| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 210 of 505) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-31179) |
(31180-32702) |
(32703-50434) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Theorem | abvdiv 20901 | The absolute value distributes under division. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ / = (/r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (((𝑅 ∈ DivRing ∧ 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ≠ 0 )) → (𝐹‘(𝑋 / 𝑌)) = ((𝐹‘𝑋) / (𝐹‘𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | abvdom 20902 | Any ring with an absolute value is a domain, which is to say that it contains no zero divisors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ≠ 0 )) → (𝑋 · 𝑌) ≠ 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | abvres 20903 | The restriction of an absolute value to a subring is an absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Dec-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (𝑅 ↾s 𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (AbsVal‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (SubRing‘𝑅)) → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐶) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | abvtrivd 20904* | The trivial absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0 , 0, 1)) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ≠ 0 ) ∧ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 0 )) → (𝑦 · 𝑧) ≠ 0 ) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | abvtrivg 20905* | The trivial absolute value. This theorem is not true for rings with zero divisors, which violate the multiplication axiom; abvdom 20902 is the converse of this theorem. (Contributed by SN, 25-Jun-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0 , 0, 1)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Domn → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | abvtriv 20906* | The trivial absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if(𝑥 = 0 , 0, 1)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ DivRing → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | abvpropd 20907* | If two structures have the same ring components, they have the same collection of absolute values. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 4-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(+g‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(+g‘𝐿)𝑦)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(.r‘𝐾)𝑦) = (𝑥(.r‘𝐿)𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (AbsVal‘𝐾) = (AbsVal‘𝐿)) | ||
| Theorem | abvn0b 20908 | Another characterization of domains, hinted at in abvtrivg 20905: a nonzero ring is a domain iff it has an absolute value. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-May-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 = (AbsVal‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Domn ↔ (𝑅 ∈ NzRing ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅)) | ||
| Syntax | cstf 20909 | Extend class notation with the functionalization of the *-ring involution. |
| class *rf | ||
| Syntax | csr 20910 | Extend class notation with class of all *-rings. |
| class *-Ring | ||
| Definition | df-staf 20911* | Define the functionalization of the involution in a star ring. This is not strictly necessary but by having *𝑟 as an actual function we can state the principal properties of an involution much more cleanly. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ *rf = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑓) ↦ ((*𝑟‘𝑓)‘𝑥))) | ||
| Definition | df-srng 20912* | Define class of all star rings. A star ring is a ring with an involution (conjugation) function. Involution (unlike say the ring zero) is not unique and therefore must be added as a new component to the ring. For example, two possible involutions for complex numbers are the identity function and complex conjugation. Definition of involution in [Holland95] p. 204. (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ *-Ring = {𝑓 ∣ [(*rf‘𝑓) / 𝑖](𝑖 ∈ (𝑓 RingHom (oppr‘𝑓)) ∧ 𝑖 = ◡𝑖)} | ||
| Theorem | staffval 20913* | The functionalization of the involution component of a structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∙ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ∙ = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ( ∗ ‘𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | stafval 20914 | The functionalization of the involution component of a structure. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∙ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ( ∙ ‘𝐴) = ( ∗ ‘𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | staffn 20915 | The functionalization is equal to the original function, if it is a function on the right base set. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∙ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ( ∗ Fn 𝐵 → ∙ = ∗ ) | ||
| Theorem | issrng 20916 | The predicate "is a star ring". (Contributed by NM, 22-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppr‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ↔ ( ∗ ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝑂) ∧ ∗ = ◡ ∗ )) | ||
| Theorem | srngrhm 20917 | The involution function in a star ring is an antiautomorphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppr‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ∗ ∈ (𝑅 RingHom 𝑂)) | ||
| Theorem | srngring 20918 | A star ring is a ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) | ||
| Theorem | srngcnv 20919 | The involution function in a star ring is its own inverse function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*rf‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ∗ = ◡ ∗ ) | ||
| Theorem | srngf1o 20920 | The involution function in a star ring is a bijection. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*rf‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ∗ :𝐵–1-1-onto→𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | srngcl 20921 | The involution function in a star ring is closed in the ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | srngnvl 20922 | The involution function in a star ring is an involution. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘( ∗ ‘𝑋)) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | srngadd 20923 | The involution function in a star ring distributes over addition. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘(𝑋 + 𝑌)) = (( ∗ ‘𝑋) + ( ∗ ‘𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | srngmul 20924 | The involution function in a star ring distributes over multiplication, with a change in the order of the factors. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ *-Ring ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘(𝑋 · 𝑌)) = (( ∗ ‘𝑌) · ( ∗ ‘𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | srng1 20925 | The conjugate of the ring identity is the identity. (This is sometimes taken as an axiom, and indeed the proof here follows because we defined *𝑟 to be a ring homomorphism, which preserves 1; nevertheless, it is redundant, as can be seen from the proof of issrngd 20927.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ( ∗ ‘ 1 ) = 1 ) | ||
| Theorem | srng0 20926 | The conjugate of the ring zero is zero. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ *-Ring → ( ∗ ‘ 0 ) = 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | issrngd 20927* | Properties that determine a star ring. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 18-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → + = (+g‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = (.r‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐾) → ( ∗ ‘𝑥) ∈ 𝐾) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐾) → ( ∗ ‘(𝑥 + 𝑦)) = (( ∗ ‘𝑥) + ( ∗ ‘𝑦))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐾) → ( ∗ ‘(𝑥 · 𝑦)) = (( ∗ ‘𝑦) · ( ∗ ‘𝑥))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐾) → ( ∗ ‘( ∗ ‘𝑥)) = 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ *-Ring) | ||
| Theorem | idsrngd 20928* | A commutative ring is a star ring when the conjugate operation is the identity. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 19-Apr-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ∗ = (*𝑟‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ CRing) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ∗ ‘𝑥) = 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ *-Ring) | ||
| Syntax | corng 20929 | Extend class notation with the class of all ordered rings. |
| class oRing | ||
| Syntax | cofld 20930 | Extend class notation with the class of all ordered fields. |
| class oField | ||
| Definition | df-orng 20931* | Define class of all ordered rings. An ordered ring is a ring with a total ordering compatible with its operations. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ oRing = {𝑟 ∈ (Ring ∩ oGrp) ∣ [(Base‘𝑟) / 𝑣][(0g‘𝑟) / 𝑧][(.r‘𝑟) / 𝑡][(le‘𝑟) / 𝑙]∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑣 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑣 ((𝑧𝑙𝑎 ∧ 𝑧𝑙𝑏) → 𝑧𝑙(𝑎𝑡𝑏))} | ||
| Definition | df-ofld 20932 | Define class of all ordered fields. An ordered field is a field with a total ordering compatible with its operations. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ oField = (Field ∩ oRing) | ||
| Theorem | isorng 20933* | An ordered ring is a ring with a total ordering compatible with its operations. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ oRing ↔ (𝑅 ∈ Ring ∧ 𝑅 ∈ oGrp ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 (( 0 ≤ 𝑎 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑏) → 0 ≤ (𝑎 · 𝑏)))) | ||
| Theorem | orngring 20934 | An ordered ring is a ring. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ oRing → 𝑅 ∈ Ring) | ||
| Theorem | orngogrp 20935 | An ordered ring is an ordered group. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝑅 ∈ oRing → 𝑅 ∈ oGrp) | ||
| Theorem | isofld 20936 | An ordered field is a field with a total ordering compatible with its operations. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 23-Mar-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ oField ↔ (𝐹 ∈ Field ∧ 𝐹 ∈ oRing)) | ||
| Theorem | orngmul 20937 | In an ordered ring, the ordering is compatible with the ring multiplication operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ oRing ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑋) ∧ (𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 ≤ 𝑌)) → 0 ≤ (𝑋 · 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | orngsqr 20938 | In an ordered ring, all squares are positive. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ oRing ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → 0 ≤ (𝑋 · 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | ornglmulle 20939 | In an ordered ring, multiplication with a positive does not change comparison. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ oRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 · 𝑋) ≤ (𝑍 · 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | orngrmulle 20940 | In an ordered ring, multiplication with a positive does not change comparison. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 10-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ oRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 ≤ 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 · 𝑍) ≤ (𝑌 · 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | ornglmullt 20941 | In an ordered ring, multiplication with a positive does not change strict comparison. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ oRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 < 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 · 𝑋) < (𝑍 · 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | orngrmullt 20942 | In an ordered ring, multiplication with a positive does not change strict comparison. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Apr-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ oRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 < 𝑌) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝑍) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 · 𝑍) < (𝑌 · 𝑍)) | ||
| Theorem | orngmullt 20943 | In an ordered ring, the strict ordering is compatible with the ring multiplication operation. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 9-Sep-2018.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑅) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝑅) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑅) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝑅) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ oRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ DivRing) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < (𝑋 · 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | ofldfld 20944 | An ordered field is a field. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ oField → 𝐹 ∈ Field) | ||
| Theorem | ofldtos 20945 | An ordered field is a totally ordered set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 20-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ oField → 𝐹 ∈ Toset) | ||
| Theorem | orng0le1 20946 | In an ordered ring, the ring unity is positive. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐹) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ oRing → 0 ≤ 1 ) | ||
| Theorem | ofldlt1 20947 | In an ordered field, the ring unity is strictly positive. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐹) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ oField → 0 < 1 ) | ||
| Theorem | suborng 20948 | Every subring of an ordered ring is also an ordered ring. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝑅 ∈ oRing ∧ (𝑅 ↾s 𝐴) ∈ Ring) → (𝑅 ↾s 𝐴) ∈ oRing) | ||
| Theorem | subofld 20949 | Every subfield of an ordered field is also an ordered field. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 21-Jan-2018.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ oField ∧ (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴) ∈ Field) → (𝐹 ↾s 𝐴) ∈ oField) | ||
| Syntax | clmod 20950 | Extend class notation with class of all left modules. |
| class LMod | ||
| Syntax | cscaf 20951 | The functionalization of the scalar multiplication operation. |
| class ·sf | ||
| Definition | df-lmod 20952* | Define the class of all left modules, which are generalizations of left vector spaces. A left module over a ring is an (Abelian) group (vectors) together with a ring (scalars) and a left scalar product connecting them. (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2013.) |
| ⊢ LMod = {𝑔 ∈ Grp ∣ [(Base‘𝑔) / 𝑣][(+g‘𝑔) / 𝑎][(Scalar‘𝑔) / 𝑓][( ·𝑠 ‘𝑔) / 𝑠][(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑘][(+g‘𝑓) / 𝑝][(.r‘𝑓) / 𝑡](𝑓 ∈ Ring ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝑘 ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝑘 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑣 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑣 (((𝑟𝑠𝑤) ∈ 𝑣 ∧ (𝑟𝑠(𝑤𝑎𝑥)) = ((𝑟𝑠𝑤)𝑎(𝑟𝑠𝑥)) ∧ ((𝑞𝑝𝑟)𝑠𝑤) = ((𝑞𝑠𝑤)𝑎(𝑟𝑠𝑤))) ∧ (((𝑞𝑡𝑟)𝑠𝑤) = (𝑞𝑠(𝑟𝑠𝑤)) ∧ ((1r‘𝑓)𝑠𝑤) = 𝑤)))} | ||
| Definition | df-scaf 20953* | Define the functionalization of the ·𝑠 operator. This restricts the value of ·𝑠 to the stated domain, which is necessary when working with restricted structures, whose operations may be defined on a larger set than the true base. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ ·sf = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑔)), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ↦ (𝑥( ·𝑠 ‘𝑔)𝑦))) | ||
| Theorem | islmod 20954* | The predicate "is a left module". (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹) & ⊢ × = (.r‘𝐹) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod ↔ (𝑊 ∈ Grp ∧ 𝐹 ∈ Ring ∧ ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑟 ∈ 𝐾 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑉 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝑉 (((𝑟 · 𝑤) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑟 · (𝑤 + 𝑥)) = ((𝑟 · 𝑤) + (𝑟 · 𝑥)) ∧ ((𝑞 ⨣ 𝑟) · 𝑤) = ((𝑞 · 𝑤) + (𝑟 · 𝑤))) ∧ (((𝑞 × 𝑟) · 𝑤) = (𝑞 · (𝑟 · 𝑤)) ∧ ( 1 · 𝑤) = 𝑤)))) | ||
| Theorem | lmodlema 20955 | Lemma for properties of a left module. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹) & ⊢ × = (.r‘𝐹) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)) → (((𝑅 · 𝑌) ∈ 𝑉 ∧ (𝑅 · (𝑌 + 𝑋)) = ((𝑅 · 𝑌) + (𝑅 · 𝑋)) ∧ ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑌) = ((𝑄 · 𝑌) + (𝑅 · 𝑌))) ∧ (((𝑄 × 𝑅) · 𝑌) = (𝑄 · (𝑅 · 𝑌)) ∧ ( 1 · 𝑌) = 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | islmodd 20956* | Properties that determine a left module. See note in isgrpd2 19013 regarding the 𝜑 on hypotheses that name structure components. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 22-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → + = (+g‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → × = (.r‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 1 = (1r‘𝐹)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ Ring) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Grp) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑥 · 𝑦) ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑥 · (𝑦 + 𝑧)) = ((𝑥 · 𝑦) + (𝑥 · 𝑧))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑥 ⨣ 𝑦) · 𝑧) = ((𝑥 · 𝑧) + (𝑦 · 𝑧))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑥 × 𝑦) · 𝑧) = (𝑥 · (𝑦 · 𝑧))) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑉) → ( 1 · 𝑥) = 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) | ||
| Theorem | lmodgrp 20957 | A left module is a group. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝑊 ∈ Grp) | ||
| Theorem | lmodring 20958 | The scalar component of a left module is a ring. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝐹 ∈ Ring) | ||
| Theorem | lmodfgrp 20959 | The scalar component of a left module is an additive group. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝐹 ∈ Grp) | ||
| Theorem | lmodgrpd 20960 | A left module is a group. (Contributed by SN, 16-May-2024.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ Grp) | ||
| Theorem | lmodbn0 20961 | The base set of a left module is nonempty. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝐵 ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | lmodacl 20962 | Closure of ring addition for a left module. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐾) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | lmodmcl 20963 | Closure of ring multiplication for a left module. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ · = (.r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐾) → (𝑋 · 𝑌) ∈ 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | lmodsn0 20964 | The set of scalars in a left module is nonempty. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝐵 ≠ ∅) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvacl 20965 | Closure of vector addition for a left module. (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) ∈ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | lmodass 20966 | Left module vector sum is associative. (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑋 + 𝑌) + 𝑍) = (𝑋 + (𝑌 + 𝑍))) | ||
| Theorem | lmodlcan 20967 | Left cancellation law for vector sum. (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑍 + 𝑋) = (𝑍 + 𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvscl 20968 | Closure of scalar product for a left module. (hvmulcl 31274 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑅 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvscld 20969 | Closure of scalar product for a left module. (Contributed by SN, 15-Mar-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 · 𝑋) ∈ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | scaffval 20970* | The scalar multiplication operation as a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 2-Mar-2024.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ∙ = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐾, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 · 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | scafval 20971 | The scalar multiplication operation as a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∙ 𝑌) = (𝑋 · 𝑌)) | ||
| Theorem | scafeq 20972 | If the scalar multiplication operation is already a function, the functionalization of it is equal to the original operation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ( · Fn (𝐾 × 𝐵) → ∙ = · ) | ||
| Theorem | scaffn 20973 | The scalar multiplication operation is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ∙ Fn (𝐾 × 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | lmodscaf 20974 | The scalar multiplication operation is a function. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 5-Oct-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ∙ = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → ∙ :(𝐾 × 𝐵)⟶𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvsdi 20975 | Distributive law for scalar product (left-distributivity). (ax-hvdistr1 31269 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑅 · (𝑋 + 𝑌)) = ((𝑅 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑌))) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvsdir 20976 | Distributive law for scalar product (right-distributivity). (ax-hvdistr1 31269 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ⨣ = (+g‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑄 ⨣ 𝑅) · 𝑋) = ((𝑄 · 𝑋) + (𝑅 · 𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvsass 20977 | Associative law for scalar product. (ax-hvmulass 31268 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 22-Sep-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ × = (.r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑄 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → ((𝑄 × 𝑅) · 𝑋) = (𝑄 · (𝑅 · 𝑋))) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0cl 20978 | The ring zero in a left module belongs to the set of scalars. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 0 ∈ 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | lmod1cl 20979 | The ring unity in a left module belongs to the set of scalars. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 1 ∈ 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvs1 20980 | Scalar product with the ring unity. (ax-hvmulid 31267 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ( 1 · 𝑋) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0vcl 20981 | The zero vector is a vector. (ax-hv0cl 31264 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 0 ∈ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0vlid 20982 | Left identity law for the zero vector. (hvaddlid 31284 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ( 0 + 𝑋) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0vrid 20983 | Right identity law for the zero vector. (ax-hvaddid 31265 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋 + 0 ) = 𝑋) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0vid 20984 | Identity equivalent to the value of the zero vector. Provides a convenient way to compute the value. (Contributed by NM, 9-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝑋 + 𝑋) = 𝑋 ↔ 0 = 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | lmod0vs 20985 | Zero times a vector is the zero vector. Equation 1a of [Kreyszig] p. 51. (ax-hvmul0 31271 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑂 = (0g‘𝐹) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑂 · 𝑋) = 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvs0 20986 | Anything times the zero vector is the zero vector. Equation 1b of [Kreyszig] p. 51. (hvmul0 31285 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 12-Jan-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐾) → (𝑋 · 0 ) = 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvsmmulgdi 20987 | Distributive law for a group multiple of a scalar multiplication. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ ↑ = (.g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐸 = (.g‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐾 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝑁 ↑ (𝐶 · 𝑋)) = ((𝑁𝐸𝐶) · 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | lmodfopnelem1 20988 | Lemma 1 for lmodfopne 20990. (Contributed by AV, 2-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ · = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+𝑓‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ + = · ) → 𝑉 = 𝐾) | ||
| Theorem | lmodfopnelem2 20989 | Lemma 2 for lmodfopne 20990. (Contributed by AV, 2-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ · = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+𝑓‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ + = · ) → ( 0 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 1 ∈ 𝑉)) | ||
| Theorem | lmodfopne 20990 | The (functionalized) operations of a left module (over a nonzero ring) cannot be identical. (Contributed by NM, 31-May-2008.) (Revised by AV, 2-Oct-2021.) |
| ⊢ · = ( ·sf ‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+𝑓‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝑆) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 1 ≠ 0 ) → + ≠ · ) | ||
| Theorem | lcomf 20991 | A linear-combination sum is a function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐼⟶𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐼⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘f · 𝐻):𝐼⟶𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | lcomfsupp 20992 | A linear-combination sum is finitely supported if the coefficients are. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.) (Revised by AV, 15-Jul-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺:𝐼⟶𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝐼⟶𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑌 = (0g‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 finSupp 𝑌) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 ∘f · 𝐻) finSupp 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvnegcl 20993 | Closure of vector negative. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑁‘𝑋) ∈ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvnegid 20994 | Addition of a vector with its negative. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋 + (𝑁‘𝑋)) = 0 ) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvneg1 20995 | Minus 1 times a vector is the negative of the vector. Equation 2 of [Kreyszig] p. 51. (Contributed by NM, 18-Apr-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (invg‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝑀‘ 1 ) · 𝑋) = (𝑁‘𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvsneg 20996 | Multiplication of a vector by a negated scalar. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Feb-2015.) |
| ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (Scalar‘𝑊) & ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (invg‘𝑊) & ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝐹) & ⊢ 𝑀 = (invg‘𝐹) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ 𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘(𝑅 · 𝑋)) = ((𝑀‘𝑅) · 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | lmodvsubcl 20997 | Closure of vector subtraction. (hvsubcl 31278 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 19-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ − = (-g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋 − 𝑌) ∈ 𝑉) | ||
| Theorem | lmodcom 20998 | Left module vector sum is commutative. (Contributed by Gérard Lang, 25-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊) & ⊢ + = (+g‘𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝑋 + 𝑌) = (𝑌 + 𝑋)) | ||
| Theorem | lmodabl 20999 | A left module is an abelian group (of vectors, under addition). (Contributed by NM, 8-Dec-2013.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2014.) |
| ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝑊 ∈ Abel) | ||
| Theorem | lmodcmn 21000 | A left module is a commutative monoid under addition. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → 𝑊 ∈ CMnd) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |