Theorem evlval 22415

Description: Value of the simple/same ring evaluation map. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Mar-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 12-Jun-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
evlval.q	⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐼 eval 𝑅)
evlval.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
evlval	⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑅)‘𝐵)

Proof of Theorem evlval

Dummy variables 𝑖 𝑟 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		evlval.q	. 2 ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐼 eval 𝑅)
2		oveq12 7430	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑖 = 𝐼 ∧ 𝑟 = 𝑅) → (𝑖 evalSub 𝑟) = (𝐼 evalSub 𝑅))
3		fveq2 6886	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑟 = 𝑅 → (Base‘𝑟) = (Base‘𝑅))
4		evlval.b	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)
5	3, 4	eqtr4di 2813	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑟 = 𝑅 → (Base‘𝑟) = 𝐵)
6	5	adantl 487	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝑖 = 𝐼 ∧ 𝑟 = 𝑅) → (Base‘𝑟) = 𝐵)
7	2, 6	fveq12d 6893	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑖 = 𝐼 ∧ 𝑟 = 𝑅) → ((𝑖 evalSub 𝑟)‘(Base‘𝑟)) = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑅)‘𝐵))
8		df-evl 22390	. . . 4 ⊢ eval = (𝑖 ∈ V, 𝑟 ∈ V ↦ ((𝑖 evalSub 𝑟)‘(Base‘𝑟)))
9		fvex 6899	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑅)‘𝐵) ∈ V
10	7, 8, 9	ovmpoa 7576	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐼 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ V) → (𝐼 eval 𝑅) = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑅)‘𝐵))
11	8	mpondm0 7662	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ (𝐼 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ V) → (𝐼 eval 𝑅) = ∅)
12		0fv 6927	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∅‘𝐵) = ∅
13	11, 12	eqtr4di 2813	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ (𝐼 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ V) → (𝐼 eval 𝑅) = (∅‘𝐵))
14		reldmevls 22399	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Rel dom evalSub
15	14	ovprc 7459	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ (𝐼 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ V) → (𝐼 evalSub 𝑅) = ∅)
16	15	fveq1d 6888	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ (𝐼 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ V) → ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑅)‘𝐵) = (∅‘𝐵))
17	13, 16	eqtr4d 2798	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ (𝐼 ∈ V ∧ 𝑅 ∈ V) → (𝐼 eval 𝑅) = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑅)‘𝐵))
18	10, 17	pm2.61i 184	. 2 ⊢ (𝐼 eval 𝑅) = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑅)‘𝐵)
19	1, 18	eqtri 2783	1 ⊢ 𝑄 = ((𝐼 evalSub 𝑅)‘𝐵)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  Vcvv 3450  ∅c0 4278  ‘cfv 6539  (class class class)co 7421  Basecbs 17393   evalSub ces 22387   eval cevl 22388

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pr 5390

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-ss 3896  df-dif 4047  df-in 4091  df-un 4151  df-nul 4279  df-if 4482  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-id 5545  df-xp 5656  df-rel 5657  df-cnv 5658  df-co 5659  df-dm 5660  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6541  df-fv 6547  df-ov 7424  df-oprab 7425  df-mpo 7426  df-evls 22389  df-evl 22390

This theorem is used by:  evlrhm  22416  evlsscasrng  22420  evlsvarsrng  22422  evlsevl  22447  evl1fval1lem  22654  evl1sca  22658  evl1var  22660  pf1rcl  22673  mpfpf1  22675  pf1ind  22679  evlextv  34221  mhphf4  43722  mzpmfp  43852