Theorem evl1fval1lem 22540

Description: Lemma for evl1fval1 22541. (Contributed by AV, 11-Sep-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
evl1fval1.q	⊢ 𝑄 = (eval1‘𝑅)
evl1fval1.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
evl1fval1lem	⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑄 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem evl1fval1lem

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2765	. . 3 ⊢ (eval1‘𝑅) = (eval1‘𝑅)
2		eqid 2765	. . 3 ⊢ (1o eval 𝑅) = (1o eval 𝑅)
3		evl1fval1.b	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)
4	1, 2, 3	evl1fval 22538	. 2 ⊢ (eval1‘𝑅) = ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (𝐵 ↑m 1o)) ↦ (𝑥 ∘ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (1o × {𝑦})))) ∘ (1o eval 𝑅))
5		evl1fval1.q	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑄 = (eval1‘𝑅)
6	5	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑄 = (eval1‘𝑅))
7	3	fvexi 6899	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
8	7	pwid 4587	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵
9		eqid 2765	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 evalSub1 𝐵) = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝐵)
10		eqid 2765	. . . . 5 ⊢ (1o evalSub 𝑅) = (1o evalSub 𝑅)
11	9, 10, 3	evls1fval 22529	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝑅 evalSub1 𝐵) = ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (𝐵 ↑m 1o)) ↦ (𝑥 ∘ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (1o × {𝑦})))) ∘ ((1o evalSub 𝑅)‘𝐵)))
12	8, 11	mpan2 704	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 evalSub1 𝐵) = ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (𝐵 ↑m 1o)) ↦ (𝑥 ∘ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (1o × {𝑦})))) ∘ ((1o evalSub 𝑅)‘𝐵)))
13	2, 3	evlval 22301	. . . . 5 ⊢ (1o eval 𝑅) = ((1o evalSub 𝑅)‘𝐵)
14	13	eqcomi 2774	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1o evalSub 𝑅)‘𝐵) = (1o eval 𝑅)
15	14	coeq2i 5848	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (𝐵 ↑m 1o)) ↦ (𝑥 ∘ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (1o × {𝑦})))) ∘ ((1o evalSub 𝑅)‘𝐵)) = ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (𝐵 ↑m 1o)) ↦ (𝑥 ∘ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (1o × {𝑦})))) ∘ (1o eval 𝑅))
16	12, 15	eqtrdi 2816	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 evalSub1 𝐵) = ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (𝐵 ↑m 1o)) ↦ (𝑥 ∘ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (1o × {𝑦})))) ∘ (1o eval 𝑅)))
17	4, 6, 16	3eqtr4a 2826	1 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑄 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝐵))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  𝒫 cpw 4564  {csn 4591   ↦ cmpt 5194   × cxp 5661   ∘ ccom 5667  ‘cfv 6540  (class class class)co 7419  1_oc1o 8452   ↑_m cmap 8830  Basecbs 17291   evalSub ces 22273   eval cevl 22274   evalSub₁ ces1 22523  eval₁ce1 22524

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-rep 5240  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7742

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-reu 3372  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3747  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-iun 4960  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-f1 6545  df-fo 6546  df-f1o 6547  df-fv 6548  df-ov 7422  df-oprab 7423  df-mpo 7424  df-evls 22275  df-evl 22276  df-evls1 22525  df-evl1 22526

This theorem is used by:  evl1fval1  22541