ILE Home Intuitionistic Logic Explorer < Previous   Next >
Nearby theorems
Mirrors  >  Home  >  ILE Home  >  Th. List  >  bezoutlema Unicode version

Theorem bezoutlema 12776
Description: Lemma for Bézout's identity. The is-bezout condition is satisfied by  A. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Dec-2021.)
Hypotheses
Ref Expression
bezoutlema.is-bezout  |-  ( ph  <->  E. s  e.  ZZ  E. t  e.  ZZ  r  =  ( ( A  x.  s )  +  ( B  x.  t
) ) )
bezoutlema.a  |-  ( th 
->  A  e.  NN0 )
bezoutlema.b  |-  ( th 
->  B  e.  NN0 )
Assertion
Ref Expression
bezoutlema  |-  ( th 
->  [. A  /  r ]. ph )
Distinct variable groups:    A, r, s, t    B, r, s, t
Allowed substitution hints:    ph( t,  s,  r)    th( t,  s,  r)

Proof of Theorem bezoutlema
StepHypRef Expression
1 1z 9670 . . 3  |-  1  e.  ZZ
2 0z 9655 . . 3  |-  0  e.  ZZ
3 bezoutlema.b . . . . . . 7  |-  ( th 
->  B  e.  NN0 )
43nn0cnd 9622 . . . . . 6  |-  ( th 
->  B  e.  CC )
54mul01d 8720 . . . . 5  |-  ( th 
->  ( B  x.  0 )  =  0 )
65oveq2d 6101 . . . 4  |-  ( th 
->  ( ( A  x.  1 )  +  ( B  x.  0 ) )  =  ( ( A  x.  1 )  +  0 ) )
7 bezoutlema.a . . . . . . 7  |-  ( th 
->  A  e.  NN0 )
87nn0cnd 9622 . . . . . 6  |-  ( th 
->  A  e.  CC )
9 1cnd 8342 . . . . . 6  |-  ( th 
->  1  e.  CC )
108, 9mulcld 8346 . . . . 5  |-  ( th 
->  ( A  x.  1 )  e.  CC )
1110addridd 8475 . . . 4  |-  ( th 
->  ( ( A  x.  1 )  +  0 )  =  ( A  x.  1 ) )
128mulridd 8343 . . . 4  |-  ( th 
->  ( A  x.  1 )  =  A )
136, 11, 123eqtrrd 2276 . . 3  |-  ( th 
->  A  =  (
( A  x.  1 )  +  ( B  x.  0 ) ) )
14 oveq2 6093 . . . . . 6  |-  ( s  =  1  ->  ( A  x.  s )  =  ( A  x.  1 ) )
1514oveq1d 6100 . . . . 5  |-  ( s  =  1  ->  (
( A  x.  s
)  +  ( B  x.  t ) )  =  ( ( A  x.  1 )  +  ( B  x.  t
) ) )
1615eqeq2d 2250 . . . 4  |-  ( s  =  1  ->  ( A  =  ( ( A  x.  s )  +  ( B  x.  t ) )  <->  A  =  ( ( A  x.  1 )  +  ( B  x.  t ) ) ) )
17 oveq2 6093 . . . . . 6  |-  ( t  =  0  ->  ( B  x.  t )  =  ( B  x.  0 ) )
1817oveq2d 6101 . . . . 5  |-  ( t  =  0  ->  (
( A  x.  1 )  +  ( B  x.  t ) )  =  ( ( A  x.  1 )  +  ( B  x.  0 ) ) )
1918eqeq2d 2250 . . . 4  |-  ( t  =  0  ->  ( A  =  ( ( A  x.  1 )  +  ( B  x.  t ) )  <->  A  =  ( ( A  x.  1 )  +  ( B  x.  0 ) ) ) )
2016, 19rspc2ev 2945 . . 3  |-  ( ( 1  e.  ZZ  /\  0  e.  ZZ  /\  A  =  ( ( A  x.  1 )  +  ( B  x.  0 ) ) )  ->  E. s  e.  ZZ  E. t  e.  ZZ  A  =  ( ( A  x.  s )  +  ( B  x.  t
) ) )
211, 2, 13, 20mp3an12i 1382 . 2  |-  ( th 
->  E. s  e.  ZZ  E. t  e.  ZZ  A  =  ( ( A  x.  s )  +  ( B  x.  t
) ) )
22 bezoutlema.is-bezout . . . . 5  |-  ( ph  <->  E. s  e.  ZZ  E. t  e.  ZZ  r  =  ( ( A  x.  s )  +  ( B  x.  t
) ) )
23 eqeq1 2245 . . . . . 6  |-  ( r  =  A  ->  (
r  =  ( ( A  x.  s )  +  ( B  x.  t ) )  <->  A  =  ( ( A  x.  s )  +  ( B  x.  t ) ) ) )
24232rexbidv 2575 . . . . 5  |-  ( r  =  A  ->  ( E. s  e.  ZZ  E. t  e.  ZZ  r  =  ( ( A  x.  s )  +  ( B  x.  t
) )  <->  E. s  e.  ZZ  E. t  e.  ZZ  A  =  ( ( A  x.  s
)  +  ( B  x.  t ) ) ) )
2522, 24bitrid 192 . . . 4  |-  ( r  =  A  ->  ( ph 
<->  E. s  e.  ZZ  E. t  e.  ZZ  A  =  ( ( A  x.  s )  +  ( B  x.  t
) ) ) )
2625sbcieg 3084 . . 3  |-  ( A  e.  NN0  ->  ( [. A  /  r ]. ph  <->  E. s  e.  ZZ  E. t  e.  ZZ  A  =  ( ( A  x.  s
)  +  ( B  x.  t ) ) ) )
277, 26syl 14 . 2  |-  ( th 
->  ( [. A  / 
r ]. ph  <->  E. s  e.  ZZ  E. t  e.  ZZ  A  =  ( ( A  x.  s
)  +  ( B  x.  t ) ) ) )
2821, 27mpbird 167 1  |-  ( th 
->  [. A  /  r ]. ph )
Colors of variables:    wff set class
This proof depends on syntax axioms:    -> wi 4    <-> wb 105    = wceq 1402    e. wcel 2209   E.wrex 2529   [.wsbc 3051  (class class class)co 6085   0cc0 8179   1c1 8180    + caddc 8182    x. cmul 8184   NN0cn0 9563   ZZcz 9644
This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4249  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346  ax-un 4578  ax-setind 4684  ax-cnex 8270  ax-resscn 8271  ax-1cn 8272  ax-1re 8273  ax-icn 8274  ax-addcl 8275  ax-addrcl 8276  ax-mulcl 8277  ax-addcom 8279  ax-mulcom 8280  ax-addass 8281  ax-mulass 8282  ax-distr 8283  ax-i2m1 8284  ax-0lt1 8285  ax-1rid 8286  ax-0id 8287  ax-rnegex 8288  ax-cnre 8290  ax-pre-ltirr 8291  ax-pre-ltwlin 8292  ax-pre-lttrn 8293  ax-pre-ltadd 8295
This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3or 1010  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ne 2421  df-nel 2516  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-reu 2535  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-int 3971  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-id 4438  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-iota 5337  df-fun 5379  df-fv 5385  df-riota 6038  df-ov 6088  df-oprab 6089  df-mpo 6090  df-pnf 8362  df-mnf 8363  df-xr 8364  df-ltxr 8365  df-le 8366  df-sub 8499  df-neg 8500  df-inn 9305  df-n0 9564  df-z 9645
This theorem is used by:  bezoutlemex  12778
  Copyright terms: Public domain W3C validator