Theorem caserel 7378

Description: The "case" construction of two relations is a relation, with bounds on its domain and codomain. Typically, the "case" construction is used when both relations have a common codomain. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Jul-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
caserel	⊢ case(𝑅, 𝑆) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆))

Proof of Theorem caserel

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-case 7375	. 2 ⊢ case(𝑅, 𝑆) = ((𝑅 ∘ ◡inl) ∪ (𝑆 ∘ ◡inr))
2		cocnvss 5288	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ∘ ◡inl) ⊆ (ran (inl ↾ dom 𝑅) × ran (𝑅 ↾ dom inl))
3		inlresf1 7352	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (inl ↾ dom 𝑅):dom 𝑅–1-1→(dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆)
4		f1rn 5574	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((inl ↾ dom 𝑅):dom 𝑅–1-1→(dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) → ran (inl ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆))
5	3, 4	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran (inl ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆)
6		resss 5062	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑅 ↾ dom inl) ⊆ 𝑅
7		rnss 4987	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑅 ↾ dom inl) ⊆ 𝑅 → ran (𝑅 ↾ dom inl) ⊆ ran 𝑅)
8	6, 7	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ran (𝑅 ↾ dom inl) ⊆ ran 𝑅
9		ssun1 3382	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ran 𝑅 ⊆ (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)
10	8, 9	sstri 3247	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran (𝑅 ↾ dom inl) ⊆ (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)
11		xpss12 4857	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((ran (inl ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) ∧ ran (𝑅 ↾ dom inl) ⊆ (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)) → (ran (inl ↾ dom 𝑅) × ran (𝑅 ↾ dom inl)) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)))
12	5, 10, 11	mp2an 426	. . . 4 ⊢ (ran (inl ↾ dom 𝑅) × ran (𝑅 ↾ dom inl)) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆))
13	2, 12	sstri 3247	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∘ ◡inl) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆))
14		cocnvss 5288	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑆 ∘ ◡inr) ⊆ (ran (inr ↾ dom 𝑆) × ran (𝑆 ↾ dom inr))
15		inrresf1 7353	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (inr ↾ dom 𝑆):dom 𝑆–1-1→(dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆)
16		f1rn 5574	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((inr ↾ dom 𝑆):dom 𝑆–1-1→(dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) → ran (inr ↾ dom 𝑆) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆))
17	15, 16	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran (inr ↾ dom 𝑆) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆)
18		resss 5062	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑆 ↾ dom inr) ⊆ 𝑆
19		rnss 4987	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑆 ↾ dom inr) ⊆ 𝑆 → ran (𝑆 ↾ dom inr) ⊆ ran 𝑆)
20	18, 19	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ran (𝑆 ↾ dom inr) ⊆ ran 𝑆
21		ssun2 3383	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ran 𝑆 ⊆ (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)
22	20, 21	sstri 3247	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran (𝑆 ↾ dom inr) ⊆ (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)
23		xpss12 4857	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((ran (inr ↾ dom 𝑆) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) ∧ ran (𝑆 ↾ dom inr) ⊆ (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)) → (ran (inr ↾ dom 𝑆) × ran (𝑆 ↾ dom inr)) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)))
24	17, 22, 23	mp2an 426	. . . 4 ⊢ (ran (inr ↾ dom 𝑆) × ran (𝑆 ↾ dom inr)) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆))
25	14, 24	sstri 3247	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∘ ◡inr) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆))
26	13, 25	unssi 3394	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ ◡inl) ∪ (𝑆 ∘ ◡inr)) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆))
27	1, 26	eqsstri 3270	1 ⊢ case(𝑅, 𝑆) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆))

Syntax hints:   ∪ cun 3209   ⊆ wss 3211   × cxp 4747  ^◡ccnv 4748  dom cdm 4749  ran crn 4750   ↾ cres 4751   ∘ ccom 4753  –1-1→wf1 5349   ⊔ cdju 7328  inlcinl 7336  inrcinr 7337  casecdjucase 7374

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-13 2205  ax-14 2206  ax-ext 2214  ax-sep 4228  ax-nul 4236  ax-pow 4287  ax-pr 4322  ax-un 4554

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1007  df-tru 1401  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1812  df-eu 2083  df-mo 2084  df-clab 2219  df-cleq 2225  df-clel 2228  df-nfc 2373  df-ral 2525  df-rex 2526  df-v 2815  df-sbc 3043  df-dif 3213  df-un 3215  df-in 3217  df-ss 3224  df-nul 3509  df-pw 3671  df-sn 3695  df-pr 3696  df-op 3698  df-uni 3915  df-br 4110  df-opab 4172  df-mpt 4173  df-tr 4209  df-id 4414  df-iord 4487  df-on 4489  df-suc 4492  df-xp 4755  df-rel 4756  df-cnv 4757  df-co 4758  df-dm 4759  df-rn 4760  df-res 4761  df-iota 5312  df-fun 5354  df-fn 5355  df-f 5356  df-f1 5357  df-fo 5358  df-f1o 5359  df-fv 5360  df-1st 6334  df-2nd 6335  df-1o 6647  df-dju 7329  df-inl 7338  df-inr 7339  df-case 7375

This theorem is referenced by:  casef  7379