Theorem isltrn2N 39593

Description: The predicate "is a lattice translation". Version of isltrn 39592 that considers only different 𝑝 and 𝑞. TODO: Can this eliminate some separate proofs for the 𝑝 = 𝑞 case? (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ltrnset.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
ltrnset.j	⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
ltrnset.m	⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
ltrnset.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
ltrnset.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)
ltrnset.d	⊢ 𝐷 = ((LDil‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
ltrnset.t	⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isltrn2N	⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑞,𝑝,𝐴   𝐾,𝑝,𝑞   𝑊,𝑝,𝑞   𝐹,𝑝,𝑞

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑞,𝑝)   𝐷(𝑞,𝑝)   𝑇(𝑞,𝑝)   𝐻(𝑞,𝑝)   ∨ (𝑞,𝑝)   ≤ (𝑞,𝑝)   ∧ (𝑞,𝑝)

Proof of Theorem isltrn2N

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ltrnset.l	. . 3 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
2		ltrnset.j	. . 3 ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
3		ltrnset.m	. . 3 ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
4		ltrnset.a	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
5		ltrnset.h	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)
6		ltrnset.d	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐷 = ((LDil‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
7		ltrnset.t	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
8	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7	isltrn 39592	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)))))
9		3simpa 1146	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) → (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊))
10	9	imim1i 63	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)) → ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)))
11		3anass 1093	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑝 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) ↔ (𝑝 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊)))
12		3anrot 1098	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑝 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) ↔ (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞))
13		df-ne 2938	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑝 ≠ 𝑞 ↔ ¬ 𝑝 = 𝑞)
14	13	anbi1i 623	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑝 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊)) ↔ (¬ 𝑝 = 𝑞 ∧ (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊)))
15	11, 12, 14	3bitr3i 301	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) ↔ (¬ 𝑝 = 𝑞 ∧ (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊)))
16	15	imbi1i 349	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)) ↔ ((¬ 𝑝 = 𝑞 ∧ (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊)) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)))
17		impexp 450	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((¬ 𝑝 = 𝑞 ∧ (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊)) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)) ↔ (¬ 𝑝 = 𝑞 → ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊))))
18	16, 17	bitri 275	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)) ↔ (¬ 𝑝 = 𝑞 → ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊))))
19		id 22	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝑞 → 𝑝 = 𝑞)
20		fveq2 6897	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝑞 → (𝐹‘𝑝) = (𝐹‘𝑞))
21	19, 20	oveq12d 7438	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝑞 → (𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) = (𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)))
22	21	oveq1d 7435	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝑞 → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊))
23	22	a1d 25	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝑞 → ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)))
24		pm2.61 191	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑝 = 𝑞 → ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊))) → ((¬ 𝑝 = 𝑞 → ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊))) → ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊))))
25	23, 24	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((¬ 𝑝 = 𝑞 → ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊))) → ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)))
26	18, 25	sylbi 216	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)) → ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)))
27	10, 26	impbii 208	. . . 4 ⊢ (((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)) ↔ ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)))
28	27	2ralbii 3125	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)) ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)))
29	28	anbi2i 622	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊))) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊))))
30	8, 29	bitrdi 287	1 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)))))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1085   = wceq 1534   ∈ wcel 2099   ≠ wne 2937  ∀wral 3058   class class class wbr 5148  ‘cfv 6548  (class class class)co 7420  lecple 17240  joincjn 18303  meetcmee 18304  Atomscatm 38735  LHypclh 39457  LDilcldil 39573  LTrncltrn 39574

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1790  ax-4 1804  ax-5 1906  ax-6 1964  ax-7 2004  ax-8 2101  ax-9 2109  ax-10 2130  ax-11 2147  ax-12 2167  ax-ext 2699  ax-rep 5285  ax-sep 5299  ax-nul 5306  ax-pr 5429

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1537  df-fal 1547  df-ex 1775  df-nf 1779  df-sb 2061  df-mo 2530  df-eu 2559  df-clab 2706  df-cleq 2720  df-clel 2806  df-nfc 2881  df-ne 2938  df-ral 3059  df-rex 3068  df-reu 3374  df-rab 3430  df-v 3473  df-sbc 3777  df-csb 3893  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-in 3954  df-ss 3964  df-nul 4324  df-if 4530  df-sn 4630  df-pr 4632  df-op 4636  df-uni 4909  df-iun 4998  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-mpt 5232  df-id 5576  df-xp 5684  df-rel 5685  df-cnv 5686  df-co 5687  df-dm 5688  df-rn 5689  df-res 5690  df-ima 5691  df-iota 6500  df-fun 6550  df-fn 6551  df-f 6552  df-f1 6553  df-fo 6554  df-f1o 6555  df-fv 6556  df-ov 7423  df-ltrn 39578

This theorem is referenced by: (None)