Theorem caserel 7427

Description: The "case" construction of two relations is a relation, with bounds on its domain and codomain. Typically, the "case" construction is used when both relations have a common codomain. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Jul-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
caserel	⊢ case(𝑅, 𝑆) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆))

Proof of Theorem caserel

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-case 7424	. 2 ⊢ case(𝑅, 𝑆) = ((𝑅 ∘ ◡inl) ∪ (𝑆 ∘ ◡inr))
2		cocnvss 5313	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ∘ ◡inl) ⊆ (ran (inl ↾ dom 𝑅) × ran (𝑅 ↾ dom inl))
3		inlresf1 7401	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (inl ↾ dom 𝑅):dom 𝑅–1-1→(dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆)
4		f1rn 5599	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((inl ↾ dom 𝑅):dom 𝑅–1-1→(dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) → ran (inl ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆))
5	3, 4	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran (inl ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆)
6		resss 5087	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑅 ↾ dom inl) ⊆ 𝑅
7		rnss 5012	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑅 ↾ dom inl) ⊆ 𝑅 → ran (𝑅 ↾ dom inl) ⊆ ran 𝑅)
8	6, 7	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ran (𝑅 ↾ dom inl) ⊆ ran 𝑅
9		ssun1 3392	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ran 𝑅 ⊆ (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)
10	8, 9	sstri 3257	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran (𝑅 ↾ dom inl) ⊆ (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)
11		xpss12 4882	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((ran (inl ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) ∧ ran (𝑅 ↾ dom inl) ⊆ (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)) → (ran (inl ↾ dom 𝑅) × ran (𝑅 ↾ dom inl)) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)))
12	5, 10, 11	mp2an 430	. . . 4 ⊢ (ran (inl ↾ dom 𝑅) × ran (𝑅 ↾ dom inl)) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆))
13	2, 12	sstri 3257	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∘ ◡inl) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆))
14		cocnvss 5313	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑆 ∘ ◡inr) ⊆ (ran (inr ↾ dom 𝑆) × ran (𝑆 ↾ dom inr))
15		inrresf1 7402	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (inr ↾ dom 𝑆):dom 𝑆–1-1→(dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆)
16		f1rn 5599	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((inr ↾ dom 𝑆):dom 𝑆–1-1→(dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) → ran (inr ↾ dom 𝑆) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆))
17	15, 16	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran (inr ↾ dom 𝑆) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆)
18		resss 5087	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑆 ↾ dom inr) ⊆ 𝑆
19		rnss 5012	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑆 ↾ dom inr) ⊆ 𝑆 → ran (𝑆 ↾ dom inr) ⊆ ran 𝑆)
20	18, 19	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ran (𝑆 ↾ dom inr) ⊆ ran 𝑆
21		ssun2 3393	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ran 𝑆 ⊆ (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)
22	20, 21	sstri 3257	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran (𝑆 ↾ dom inr) ⊆ (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)
23		xpss12 4882	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((ran (inr ↾ dom 𝑆) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) ∧ ran (𝑆 ↾ dom inr) ⊆ (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)) → (ran (inr ↾ dom 𝑆) × ran (𝑆 ↾ dom inr)) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)))
24	17, 22, 23	mp2an 430	. . . 4 ⊢ (ran (inr ↾ dom 𝑆) × ran (𝑆 ↾ dom inr)) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆))
25	14, 24	sstri 3257	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∘ ◡inr) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆))
26	13, 25	unssi 3404	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ ◡inl) ∪ (𝑆 ∘ ◡inr)) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆))
27	1, 26	eqsstri 3280	1 ⊢ case(𝑅, 𝑆) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ∪ cun 3218   ⊆ wss 3220   × cxp 4772  ^◡ccnv 4773  dom cdm 4774  ran crn 4775   ↾ cres 4776   ∘ ccom 4778  –1-1→wf1 5374   ⊔ cdju 7377  inlcinl 7385  inrcinr 7386  casecdjucase 7423

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 623  ax-in2 624  ax-io 721  ax-5 1500  ax-7 1501  ax-gen 1502  ax-ie1 1546  ax-ie2 1547  ax-8 1557  ax-10 1558  ax-11 1559  ax-i12 1560  ax-bndl 1562  ax-4 1563  ax-17 1579  ax-i9 1583  ax-ial 1587  ax-i5r 1588  ax-14 2212  ax-ext 2220  ax-sep 4249  ax-nul 4259  ax-pow 4311  ax-pr 4346  ax-un 4578

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1011  df-tru 1405  df-nf 1514  df-sb 1816  df-eu 2089  df-mo 2090  df-clab 2225  df-cleq 2231  df-clel 2234  df-nfc 2381  df-ral 2533  df-rex 2534  df-v 2823  df-sbc 3052  df-dif 3222  df-un 3224  df-in 3226  df-ss 3233  df-nul 3521  df-pw 3690  df-sn 3715  df-pr 3716  df-op 3718  df-uni 3936  df-br 4131  df-opab 4193  df-mpt 4194  df-tr 4230  df-id 4438  df-iord 4511  df-on 4513  df-suc 4516  df-xp 4780  df-rel 4781  df-cnv 4782  df-co 4783  df-dm 4784  df-rn 4785  df-res 4786  df-iota 5337  df-fun 5379  df-fn 5380  df-f 5381  df-f1 5382  df-fo 5383  df-f1o 5384  df-fv 5385  df-1st 6374  df-2nd 6375  df-1o 6687  df-dju 7378  df-inl 7387  df-inr 7388  df-case 7424

This theorem is used by:  casef  7428