Theorem islmim 21198

Description: An isomorphism of left modules is a bijective homomorphism. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Jan-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
islmim.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)
islmim.c	⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
islmim	⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMIso 𝑆) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶))

Proof of Theorem islmim

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 𝑐 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		df-lmim 21159	. . 3 ⊢ LMIso = (𝑎 ∈ LMod, 𝑏 ∈ LMod ↦ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑎 LMHom 𝑏) ∣ 𝑐:(Base‘𝑎)–1-1-onto→(Base‘𝑏)})
2		ovex 7449	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑎 LMHom 𝑏) ∈ V
3	2	rabex 5312	. . 3 ⊢ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑎 LMHom 𝑏) ∣ 𝑐:(Base‘𝑎)–1-1-onto→(Base‘𝑏)} ∈ V
4		oveq12 7425	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝑅 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑆) → (𝑎 LMHom 𝑏) = (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆))
5		fveq2 6885	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑅 → (Base‘𝑎) = (Base‘𝑅))
6		islmim.b	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅)
7	5, 6	eqtr4di 2819	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑎 = 𝑅 → (Base‘𝑎) = 𝐵)
8		fveq2 6885	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑆 → (Base‘𝑏) = (Base‘𝑆))
9		islmim.c	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐶 = (Base‘𝑆)
10	8, 9	eqtr4di 2819	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑏 = 𝑆 → (Base‘𝑏) = 𝐶)
11		f1oeq23 6815	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((Base‘𝑎) = 𝐵 ∧ (Base‘𝑏) = 𝐶) → (𝑐:(Base‘𝑎)–1-1-onto→(Base‘𝑏) ↔ 𝑐:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶))
12	7, 10, 11	syl2an 608	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝑅 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑆) → (𝑐:(Base‘𝑎)–1-1-onto→(Base‘𝑏) ↔ 𝑐:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶))
13	4, 12	rabeqbidv 3437	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑎 = 𝑅 ∧ 𝑏 = 𝑆) → {𝑐 ∈ (𝑎 LMHom 𝑏) ∣ 𝑐:(Base‘𝑎)–1-1-onto→(Base‘𝑏)} = {𝑐 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∣ 𝑐:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶})
14	1, 3, 13	elovmpo 7661	. 2 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMIso 𝑆) ↔ (𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐹 ∈ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∣ 𝑐:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶}))
15		df-3an 1105	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐹 ∈ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∣ 𝑐:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶}) ↔ ((𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∣ 𝑐:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶}))
16		f1oeq1 6812	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐹 → (𝑐:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶 ↔ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶))
17	16	elrab 3653	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∣ 𝑐:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶} ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶))
18	17	anbi2i 635	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∣ 𝑐:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶}) ↔ ((𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶)))
19		lmhmlmod1 21169	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) → 𝑅 ∈ LMod)
20		lmhmlmod2 21168	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) → 𝑆 ∈ LMod)
21	19, 20	jca 521	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) → (𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod))
22	21	adantr 486	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶) → (𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod))
23	22	pm4.71ri 570	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶) ↔ ((𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶)))
24	18, 23	bitr4i 281	. 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑆 ∈ LMod) ∧ 𝐹 ∈ {𝑐 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∣ 𝑐:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶}) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶))
25	14, 15, 24	3bitri 300	1 ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMIso 𝑆) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ (𝑅 LMHom 𝑆) ∧ 𝐹:𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐶))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  {crab 3419  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6539  ‘cfv 6540  (class class class)co 7416  Basecbs 17279  LModclmod 20996   LMHom clmhm 21155   LMIso clmim 21156

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2738  ax-sep 5260  ax-nul 5272  ax-pr 5407

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2570  df-eu 2600  df-clab 2745  df-cleq 2758  df-clel 2841  df-nfc 2915  df-ne 2962  df-ral 3083  df-rex 3093  df-rab 3420  df-v 3460  df-sbc 3748  df-dif 3911  df-un 3913  df-in 3915  df-ss 3925  df-nul 4290  df-if 4491  df-pw 4567  df-sn 4593  df-pr 4595  df-op 4599  df-uni 4876  df-br 5113  df-opab 5177  df-id 5559  df-xp 5670  df-rel 5671  df-cnv 5672  df-co 5673  df-dm 5674  df-rn 5675  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-f1 6545  df-fo 6546  df-f1o 6547  df-fv 6548  df-ov 7419  df-oprab 7420  df-mpo 7421  df-lmhm 21158  df-lmim 21159

This theorem is used by:  lmimf1o  21199  lmimlmhm  21200  islmim2  21202  indlcim  22005  lmimco  22009  lmhmqusker  33739  dimkerim  34030  frlmsnic  43340  pwssplit4  43848