015	The edges starting at an outside vertex 𝑋 in a generalized Petersen graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 30-Aug-2025.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽) ∧ (1st ‘𝑋) = 0 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ 𝐸) → (𝑌 = ⟨0, (((2nd ‘𝑋) + 1) mod 𝑁)⟩ ∨ 𝑌 = ⟨1, (2nd ‘𝑋)⟩ ∨ 𝑌 = ⟨0, (((2nd ‘𝑋) − 1) mod 𝑁)⟩))
Theorem	gpgvtxedg1 48016	The edges starting at an inside vertex 𝑋 in a generalized Petersen graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽) ∧ (1st ‘𝑋) = 1 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ 𝐸) → (𝑌 = ⟨1, (((2nd ‘𝑋) + 𝐾) mod 𝑁)⟩ ∨ 𝑌 = ⟨0, (2nd ‘𝑋)⟩ ∨ 𝑌 = ⟨1, (((2nd ‘𝑋) − 𝐾) mod 𝑁)⟩))
Theorem	gpg3nbgrvtxlem 48017	Lemma for gpg3nbgrvtx0ALT 48027 and gpg3nbgrvtx1 48028. For this theorem, it is essential that 2 < 𝑁 and 𝐾 < (𝑁 / 2)! (Contributed by AV, 3-Sep-2025.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Sep-2025.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2))) ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (0..^𝑁)) → ((𝐴 + 𝐾) mod 𝑁) ≠ ((𝐴 − 𝐾) mod 𝑁))
Theorem	gpg5nbgrvtx03starlem1 48018	Lemma 1 for gpg5nbgrvtx03star 48030. (Contributed by AV, 5-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊) → {⟨0, ((𝑋 + 1) mod 𝑁)⟩, ⟨1, 𝑋⟩} ∉ 𝐸)
Theorem	gpg5nbgrvtx03starlem2 48019	Lemma 2 for gpg5nbgrvtx03star 48030. (Contributed by AV, 6-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘4) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℤ) → {⟨0, ((𝑋 + 1) mod 𝑁)⟩, ⟨0, ((𝑋 − 1) mod 𝑁)⟩} ∉ 𝐸)
Theorem	gpg5nbgrvtx03starlem3 48020	Lemma 3 for gpg5nbgrvtx03star 48030. (Contributed by AV, 5-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊) → {⟨1, 𝑋⟩, ⟨0, ((𝑋 − 1) mod 𝑁)⟩} ∉ 𝐸)
Theorem	gpg5nbgrvtx13starlem1 48021	Lemma 1 for gpg5nbgr3star 48031. (Contributed by AV, 7-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 = 5 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊) → {⟨1, ((𝑋 + 𝐾) mod 𝑁)⟩, ⟨0, 𝑋⟩} ∉ 𝐸)
Theorem	gpg5nbgrvtx13starlem2 48022	Lemma 2 for gpg5nbgr3star 48031. (Contributed by AV, 8-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 = 5 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℤ) → {⟨1, ((𝑋 + 𝐾) mod 𝑁)⟩, ⟨1, ((𝑋 − 𝐾) mod 𝑁)⟩} ∉ 𝐸)
Theorem	gpg5nbgrvtx13starlem3 48023	Lemma 3 for gpg5nbgr3star 48031. (Contributed by AV, 8-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 = 5 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑊) → {⟨0, 𝑋⟩, ⟨1, ((𝑋 − 𝐾) mod 𝑁)⟩} ∉ 𝐸)
Theorem	gpgnbgrvtx0 48024	The (open) neighborhood of an outside vertex in a generalized Petersen graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 28-Aug-2025.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (1st ‘𝑋) = 0)) → 𝑈 = {⟨0, (((2nd ‘𝑋) + 1) mod 𝑁)⟩, ⟨1, (2nd ‘𝑋)⟩, ⟨0, (((2nd ‘𝑋) − 1) mod 𝑁)⟩})
Theorem	gpgnbgrvtx1 48025	The (open) neighborhood of an inside vertex in a generalized Petersen graph 𝐺. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (1st ‘𝑋) = 1)) → 𝑈 = {⟨1, (((2nd ‘𝑋) + 𝐾) mod 𝑁)⟩, ⟨0, (2nd ‘𝑋)⟩, ⟨1, (((2nd ‘𝑋) − 𝐾) mod 𝑁)⟩})
Theorem	gpg3nbgrvtx0 48026	In a generalized Petersen graph 𝐺, every outside vertex has exactly three (different) neighbors. (Contributed by AV, 30-Aug-2025.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (1st ‘𝑋) = 0)) → (♯‘𝑈) = 3)
Theorem	gpg3nbgrvtx0ALT 48027	In a generalized Petersen graph 𝐺, every outside vertex has exactly three (different) neighbors. (Contributed by AV, 30-Aug-2025.) The proof of gpg3nbgrvtx0 48026 can be shortened using lemma gpg3nbgrvtxlem 48017, but then theorem 2ltceilhalf 47305 is required which is based on an "example" ex-ceil 30375. If these theorems were moved to main, the "example" should also be moved up to become a full-fledged theorem. (Proof shortened by AV, 4-Sep-2025.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (1st ‘𝑋) = 0)) → (♯‘𝑈) = 3)
Theorem	gpg3nbgrvtx1 48028	In a generalized Petersen graph 𝐺, every inside vertex has exactly three (different) neighbors. (Contributed by AV, 3-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (1st ‘𝑋) = 1)) → (♯‘𝑈) = 3)
Theorem	gpgcubic 48029	Every generalized Petersen graph is a cubic graph, i.e., it is a 3-regular graph, i.e., every vertex has degree 3 (see gpgvtxdg3 48032), i.e., every vertex has exactly three (different) neighbors. (Contributed by AV, 3-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (♯‘𝑈) = 3)
Theorem	gpg5nbgrvtx03star 48030*	In a generalized Petersen graph G(N,K) of order greater than 8 (3 < 𝑁), every outside vertex has exactly three (different) neighbors, and none of these neighbors are connected by an edge (i.e., the (closed) neighborhood of every outside vertex induces a subgraph which is isomorphic to a 3-star). (Contributed by AV, 31-Aug-2025.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘4) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (1st ‘𝑋) = 0)) → ((♯‘𝑈) = 3 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 {𝑥, 𝑦} ∉ 𝐸))
Theorem	gpg5nbgr3star 48031*	In a generalized Petersen graph G(N,K) of order 10 (𝑁 = 5), these are the Petersen graph G(5,2) and the 5-prism G(5,1), every vertex has exactly three (different) neighbors, and none of these neighbors are connected by an edge (i.e., the (closed) neighborhood of every vertex induces a subgraph which is isomorphic to a 3-star). This does not hold for every generalized Petersen graph: for example, in the 3-prism G(3,1) (see gpg31grim3prism TODO) and the Dürer graph G(6,2) there are vertices which have neighborhoods containing triangles. In general, all generalized Peterson graphs G(N,K) with 𝑁 = 3 · 𝐾 contain triangles, see gpg3kgrtriex 48039. (Contributed by AV, 8-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝐺 NeighbVtx 𝑋)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (Edg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 = 5 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ((♯‘𝑈) = 3 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑈 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 {𝑥, 𝑦} ∉ 𝐸))
Theorem	gpgvtxdg3 48032	Every vertex in a generalized Petersen graph has degree 3. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐽 = (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2)))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ 𝐽 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ((VtxDeg‘𝐺)‘𝑋) = 3)
Theorem	gpg3kgrtriexlem1 48033	Lemma 1 for gpg3kgrtriex 48039. (Contributed by AV, 1-Oct-2025.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ ℕ → 𝐾 < (⌈‘((3 · 𝐾) / 2)))
Theorem	gpg3kgrtriexlem2 48034	Lemma 2 for gpg3kgrtriex 48039. (Contributed by AV, 1-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (3 · 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ ℕ → (-𝐾 mod 𝑁) = (((𝐾 mod 𝑁) + 𝐾) mod 𝑁))
Theorem	gpg3kgrtriexlem3 48035	Lemma 3 for gpg3kgrtriex 48039. (Contributed by AV, 1-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (3 · 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ ℕ → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3))
Theorem	gpg3kgrtriexlem4 48036	Lemma 4 for gpg3kgrtriex 48039. (Contributed by AV, 1-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (3 · 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ ℕ → 𝐾 ∈ (1..^(⌈‘(𝑁 / 2))))
Theorem	gpg3kgrtriexlem5 48037	Lemma 5 for gpg3kgrtriex 48039. (Contributed by AV, 1-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (3 · 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ ℕ → (𝐾 mod 𝑁) ≠ (-𝐾 mod 𝑁))
Theorem	gpg3kgrtriexlem6 48038	Lemma 6 for gpg3kgrtriex 48039: 𝐸 is an edge in the generalized Petersen graph G(N,K) with 𝑁 = 3 · 𝐾. (Contributed by AV, 1-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (3 · 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = {⟨1, (𝐾 mod 𝑁)⟩, ⟨1, (-𝐾 mod 𝑁)⟩}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ ℕ → 𝐸 ∈ (Edg‘𝐺))
Theorem	gpg3kgrtriex 48039*	All generalized Petersen graphs G(N,K) with 𝑁 = 3 · 𝐾 contain triangles. (Contributed by AV, 1-Oct-2025.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (3 · 𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ ℕ → ∃𝑡 𝑡 ∈ (GrTriangles‘𝐺))
Theorem	gpg5gricstgr3 48040	Each closed neighborhood in a generalized Petersen graph G(N,K) of order 10 (𝑁 = 5), which is either the Petersen graph G(5,2) or the 5-prism G(5,1), is isomorphic to a 3-star. (Contributed by AV, 13-Sep-2025.)
⊢ 𝐺 = (5 gPetersenGr 𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ (1...2) ∧ 𝑉 ∈ (Vtx‘𝐺)) → (𝐺 ISubGr (𝐺 ClNeighbVtx 𝑉)) ≃𝑔𝑟 (StarGr‘3))
Theorem	gpg5grlic 48041	The two generalized Petersen graphs G(N,K) of order 10 (𝑁 = 5), which are the Petersen graph G(5,2) and the 5-prism G(5,1), are locally isomorphic. (Contributed by AV, 29-Sep-2025.)
⊢ (5 gPetersenGr 1) ≃𝑙𝑔𝑟 (5 gPetersenGr 2)
Theorem	gpgprismgr4cycllem1 48042	Lemma 1 for gpgprismgr4cycl0 48053: the cycle ⟨𝑃, 𝐹⟩ consists of 4 edges (i.e., has length 4). (Contributed by AV, 1-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“{⟨0, 0⟩, ⟨0, 1⟩} {⟨0, 1⟩, ⟨1, 1⟩} {⟨1, 1⟩, ⟨1, 0⟩} {⟨1, 0⟩, ⟨0, 0⟩}”⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (♯‘𝐹) = 4
Theorem	gpgprismgr4cycllem2 48043	Lemma 2 for gpgprismgr4cycl0 48053: the cycle ⟨𝑃, 𝐹⟩ is proper, i.e., it has no overlapping edges. (Contributed by AV, 2-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“{⟨0, 0⟩, ⟨0, 1⟩} {⟨0, 1⟩, ⟨1, 1⟩} {⟨1, 1⟩, ⟨1, 0⟩} {⟨1, 0⟩, ⟨0, 0⟩}”⟩    ⇒   ⊢ Fun ◡𝐹
Theorem	gpgprismgr4cycllem3 48044*	Lemma 3 for gpgprismgr4cycl0 48053. (Contributed by AV, 5-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“{⟨0, 0⟩, ⟨0, 1⟩} {⟨0, 1⟩, ⟨1, 1⟩} {⟨1, 1⟩, ⟨1, 0⟩} {⟨1, 0⟩, ⟨0, 0⟩}”⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (0..^4)) → ((𝐹‘𝑋) ∈ 𝒫 ({0, 1} × (0..^𝑁)) ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ (0..^𝑁)((𝐹‘𝑋) = {⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨0, ((𝑥 + 1) mod 𝑁)⟩} ∨ (𝐹‘𝑋) = {⟨0, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, 𝑥⟩} ∨ (𝐹‘𝑋) = {⟨1, 𝑥⟩, ⟨1, ((𝑥 + 1) mod 𝑁)⟩})))
Theorem	gpgprismgr4cycllem4 48045	Lemma 4 for gpgprismgr4cycl0 48053: the cycle ⟨𝑃, 𝐹⟩ consists of 5 vertices (the first and the last vertex are identical, see gpgprismgr4cycllem6 48047. (Contributed by AV, 1-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“⟨0, 0⟩⟨0, 1⟩⟨1, 1⟩⟨1, 0⟩⟨0, 0⟩”⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (♯‘𝑃) = 5
Theorem	gpgprismgr4cycllem5 48046	Lemma 5 for gpgprismgr4cycl0 48053. (Contributed by AV, 1-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“⟨0, 0⟩⟨0, 1⟩⟨1, 1⟩⟨1, 0⟩⟨0, 0⟩”⟩    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑃 ∈ Word V
Theorem	gpgprismgr4cycllem6 48047	Lemma 6 for gpgprismgr4cycl0 48053: the cycle ⟨𝑃, 𝐹⟩ is closed, i.e., the first and the last vertex are identical. (Contributed by AV, 1-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“⟨0, 0⟩⟨0, 1⟩⟨1, 1⟩⟨1, 0⟩⟨0, 0⟩”⟩    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑃‘0) = (𝑃‘4)
Theorem	gpgprismgr4cycllem7 48048	Lemma 7 for gpgprismgr4cycl0 48053: the cycle ⟨𝑃, 𝐹⟩ is proper, i.e., it has no overlapping vertices, except the first and the last one. (Contributed by AV, 1-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“⟨0, 0⟩⟨0, 1⟩⟨1, 1⟩⟨1, 0⟩⟨0, 0⟩”⟩    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑃)) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ (1..^4)) → (𝑋 ≠ 𝑌 → (𝑃‘𝑋) ≠ (𝑃‘𝑌)))
Theorem	gpgprismgr4cycllem8 48049	Lemma 8 for gpgprismgr4cycl0 48053. (Contributed by AV, 2-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“⟨0, 0⟩⟨0, 1⟩⟨1, 1⟩⟨1, 0⟩⟨0, 0⟩”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“{⟨0, 0⟩, ⟨0, 1⟩} {⟨0, 1⟩, ⟨1, 1⟩} {⟨1, 1⟩, ⟨1, 0⟩} {⟨1, 0⟩, ⟨0, 0⟩}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → 𝐹 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝐺))
Theorem	gpgprismgr4cycllem9 48050	Lemma 9 for gpgprismgr4cycl0 48053. (Contributed by AV, 3-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“⟨0, 0⟩⟨0, 1⟩⟨1, 1⟩⟨1, 0⟩⟨0, 0⟩”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“{⟨0, 0⟩, ⟨0, 1⟩} {⟨0, 1⟩, ⟨1, 1⟩} {⟨1, 1⟩, ⟨1, 0⟩} {⟨1, 0⟩, ⟨0, 0⟩}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶(Vtx‘𝐺))
Theorem	gpgprismgr4cycllem10 48051	Lemma 10 for gpgprismgr4cycl0 48053. (Contributed by AV, 5-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“⟨0, 0⟩⟨0, 1⟩⟨1, 1⟩⟨1, 0⟩⟨0, 0⟩”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“{⟨0, 0⟩, ⟨0, 1⟩} {⟨0, 1⟩, ⟨1, 1⟩} {⟨1, 1⟩, ⟨1, 0⟩} {⟨1, 0⟩, ⟨0, 0⟩}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 1)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))) → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘(𝐹‘𝑋)) = {(𝑃‘𝑋), (𝑃‘(𝑋 + 1))})
Theorem	gpgprismgr4cycllem11 48052	Lemma 11 for gpgprismgr4cycl0 48053. (Contributed by AV, 5-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“⟨0, 0⟩⟨0, 1⟩⟨1, 1⟩⟨1, 0⟩⟨0, 0⟩”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“{⟨0, 0⟩, ⟨0, 1⟩} {⟨0, 1⟩, ⟨1, 1⟩} {⟨1, 1⟩, ⟨1, 0⟩} {⟨1, 0⟩, ⟨0, 0⟩}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → 𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	gpgprismgr4cycl0 48053	The generalized Petersen graphs G(N,1), which are the N-prisms, have a cycle of length 4 starting at the vertex ⟨0, 0⟩. (Contributed by AV, 5-Nov-2025.)
⊢ 𝑃 = ⟨“⟨0, 0⟩⟨0, 1⟩⟨1, 1⟩⟨1, 0⟩⟨0, 0⟩”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = ⟨“{⟨0, 0⟩, ⟨0, 1⟩} {⟨0, 1⟩, ⟨1, 1⟩} {⟨1, 1⟩, ⟨1, 0⟩} {⟨1, 0⟩, ⟨0, 0⟩}”⟩    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑁 gPetersenGr 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → (𝐹(Cycles‘𝐺)𝑃 ∧ (♯‘𝐹) = 4))
Theorem	gpgprismgr4cyclex 48054*	The generalized Petersen graphs G(N,1), which are the N-prisms, have (at least) one cycle of length 4. (Contributed by AV, 5-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3) → ∃𝑝∃𝑓(𝑓(Cycles‘(𝑁 gPetersenGr 1))𝑝 ∧ (♯‘𝑓) = 4))
21.48.15.9  Loop-free graphs - extension
Theorem	1hegrlfgr 48055*	A graph 𝐺 with one hyperedge joining at least two vertices is a loop-free graph. (Contributed by AV, 23-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝐺) = {⟨𝐴, 𝐸⟩})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐵, 𝐶} ⊆ 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (iEdg‘𝐺):{𝐴}⟶{𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝑉 ∣ 2 ≤ (♯‘𝑥)})
21.48.15.10  Walks - extension
Syntax	cupwlks 48056	Extend class notation with walks (of a pseudograph).
class UPWalks
Definition	df-upwlks 48057*	Define the set of all walks (in a pseudograph), called "simple walks" in the following. According to Wikipedia ("Path (graph theory)", https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Path_(graph_theory), 3-Oct-2017): "A walk of length k in a graph is an alternating sequence of vertices and edges, v0 , e0 , v1 , e1 , v2 , ... , v(k-1) , e(k-1) , v(k) which begins and ends with vertices. If the graph is undirected, then the endpoints of e(i) are v(i) and v(i+1)." According to Bollobas: " A walk W in a graph is an alternating sequence of vertices and edges x0 , e1 , x1 , e2 , ... , e(l) , x(l) where e(i) = x(i-1)x(i), 0<i<=l.", see Definition of [Bollobas] p. 4. Therefore, a walk can be represented by two mappings f from { 1 , ... , n } and p from { 0 , ... , n }, where f enumerates the (indices of the) edges, and p enumerates the vertices. So the walk is represented by the following sequence: p(0) e(f(1)) p(1) e(f(2)) ... p(n-1) e(f(n)) p(n). Although this definition is also applicable for arbitrary hypergraphs, it allows only walks consisting of not proper hyperedges (i.e. edges connecting at most two vertices). Therefore, it should be used for pseudographs only. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens and Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 28-Dec-2020.)
⊢ UPWalks = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓 ∈ Word dom (iEdg‘𝑔) ∧ 𝑝:(0...(♯‘𝑓))⟶(Vtx‘𝑔) ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑓))((iEdg‘𝑔)‘(𝑓‘𝑘)) = {(𝑝‘𝑘), (𝑝‘(𝑘 + 1))})})
Theorem	upwlksfval 48058*	The set of simple walks (in an undirected graph). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 19-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 28-Dec-2020.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (UPWalks‘𝐺) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑝⟩ ∣ (𝑓 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑝:(0...(♯‘𝑓))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝑓))(𝐼‘(𝑓‘𝑘)) = {(𝑝‘𝑘), (𝑝‘(𝑘 + 1))})})
Theorem	isupwlk 48059*	Properties of a pair of functions to be a simple walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 20-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 28-Dec-2020.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))})))
Theorem	isupwlkg 48060*	Generalization of isupwlk 48059: Conditions for two classes to represent a simple walk. (Contributed by AV, 5-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑊 → (𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))})))
Theorem	upwlkbprop 48061	Basic properties of a simple walk. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 31-Oct-2017.) (Revised by AV, 29-Dec-2020.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 → (𝐺 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝑃 ∈ V))
Theorem	upwlkwlk 48062	A simple walk is a walk. (Contributed by AV, 30-Dec-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 27-Feb-2021.)
⊢ (𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃 → 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	upgrwlkupwlk 48063	In a pseudograph, a walk is a simple walk. (Contributed by AV, 30-Dec-2020.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Jan-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃) → 𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃)
Theorem	upgrwlkupwlkb 48064	In a pseudograph, the definitions for a walk and a simple walk are equivalent. (Contributed by AV, 30-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ 𝐹(UPWalks‘𝐺)𝑃))
Theorem	upgrisupwlkALT 48065*	Alternate proof of upgriswlk 29567 using the definition of UPGraph and related theorems. (Contributed by AV, 2-Jan-2021.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑉 = (Vtx‘𝐺)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (iEdg‘𝐺)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UPGraph ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝑈 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝑍) → (𝐹(Walks‘𝐺)𝑃 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Word dom 𝐼 ∧ 𝑃:(0...(♯‘𝐹))⟶𝑉 ∧ ∀𝑘 ∈ (0..^(♯‘𝐹))(𝐼‘(𝐹‘𝑘)) = {(𝑃‘𝑘), (𝑃‘(𝑘 + 1))})))
21.48.15.11  Edges of graphs expressed as sets of unordered pairs
Theorem	upgredgssspr 48066	The set of edges of a pseudograph is a subset of the set of unordered pairs of vertices. (Contributed by AV, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UPGraph → (Edg‘𝐺) ⊆ (Pairs‘(Vtx‘𝐺)))
Theorem	uspgropssxp 48067*	The set 𝐺 of "simple pseudographs" for a fixed set 𝑉 of vertices is a subset of a Cartesian product. For more details about the class 𝐺 of all "simple pseudographs" see comments on uspgrbisymrel 48077. (Contributed by AV, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝑊 × 𝑃))
Theorem	uspgrsprfv 48068*	The value of the function 𝐹 which maps a "simple pseudograph" for a fixed set 𝑉 of vertices to the set of edges (i.e. range of the edge function) of the graph. Solely for 𝐺 as defined here, the function 𝐹 is a bijection between the "simple pseudographs" and the subsets of the set of pairs 𝑃 over the fixed set 𝑉 of vertices, see uspgrbispr 48074. (Contributed by AV, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑔))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐺 → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (2nd ‘𝑋))
Theorem	uspgrsprf 48069*	The mapping 𝐹 is a function from the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 into the subsets of the set of pairs over the set 𝑉. (Contributed by AV, 24-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑔))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:𝐺⟶𝑃
Theorem	uspgrsprf1 48070*	The mapping 𝐹 is a one-to-one function from the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 into the subsets of the set of pairs over the set 𝑉. (Contributed by AV, 25-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑔))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐹:𝐺–1-1→𝑃
Theorem	uspgrsprfo 48071*	The mapping 𝐹 is a function from the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 onto the subsets of the set of pairs over the set 𝑉. (Contributed by AV, 25-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑔))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐹:𝐺–onto→𝑃)
Theorem	uspgrsprf1o 48072*	The mapping 𝐹 is a bijection between the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 and the subsets of the set of pairs over the set 𝑉. See also the comments on uspgrbisymrel 48077. (Contributed by AV, 25-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑔 ∈ 𝐺 ↦ (2nd ‘𝑔))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐹:𝐺–1-1-onto→𝑃)
Theorem	uspgrex 48073*	The class 𝐺 of all "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 is a set. (Contributed by AV, 26-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐺 ∈ V)
Theorem	uspgrbispr 48074*	There is a bijection between the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 and the subsets of the set of pairs over the set 𝑉. (Contributed by AV, 26-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐺–1-1-onto→𝑃)
Theorem	uspgrspren 48075*	The set 𝐺 of the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 and the class 𝑃 of subsets of the set of pairs over the fixed set 𝑉 are equinumerous. (Contributed by AV, 27-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝑃 = 𝒫 (Pairs‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐺 ≈ 𝑃)
Theorem	uspgrymrelen 48076*	The set 𝐺 of the "simple pseudographs" with a fixed set of vertices 𝑉 and the class 𝑅 of the symmetric relations on the fixed set 𝑉 are equinumerous. For more details about the class 𝐺 of all "simple pseudographs" see comments on uspgrbisymrel 48077. (Contributed by AV, 27-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑉 × 𝑉) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥𝑟𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑟𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → 𝐺 ≈ 𝑅)
Theorem	uspgrbisymrel 48077*	There is a bijection between the "simple pseudographs" for a fixed set 𝑉 of vertices and the class 𝑅 of the symmetric relations on the fixed set 𝑉. The simple pseudographs, which are graphs without hyper- or multiedges, but which may contain loops, are expressed as ordered pairs of the vertices and the edges (as proper or improper unordered pairs of vertices, not as indexed edges!) in this theorem. That class 𝐺 of such simple pseudographs is a set (if 𝑉 is a set, see uspgrex 48073) of equivalence classes of graphs abstracting from the index sets of their edge functions. Solely for this abstraction, there is a bijection between the "simple pseudographs" as members of 𝐺 and the symmetric relations 𝑅 on the fixed set 𝑉 of vertices. This theorem would not hold for 𝐺 = {𝑔 ∈ USPGraph ∣ (Vtx‘𝑔) = 𝑉} and even not for 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∈ USPGraph)}, because these are much bigger classes. (Proposed by Gerard Lang, 16-Nov-2021.) (Contributed by AV, 27-Nov-2021.)
⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑉 × 𝑉) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥𝑟𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑟𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐺–1-1-onto→𝑅)
Theorem	uspgrbisymrelALT 48078*	Alternate proof of uspgrbisymrel 48077 not using the definition of equinumerosity. (Contributed by AV, 26-Nov-2021.) (New usage is discouraged.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐺 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑒⟩ ∣ (𝑣 = 𝑉 ∧ ∃𝑞 ∈ USPGraph ((Vtx‘𝑞) = 𝑣 ∧ (Edg‘𝑞) = 𝑒))}    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = {𝑟 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑉 × 𝑉) ∣ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 (𝑥𝑟𝑦 ↔ 𝑦𝑟𝑥)}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ 𝑊 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐺–1-1-onto→𝑅)
21.48.16  Monoids (extension)
21.48.16.1  Auxiliary theorems
Theorem	ovn0dmfun 48079	If a class operation value for two operands is not the empty set, then the operands are contained in the domain of the class, and the class restricted to the operands is a function, analogous to fvfundmfvn0 6918. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) ≠ ∅ → (⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩})))
Theorem	xpsnopab 48080*	A Cartesian product with a singleton expressed as ordered-pair class abstraction. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.)
⊢ ({𝑋} × 𝐶) = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 = 𝑋 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐶)}
Theorem	xpiun 48081*	A Cartesian product expressed as indexed union of ordered-pair class abstractions. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐵 × 𝐶) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ (𝑎 = 𝑥 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝐶)}
Theorem	ovn0ssdmfun 48082*	If a class' operation value for two operands is not the empty set, the operands are contained in the domain of the class, and the class restricted to the operands is a function, analogous to fvfundmfvn0 6918. (Contributed by AV, 27-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐷 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐸 (𝑎𝐹𝑏) ≠ ∅ → ((𝐷 × 𝐸) ⊆ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ (𝐷 × 𝐸))))
Theorem	fnxpdmdm 48083	The domain of the domain of a function over a Cartesian square. (Contributed by AV, 13-Jan-2020.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐴) → dom dom 𝐹 = 𝐴)
Theorem	cnfldsrngbas 48084	The base set of a subring of the field of complex numbers. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2020.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ⊆ ℂ → 𝑆 = (Base‘𝑅))
Theorem	cnfldsrngadd 48085	The group addition operation of a subring of the field of complex numbers. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2020.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → + = (+g‘𝑅))
Theorem	cnfldsrngmul 48086	The ring multiplication operation of a subring of the field of complex numbers. (Contributed by AV, 31-Jan-2020.)
⊢ 𝑅 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → · = (.r‘𝑅))
21.48.16.2  Magmas, Semigroups and Monoids (extension)
Theorem	plusfreseq 48087	If the empty set is not contained in the range of the group addition function of an extensible structure (not necessarily a magma), the restriction of the addition operation to (the Cartesian square of) the base set is the functionalization of it. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jan-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ ⨣ = (+𝑓‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ (∅ ∉ ran ⨣ → ( + ↾ (𝐵 × 𝐵)) = ⨣ )
Theorem	mgmplusfreseq 48088	If the empty set is not contained in the base set of a magma, the restriction of the addition operation to (the Cartesian square of) the base set is the functionalization of it. (Contributed by AV, 28-Jan-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ ⨣ = (+𝑓‘𝑀)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ Mgm ∧ ∅ ∉ 𝐵) → ( + ↾ (𝐵 × 𝐵)) = ⨣ )
Theorem	0mgm 48089	A set with an empty base set is always a magma. (Contributed by AV, 25-Feb-2020.)
⊢ (Base‘𝑀) = ∅    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑀 ∈ Mgm)
21.48.16.3  Examples and counterexamples for magmas, semigroups and monoids (extension)
Theorem	opmpoismgm 48090*	A structure with a group addition operation in maps-to notation is a magma if the operation value is contained in the base set. (Contributed by AV, 16-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (+g‘𝑀) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Mgm)
Theorem	copissgrp 48091*	A structure with a constant group addition operation is a semigroup if the constant is contained in the base set. (Contributed by AV, 16-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (+g‘𝑀) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ Smgrp)
Theorem	copisnmnd 48092*	A structure with a constant group addition operation and at least two elements is not a monoid. (Contributed by AV, 16-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑀)    &   ⊢ (+g‘𝑀) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 < (♯‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∉ Mnd)
Theorem	0nodd 48093*	0 is not an odd integer. (Contributed by AV, 3-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ 𝑧 = ((2 · 𝑥) + 1)}    ⇒   ⊢ 0 ∉ 𝑂
Theorem	1odd 48094*	1 is an odd integer. (Contributed by AV, 3-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ 𝑧 = ((2 · 𝑥) + 1)}    ⇒   ⊢ 1 ∈ 𝑂
Theorem	2nodd 48095*	2 is not an odd integer. (Contributed by AV, 3-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ 𝑧 = ((2 · 𝑥) + 1)}    ⇒   ⊢ 2 ∉ 𝑂
Theorem	oddibas 48096*	Lemma 1 for oddinmgm 48098: The base set of M is the set of all odd integers. (Contributed by AV, 3-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ 𝑧 = ((2 · 𝑥) + 1)}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑂 = (Base‘𝑀)
Theorem	oddiadd 48097*	Lemma 2 for oddinmgm 48098: The group addition operation of M is the addition of complex numbers. (Contributed by AV, 3-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ 𝑧 = ((2 · 𝑥) + 1)}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑀)
Theorem	oddinmgm 48098*	The structure of all odd integers together with the addition of complex numbers is not a magma. Remark: the structure of the complementary subset of the set of integers, the even integers, is a magma, actually an abelian group, see 2zrngaabl 48173, and even a non-unital ring, see 2zrng 48164. (Contributed by AV, 3-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑧 ∈ ℤ ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℤ 𝑧 = ((2 · 𝑥) + 1)}    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (ℂfld ↾s 𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑀 ∉ Mgm
Theorem	nnsgrpmgm 48099	The structure of positive integers together with the addition of complex numbers is a magma. (Contributed by AV, 4-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (ℂfld ↾s ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ Mgm
Theorem	nnsgrp 48100	The structure of positive integers together with the addition of complex numbers is a semigroup. (Contributed by AV, 4-Feb-2020.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (ℂfld ↾s ℕ)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝑀 ∈ Smgrp