| Intuitionistic Logic Explorer Theorem List (p. 72 of 169) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > ILE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | xpmapenlem 7101* | Lemma for xpmapen 7102. (Contributed by NM, 1-May-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ (1st ‘(𝑥‘𝑧))) & ⊢ 𝑅 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ (2nd ‘(𝑥‘𝑧))) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 ↦ 〈((1st ‘𝑦)‘𝑧), ((2nd ‘𝑦)‘𝑧)〉) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ↑𝑚 𝐶) ≈ ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐶) × (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | xpmapen 7102 | Equinumerosity law for set exponentiation of a Cartesian product. Exercise 4.47 of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM, 23-Feb-2004.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) ↑𝑚 𝐶) ≈ ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐶) × (𝐵 ↑𝑚 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | mapunen 7103 | Equinumerosity law for set exponentiation of a disjoint union. Exercise 4.45 of [Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by NM, 23-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → (𝐶 ↑𝑚 (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵)) ≈ ((𝐶 ↑𝑚 𝐴) × (𝐶 ↑𝑚 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | ssenen 7104* | Equinumerosity of equinumerous subsets of a set. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐶)} ≈ {𝑥 ∣ (𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝐶)}) | ||
| Theorem | phplem1 7105 | Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. If we join a natural number to itself minus an element, we end up with its successor minus the same element. (Contributed by NM, 25-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ({𝐴} ∪ (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵})) = (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵})) | ||
| Theorem | phplem2 7106 | Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is equinumerous to its successor minus one of its elements. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵})) | ||
| Theorem | phplem3 7107 | Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is equinumerous to its successor minus any element of the successor. For a version without the redundant hypotheses, see phplem3g 7109. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵})) | ||
| Theorem | phplem4 7108 | Lemma for Pigeonhole Principle. Equinumerosity of successors implies equinumerosity of the original natural numbers. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | phplem3g 7109 | A natural number is equinumerous to its successor minus any element of the successor. Version of phplem3 7107 with unnecessary hypotheses removed. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ suc 𝐴) → 𝐴 ≈ (suc 𝐴 ∖ {𝐵})) | ||
| Theorem | nneneq 7110 | Two equinumerous natural numbers are equal. Proposition 10.20 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90 and its converse. Also compare Corollary 6E of [Enderton] p. 136. (Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | php5 7111 | A natural number is not equinumerous to its successor. Corollary 10.21(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 90. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2004.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → ¬ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | snnen2og 7112 | A singleton {𝐴} is never equinumerous with the ordinal number 2. If 𝐴 is a proper class, see snnen2oprc 7113. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ¬ {𝐴} ≈ 2o) | ||
| Theorem | snnen2oprc 7113 | A singleton {𝐴} is never equinumerous with the ordinal number 2. If 𝐴 is a set, see snnen2og 7112. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ {𝐴} ≈ 2o) | ||
| Theorem | 1nen2 7114 | One and two are not equinumerous. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Jan-2022.) |
| ⊢ ¬ 1o ≈ 2o | ||
| Theorem | phplem4dom 7115 | Dominance of successors implies dominance of the original natural numbers. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 ≼ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | php5dom 7116 | A natural number does not dominate its successor. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → ¬ suc 𝐴 ≼ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | nndomo 7117 | Cardinal ordering agrees with natural number ordering. Example 3 of [Enderton] p. 146. (Contributed by NM, 17-Jun-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | 1ndom2 7118 | Two is not dominated by one. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Jan-2026.) |
| ⊢ ¬ 2o ≼ 1o | ||
| Theorem | phpm 7119* | Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is not equinumerous to a proper subset of itself. By "proper subset" here we mean that there is an element which is in the natural number and not in the subset, or in symbols ∃𝑥𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) (which is stronger than not being equal in the absence of excluded middle). Theorem (Pigeonhole Principle) of [Enderton] p. 134. The theorem is so-called because you can't put n + 1 pigeons into n holes (if each hole holds only one pigeon). The proof consists of lemmas phplem1 7105 through phplem4 7108, nneneq 7110, and this final piece of the proof. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-1998.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)) → ¬ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | phpelm 7120 | Pigeonhole Principle. A natural number is not equinumerous to an element of itself. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | phplem4on 7121 | Equinumerosity of successors of an ordinal and a natural number implies equinumerosity of the originals. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → (suc 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | fict 7122 | A finite set is dominated by ω. Also see finct 7406. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 27-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝐴 ≼ ω) | ||
| Theorem | fidceq 7123 | Equality of members of a finite set is decidable. This may be counterintuitive: cannot any two sets be elements of a finite set? Well, to show, for example, that {𝐵, 𝐶} is finite would require showing it is equinumerous to 1o or to 2o but to show that you'd need to know 𝐵 = 𝐶 or ¬ 𝐵 = 𝐶, respectively. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → DECID 𝐵 = 𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | fidifsnen 7124 | All decrements of a finite set are equinumerous. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑋 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑋 ∖ {𝐴}) ≈ (𝑋 ∖ {𝐵})) | ||
| Theorem | fidifsnid 7125 | If we remove a single element from a finite set then put it back in, we end up with the original finite set. This strengthens difsnss 3839 from subset to equality when the set is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 9-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}) ∪ {𝐵}) = 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | nnfi 7126 | Natural numbers are finite sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | enfi 7127 | Equinumerous sets have the same finiteness. (Contributed by NM, 22-Aug-2008.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ 𝐵 ∈ Fin)) | ||
| Theorem | enfii 7128 | A set equinumerous to a finite set is finite. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | ssfilem 7129* | Lemma for ssfiexmid 7130. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜑} ∈ Fin ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | ssfiexmid 7130* | If any subset of a finite set is finite, excluded middle follows. One direction of Theorem 2.1 of [Bauer], p. 485. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → 𝑦 ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | ssfilemd 7131* | Lemma for ssfiexmidt 7132. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑧 ∈ {∅} ∣ 𝜓} ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝜓 ∨ ¬ 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | ssfiexmidt 7132* | If any subset of a finite set is finite, excluded middle follows. One direction of Theorem 2.1 of [Bauer], p. 485. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 19-May-2020.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → 𝑦 ∈ Fin) → (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | infiexmid 7133* | If the intersection of any finite set and any other set is finite, excluded middle follows. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ Fin → (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | domfiexmid 7134* | If any set dominated by a finite set is finite, excluded middle follows. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑦 ≼ 𝑥) → 𝑦 ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | dif1en 7135 | If a set 𝐴 is equinumerous to the successor of a natural number 𝑀, then 𝐴 with an element removed is equinumerous to 𝑀. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Aug-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≈ suc 𝑀 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝑋}) ≈ 𝑀) | ||
| Theorem | dif1enen 7136 | Subtracting one element from each of two equinumerous finite sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Jun-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ∖ {𝐶}) ≈ (𝐵 ∖ {𝐷})) | ||
| Theorem | fiunsnnn 7137 | Adding one element to a finite set which is equinumerous to a natural number. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (V ∖ 𝐴)) ∧ (𝑁 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝑁)) → (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵}) ≈ suc 𝑁) | ||
| Theorem | php5fin 7138 | A finite set is not equinumerous to a set which adds one element. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (V ∖ 𝐴)) → ¬ 𝐴 ≈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵})) | ||
| Theorem | fisbth 7139 | Schroeder-Bernstein Theorem for finite sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) ∧ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | 0fi 7140 | The empty set is finite. (Contributed by FL, 14-Jul-2008.) |
| ⊢ ∅ ∈ Fin | ||
| Theorem | fin0 7141* | A nonempty finite set has at least one element. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝐴 ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | fin0or 7142* | A finite set is either empty or inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝐴 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | diffitest 7143* | If subtracting any set from a finite set gives a finite set, any proposition of the form ¬ 𝜑 is decidable. This is not a proof of full excluded middle, but it is close enough to show we won't be able to prove 𝐴 ∈ Fin → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∈ Fin. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ ∀𝑎 ∈ Fin ∀𝑏(𝑎 ∖ 𝑏) ∈ Fin ⇒ ⊢ (¬ 𝜑 ∨ ¬ ¬ 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | findcard 7144* | Schema for induction on the cardinality of a finite set. The inductive hypothesis is that the result is true on the given set with any one element removed. The result is then proven to be true for all finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∖ {𝑧}) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ Fin → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 𝜒 → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | findcard2 7145* | Schema for induction on the cardinality of a finite set. The inductive step shows that the result is true if one more element is added to the set. The result is then proven to be true for all finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 8-Jul-2010.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ Fin → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | findcard2s 7146* | Variation of findcard2 7145 requiring that the element added in the induction step not be a member of the original set. (Contributed by Paul Chapman, 30-Nov-2012.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ 𝜓 & ⊢ ((𝑦 ∈ Fin ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦) → (𝜒 → 𝜃)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin → 𝜏) | ||
| Theorem | findcard2d 7147* | Deduction version of findcard2 7145. If you also need 𝑦 ∈ Fin (which doesn't come for free due to ssfiexmid 7130), use findcard2sd 7148 instead. (Contributed by SO, 16-Jul-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑦))) → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | findcard2sd 7148* | Deduction form of finite set induction . (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 14-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = (𝑦 ∪ {𝑧}) → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜂)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜒) & ⊢ (((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Fin) ∧ (𝑦 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝑦))) → (𝜃 → 𝜏)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝜂) | ||
| Theorem | diffisn 7149 | Subtracting a singleton from a finite set produces a finite set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ {𝐵}) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | diffifi 7150 | Subtracting one finite set from another produces a finite set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 8-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | infnfi 7151 | An infinite set is not finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ (ω ≼ 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | ominf 7152 | The set of natural numbers is not finite. Although we supply this theorem because we can, the more natural way to express "ω is infinite" is ω ≼ ω which is an instance of domrefg 7005. (Contributed by NM, 2-Jun-1998.) |
| ⊢ ¬ ω ∈ Fin | ||
| Theorem | isinfinf 7153* | An infinite set contains subsets of arbitrarily large finite cardinality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jun-2022.) |
| ⊢ (ω ≼ 𝐴 → ∀𝑛 ∈ ω ∃𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≈ 𝑛)) | ||
| Theorem | ac6sfi 7154* | Existence of a choice function for finite sets. (Contributed by Jeff Hankins, 26-Jun-2009.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑦 = (𝑓‘𝑥) → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝜑) → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓)) | ||
| Theorem | fidcen 7155 | Equinumerosity of finite sets is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 10-Feb-2026.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → DECID 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | tridc 7156* | A trichotomous order is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝐵𝑅𝐶) | ||
| Theorem | fimax2gtrilemstep 7157* | Lemma for fimax2gtri 7158. The induction step. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑉 ∈ 𝑈) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑈 ¬ 𝑍𝑅𝑦) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ (𝑈 ∪ {𝑉}) ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | fimax2gtri 7158* | A finite set has a maximum under a trichotomous order. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-Sep-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 Po 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦𝑅𝑥)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥𝑅𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | finexdc 7159* | Decidability of existence, over a finite set and defined by a decidable proposition. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 12-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝜑) → DECID ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | dfrex2fin 7160* | Relationship between universal and existential quantifiers over a finite set. Remark in Section 2.2.1 of [Pierik], p. 8. Although Pierik does not mention the decidability condition explicitly, it does say "only finitely many x to check" which means there must be some way of checking each value of x. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Jul-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝜑) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ ¬ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝜑)) | ||
| Theorem | elssdc 7161* | Membership in a finite subset of a set with decidable equality is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 11-Feb-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | eqsndc 7162* | Decidability of equality between a finite subset of a set with decidable equality, and a singleton whose element is an element of the larger set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Feb-2026.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → DECID 𝐴 = {𝑋}) | ||
| Theorem | infm 7163* | An infinite set is inhabited. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 18-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ (ω ≼ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | infn0 7164 | An infinite set is not empty. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-2004.) |
| ⊢ (ω ≼ 𝐴 → 𝐴 ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | inffiexmid 7165* | If any given set is either finite or infinite, excluded middle follows. For another example, 𝒫 1o is not infinite, by pw1ninf 16752, but also cannot be shown to be finite by pw1fin 7169. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Jun-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ Fin ∨ ω ≼ 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | en2eqpr 7166 | Building a set with two elements. (Contributed by FL, 11-Aug-2008.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐶 ≈ 2o ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝐴 ≠ 𝐵 → 𝐶 = {𝐴, 𝐵})) | ||
| Theorem | exmidpw 7167 | Excluded middle is equivalent to the power set of 1o having two elements. Remark of [PradicBrown2022], p. 2. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 30-Jun-2022.) |
| ⊢ (EXMID ↔ 𝒫 1o ≈ 2o) | ||
| Theorem | exmidpweq 7168 | Excluded middle is equivalent to the power set of 1o being 2o. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Jul-2024.) |
| ⊢ (EXMID ↔ 𝒫 1o = 2o) | ||
| Theorem | pw1fin 7169 | Excluded middle is equivalent to the power set of 1o being finite. (Contributed by SN and Jim Kingdon, 7-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (EXMID ↔ 𝒫 1o ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | pw1dc0el 7170 | Another equivalent of excluded middle, which is a mere reformulation of the definition. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 1oDECID ∅ ∈ 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | exmidpw2en 7171 |
The power set of a set being equinumerous to set exponentiation with a
base of ordinal 2o is equivalent to
excluded middle. This is
Metamath 100 proof #52. The forward direction uses excluded middle
expressed as EXMID to show this
equinumerosity.
The reverse direction is the one which establishes that power set being equinumerous to set exponentiation implies excluded middle. This resolves the question of whether we will be able to prove this equinumerosity theorem in the negative. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Aug-2022.) |
| ⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥𝒫 𝑥 ≈ (2o ↑𝑚 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | ss1o0el1o 7172 | Reformulation of ss1o0el1 4309 using 1o instead of {∅}. (Contributed by BJ, 9-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 1o → (∅ ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = 1o)) | ||
| Theorem | pw1dc1 7173 | If, in the set of truth values (the powerset of 1o), equality to 1o is decidable, then excluded middle holds (and conversely). (Contributed by BJ and Jim Kingdon, 8-Aug-2024.) |
| ⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 1oDECID 𝑥 = 1o) | ||
| Theorem | fientri3 7174 | Trichotomy of dominance for finite sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 15-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | nnwetri 7175* | A natural number is well-ordered by E. More specifically, this order both satisfies We and is trichotomous. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Sep-2021.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ω → ( E We 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 E 𝑦 ∨ 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ 𝑦 E 𝑥))) | ||
| Theorem | onunsnss 7176 | Adding a singleton to create an ordinal. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵}) ∈ On) → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | unfiexmid 7177* | If the union of any two finite sets is finite, excluded middle follows. Remark 8.1.17 of [AczelRathjen], p. 74. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro and Jim Kingdon, 5-Mar-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑦 ∈ Fin) → (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 ∨ ¬ 𝜑) | ||
| Theorem | unsnfi 7178 | Adding a singleton to a finite set yields a finite set. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 3-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵}) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | unsnfidcex 7179 | The 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 condition in unsnfi 7178. This is intended to show that unsnfi 7178 without that condition would not be provable but it probably would need to be strengthened (for example, to imply included middle) to fully show that. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵}) ∈ Fin) → DECID ¬ 𝐵 ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | unsnfidcel 7180 | The ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 condition in unsnfi 7178. This is intended to show that unsnfi 7178 without that condition would not be provable but it probably would need to be strengthened (for example, to imply included middle) to fully show that. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 6-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐵}) ∈ Fin) → DECID ¬ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | unfidisj 7181 | The union of two disjoint finite sets is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 25-Feb-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | undifdcss 7182* | Union of complementary parts into whole and decidability. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jun-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵)) ↔ (𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | undifdc 7183* | Union of complementary parts into whole. This is a case where we can strengthen undifss 3589 from subset to equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 17-Jun-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | undiffi 7184 | Union of complementary parts into whole. This is a case where we can strengthen undifss 3589 from subset to equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Mar-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → 𝐴 = (𝐵 ∪ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵))) | ||
| Theorem | unfiin 7185 | The union of two finite sets is finite if their intersection is. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 2-Mar-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ Fin) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐵) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | prfidisj 7186 | A pair is finite if it consists of two unequal sets. For the case where 𝐴 = 𝐵, see snfig 7055. For the cases where one or both is a proper class, see prprc1 3799, prprc2 3800, or prprc 3801. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 31-May-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | prfidceq 7187* | A pair is finite if it consists of elements of a class with decidable equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐶 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐶 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | tpfidisj 7188 | A triple is finite if it consists of three unequal sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Oct-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐶) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | tpfidceq 7189* | A triple is finite if it consists of elements of a class with decidable equality. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Oct-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐷) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐷 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐷 DECID 𝑥 = 𝑦) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵, 𝐶} ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | fiintim 7190* |
If a class is closed under pairwise intersections, then it is closed
under nonempty finite intersections. The converse would appear to
require an additional condition, such as 𝑥 and 𝑦 not
being
equal, or 𝐴 having decidable equality.
This theorem is applicable to a topology, which (among other axioms) is closed under finite intersections. Some texts use a pairwise intersection and some texts use a finite intersection, but most topology texts assume excluded middle (in which case the two intersection properties would be equivalent). (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2002.) (Revised by Jim Kingdon, 14-Jan-2023.) |
| ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) ∈ 𝐴 → ∀𝑥((𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑥 ≠ ∅ ∧ 𝑥 ∈ Fin) → ∩ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | xpfi 7191 | The Cartesian product of two finite sets is finite. Lemma 8.1.16 of [AczelRathjen], p. 74. (Contributed by Jeff Madsen, 2-Sep-2009.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Mar-2015.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | imaf1fi 7192 | The image of a finite set under a one-to-one mapping is finite. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 28-Mar-2026.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Fin) → (𝐹 “ 𝑋) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | 3xpfi 7193 | The Cartesian product of three finite sets is a finite set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 11-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ Fin → ((𝑉 × 𝑉) × 𝑉) ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | fisseneq 7194 | A finite set is equal to its subset if they are equinumerous. (Contributed by FL, 11-Aug-2008.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐵 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | phpeqd 7195 | Corollary of the Pigeonhole Principle using equality. Strengthening of phpm 7119 expressed without negation. (Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | ssfirab 7196* | A subset of a finite set is finite if it is defined by a decidable property. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2022.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜓} ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | ssfidc 7197* | A subset of a finite set is finite if membership in the subset is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 27-May-2022.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | exmidssfi 7198* | Excluded middle is equivalent to any subset of a finite set being finite. Theorem 2.1 of [Bauer], p. 485. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 20-Mar-2026.) |
| ⊢ (EXMID ↔ ∀𝑥∀𝑦((𝑥 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) → 𝑦 ∈ Fin)) | ||
| Theorem | opabfi 7199* | Finiteness of an ordered pair abstraction which is a decidable subset of finite sets. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 16-Sep-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑆 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝜓)} & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ Fin) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 DECID 𝜓) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ Fin) | ||
| Theorem | infidc 7200* | The intersection of two sets is finite if one of them is and the other is decidable. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 24-May-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 DECID 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) ∈ Fin) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |