P. 120 of Theorem List - Intuitionistic Logic Explorer

Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 11901-12000   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	geo2sum2 11901*	The value of the finite geometric series 1 + 2 + 4 + 8 +... + 2 ^ ( N - 1 ). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Sep-2016.)
|- ( N e. NN0 -> sum_ k e. ( 0..^ N ) ( 2 ^ k ) = ( ( 2 ^ N ) - 1 ) )
Theorem	geo2lim 11902*	The value of the infinite geometric series 2 ^ -u 1 + 2 ^ -u 2 +... , multiplied by a constant. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jun-2014.)
|- F = ( k e. NN |-> ( A / ( 2 ^ k ) ) )   =>    |- ( A e. CC -> seq 1 ( + , F ) ~~> A )
Theorem	geoisum 11903*	The infinite sum of 1 + A ^ 1 + A ^ 2... is ( 1 / ( 1 - A ) ). (Contributed by NM, 15-May-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ ( abs ` A ) < 1 ) -> sum_ k e. NN0 ( A ^ k ) = ( 1 / ( 1 - A ) ) )
Theorem	geoisumr 11904*	The infinite sum of reciprocals 1 + ( 1 / A ) ^ 1 + ( 1 / A ) ^ 2... is A / ( A - 1 ). (Contributed by rpenner, 3-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ 1 < ( abs ` A ) ) -> sum_ k e. NN0 ( ( 1 / A ) ^ k ) = ( A / ( A - 1 ) ) )
Theorem	geoisum1 11905*	The infinite sum of A ^ 1 + A ^ 2... is ( A / ( 1 - A ) ). (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ ( abs ` A ) < 1 ) -> sum_ k e. NN ( A ^ k ) = ( A / ( 1 - A ) ) )
Theorem	geoisum1c 11906*	The infinite sum of A x. ( R ^ 1 ) + A x. ( R ^ 2 )... is ( A x. R ) / ( 1 - R ). (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( A e. CC /\ R e. CC /\ ( abs ` R ) < 1 ) -> sum_ k e. NN ( A x. ( R ^ k ) ) = ( ( A x. R ) / ( 1 - R ) ) )
Theorem	0.999... 11907	The recurring decimal 0.999..., which is defined as the infinite sum 0.9 + 0.09 + 0.009 + ... i.e. 9 / 1 0 ^ 1 + 9 / 1 0 ^ 2 + 9 / 1 0 ^ 3 + ..., is exactly equal to 1. (Contributed by NM, 2-Nov-2007.) (Revised by AV, 8-Sep-2021.)
|- sum_ k e. NN ( 9 / (; 1 0 ^ k ) ) = 1
Theorem	geoihalfsum 11908	Prove that the infinite geometric series of 1/2, 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + ... = 1. Uses geoisum1 11905. This is a representation of .111... in binary with an infinite number of 1's. Theorem 0.999... 11907 proves a similar claim for .999... in base 10. (Contributed by David A. Wheeler, 4-Jan-2017.) (Proof shortened by AV, 9-Jul-2022.)
|- sum_ k e. NN ( 1 / ( 2 ^ k ) ) = 1
4.9.8  Ratio test for infinite series convergence
Theorem	cvgratnnlembern 11909	Lemma for cvgratnn 11917. Upper bound for a geometric progression of positive ratio less than one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-Nov-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( A ^ M ) < ( ( 1 / ( ( 1 / A ) - 1 ) ) / M ) )
Theorem	cvgratnnlemnexp 11910*	Lemma for cvgratnn 11917. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Nov-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( abs ` ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) ) <_ ( A x. ( abs ` ( F ` k ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. NN )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( abs ` ( F ` N ) ) <_ ( ( abs ` ( F ` 1 ) ) x. ( A ^ ( N - 1 ) ) ) )
Theorem	cvgratnnlemmn 11911*	Lemma for cvgratnn 11917. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Nov-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( abs ` ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) ) <_ ( A x. ( abs ` ( F ` k ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( abs ` ( F ` N ) ) <_ ( ( abs ` ( F ` M ) ) x. ( A ^ ( N - M ) ) ) )
Theorem	cvgratnnlemseq 11912*	Lemma for cvgratnn 11917. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( abs ` ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) ) <_ ( A x. ( abs ` ( F ` k ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( ( seq 1 ( + , F ) ` N ) - ( seq 1 ( + , F ) ` M ) ) = sum_ i e. ( ( M + 1 ) ... N ) ( F ` i ) )
Theorem	cvgratnnlemabsle 11913*	Lemma for cvgratnn 11917. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( abs ` ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) ) <_ ( A x. ( abs ` ( F ` k ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( abs ` sum_ i e. ( ( M + 1 ) ... N ) ( F ` i ) ) <_ ( ( abs ` ( F ` M ) ) x. sum_ i e. ( ( M + 1 ) ... N ) ( A ^ ( i - M ) ) ) )
Theorem	cvgratnnlemsumlt 11914*	Lemma for cvgratnn 11917. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Nov-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( abs ` ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) ) <_ ( A x. ( abs ` ( F ` k ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> sum_ i e. ( ( M + 1 ) ... N ) ( A ^ ( i - M ) ) < ( A / ( 1 - A ) ) )
Theorem	cvgratnnlemfm 11915*	Lemma for cvgratnn 11917. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 23-Nov-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( abs ` ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) ) <_ ( A x. ( abs ` ( F ` k ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( abs ` ( F ` M ) ) < ( ( ( ( 1 / ( ( 1 / A ) - 1 ) ) / A ) x. ( ( abs ` ( F ` 1 ) ) + 1 ) ) / M ) )
Theorem	cvgratnnlemrate 11916*	Lemma for cvgratnn 11917. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 21-Nov-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( abs ` ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) ) <_ ( A x. ( abs ` ( F ` k ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( abs ` ( ( seq 1 ( + , F ) ` N ) - ( seq 1 ( + , F ) ` M ) ) ) < ( ( ( ( ( 1 / ( ( 1 / A ) - 1 ) ) / A ) x. ( ( abs ` ( F ` 1 ) ) + 1 ) ) x. ( A / ( 1 - A ) ) ) / M ) )
Theorem	cvgratnn 11917*	Ratio test for convergence of a complex infinite series. If the ratio A of the absolute values of successive terms in an infinite sequence F is less than 1 for all terms, then the infinite sum of the terms of F converges to a complex number. Although this theorem is similar to cvgratz 11918 and cvgratgt0 11919, the decision to index starting at one is not merely cosmetic, as proving convergence using climcvg1n 11736 is sensitive to how a sequence is indexed. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2005.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 12-Nov-2022.)
|- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN ) -> ( abs ` ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) ) <_ ( A x. ( abs ` ( F ` k ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> seq 1 ( + , F ) e. dom ~~> )
Theorem	cvgratz 11918*	Ratio test for convergence of a complex infinite series. If the ratio A of the absolute values of successive terms in an infinite sequence F is less than 1 for all terms, then the infinite sum of the terms of F converges to a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2005.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 11-Nov-2022.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( abs ` ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) ) <_ ( A x. ( abs ` ( F ` k ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> seq M ( + , F ) e. dom ~~> )
Theorem	cvgratgt0 11919*	Ratio test for convergence of a complex infinite series. If the ratio A of the absolute values of successive terms in an infinite sequence F is less than 1 for all terms beyond some index B, then the infinite sum of the terms of F converges to a complex number. (Contributed by NM, 26-Apr-2005.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 11-Nov-2022.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- W = ( ZZ>= ` N )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> A < 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 < A )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. Z )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. W ) -> ( abs ` ( F ` ( k + 1 ) ) ) <_ ( A x. ( abs ` ( F ` k ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> seq M ( + , F ) e. dom ~~> )
4.9.9  Mertens' theorem
Theorem	mertenslemub 11920*	Lemma for mertensabs 11923. An upper bound for T. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Dec-2022.)
|- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> ( G ` k ) = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> seq 0 ( + , G ) e. dom ~~> )   &    |- T = { z | E. n e. ( 0 ... ( S - 1 ) ) z = ( abs ` sum_ k e. ( ZZ>= ` ( n + 1 ) ) ( G ` k ) ) }   &    |- ( ph -> X e. T )   &    |- ( ph -> S e. NN )   =>    |- ( ph -> X <_ sum_ n e. ( 0 ... ( S - 1 ) ) ( abs ` sum_ k e. ( ZZ>= ` ( n + 1 ) ) ( G ` k ) ) )
Theorem	mertenslemi1 11921*	Lemma for mertensabs 11923. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 2-Dec-2022.)
|- ( ( ph /\ j e. NN0 ) -> ( F ` j ) = A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ j e. NN0 ) -> ( K ` j ) = ( abs ` A ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ j e. NN0 ) -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> ( G ` k ) = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> ( H ` k ) = sum_ j e. ( 0 ... k ) ( A x. ( G ` ( k - j ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> seq 0 ( + , K ) e. dom ~~> )   &    |- ( ph -> seq 0 ( + , G ) e. dom ~~> )   &    |- ( ph -> E e. RR+ )   &    |- T = { z | E. n e. ( 0 ... ( s - 1 ) ) z = ( abs ` sum_ k e. ( ZZ>= ` ( n + 1 ) ) ( G ` k ) ) }   &    |- ( ps <-> ( s e. NN /\ A. n e. ( ZZ>= ` s ) ( abs ` sum_ k e. ( ZZ>= ` ( n + 1 ) ) ( G ` k ) ) < ( ( E / 2 ) / ( sum_ j e. NN0 ( K ` j ) + 1 ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> P e. RR )   &    |- ( ph -> ( ps /\ ( t e. NN0 /\ A. m e. ( ZZ>= ` t ) ( K ` m ) < ( ( ( E / 2 ) / s ) / ( P + 1 ) ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> 0 <_ P )   &    |- ( ph -> A. w e. T w <_ P )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. NN0 A. m e. ( ZZ>= ` y ) ( abs ` sum_ j e. ( 0 ... m ) ( A x. sum_ k e. ( ZZ>= ` ( ( m - j ) + 1 ) ) B ) ) < E )
Theorem	mertenslem2 11922*	Lemma for mertensabs 11923. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Apr-2014.)
|- ( ( ph /\ j e. NN0 ) -> ( F ` j ) = A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ j e. NN0 ) -> ( K ` j ) = ( abs ` A ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ j e. NN0 ) -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> ( G ` k ) = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> ( H ` k ) = sum_ j e. ( 0 ... k ) ( A x. ( G ` ( k - j ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> seq 0 ( + , K ) e. dom ~~> )   &    |- ( ph -> seq 0 ( + , G ) e. dom ~~> )   &    |- ( ph -> E e. RR+ )   &    |- T = { z | E. n e. ( 0 ... ( s - 1 ) ) z = ( abs ` sum_ k e. ( ZZ>= ` ( n + 1 ) ) ( G ` k ) ) }   &    |- ( ps <-> ( s e. NN /\ A. n e. ( ZZ>= ` s ) ( abs ` sum_ k e. ( ZZ>= ` ( n + 1 ) ) ( G ` k ) ) < ( ( E / 2 ) / ( sum_ j e. NN0 ( K ` j ) + 1 ) ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. y e. NN0 A. m e. ( ZZ>= ` y ) ( abs ` sum_ j e. ( 0 ... m ) ( A x. sum_ k e. ( ZZ>= ` ( ( m - j ) + 1 ) ) B ) ) < E )
Theorem	mertensabs 11923*	Mertens' theorem. If A ( j ) is an absolutely convergent series and B ( k ) is convergent, then ( sum_ j e. NN0 A ( j ) x. sum_ k e. NN0 B ( k ) ) = sum_ k e. NN0 sum_ j e. ( 0 ... k ) ( A ( j ) x. B ( k - j ) ) (and this latter series is convergent). This latter sum is commonly known as the Cauchy product of the sequences. The proof follows the outline at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cauchy_product#Proof_of_Mertens.27_theorem. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 8-Dec-2022.)
|- ( ( ph /\ j e. NN0 ) -> ( F ` j ) = A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ j e. NN0 ) -> ( K ` j ) = ( abs ` A ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ j e. NN0 ) -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> ( G ` k ) = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. NN0 ) -> ( H ` k ) = sum_ j e. ( 0 ... k ) ( A x. ( G ` ( k - j ) ) ) )   &    |- ( ph -> seq 0 ( + , K ) e. dom ~~> )   &    |- ( ph -> seq 0 ( + , G ) e. dom ~~> )   &    |- ( ph -> seq 0 ( + , F ) e. dom ~~> )   =>    |- ( ph -> seq 0 ( + , H ) ~~> ( sum_ j e. NN0 A x. sum_ k e. NN0 B ) )
4.9.10  Finite and infinite products
4.9.10.1  Product sequences
Theorem	prodf 11924*	An infinite product of complex terms is a function from an upper set of integers to CC. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> seq M ( x. , F ) : Z --> CC )
Theorem	clim2prod 11925*	The limit of an infinite product with an initial segment added. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. Z )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> seq ( N + 1 ) ( x. , F ) ~~> A )   =>    |- ( ph -> seq M ( x. , F ) ~~> ( ( seq M ( x. , F ) ` N ) x. A ) )
Theorem	clim2divap 11926*	The limit of an infinite product with an initial segment removed. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 20-Dec-2017.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. Z )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> seq M ( x. , F ) ~~> A )   &    |- ( ph -> ( seq M ( x. , F ) ` N ) # 0 )   =>    |- ( ph -> seq ( N + 1 ) ( x. , F ) ~~> ( A / ( seq M ( x. , F ) ` N ) ) )
Theorem	prod3fmul 11927*	The product of two infinite products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 22-Mar-2024.)
|- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( G ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( H ` k ) = ( ( F ` k ) x. ( G ` k ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( seq M ( x. , H ) ` N ) = ( ( seq M ( x. , F ) ` N ) x. ( seq M ( x. , G ) ` N ) ) )
Theorem	prodf1 11928	The value of the partial products in a one-valued infinite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   =>    |- ( N e. Z -> ( seq M ( x. , ( Z X. { 1 } ) ) ` N ) = 1 )
Theorem	prodf1f 11929	A one-valued infinite product is equal to the constant one function. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   =>    |- ( M e. ZZ -> seq M ( x. , ( Z X. { 1 } ) ) = ( Z X. { 1 } ) )
Theorem	prodfclim1 11930	The constant one product converges to one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   =>    |- ( M e. ZZ -> seq M ( x. , ( Z X. { 1 } ) ) ~~> 1 )
Theorem	prodfap0 11931*	The product of finitely many terms apart from zero is apart from zero. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Jan-2018.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 23-Mar-2024.)
|- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( M ... N ) ) -> ( F ` k ) # 0 )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( seq M ( x. , F ) ` N ) # 0 )
Theorem	prodfrecap 11932*	The reciprocal of a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jan-2018.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 24-Mar-2024.)
|- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( M ... N ) ) -> ( F ` k ) # 0 )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( M ... N ) ) -> ( G ` k ) = ( 1 / ( F ` k ) ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( G ` k ) e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( seq M ( x. , G ) ` N ) = ( 1 / ( seq M ( x. , F ) ` N ) ) )
Theorem	prodfdivap 11933*	The quotient of two products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Jan-2018.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 24-Mar-2024.)
|- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( G ` k ) e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( G ` k ) # 0 )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( H ` k ) = ( ( F ` k ) / ( G ` k ) ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( seq M ( x. , H ) ` N ) = ( ( seq M ( x. , F ) ` N ) / ( seq M ( x. , G ) ` N ) ) )
4.9.10.2  Non-trivial convergence
Theorem	ntrivcvgap 11934*	A non-trivially converging infinite product converges. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> E. n e. Z E. y ( y # 0 /\ seq n ( x. , F ) ~~> y ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> seq M ( x. , F ) e. dom ~~> )
Theorem	ntrivcvgap0 11935*	A product that converges to a value apart from zero converges non-trivially. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 18-Dec-2017.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> seq M ( x. , F ) ~~> X )   &    |- ( ph -> X # 0 )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. n e. Z E. y ( y # 0 /\ seq n ( x. , F ) ~~> y ) )
4.9.10.3  Complex products
Syntax	cprod 11936	Extend class notation to include complex products.
class prod_ k e. A B
Definition	df-proddc 11937*	Define the product of a series with an index set of integers A. This definition takes most of the aspects of df-sumdc 11740 and adapts them for multiplication instead of addition. However, we insist that in the infinite case, there is a nonzero tail of the sequence. This ensures that the convergence criteria match those of infinite sums. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 21-Mar-2024.)
|- prod_ k e. A B = ( iota x ( E. m e. ZZ ( ( A C_ ( ZZ>= ` m ) /\ A. j e. ( ZZ>= ` m )DECID j e. A ) /\ ( E. n e. ( ZZ>= ` m ) E. y ( y # 0 /\ seq n ( x. , ( k e. ZZ |-> if ( k e. A , B , 1 ) ) ) ~~> y ) /\ seq m ( x. , ( k e. ZZ |-> if ( k e. A , B , 1 ) ) ) ~~> x ) ) \/ E. m e. NN E. f ( f : ( 1 ... m ) -1-1-onto-> A /\ x = ( seq 1 ( x. , ( n e. NN |-> if ( n <_ m , [_ ( f ` n ) / k ]_ B , 1 ) ) ) ` m ) ) ) )
Theorem	prodeq1f 11938	Equality theorem for a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Dec-2017.)
|- F/_ k A   &    |- F/_ k B   =>    |- ( A = B -> prod_ k e. A C = prod_ k e. B C )
Theorem	prodeq1 11939*	Equality theorem for a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Dec-2017.)
|- ( A = B -> prod_ k e. A C = prod_ k e. B C )
Theorem	nfcprod1 11940*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- F/_ k A   =>    |- F/_ k prod_ k e. A B
Theorem	nfcprod 11941*	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for product: if x is (effectively) not free in A and B, it is not free in prod_ k e. A B. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 1-Dec-2017.)
|- F/_ x A   &    |- F/_ x B   =>    |- F/_ x prod_ k e. A B
Theorem	prodeq2w 11942*	Equality theorem for product, when the class expressions B and C are equal everywhere. Proved using only Extensionality. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( A. k B = C -> prod_ k e. A B = prod_ k e. A C )
Theorem	prodeq2 11943*	Equality theorem for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( A. k e. A B = C -> prod_ k e. A B = prod_ k e. A C )
Theorem	cbvprod 11944*	Change bound variable in a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( j = k -> B = C )   &    |- F/_ k A   &    |- F/_ j A   &    |- F/_ k B   &    |- F/_ j C   =>    |- prod_ j e. A B = prod_ k e. A C
Theorem	cbvprodv 11945*	Change bound variable in a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( j = k -> B = C )   =>    |- prod_ j e. A B = prod_ k e. A C
Theorem	cbvprodi 11946*	Change bound variable in a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- F/_ k B   &    |- F/_ j C   &    |- ( j = k -> B = C )   =>    |- prod_ j e. A B = prod_ k e. A C
Theorem	prodeq1i 11947*	Equality inference for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- A = B   =>    |- prod_ k e. A C = prod_ k e. B C
Theorem	prodeq2i 11948*	Equality inference for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( k e. A -> B = C )   =>    |- prod_ k e. A B = prod_ k e. A C
Theorem	prodeq12i 11949*	Equality inference for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- A = B   &    |- ( k e. A -> C = D )   =>    |- prod_ k e. A C = prod_ k e. B D
Theorem	prodeq1d 11950*	Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A C = prod_ k e. B C )
Theorem	prodeq2d 11951*	Equality deduction for product. Note that unlike prodeq2dv 11952, k may occur in ph. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A. k e. A B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A B = prod_ k e. A C )
Theorem	prodeq2dv 11952*	Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A B = prod_ k e. A C )
Theorem	prodeq2sdv 11953*	Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> B = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A B = prod_ k e. A C )
Theorem	2cprodeq2dv 11954*	Equality deduction for double product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ( ph /\ j e. A /\ k e. B ) -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ j e. A prod_ k e. B C = prod_ j e. A prod_ k e. B D )
Theorem	prodeq12dv 11955*	Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A C = prod_ k e. B D )
Theorem	prodeq12rdv 11956*	Equality deduction for product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. B ) -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A C = prod_ k e. B D )
Theorem	prodrbdclem 11957*	Lemma for prodrbdc 11960. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 4-Apr-2024.)
|- F = ( k e. ZZ |-> if ( k e. A , B , 1 ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> DECID k e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ A C_ ( ZZ>= ` N ) ) -> ( seq M ( x. , F ) |` ( ZZ>= ` N ) ) = seq N ( x. , F ) )
Theorem	fproddccvg 11958*	The sequence of partial products of a finite product converges to the whole product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- F = ( k e. ZZ |-> if ( k e. A , B , 1 ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> DECID k e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ ( M ... N ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> seq M ( x. , F ) ~~> ( seq M ( x. , F ) ` N ) )
Theorem	prodrbdclem2 11959*	Lemma for prodrbdc 11960. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- F = ( k e. ZZ |-> if ( k e. A , B , 1 ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ ( ZZ>= ` N ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> DECID k e. A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` N ) ) -> DECID k e. A )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> ( seq M ( x. , F ) ~~> C <-> seq N ( x. , F ) ~~> C ) )
Theorem	prodrbdc 11960*	Rebase the starting point of a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.)
|- F = ( k e. ZZ |-> if ( k e. A , B , 1 ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ ( ZZ>= ` N ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> DECID k e. A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` N ) ) -> DECID k e. A )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( seq M ( x. , F ) ~~> C <-> seq N ( x. , F ) ~~> C ) )
Theorem	prodmodclem3 11961*	Lemma for prodmodc 11964. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 11-Apr-2024.)
|- F = ( k e. ZZ |-> if ( k e. A , B , 1 ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. CC )   &    |- G = ( j e. NN |-> if ( j <_ (♯ ` A ) , [_ ( f ` j ) / k ]_ B , 1 ) )   &    |- H = ( j e. NN |-> if ( j <_ (♯ ` A ) , [_ ( K ` j ) / k ]_ B , 1 ) )   &    |- ( ph -> ( M e. NN /\ N e. NN ) )   &    |- ( ph -> f : ( 1 ... M ) -1-1-onto-> A )   &    |- ( ph -> K : ( 1 ... N ) -1-1-onto-> A )   =>    |- ( ph -> ( seq 1 ( x. , G ) ` M ) = ( seq 1 ( x. , H ) ` N ) )
Theorem	prodmodclem2a 11962*	Lemma for prodmodc 11964. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 11-Apr-2024.)
|- F = ( k e. ZZ |-> if ( k e. A , B , 1 ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. CC )   &    |- G = ( j e. NN |-> if ( j <_ (♯ ` A ) , [_ ( f ` j ) / k ]_ B , 1 ) )   &    |- H = ( j e. NN |-> if ( j <_ (♯ ` A ) , [_ ( K ` j ) / k ]_ B , 1 ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) ) -> DECID k e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   &    |- ( ph -> f : ( 1 ... N ) -1-1-onto-> A )   &    |- ( ph -> K Isom < , < ( ( 1 ... (♯ ` A ) ) , A ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> seq M ( x. , F ) ~~> ( seq 1 ( x. , G ) ` N ) )
Theorem	prodmodclem2 11963*	Lemma for prodmodc 11964. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 13-Apr-2024.)
|- F = ( k e. ZZ |-> if ( k e. A , B , 1 ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. CC )   &    |- G = ( j e. NN |-> if ( j <_ (♯ ` A ) , [_ ( f ` j ) / k ]_ B , 1 ) )   =>    |- ( ( ph /\ E. m e. ZZ ( ( A C_ ( ZZ>= ` m ) /\ A. j e. ( ZZ>= ` m )DECID j e. A ) /\ ( E. n e. ( ZZ>= ` m ) E. y ( y # 0 /\ seq n ( x. , F ) ~~> y ) /\ seq m ( x. , F ) ~~> x ) ) ) -> ( E. m e. NN E. f ( f : ( 1 ... m ) -1-1-onto-> A /\ z = ( seq 1 ( x. , G ) ` m ) ) -> x = z ) )
Theorem	prodmodc 11964*	A product has at most one limit. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 4-Dec-2017.) (Modified by Jim Kingdon, 14-Apr-2024.)
|- F = ( k e. ZZ |-> if ( k e. A , B , 1 ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. CC )   &    |- G = ( j e. NN |-> if ( j <_ (♯ ` A ) , [_ ( f ` j ) / k ]_ B , 1 ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E* x ( E. m e. ZZ ( ( A C_ ( ZZ>= ` m ) /\ A. j e. ( ZZ>= ` m )DECID j e. A ) /\ ( E. n e. ( ZZ>= ` m ) E. y ( y # 0 /\ seq n ( x. , F ) ~~> y ) /\ seq m ( x. , F ) ~~> x ) ) \/ E. m e. NN E. f ( f : ( 1 ... m ) -1-1-onto-> A /\ x = ( seq 1 ( x. , G ) ` m ) ) ) )
Theorem	zproddc 11965*	Series product with index set a subset of the upper integers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> E. n e. Z E. y ( y # 0 /\ seq n ( x. , F ) ~~> y ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ Z )   &    |- ( ph -> A. j e. Z DECID j e. A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) = if ( k e. A , B , 1 ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A B = ( ~~> ` seq M ( x. , F ) ) )
Theorem	iprodap 11966*	Series product with an upper integer index set (i.e. an infinite product.) (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> E. n e. Z E. y ( y # 0 /\ seq n ( x. , F ) ~~> y ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> B e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. Z B = ( ~~> ` seq M ( x. , F ) ) )
Theorem	zprodap0 11967*	Nonzero series product with index set a subset of the upper integers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2017.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> X # 0 )   &    |- ( ph -> seq M ( x. , F ) ~~> X )   &    |- ( ph -> A. j e. Z DECID j e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ Z )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) = if ( k e. A , B , 1 ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A B = X )
Theorem	iprodap0 11968*	Nonzero series product with an upper integer index set (i.e. an infinite product.) (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2017.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ph -> X # 0 )   &    |- ( ph -> seq M ( x. , F ) ~~> X )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> ( F ` k ) = B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. Z ) -> B e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. Z B = X )
4.9.10.4  Finite products
Theorem	fprodseq 11969*	The value of a product over a nonempty finite set. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 6-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jul-2024.)
|- ( k = ( F ` n ) -> B = C )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. NN )   &    |- ( ph -> F : ( 1 ... M ) -1-1-onto-> A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ n e. ( 1 ... M ) ) -> ( G ` n ) = C )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A B = ( seq 1 ( x. , ( n e. NN |-> if ( n <_ M , ( G ` n ) , 1 ) ) ) ` M ) )
Theorem	fprodntrivap 11970*	A non-triviality lemma for finite sequences. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Dec-2017.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> N e. Z )   &    |- ( ph -> A C_ ( M ... N ) )   =>    |- ( ph -> E. n e. Z E. y ( y # 0 /\ seq n ( x. , ( k e. Z |-> if ( k e. A , B , 1 ) ) ) ~~> y ) )
Theorem	prod0 11971	A product over the empty set is one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 5-Dec-2017.)
|- prod_ k e. (/) A = 1
Theorem	prod1dc 11972*	Any product of one over a valid set is one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 5-Aug-2024.)
|- ( ( ( M e. ZZ /\ A C_ ( ZZ>= ` M ) /\ A. j e. ( ZZ>= ` M )DECID j e. A ) \/ A e. Fin ) -> prod_ k e. A 1 = 1 )
Theorem	prodfct 11973*	A lemma to facilitate conversions from the function form to the class-variable form of a product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2017.)
|- ( A. k e. A B e. CC -> prod_ j e. A ( ( k e. A |-> B ) ` j ) = prod_ k e. A B )
Theorem	fprodf1o 11974*	Re-index a finite product using a bijection. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 7-Dec-2017.)
|- ( k = G -> B = D )   &    |- ( ph -> C e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> F : C -1-1-onto-> A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ n e. C ) -> ( F ` n ) = G )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A B = prod_ n e. C D )
Theorem	prodssdc 11975*	Change the index set to a subset in an upper integer product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 11-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 6-Aug-2024.)
|- ( ph -> A C_ B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> C e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> E. n e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) E. y ( y # 0 /\ seq n ( x. , ( k e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) |-> if ( k e. B , C , 1 ) ) ) ~~> y ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. j e. ( ZZ>= ` M )DECID j e. A )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( B \ A ) ) -> C = 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> B C_ ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   &    |- ( ph -> A. j e. ( ZZ>= ` M )DECID j e. B )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A C = prod_ k e. B C )
Theorem	fprodssdc 11976*	Change the index set to a subset in a finite sum. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A C_ B )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> C e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> A. j e. B DECID j e. A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( B \ A ) ) -> C = 1 )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. Fin )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A C = prod_ k e. B C )
Theorem	fprodmul 11977*	The product of two finite products. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A ( B x. C ) = ( prod_ k e. A B x. prod_ k e. A C ) )
Theorem	prodsnf 11978*	A product of a singleton is the term. A version of prodsn 11979 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Apr-2020.)
|- F/_ k B   &    |- ( k = M -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ( M e. V /\ B e. CC ) -> prod_ k e. { M } A = B )
Theorem	prodsn 11979*	A product of a singleton is the term. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
|- ( k = M -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ( M e. V /\ B e. CC ) -> prod_ k e. { M } A = B )
Theorem	fprod1 11980*	A finite product of only one term is the term itself. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
|- ( k = M -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ( M e. ZZ /\ B e. CC ) -> prod_ k e. ( M ... M ) A = B )
Theorem	climprod1 11981	The limit of a product over one. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 15-Dec-2017.)
|- Z = ( ZZ>= ` M )   &    |- ( ph -> M e. ZZ )   =>    |- ( ph -> seq M ( x. , ( Z X. { 1 } ) ) ~~> 1 )
Theorem	fprodsplitdc 11982*	Split a finite product into two parts. New proofs should use fprodsplit 11983 which is the same but with one fewer hypothesis. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Dec-2017.) (New usage is discouraged.)
|- ( ph -> ( A i^i B ) = (/) )   &    |- ( ph -> U = ( A u. B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> U e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> A. j e. U DECID j e. A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. U ) -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. U C = ( prod_ k e. A C x. prod_ k e. B C ) )
Theorem	fprodsplit 11983*	Split a finite product into two parts. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> ( A i^i B ) = (/) )   &    |- ( ph -> U = ( A u. B ) )   &    |- ( ph -> U e. Fin )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. U ) -> C e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. U C = ( prod_ k e. A C x. prod_ k e. B C ) )
Theorem	fprodm1 11984*	Separate out the last term in a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 16-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( M ... N ) ) -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( k = N -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. ( M ... N ) A = ( prod_ k e. ( M ... ( N - 1 ) ) A x. B ) )
Theorem	fprod1p 11985*	Separate out the first term in a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( M ... N ) ) -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( k = M -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. ( M ... N ) A = ( B x. prod_ k e. ( ( M + 1 ) ... N ) A ) )
Theorem	fprodp1 11986*	Multiply in the last term in a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 24-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( M ... ( N + 1 ) ) ) -> A e. CC )   &    |- ( k = ( N + 1 ) -> A = B )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. ( M ... ( N + 1 ) ) A = ( prod_ k e. ( M ... N ) A x. B ) )
Theorem	fprodm1s 11987*	Separate out the last term in a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( M ... N ) ) -> A e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. ( M ... N ) A = ( prod_ k e. ( M ... ( N - 1 ) ) A x. [_ N / k ]_ A ) )
Theorem	fprodp1s 11988*	Multiply in the last term in a finite product. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 27-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> N e. ( ZZ>= ` M ) )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. ( M ... ( N + 1 ) ) ) -> A e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. ( M ... ( N + 1 ) ) A = ( prod_ k e. ( M ... N ) A x. [_ ( N + 1 ) / k ]_ A ) )
Theorem	prodsns 11989*	A product of the singleton is the term. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 25-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ( M e. V /\ [_ M / k ]_ A e. CC ) -> prod_ k e. { M } A = [_ M / k ]_ A )
Theorem	fprodunsn 11990*	Multiply in an additional term in a finite product. See also fprodsplitsn 12019 which is the same but with a F/ k ph hypothesis in place of the distinct variable condition between ph and k. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Aug-2024.)
|- F/_ k D   &    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ph -> B e. V )   &    |- ( ph -> -. B e. A )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> C e. CC )   &    |- ( ph -> D e. CC )   &    |- ( k = B -> C = D )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. ( A u. { B } ) C = ( prod_ k e. A C x. D ) )
Theorem	fprodcl2lem 11991*	Finite product closure lemma. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 17-Aug-2024.)
|- ( ph -> S C_ CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x x. y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> A =/= (/) )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A B e. S )
Theorem	fprodcllem 11992*	Finite product closure lemma. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> S C_ CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x x. y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> 1 e. S )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A B e. S )
Theorem	fprodcl 11993*	Closure of a finite product of complex numbers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. CC )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A B e. CC )
Theorem	fprodrecl 11994*	Closure of a finite product of real numbers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. RR )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A B e. RR )
Theorem	fprodzcl 11995*	Closure of a finite product of integers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. ZZ )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A B e. ZZ )
Theorem	fprodnncl 11996*	Closure of a finite product of positive integers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. NN )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A B e. NN )
Theorem	fprodrpcl 11997*	Closure of a finite product of positive reals. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. RR+ )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A B e. RR+ )
Theorem	fprodnn0cl 11998*	Closure of a finite product of nonnegative integers. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 14-Dec-2017.)
|- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. NN0 )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A B e. NN0 )
Theorem	fprodcllemf 11999*	Finite product closure lemma. A version of fprodcllem 11992 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Apr-2020.)
|- F/ k ph   &    |- ( ph -> S C_ CC )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ ( x e. S /\ y e. S ) ) -> ( x x. y ) e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. S )   &    |- ( ph -> 1 e. S )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A B e. S )
Theorem	fprodreclf 12000*	Closure of a finite product of real numbers. A version of fprodrecl 11994 using bound-variable hypotheses instead of distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Glauco Siliprandi, 5-Apr-2020.)
|- F/ k ph   &    |- ( ph -> A e. Fin )   &    |- ( ( ph /\ k e. A ) -> B e. RR )   =>    |- ( ph -> prod_ k e. A B e. RR )