Theorem islmim 21247

Description: An isomorphism of left modules is a bijective homomorphism. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Jan-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
islmim.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)
islmim.c	⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
islmim	⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMIso 𝑆) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶))

Proof of Theorem islmim

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑐 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-lmim 21208	. . 3 ⊢ LMIso = (𝑎 ∈ LMod, 𝑏 ∈ LMod ↦ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑎 LMHom 𝑏) ∣ 𝑐:(Base‘𝑎)–1-1-onto→(Base‘𝑏)})
2		ovex 7449	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 LMHom 𝑏) ∈ V
3	2	rabex 5307	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑎 LMHom 𝑏) ∣ 𝑐:(Base‘𝑎)–1-1-onto→(Base‘𝑏)} ∈ V
4		oveq12 7425	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝑅 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑆) → (𝑎 LMHom 𝑏) = (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆))
5		fveq2 6882	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑅 → (Base‘𝑎) = (Base‘𝑅))
6		islmim.b	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)
7	5, 6	eqtr4di 2815	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑅 → (Base‘𝑎) = 𝐵)
8		fveq2 6882	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑆 → (Base‘𝑏) = (Base‘𝑆))
9		islmim.c	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)
10	8, 9	eqtr4di 2815	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑆 → (Base‘𝑏) = 𝐶)
11		f1oeq23 6812	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((Base‘𝑎) = 𝐵 ∧ (Base‘𝑏) = 𝐶) → (𝑐:(Base‘𝑎)–1-1-onto→(Base‘𝑏) ↔ 𝑐:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶))
12	7, 10, 11	syl2an 608	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝑅 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑆) → (𝑐:(Base‘𝑎)–1-1-onto→(Base‘𝑏) ↔ 𝑐:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶))
13	4, 12	rabeqbidv 3432	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝑅 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑆) → {𝑐 ∈ (𝑎 LMHom 𝑏) ∣ 𝑐:(Base‘𝑎)–1-1-onto→(Base‘𝑏)} = {𝑐 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∣ 𝑐:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶})
14	1, 3, 13	elovmpo 7662	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMIso 𝑆) ↔ (𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐹 ∈ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∣ 𝑐:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶}))
15		df-3an 1105	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐹 ∈ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∣ 𝑐:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶}) ↔ ((𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∣ 𝑐:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶}))
16		f1oeq1 6809	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐹 → (𝑐:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶 ↔ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶))
17	16	elrab 3648	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∣ 𝑐:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶} ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶))
18	17	anbi2i 635	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∣ 𝑐:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶}) ↔ ((𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶)))
19		lmhmlmod1 21218	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) → 𝑅 ∈ LMod)
20		lmhmlmod2 21217	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) → 𝑆 ∈ LMod)
21	19, 20	jca 521	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) → (𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod))
22	21	adantr 486	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶) → (𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod))
23	22	pm4.71ri 570	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶) ↔ ((𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶)))
24	18, 23	bitr4i 281	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∣ 𝑐:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶}) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶))
25	14, 15, 24	3bitri 300	1 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMIso 𝑆) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  {crab 3414  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6536  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7416  Basecbs 17305  LModclmod 21045   LMHom clmhm 21204   LMIso clmim 21205

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pr 5402

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-id 5554  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7419  df-oprab 7420  df-mpo 7421  df-lmhm 21207  df-lmim 21208

This theorem is used by:  lmimf1o  21248  lmimlmhm  21249  islmim2  21251  indlcim  22054  lmimco  22058  lmhmqusker  33833  dimkerim  34124  frlmsnic  43409  pwssplit4  43917