Theorem islmim 21367

Description: An isomorphism of left modules is a bijective homomorphism. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Jan-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
islmim.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)
islmim.c	⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
islmim	⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMIso 𝑆) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶1-1onto𝐶))

Proof of Theorem islmim

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑐 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-lmim 21328	. . 3 ⊢ LMIso = (𝑎 ∈ LMod, 𝑏 ∈ LMod ↦ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑎 LMHom 𝑏) ∣ 𝑐:(Base‘𝑎)⟶1-1onto(Base‘𝑏)})
2		ovex 7476	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 LMHom 𝑏) ∈ V
3	2	rabex 5304	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑎 LMHom 𝑏) ∣ 𝑐:(Base‘𝑎)⟶1-1onto(Base‘𝑏)} ∈ V
4		oveq12 7452	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝑅 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑆) → (𝑎 LMHom 𝑏) = (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆))
5		fveq2 6908	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑅 → (Base‘𝑎) = (Base‘𝑅))
6		islmim.b	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)
7	5, 6	eqtr4di 2816	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑅 → (Base‘𝑎) = 𝐵)
8		fveq2 6908	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑆 → (Base‘𝑏) = (Base‘𝑆))
9		islmim.c	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)
10	8, 9	eqtr4di 2816	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑆 → (Base‘𝑏) = 𝐶)
11		f1oeq23 6837	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((Base‘𝑎) = 𝐵 ∧ (Base‘𝑏) = 𝐶) → (𝑐:(Base‘𝑎)⟶1-1onto(Base‘𝑏) ↔ 𝑐:𝐵⟶1-1onto𝐶))
12	7, 10, 11	syl2an 608	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝑅 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑆) → (𝑐:(Base‘𝑎)⟶1-1onto(Base‘𝑏) ↔ 𝑐:𝐵⟶1-1onto𝐶))
13	4, 12	rabeqbidv 3433	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝑅 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑆) → {𝑐 ∈ (𝑎 LMHom 𝑏) ∣ 𝑐:(Base‘𝑎)⟶1-1onto(Base‘𝑏)} = {𝑐 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∣ 𝑐:𝐵⟶1-1onto𝐶})
14	1, 3, 13	elovmpo 7690	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMIso 𝑆) ↔ (𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐹 ∈ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∣ 𝑐:𝐵⟶1-1onto𝐶}))
15		df-3an 1105	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐹 ∈ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∣ 𝑐:𝐵⟶1-1onto𝐶}) ↔ ((𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∣ 𝑐:𝐵⟶1-1onto𝐶}))
16		f1oeq1 6834	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐹 → (𝑐:𝐵⟶1-1onto𝐶 ↔ 𝐹:𝐵⟶1-1onto𝐶))
17	16	elrab 3648	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∣ 𝑐:𝐵⟶1-1onto𝐶} ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶1-1onto𝐶))
18	17	anbi2i 635	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∣ 𝑐:𝐵⟶1-1onto𝐶}) ↔ ((𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶1-1onto𝐶)))
19		lmhmlmod1 21338	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) → 𝑅 ∈ LMod)
20		lmhmlmod2 21337	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) → 𝑆 ∈ LMod)
21	19, 20	jca 521	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) → (𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod))
22	21	adantr 486	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶1-1onto𝐶) → (𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod))
23	22	pm4.71ri 570	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶1-1onto𝐶) ↔ ((𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶1-1onto𝐶)))
24	18, 23	bitr4i 281	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∣ 𝑐:𝐵⟶1-1onto𝐶}) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶1-1onto𝐶))
25	14, 15, 24	3bitri 300	1 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMIso 𝑆) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵⟶1-1onto𝐶))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  {crab 3416  ⟶1-1ontowf1o 6557  ‘cfv 6558  (class class class)co 7443  Basecbs 17416  LModclmod 21165   LMHom clmhm 21324   LMIso clmim 21325

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5395

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-iota 6512  df-fun 6560  df-fn 6561  df-f 6562  df-f1 6563  df-fo 6564  df-f1o 6565  df-fv 6566  df-ov 7446  df-oprab 7447  df-mpo 7448  df-lmhm 21327  df-lmim 21328

This theorem is used by:  lmimf1o  21368  lmimlmhm  21369  islmim2  21371  indlcim  22176  lmimco  22180  lmhmqusker  34038  dimkerim  34329  frlmsnic  43797  pwssplit4  44284