P. 121 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 12001-12100   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	iserabs 12001*	Generalized triangle inequality: the absolute value of an infinite sum is less than or equal to the sum of absolute values. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 10-Sep-2007.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 14-Dec-2022.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> seq M ( + , F ) ~~> A )   &    |- ( ph -> seq M ( + , G ) ~~> B )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( G ` k ) = ( abs ` ( F ` k ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( abs ` A ) <_ B )
Theorem	cvgcmpub 12002*	An upper bound for the limit of a real infinite series. This theorem can also be used to compare two infinite series. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Mar-2014.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. Z )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) e. RR )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( G ` k ) e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> seq M ( + , F ) ~~> A )   &    |- ( ph -> seq M ( + , G ) ~~> B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( G ` k ) <_ ( F ` k ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> B <_ A )
Theorem	fsumiun 12003*	Sum over a disjoint indexed union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Jul-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Dec-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> B e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> Disj x e. A B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. A /\ k e. B ) ) -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> sum_ k e. U_ x e. A B C = sum_ x e. A sum_ k e. B C )
Theorem	hashiun 12004*	The cardinality of a disjoint indexed union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Dec-2016.)
|- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> B e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> Disj x e. A B )   =>    |- ( ph -> (♯ ` U_ x e. A B ) = sum_ x e. A (♯ ` B ) )
Theorem	hash2iun 12005*	The cardinality of a nested disjoint indexed union. (Contributed by AV, 9-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> B e. Fin )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> C e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> Disj x e. A U_ y e. B C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> Disj y e. B C )   =>    |- ( ph -> (♯ ` U_ x e. A U_ y e. B C ) = sum_ x e. A sum_ y e. B (♯ ` C ) )
Theorem	hash2iun1dif1 12006*	The cardinality of a nested disjoint indexed union. (Contributed by AV, 9-Jan-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- B = ( A \ { x } )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> C e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> Disj x e. A U_ y e. B C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A ) -> Disj y e. B C )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ x e. A /\ y e. B ) -> (♯ ` C ) = 1 )   =>    |- ( ph -> (♯ ` U_ x e. A U_ y e. B C ) = ( (♯ ` A ) x. ( (♯ ` A ) - 1 ) ) )
Theorem	hashrabrex 12007*	The number of elements in a class abstraction with a restricted existential quantification. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Jul-2018.)
|- ( ph -> Y e. Fin )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ y e. Y ) -> { x e. X | ps } e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> Disj y e. Y { x e. X | ps } )   =>    |- ( ph -> (♯ ` { x e. X | E. y e. Y ps } ) = sum_ y e. Y (♯ ` { x e. X | ps } ) )
Theorem	hashuni 12008*	The cardinality of a disjoint union. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jan-2015.)
|- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> Disj x e. A x )   =>    |- ( ph -> (♯ ` U. A ) = sum_ x e. A (♯ ` x ) )
4.9.3  The binomial theorem
Theorem	binomlem 12009*	Lemma for binom 12010 (binomial theorem). Inductive step. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2005.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. NN0 )   &    |- ( ps -> ( ( A + B ) ^ N ) = sum_ k e. ( 0 ... N ) ( ( N _C k ) x. ( ( A ^ ( N - k ) ) x. ( B ^ k ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ ps ) -> ( ( A + B ) ^ ( N + 1 ) ) = sum_ k e. ( 0 ... ( N + 1 ) ) ( ( ( N + 1 ) _C k ) x. ( ( A ^ ( ( N + 1 ) - k ) ) x. ( B ^ k ) ) ) )
Theorem	binom 12010*	The binomial theorem: ( A + B ) ^ N is the sum from k = 0 to N of ( N _C k ) x. ( ( A ^ k ) x. ( B ^ ( N - k ) ). Theorem 15-2.8 of [Gleason] p. 296. This part of the proof sets up the induction and does the base case, with the bulk of the work (the induction step) in binomlem 12009. This is Metamath 100 proof #44. (Contributed by NM, 7-Dec-2005.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ B e. CC /\ N e. NN0 ) -> ( ( A + B ) ^ N ) = sum_ k e. ( 0 ... N ) ( ( N _C k ) x. ( ( A ^ ( N - k ) ) x. ( B ^ k ) ) ) )
Theorem	binom1p 12011*	Special case of the binomial theorem for ( 1 + A ) ^ N. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 10-May-2007.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ N e. NN0 ) -> ( ( 1 + A ) ^ N ) = sum_ k e. ( 0 ... N ) ( ( N _C k ) x. ( A ^ k ) ) )
Theorem	binom11 12012*	Special case of the binomial theorem for 2 ^ N. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 13-Mar-2014.)
|- ( N e. NN0 -> ( 2 ^ N ) = sum_ k e. ( 0 ... N ) ( N _C k ) )
Theorem	binom1dif 12013*	A summation for the difference between ( ( A + 1 ) ^ N ) and ( A ^ N ). (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 9-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ N e. NN0 ) -> ( ( ( A + 1 ) ^ N ) - ( A ^ N ) ) = sum_ k e. ( 0 ... ( N - 1 ) ) ( ( N _C k ) x. ( A ^ k ) ) )
Theorem	bcxmaslem1 12014	Lemma for bcxmas 12015. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 18-May-2007.)
|- ( A = B -> ( ( N + A ) _C A ) = ( ( N + B ) _C B ) )
Theorem	bcxmas 12015*	Parallel summation (Christmas Stocking) theorem for Pascal's Triangle. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 18-May-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( N e. NN0 /\ M e. NN0 ) -> ( ( ( N + 1 ) + M ) _C M ) = sum_ j e. ( 0 ... M ) ( ( N + j ) _C j ) )
4.9.4  Infinite sums (cont.)
Theorem	isumshft 12016*	Index shift of an infinite sum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 31-Oct-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- W = ( ZZ>= ` ( M + K ) )   &    |- ( j = ( K + k ) -> A = B )   &    |- ( ph -> K e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ j e. W ) -> A e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> sum_ j e. W A = sum_ k e. Z B )
Theorem	isumsplit 12017*	Split off the first N terms of an infinite sum. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 21-Oct-2022.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- W = ( ZZ>= ` N )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. Z )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) = A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> seq M ( + , F ) e. dom ~~> )   =>    |- ( ph -> sum_ k e. Z A = ( sum_ k e. ( M ... ( N - 1 ) ) A + sum_ k e. W A ) )
Theorem	isum1p 12018*	The infinite sum of a converging infinite series equals the first term plus the infinite sum of the rest of it. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) = A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> seq M ( + , F ) e. dom ~~> )   =>    |- ( ph -> sum_ k e. Z A = ( ( F ` M ) + sum_ k e. ( ZZ>= ` ( M + 1 ) ) A ) )
Theorem	isumnn0nn 12019*	Sum from 0 to infinity in terms of sum from 1 to infinity. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jan-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
|- ( k = 0 -> A = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> ( F ` k ) = A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> seq 0 ( + , F ) e. dom ~~> )   =>    |- ( ph -> sum_ k e. NN0 A = ( B + sum_ k e. NN A ) )
Theorem	isumrpcl 12020*	The infinite sum of positive reals is positive. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 9-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- W = ( ZZ>= ` N )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. Z )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) = A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> A e. RR+ )   &    |- ( ph -> seq M ( + , F ) e. dom ~~> )   =>    |- ( ph -> sum_ k e. W A e. RR+ )
Theorem	isumle 12021*	Comparison of two infinite sums. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 13-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) = A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( G ` k ) = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> B e. RR )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> A <_ B )   &    |- ( ph -> seq M ( + , F ) e. dom ~~> )   &    |- ( ph -> seq M ( + , G ) e. dom ~~> )   =>    |- ( ph -> sum_ k e. Z A <_ sum_ k e. Z B )
Theorem	isumlessdc 12022*	A finite sum of nonnegative numbers is less than or equal to its limit. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Apr-2014.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ Z )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) = B )   &    |- ( ph -> A. k e. Z DECID k e. A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> B e. RR )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> 0 <_ B )   &    |- ( ph -> seq M ( + , F ) e. dom ~~> )   =>    |- ( ph -> sum_ k e. A B <_ sum_ k e. Z B )
4.9.5  Miscellaneous converging and diverging sequences
Theorem	divcnv 12023*	The sequence of reciprocals of positive integers, multiplied by the factor A, converges to zero. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2008.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Oct-2022.)
|- ( A e. CC -> ( n e. NN |-> ( A / n ) ) ~~> 0 )
4.9.6  Arithmetic series
Theorem	arisum 12024*	Arithmetic series sum of the first N positive integers. This is Metamath 100 proof #68. (Contributed by FL, 16-Nov-2006.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2014.)
|- ( N e. NN0 -> sum_ k e. ( 1 ... N ) k = ( ( ( N ^ 2 ) + N ) / 2 ) )
Theorem	arisum2 12025*	Arithmetic series sum of the first N nonnegative integers. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Apr-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Aug-2021.)
|- ( N e. NN0 -> sum_ k e. ( 0 ... ( N - 1 ) ) k = ( ( ( N ^ 2 ) - N ) / 2 ) )
Theorem	trireciplem 12026	Lemma for trirecip 12027. Show that the sum converges. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 22-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2014.)
|- F = ( n e. NN |-> ( 1 / ( n x. ( n + 1 ) ) ) )   =>    |- seq 1 ( + , F ) ~~> 1
Theorem	trirecip 12027	The sum of the reciprocals of the triangle numbers converge to two. This is Metamath 100 proof #42. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 23-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-May-2014.)
|- sum_ k e. NN ( 2 / ( k x. ( k + 1 ) ) ) = 2
4.9.7  Geometric series
Theorem	expcnvap0 12028*	A sequence of powers of a complex number A with absolute value smaller than 1 converges to zero. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2006.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 23-Oct-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> ( abs ` A ) < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> A # 0 )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( n e. NN0 |-> ( A ^ n ) ) ~~> 0 )
Theorem	expcnvre 12029*	A sequence of powers of a nonnegative real number less than one converges to zero. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 <_ A )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( n e. NN0 |-> ( A ^ n ) ) ~~> 0 )
Theorem	expcnv 12030*	A sequence of powers of a complex number A with absolute value smaller than 1 converges to zero. (Contributed by NM, 8-May-2006.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 28-Oct-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> ( abs ` A ) < 1 )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( n e. NN0 |-> ( A ^ n ) ) ~~> 0 )
Theorem	explecnv 12031*	A sequence of terms converges to zero when it is less than powers of a number A whose absolute value is smaller than 1. (Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> F e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> ( abs ` A ) < 1 )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( abs ` ( F ` k ) ) <_ ( A ^ k ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> F ~~> 0 )
Theorem	geosergap 12032*	The value of the finite geometric series A ^ M + A ^ ( M + 1 ) +... + A ^ ( N - 1 ). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-May-2016.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 24-Oct-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> A # 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN0 )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> sum_ k e. ( M..^ N ) ( A ^ k ) = ( ( ( A ^ M ) - ( A ^ N ) ) / ( 1 - A ) ) )
Theorem	geoserap 12033*	The value of the finite geometric series 1 + A ^ 1 + A ^ 2 +... + A ^ ( N - 1 ). This is Metamath 100 proof #66. (Contributed by NM, 12-May-2006.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 24-Oct-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> A # 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. NN0 )   =>    |- ( ph -> sum_ k e. ( 0 ... ( N - 1 ) ) ( A ^ k ) = ( ( 1 - ( A ^ N ) ) / ( 1 - A ) ) )
Theorem	pwm1geoserap1 12034*	The n-th power of a number decreased by 1 expressed by the finite geometric series 1 + A ^ 1 + A ^ 2 +... + A ^ ( N - 1 ). (Contributed by AV, 14-Aug-2021.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 24-Oct-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. NN0 )   &    |- ( ph -> A # 1 )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( A ^ N ) - 1 ) = ( ( A - 1 ) x. sum_ k e. ( 0 ... ( N - 1 ) ) ( A ^ k ) ) )
Theorem	absltap 12035	Less-than of absolute value implies apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Oct-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> ( abs ` A ) < B )   =>    |- ( ph -> A # B )
Theorem	absgtap 12036	Greater-than of absolute value implies apartness. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 29-Oct-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. RR+ )   &    |- ( ph -> B < ( abs ` A ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> A # B )
Theorem	geolim 12037*	The partial sums in the infinite series 1 + A ^ 1 + A ^ 2... converge to ( 1 / ( 1 - A ) ). (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2006.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> ( abs ` A ) < 1 )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> ( F ` k ) = ( A ^ k ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> seq 0 ( + , F ) ~~> ( 1 / ( 1 - A ) ) )
Theorem	geolim2 12038*	The partial sums in the geometric series A ^ M + A ^ ( M + 1 )... converge to ( ( A ^ M ) / ( 1 - A ) ). (Contributed by NM, 6-Jun-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> ( abs ` A ) < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN0 )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( F ` k ) = ( A ^ k ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> seq M ( + , F ) ~~> ( ( A ^ M ) / ( 1 - A ) ) )
Theorem	georeclim 12039*	The limit of a geometric series of reciprocals. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 28-Dec-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ph -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> 1 < ( abs ` A ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> ( F ` k ) = ( ( 1 / A ) ^ k ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> seq 0 ( + , F ) ~~> ( A / ( A - 1 ) ) )
Theorem	geo2sum 12040*	The value of the finite geometric series 2 ^ -u 1 + 2 ^ -u 2 +... + 2 ^ -u N, multiplied by a constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( N e. NN /\ A e. CC ) -> sum_ k e. ( 1 ... N ) ( A / ( 2 ^ k ) ) = ( A - ( A / ( 2 ^ N ) ) ) )
Theorem	geo2sum2 12041*	The value of the finite geometric series 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 +... + 2 ^ ( N - 1 ). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2016.)
|- ( N e. NN0 -> sum_ k e. ( 0..^ N ) ( 2 ^ k ) = ( ( 2 ^ N ) - 1 ) )
Theorem	geo2lim 12042*	The value of the infinite geometric series 2 ^ -u 1 + 2 ^ -u 2 +... , multiplied by a constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2014.)
|- F = ( k e. NN |-> ( A / ( 2 ^ k ) ) )   =>    |- ( A e. CC -> seq 1 ( + , F ) ~~> A )
Theorem	geoisum 12043*	The infinite sum of 1 + A ^ 1 + A ^ 2... is ( 1 / ( 1 - A ) ). (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ ( abs ` A ) < 1 ) -> sum_ k e. NN0 ( A ^ k ) = ( 1 / ( 1 - A ) ) )
Theorem	geoisumr 12044*	The infinite sum of reciprocals 1 + ( 1 / A ) ^ 1 + ( 1 / A ) ^ 2... is A / ( A - 1 ). (Contributed by rpenner, 3-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ 1 < ( abs ` A ) ) -> sum_ k e. NN0 ( ( 1 / A ) ^ k ) = ( A / ( A - 1 ) ) )
Theorem	geoisum1 12045*	The infinite sum of A ^ 1 + A ^ 2... is ( A / ( 1 - A ) ). (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ ( abs ` A ) < 1 ) -> sum_ k e. NN ( A ^ k ) = ( A / ( 1 - A ) ) )
Theorem	geoisum1c 12046*	The infinite sum of A x. ( R ^ 1 ) + A x. ( R ^ 2 )... is ( A x. R ) / ( 1 - R ). (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ R e. CC /\ ( abs ` R ) < 1 ) -> sum_ k e. NN ( A x. ( R ^ k ) ) = ( ( A x. R ) / ( 1 - R ) ) )
Theorem	0.999... 12047	The recurring decimal 0.999..., which is defined as the infinite sum 0.9 + 0.09 + 0.009 + ... i.e. 9 / 1 0 ^ 1 + 9 / 1 0 ^ 2 + 9 / 1 0 ^ 3 + ..., is exactly equal to 1. (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-2007.) (Revised by AV, 8-Sep-2021.)
|- sum_ k e. NN ( 9 / (; 1 0 ^ k ) ) = 1
Theorem	geoihalfsum 12048	Prove that the infinite geometric series of 1/2, 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + ... = 1. Uses geoisum1 12045. This is a representation of .111... in binary with an infinite number of 1's. Theorem 0.999... 12047 proves a similar claim for .999... in base 10. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Jul-2022.)
|- sum_ k e. NN ( 1 / ( 2 ^ k ) ) = 1
4.9.8  Ratio test for infinite series convergence
Theorem	cvgratnnlembern 12049	Lemma for cvgratnn 12057. Upper bound for a geometric progression of positive ratio less than one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Nov-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A ^ M ) < ( ( 1 / ( ( 1 / A ) - 1 ) ) / M ) )
Theorem	cvgratnnlemnexp 12050*	Lemma for cvgratnn 12057. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Nov-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( abs ` ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) ) <_ ( A x. ( abs ` ( F ` k ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. NN )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( abs ` ( F ` N ) ) <_ ( ( abs ` ( F ` 1 ) ) x. ( A ^ ( N - 1 ) ) ) )
Theorem	cvgratnnlemmn 12051*	Lemma for cvgratnn 12057. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Nov-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( abs ` ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) ) <_ ( A x. ( abs ` ( F ` k ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( abs ` ( F ` N ) ) <_ ( ( abs ` ( F ` M ) ) x. ( A ^ ( N - M ) ) ) )
Theorem	cvgratnnlemseq 12052*	Lemma for cvgratnn 12057. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( abs ` ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) ) <_ ( A x. ( abs ` ( F ` k ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( seq 1 ( + , F ) ` N ) - ( seq 1 ( + , F ) ` M ) ) = sum_ i e. ( ( M + 1 ) ... N ) ( F ` i ) )
Theorem	cvgratnnlemabsle 12053*	Lemma for cvgratnn 12057. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( abs ` ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) ) <_ ( A x. ( abs ` ( F ` k ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( abs ` sum_ i e. ( ( M + 1 ) ... N ) ( F ` i ) ) <_ ( ( abs ` ( F ` M ) ) x. sum_ i e. ( ( M + 1 ) ... N ) ( A ^ ( i - M ) ) ) )
Theorem	cvgratnnlemsumlt 12054*	Lemma for cvgratnn 12057. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Nov-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( abs ` ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) ) <_ ( A x. ( abs ` ( F ` k ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> sum_ i e. ( ( M + 1 ) ... N ) ( A ^ ( i - M ) ) < ( A / ( 1 - A ) ) )
Theorem	cvgratnnlemfm 12055*	Lemma for cvgratnn 12057. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Nov-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( abs ` ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) ) <_ ( A x. ( abs ` ( F ` k ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( abs ` ( F ` M ) ) < ( ( ( ( 1 / ( ( 1 / A ) - 1 ) ) / A ) x. ( ( abs ` ( F ` 1 ) ) + 1 ) ) / M ) )
Theorem	cvgratnnlemrate 12056*	Lemma for cvgratnn 12057. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( abs ` ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) ) <_ ( A x. ( abs ` ( F ` k ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( abs ` ( ( seq 1 ( + , F ) ` N ) - ( seq 1 ( + , F ) ` M ) ) ) < ( ( ( ( ( 1 / ( ( 1 / A ) - 1 ) ) / A ) x. ( ( abs ` ( F ` 1 ) ) + 1 ) ) x. ( A / ( 1 - A ) ) ) / M ) )
Theorem	cvgratnn 12057*	Ratio test for convergence of a complex infinite series. If the ratio A of the absolute values of successive terms in an infinite sequence F is less than 1 for all terms, then the infinite sum of the terms of F converges to a complex number. Although this theorem is similar to cvgratz 12058 and cvgratgt0 12059, the decision to index starting at one is not merely cosmetic, as proving convergence using climcvg1n 11876 is sensitive to how a sequence is indexed. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2005.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 12-Nov-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( abs ` ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) ) <_ ( A x. ( abs ` ( F ` k ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> seq 1 ( + , F ) e. dom ~~> )
Theorem	cvgratz 12058*	Ratio test for convergence of a complex infinite series. If the ratio A of the absolute values of successive terms in an infinite sequence F is less than 1 for all terms, then the infinite sum of the terms of F converges to a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2005.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 11-Nov-2022.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( abs ` ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) ) <_ ( A x. ( abs ` ( F ` k ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> seq M ( + , F ) e. dom ~~> )
Theorem	cvgratgt0 12059*	Ratio test for convergence of a complex infinite series. If the ratio A of the absolute values of successive terms in an infinite sequence F is less than 1 for all terms beyond some index B, then the infinite sum of the terms of F converges to a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2005.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 11-Nov-2022.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- W = ( ZZ>= ` N )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. Z )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. W ) -> ( abs ` ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) ) <_ ( A x. ( abs ` ( F ` k ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> seq M ( + , F ) e. dom ~~> )
4.9.9  Mertens' theorem
Theorem	mertenslemub 12060*	Lemma for mertensabs 12063. An upper bound for T. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Dec-2022.)
|- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> ( G ` k ) = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> seq 0 ( + , G ) e. dom ~~> )   &    |- T = { z | E. n e. ( 0 ... ( S - 1 ) ) z = ( abs ` sum_ k e. ( ZZ>= ` ( n + 1 ) ) ( G ` k ) ) }   &    |- ( ph -> X e. T )   &    |- ( ph -> S e. NN )   =>    |- ( ph -> X <_ sum_ n e. ( 0 ... ( S - 1 ) ) ( abs ` sum_ k e. ( ZZ>= ` ( n + 1 ) ) ( G ` k ) ) )
Theorem	mertenslemi1 12061*	Lemma for mertensabs 12063. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 2-Dec-2022.)
|- ( ( ph /\ j e. NN0 ) -> ( F ` j ) = A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ j e. NN0 ) -> ( K ` j ) = ( abs ` A ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ j e. NN0 ) -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> ( G ` k ) = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> ( H ` k ) = sum_ j e. ( 0 ... k ) ( A x. ( G ` ( k - j ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> seq 0 ( + , K ) e. dom ~~> )   &    |- ( ph -> seq 0 ( + , G ) e. dom ~~> )   &    |- ( ph -> E e. RR+ )   &    |- T = { z | E. n e. ( 0 ... ( s - 1 ) ) z = ( abs ` sum_ k e. ( ZZ>= ` ( n + 1 ) ) ( G ` k ) ) }   &    |- ( ps <-> ( s e. NN /\ A. n e. ( ZZ>= ` s ) ( abs ` sum_ k e. ( ZZ>= ` ( n + 1 ) ) ( G ` k ) ) < ( ( E / 2 ) / ( sum_ j e. NN0 ( K ` j ) + 1 ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> P e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ps /\ ( t e. NN0 /\ A. m e. ( ZZ>= ` t ) ( K ` m ) < ( ( ( E / 2 ) / s ) / ( P + 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 <_ P )   &    |- ( ph -> A. w e. T w <_ P )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. NN0 A. m e. ( ZZ>= ` y ) ( abs ` sum_ j e. ( 0 ... m ) ( A x. sum_ k e. ( ZZ>= ` ( ( m - j ) + 1 ) ) B ) ) < E )
Theorem	mertenslem2 12062*	Lemma for mertensabs 12063. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( ph /\ j e. NN0 ) -> ( F ` j ) = A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ j e. NN0 ) -> ( K ` j ) = ( abs ` A ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ j e. NN0 ) -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> ( G ` k ) = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> ( H ` k ) = sum_ j e. ( 0 ... k ) ( A x. ( G ` ( k - j ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> seq 0 ( + , K ) e. dom ~~> )   &    |- ( ph -> seq 0 ( + , G ) e. dom ~~> )   &    |- ( ph -> E e. RR+ )   &    |- T = { z | E. n e. ( 0 ... ( s - 1 ) ) z = ( abs ` sum_ k e. ( ZZ>= ` ( n + 1 ) ) ( G ` k ) ) }   &    |- ( ps <-> ( s e. NN /\ A. n e. ( ZZ>= ` s ) ( abs ` sum_ k e. ( ZZ>= ` ( n + 1 ) ) ( G ` k ) ) < ( ( E / 2 ) / ( sum_ j e. NN0 ( K ` j ) + 1 ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. NN0 A. m e. ( ZZ>= ` y ) ( abs ` sum_ j e. ( 0 ... m ) ( A x. sum_ k e. ( ZZ>= ` ( ( m - j ) + 1 ) ) B ) ) < E )
Theorem	mertensabs 12063*	Mertens' theorem. If A ( j ) is an absolutely convergent series and B ( k ) is convergent, then ( sum_ j e. NN0 A ( j ) x. sum_ k e. NN0 B ( k ) ) = sum_ k e. NN0 sum_ j e. ( 0 ... k ) ( A ( j ) x. B ( k - j ) ) (and this latter series is convergent). This latter sum is commonly known as the Cauchy product of the sequences. The proof follows the outline at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_product#Proof_of_Mertens.27_theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 8-Dec-2022.)
|- ( ( ph /\ j e. NN0 ) -> ( F ` j ) = A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ j e. NN0 ) -> ( K ` j ) = ( abs ` A ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ j e. NN0 ) -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> ( G ` k ) = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> ( H ` k ) = sum_ j e. ( 0 ... k ) ( A x. ( G ` ( k - j ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> seq 0 ( + , K ) e. dom ~~> )   &    |- ( ph -> seq 0 ( + , G ) e. dom ~~> )   &    |- ( ph -> seq 0 ( + , F ) e. dom ~~> )   =>    |- ( ph -> seq 0 ( + , H ) ~~> ( sum_ j e. NN0 A x. sum_ k e. NN0 B ) )
4.9.10  Finite and infinite products
4.9.10.1  Product sequences
Theorem	prodf 12064*	An infinite product of complex terms is a function from an upper set of integers to CC. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> seq M ( x. , F ) : Z --> CC )
Theorem	clim2prod 12065*	The limit of an infinite product with an initial segment added. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. Z )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> seq ( N + 1 ) ( x. , F ) ~~> A )   =>    |- ( ph -> seq M ( x. , F ) ~~> ( ( seq M ( x. , F ) ` N ) x. A ) )
Theorem	clim2divap 12066*	The limit of an infinite product with an initial segment removed. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Dec-2017.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. Z )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> seq M ( x. , F ) ~~> A )   &    |- ( ph -> ( seq M ( x. , F ) ` N ) # 0 )   =>    |- ( ph -> seq ( N + 1 ) ( x. , F ) ~~> ( A / ( seq M ( x. , F ) ` N ) ) )
Theorem	prod3fmul 12067*	The product of two infinite products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Mar-2024.)
|- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( G ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( H ` k ) = ( ( F ` k ) x. ( G ` k ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( seq M ( x. , H ) ` N ) = ( ( seq M ( x. , F ) ` N ) x. ( seq M ( x. , G ) ` N ) ) )
Theorem	prodf1 12068	The value of the partial products in a one-valued infinite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   =>    |- ( N e. Z -> ( seq M ( x. , ( Z X. { 1 } ) ) ` N ) = 1 )
Theorem	prodf1f 12069	A one-valued infinite product is equal to the constant one function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   =>    |- ( M e. ZZ -> seq M ( x. , ( Z X. { 1 } ) ) = ( Z X. { 1 } ) )
Theorem	prodfclim1 12070	The constant one product converges to one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   =>    |- ( M e. ZZ -> seq M ( x. , ( Z X. { 1 } ) ) ~~> 1 )
Theorem	prodfap0 12071*	The product of finitely many terms apart from zero is apart from zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jan-2018.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 23-Mar-2024.)
|- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( M ... N ) ) -> ( F ` k ) # 0 )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( seq M ( x. , F ) ` N ) # 0 )
Theorem	prodfrecap 12072*	The reciprocal of a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jan-2018.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 24-Mar-2024.)
|- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( M ... N ) ) -> ( F ` k ) # 0 )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( M ... N ) ) -> ( G ` k ) = ( 1 / ( F ` k ) ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( G ` k ) e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( seq M ( x. , G ) ` N ) = ( 1 / ( seq M ( x. , F ) ` N ) ) )
Theorem	prodfdivap 12073*	The quotient of two products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jan-2018.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 24-Mar-2024.)
|- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( G ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( G ` k ) # 0 )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( H ` k ) = ( ( F ` k ) / ( G ` k ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( seq M ( x. , H ) ` N ) = ( ( seq M ( x. , F ) ` N ) / ( seq M ( x. , G ) ` N ) ) )
4.9.10.2  Non-trivial convergence
Theorem	ntrivcvgap 12074*	A non-trivially converging infinite product converges. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> E. n e. Z E. y ( y # 0 /\ seq n ( x. , F ) ~~> y ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> seq M ( x. , F ) e. dom ~~> )
Theorem	ntrivcvgap0 12075*	A product that converges to a value apart from zero converges non-trivially. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> seq M ( x. , F ) ~~> X )   &    |- ( ph -> X # 0 )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. n e. Z E. y ( y # 0 /\ seq n ( x. , F ) ~~> y ) )
4.9.10.3  Complex products
Syntax	cprod 12076	Extend class notation to include complex products.
class prod_ k e. A B
Definition	df-proddc 12077*	Define the product of a series with an index set of integers A. This definition takes most of the aspects of df-sumdc 11880 and adapts them for multiplication instead of addition. However, we insist that in the infinite case, there is a nonzero tail of the sequence. This ensures that the convergence criteria match those of infinite sums. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 21-Mar-2024.)
|- prod_ k e. A B = ( iota x ( E. m e. ZZ ( ( A C_ ( ZZ>= ` m ) /\ A. j e. ( ZZ>= ` m )DECID j e. A ) /\ ( E. n e. ( ZZ>= ` m ) E. y ( y # 0 /\ seq n ( x. , ( k e. ZZ |-> if ( k e. A , B , 1 ) ) ) ~~> y ) /\ seq m ( x. , ( k e. ZZ |-> if ( k e. A , B , 1 ) ) ) ~~> x ) ) \/ E. m e. NN E. f ( f : ( 1 ... m ) -1-1-onto-> A /\ x = ( seq 1 ( x. , ( n e. NN |-> if ( n <_ m , [_ ( f ` n ) / k ]_ B , 1 ) ) ) ` m ) ) ) )
Theorem	prodeq1f 12078	Equality theorem for a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Dec-2017.)
|- F/_ k A   &    |- F/_ k B   =>    |- ( A = B -> prod_ k e. A C = prod_ k e. B C )
Theorem	prodeq1 12079*	Equality theorem for a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Dec-2017.)
|- ( A = B -> prod_ k e. A C = prod_ k e. B C )
Theorem	nfcprod1 12080*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- F/_ k A   =>    |- F/_ k prod_ k e. A B
Theorem	nfcprod 12081*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for product: if x is (effectively) not free in A and B, it is not free in prod_ k e. A B. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Dec-2017.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/_ x prod_ k e. A B
Theorem	prodeq2w 12082*	Equality theorem for product, when the class expressions B and C are equal everywhere. Proved using only Extensionality. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( A. k B = C -> prod_ k e. A B = prod_ k e. A C )
Theorem	prodeq2 12083*	Equality theorem for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( A. k e. A B = C -> prod_ k e. A B = prod_ k e. A C )
Theorem	cbvprod 12084*	Change bound variable in a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( j = k -> B = C )   &    |- F/_ k A   &    |- F/_ j A   &    |- F/_ k B   &    |- F/_ j C   =>    |- prod_ j e. A B = prod_ k e. A C
Theorem	cbvprodv 12085*	Change bound variable in a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( j = k -> B = C )   =>    |- prod_ j e. A B = prod_ k e. A C
Theorem	cbvprodi 12086*	Change bound variable in a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- F/_ k B   &    |- F/_ j C   &    |- ( j = k -> B = C )   =>    |- prod_ j e. A B = prod_ k e. A C
Theorem	prodeq1i 12087*	Equality inference for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- A = B   =>    |- prod_ k e. A C = prod_ k e. B C
Theorem	prodeq2i 12088*	Equality inference for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( k e. A -> B = C )   =>    |- prod_ k e. A B = prod_ k e. A C
Theorem	prodeq12i 12089*	Equality inference for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- A = B   &    |- ( k e. A -> C = D )   =>    |- prod_ k e. A C = prod_ k e. B D
Theorem	prodeq1d 12090*	Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A C = prod_ k e. B C )
Theorem	prodeq2d 12091*	Equality deduction for product. Note that unlike prodeq2dv 12092, k may occur in ph. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A. k e. A B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A B = prod_ k e. A C )
Theorem	prodeq2dv 12092*	Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A B = prod_ k e. A C )
Theorem	prodeq2sdv 12093*	Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A B = prod_ k e. A C )
Theorem	2cprodeq2dv 12094*	Equality deduction for double product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ( ph /\ j e. A /\ k e. B ) -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ j e. A prod_ k e. B C = prod_ j e. A prod_ k e. B D )
Theorem	prodeq12dv 12095*	Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A C = prod_ k e. B D )
Theorem	prodeq12rdv 12096*	Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. B ) -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A C = prod_ k e. B D )
Theorem	prodrbdclem 12097*	Lemma for prodrbdc 12100. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 4-Apr-2024.)
|- F = ( k e. ZZ |-> if ( k e. A , B , 1 ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> DECID k e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ A C_ ( ZZ>= ` N ) ) -> ( seq M ( x. , F ) |` ( ZZ>= ` N ) ) = seq N ( x. , F ) )
Theorem	fproddccvg 12098*	The sequence of partial products of a finite product converges to the whole product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- F = ( k e. ZZ |-> if ( k e. A , B , 1 ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> DECID k e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ ( M ... N ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> seq M ( x. , F ) ~~> ( seq M ( x. , F ) ` N ) )
Theorem	prodrbdclem2 12099*	Lemma for prodrbdc 12100. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- F = ( k e. ZZ |-> if ( k e. A , B , 1 ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ ( ZZ>= ` N ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> DECID k e. A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` N ) ) -> DECID k e. A )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( seq M ( x. , F ) ~~> C <-> seq N ( x. , F ) ~~> C ) )
Theorem	prodrbdc 12100*	Rebase the starting point of a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- F = ( k e. ZZ |-> if ( k e. A , B , 1 ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ ( ZZ>= ` N ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> DECID k e. A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` N ) ) -> DECID k e. A )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( seq M ( x. , F ) ~~> C <-> seq N ( x. , F ) ~~> C ) )