Theorem caserel 6972

Description: The "case" construction of two relations is a relation, with bounds on its domain and codomain. Typically, the "case" construction is used when both relations have a common codomain. (Contributed by BJ, 10-Jul-2022.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
caserel	⊢ case(𝑅, 𝑆) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆))

Proof of Theorem caserel

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-case 6969	. 2 ⊢ case(𝑅, 𝑆) = ((𝑅 ∘ ◡inl) ∪ (𝑆 ∘ ◡inr))
2		cocnvss 5064	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑅 ∘ ◡inl) ⊆ (ran (inl ↾ dom 𝑅) × ran (𝑅 ↾ dom inl))
3		inlresf1 6946	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (inl ↾ dom 𝑅):dom 𝑅–1-1→(dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆)
4		f1rn 5329	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((inl ↾ dom 𝑅):dom 𝑅–1-1→(dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) → ran (inl ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆))
5	3, 4	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran (inl ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆)
6		resss 4843	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑅 ↾ dom inl) ⊆ 𝑅
7		rnss 4769	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑅 ↾ dom inl) ⊆ 𝑅 → ran (𝑅 ↾ dom inl) ⊆ ran 𝑅)
8	6, 7	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ran (𝑅 ↾ dom inl) ⊆ ran 𝑅
9		ssun1 3239	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ran 𝑅 ⊆ (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)
10	8, 9	sstri 3106	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran (𝑅 ↾ dom inl) ⊆ (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)
11		xpss12 4646	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((ran (inl ↾ dom 𝑅) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) ∧ ran (𝑅 ↾ dom inl) ⊆ (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)) → (ran (inl ↾ dom 𝑅) × ran (𝑅 ↾ dom inl)) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)))
12	5, 10, 11	mp2an 422	. . . 4 ⊢ (ran (inl ↾ dom 𝑅) × ran (𝑅 ↾ dom inl)) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆))
13	2, 12	sstri 3106	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∘ ◡inl) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆))
14		cocnvss 5064	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑆 ∘ ◡inr) ⊆ (ran (inr ↾ dom 𝑆) × ran (𝑆 ↾ dom inr))
15		inrresf1 6947	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (inr ↾ dom 𝑆):dom 𝑆–1-1→(dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆)
16		f1rn 5329	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((inr ↾ dom 𝑆):dom 𝑆–1-1→(dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) → ran (inr ↾ dom 𝑆) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆))
17	15, 16	ax-mp 5	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran (inr ↾ dom 𝑆) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆)
18		resss 4843	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑆 ↾ dom inr) ⊆ 𝑆
19		rnss 4769	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑆 ↾ dom inr) ⊆ 𝑆 → ran (𝑆 ↾ dom inr) ⊆ ran 𝑆)
20	18, 19	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ran (𝑆 ↾ dom inr) ⊆ ran 𝑆
21		ssun2 3240	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ran 𝑆 ⊆ (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)
22	20, 21	sstri 3106	. . . . 5 ⊢ ran (𝑆 ↾ dom inr) ⊆ (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)
23		xpss12 4646	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((ran (inr ↾ dom 𝑆) ⊆ (dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) ∧ ran (𝑆 ↾ dom inr) ⊆ (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)) → (ran (inr ↾ dom 𝑆) × ran (𝑆 ↾ dom inr)) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆)))
24	17, 22, 23	mp2an 422	. . . 4 ⊢ (ran (inr ↾ dom 𝑆) × ran (𝑆 ↾ dom inr)) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆))
25	14, 24	sstri 3106	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∘ ◡inr) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆))
26	13, 25	unssi 3251	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∘ ◡inl) ∪ (𝑆 ∘ ◡inr)) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆))
27	1, 26	eqsstri 3129	1 ⊢ case(𝑅, 𝑆) ⊆ ((dom 𝑅 ⊔ dom 𝑆) × (ran 𝑅 ∪ ran 𝑆))

Syntax hints:   ∪ cun 3069   ⊆ wss 3071   × cxp 4537  ^◡ccnv 4538  dom cdm 4539  ran crn 4540   ↾ cres 4541   ∘ ccom 4543  –1-1→wf1 5120   ⊔ cdju 6922  inlcinl 6930  inrcinr 6931  casecdjucase 6968

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 105  ax-ia2 106  ax-ia3 107  ax-in1 603  ax-in2 604  ax-io 698  ax-5 1423  ax-7 1424  ax-gen 1425  ax-ie1 1469  ax-ie2 1470  ax-8 1482  ax-10 1483  ax-11 1484  ax-i12 1485  ax-bndl 1486  ax-4 1487  ax-13 1491  ax-14 1492  ax-17 1506  ax-i9 1510  ax-ial 1514  ax-i5r 1515  ax-ext 2121  ax-sep 4046  ax-nul 4054  ax-pow 4098  ax-pr 4131  ax-un 4355

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 116  df-3an 964  df-tru 1334  df-nf 1437  df-sb 1736  df-eu 2002  df-mo 2003  df-clab 2126  df-cleq 2132  df-clel 2135  df-nfc 2270  df-ral 2421  df-rex 2422  df-v 2688  df-sbc 2910  df-dif 3073  df-un 3075  df-in 3077  df-ss 3084  df-nul 3364  df-pw 3512  df-sn 3533  df-pr 3534  df-op 3536  df-uni 3737  df-br 3930  df-opab 3990  df-mpt 3991  df-tr 4027  df-id 4215  df-iord 4288  df-on 4290  df-suc 4293  df-xp 4545  df-rel 4546  df-cnv 4547  df-co 4548  df-dm 4549  df-rn 4550  df-res 4551  df-iota 5088  df-fun 5125  df-fn 5126  df-f 5127  df-f1 5128  df-fo 5129  df-f1o 5130  df-fv 5131  df-1st 6038  df-2nd 6039  df-1o 6313  df-dju 6923  df-inl 6932  df-inr 6933  df-case 6969

This theorem is referenced by:  casef  6973