Theorem evl1fval1lem 22555

Description: Lemma for evl1fval1 22556. (Contributed by AV, 11-Sep-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
evl1fval1.q	⊢ 𝑄 = (eval1‘𝑅)
evl1fval1.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
evl1fval1lem	⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑄 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝐵))

Proof of Theorem evl1fval1lem

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqid 2760	. . 3 ⊢ (eval1‘𝑅) = (eval1‘𝑅)
2		eqid 2760	. . 3 ⊢ (1o eval 𝑅) = (1o eval 𝑅)
3		evl1fval1.b	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)
4	1, 2, 3	evl1fval 22553	. 2 ⊢ (eval1‘𝑅) = ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (𝐵 ↑m 1o)) ↦ (𝑥 ∘ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (1o × {𝑦})))) ∘ (1o eval 𝑅))
5		evl1fval1.q	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑄 = (eval1‘𝑅)
6	5	a1i 11	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑄 = (eval1‘𝑅))
7	3	fvexi 6892	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
8	7	pwid 4580	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵
9		eqid 2760	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑅 evalSub1 𝐵) = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝐵)
10		eqid 2760	. . . . 5 ⊢ (1o evalSub 𝑅) = (1o evalSub 𝑅)
11	9, 10, 3	evls1fval 22544	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝑅 evalSub1 𝐵) = ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (𝐵 ↑m 1o)) ↦ (𝑥 ∘ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (1o × {𝑦})))) ∘ ((1o evalSub 𝑅)‘𝐵)))
12	8, 11	mpan2 704	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 evalSub1 𝐵) = ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (𝐵 ↑m 1o)) ↦ (𝑥 ∘ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (1o × {𝑦})))) ∘ ((1o evalSub 𝑅)‘𝐵)))
13	2, 3	evlval 22316	. . . . 5 ⊢ (1o eval 𝑅) = ((1o evalSub 𝑅)‘𝐵)
14	13	eqcomi 2769	. . . 4 ⊢ ((1o evalSub 𝑅)‘𝐵) = (1o eval 𝑅)
15	14	coeq2i 5840	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (𝐵 ↑m 1o)) ↦ (𝑥 ∘ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (1o × {𝑦})))) ∘ ((1o evalSub 𝑅)‘𝐵)) = ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (𝐵 ↑m 1o)) ↦ (𝑥 ∘ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (1o × {𝑦})))) ∘ (1o eval 𝑅))
16	12, 15	eqtrdi 2811	. 2 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 evalSub1 𝐵) = ((𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 ↑m (𝐵 ↑m 1o)) ↦ (𝑥 ∘ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (1o × {𝑦})))) ∘ (1o eval 𝑅)))
17	4, 6, 16	3eqtr4a 2821	1 ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑄 = (𝑅 evalSub1 𝐵))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  𝒫 cpw 4557  {csn 4584   ↦ cmpt 5186   × cxp 5653   ∘ ccom 5659  ‘cfv 6533  (class class class)co 7413  1_oc1o 8448   ↑_m cmap 8826  Basecbs 17301   evalSub ces 22288   eval cevl 22289   evalSub₁ ces1 22538  eval₁ce1 22539

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5330  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7736

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-f1 6538  df-fo 6539  df-f1o 6540  df-fv 6541  df-ov 7416  df-oprab 7417  df-mpo 7418  df-evls 22290  df-evl 22291  df-evls1 22540  df-evl1 22541

This theorem is used by:  evl1fval1  22556