Theorem evl1fval1lem 22657

Description: Lemma for evl1fval1 22658. (Contributed by AV, 11-Sep-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
evl1fval1.q	⊢ 𝑄 = (eval1‘𝑅)
evl1fval1.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
evl1fval1lem	⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑄 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem evl1fval1lem

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2760	. . 3 ⊢ (eval1‘𝑅) = (eval1‘𝑅)
2		eqid 2760	. . 3 ⊢ (1o eval 𝑅) = (1o eval 𝑅)
3		evl1fval1.b	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)
4	1, 2, 3	evl1fval 22655	. 2 ⊢ (eval1‘𝑅) = ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (𝐵 ↑m 1o)) ↦ (𝑥 ∘ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (1o × {𝑦})))) ∘ (1o eval 𝑅))
5		evl1fval1.q	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑄 = (eval1‘𝑅)
6	5	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑄 = (eval1‘𝑅))
7	3	fvexi 6904	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
8	7	pwid 4580	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵
9		eqid 2760	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 evalSub1 𝐵) = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝐵)
10		eqid 2760	. . . . 5 ⊢ (1o evalSub 𝑅) = (1o evalSub 𝑅)
11	9, 10, 3	evls1fval 22646	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝑅 evalSub1 𝐵) = ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (𝐵 ↑m 1o)) ↦ (𝑥 ∘ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (1o × {𝑦})))) ∘ ((1o evalSub 𝑅)‘𝐵)))
12	8, 11	mpan2 704	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 evalSub1 𝐵) = ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (𝐵 ↑m 1o)) ↦ (𝑥 ∘ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (1o × {𝑦})))) ∘ ((1o evalSub 𝑅)‘𝐵)))
13	2, 3	evlval 22418	. . . . 5 ⊢ (1o eval 𝑅) = ((1o evalSub 𝑅)‘𝐵)
14	13	eqcomi 2769	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1o evalSub 𝑅)‘𝐵) = (1o eval 𝑅)
15	14	coeq2i 5839	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (𝐵 ↑m 1o)) ↦ (𝑥 ∘ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (1o × {𝑦})))) ∘ ((1o evalSub 𝑅)‘𝐵)) = ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (𝐵 ↑m 1o)) ↦ (𝑥 ∘ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (1o × {𝑦})))) ∘ (1o eval 𝑅))
16	12, 15	eqtrdi 2811	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 evalSub1 𝐵) = ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (𝐵 ↑m 1o)) ↦ (𝑥 ∘ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (1o × {𝑦})))) ∘ (1o eval 𝑅)))
17	4, 6, 16	3eqtr4a 2821	1 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑄 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝐵))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2144  𝒫 cpw 4556  {csn 4584   ↦ cmpt 5185   × cxp 5649   ∘ ccom 5655  ‘cfv 6543  (class class class)co 7424  1_oc1o 8476   ↑_m cmap 8854  Basecbs 17396   evalSub ces 22390   eval cevl 22391   evalSub₁ ces1 22640  eval₁ce1 22641

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1942  ax-6 1999  ax-7 2040  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5231  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5259  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7755

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2099  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3739  df-csb 3848  df-ss 3897  df-dif 4046  df-in 4090  df-un 4150  df-nul 4278  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4835  df-uni 4867  df-iun 4952  df-br 5103  df-opab 5167  df-mpt 5186  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-iota 6497  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-f1 6548  df-fo 6549  df-f1o 6550  df-fv 6551  df-ov 7427  df-oprab 7428  df-mpo 7429  df-evls 22392  df-evl 22393  df-evls1 22642  df-evl1 22643

This theorem is used by:  evl1fval1  22658