Theorem zsupcl 10664

Description: Closure of supremum for decidable integer properties. The property which defines the set we are taking the supremum of must (a) be true at M (which corresponds to the nonempty condition of classical supremum theorems), (b) decidable at each value after M, and (c) be false after j (which corresponds to the upper bound condition found in classical supremum theorems). (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 7-Dec-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
zsupcl.m	|- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )
zsupcl.sbm	|- ( n = M -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
zsupcl.mtru	|- ( ph -> ch )
zsupcl.dc	|- ( ( ph /\ n e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> DECID ps )
zsupcl.bnd	|- ( ph -> E. j e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) A. n e. ( ZZ>= ` j ) -. ps )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
zsupcl	|- ( ph -> sup ( { n e. ZZ | ps } , RR , < ) e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )

Distinct variable groups:   ph, j, n   ps, j   ch, j, n   j, M, n

Allowed substitution hint:   ps( n)

Proof of Theorem zsupcl

Dummy variables x y z u v are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		zsupcl.m	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )
2	1	zred 9768	. . 3 |- ( ph -> M e. RR )
3		lttri3 8405	. . . . 5 |- ( ( u e. RR /\ v e. RR ) -> ( u = v <-> ( -. u < v /\ -. v < u ) ) )
4	3	adantl 277	. . . 4 |- ( ( ph /\ ( u e. RR /\ v e. RR ) ) -> ( u = v <-> ( -. u < v /\ -. v < u ) ) )
5		zssre 9651	. . . . 5 |- ZZ C_ RR
6		zsupcl.sbm	. . . . . 6 |- ( n = M -> ( ps <-> ch ) )
7		zsupcl.mtru	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> ch )
8		zsupcl.dc	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( ph /\ n e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> DECID ps )
9		zsupcl.bnd	. . . . . 6 |- ( ph -> E. j e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) A. n e. ( ZZ>= ` j ) -. ps )
10	1, 6, 7, 8, 9	zsupcllemex 10663	. . . . 5 |- ( ph -> E. x e. ZZ ( A. y e. { n e. ZZ | ps } -. x < y /\ A. y e. RR ( y < x -> E. z e. { n e. ZZ | ps } y < z ) ) )
11		ssrexv 3313	. . . . 5 |- ( ZZ C_ RR -> ( E. x e. ZZ ( A. y e. { n e. ZZ | ps } -. x < y /\ A. y e. RR ( y < x -> E. z e. { n e. ZZ | ps } y < z ) ) -> E. x e. RR ( A. y e. { n e. ZZ | ps } -. x < y /\ A. y e. RR ( y < x -> E. z e. { n e. ZZ | ps } y < z ) ) ) )
12	5, 10, 11	mpsyl 65	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> E. x e. RR ( A. y e. { n e. ZZ | ps } -. x < y /\ A. y e. RR ( y < x -> E. z e. { n e. ZZ | ps } y < z ) ) )
13	4, 12	supclti 7338	. . 3 |- ( ph -> sup ( { n e. ZZ | ps } , RR , < ) e. RR )
14	6	elrab 2982	. . . . 5 |- ( M e. { n e. ZZ | ps } <-> ( M e. ZZ /\ ch ) )
15	1, 7, 14	sylanbrc 421	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> M e. { n e. ZZ | ps } )
16	4, 12	supubti 7339	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ( M e. { n e. ZZ | ps } -> -. sup ( { n e. ZZ | ps } , RR , < ) < M ) )
17	15, 16	mpd 13	. . 3 |- ( ph -> -. sup ( { n e. ZZ | ps } , RR , < ) < M )
18	2, 13, 17	nltled 8447	. 2 |- ( ph -> M <_ sup ( { n e. ZZ | ps } , RR , < ) )
19	5	a1i 9	. . . 4 |- ( ph -> ZZ C_ RR )
20	4, 10, 19	supelti 7342	. . 3 |- ( ph -> sup ( { n e. ZZ | ps } , RR , < ) e. ZZ )
21		eluz 9935	. . 3 |- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ sup ( { n e. ZZ | ps } , RR , < ) e. ZZ ) -> ( sup ( { n e. ZZ | ps } , RR , < ) e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) <-> M <_ sup ( { n e. ZZ | ps } , RR , < ) ) )
22	1, 20, 21	syl2anc 415	. 2 |- ( ph -> ( sup ( { n e. ZZ | ps } , RR , < ) e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) <-> M <_ sup ( { n e. ZZ | ps } , RR , < ) ) )
23	18, 22	mpbird 167	1 |- ( ph -> sup ( { n e. ZZ | ps } , RR , < ) e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   -. wn 3   -> wi 4   /\ wa 104   <-> wb 105  DECID wdc 846   = wceq 1402   e. wcel 2209   A.wral 2528   E.wrex 2529   {crab 2532   C_ wss 3220   class class class wbr 4130   ` cfv 5377   supcsup 7322   RRcr 8178   < clt 8360   <_ cle 8361   ZZcz 9644   ZZ>=cuz 9921

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4249  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346  ax-un 4578  ax-setind 4684  ax-cnex 8270  ax-resscn 8271  ax-1cn 8272  ax-1re 8273  ax-icn 8274  ax-addcl 8275  ax-addrcl 8276  ax-mulcl 8277  ax-addcom 8279  ax-addass 8281  ax-distr 8283  ax-i2m1 8284  ax-0lt1 8285  ax-0id 8287  ax-rnegex 8288  ax-cnre 8290  ax-pre-ltirr 8291  ax-pre-ltwlin 8292  ax-pre-lttrn 8293  ax-pre-apti 8294  ax-pre-ltadd 8295

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-dc 847  df-3or 1010  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-fal 1408  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ne 2421  df-nel 2516  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-reu 2535  df-rmo 2536  df-rab 2537  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-csb 3148  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-int 3971  df-iun 4014  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-mpt 4194  df-id 4438  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785  df-res 4786  df-ima 4787  df-iota 5337  df-fun 5379  df-fn 5380  df-f 5381  df-fv 5385  df-riota 6038  df-ov 6088  df-oprab 6089  df-mpo 6090  df-1st 6374  df-2nd 6375  df-sup 7324  df-pnf 8362  df-mnf 8363  df-xr 8364  df-ltxr 8365  df-le 8366  df-sub 8499  df-neg 8500  df-inn 9305  df-n0 9564  df-z 9645  df-uz 9922  df-fz 10412  df-fzo 10550

This theorem is used by:  suprzubdc  10671  gcdsupcl  12735