Theorem isltrn2N 38986

Description: The predicate "is a lattice translation". Version of isltrn 38985 that considers only different 𝑝 and 𝑞. TODO: Can this eliminate some separate proofs for the 𝑝 = 𝑞 case? (Contributed by NM, 22-Apr-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ltrnset.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
ltrnset.j	⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
ltrnset.m	⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
ltrnset.a	⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
ltrnset.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)
ltrnset.d	⊢ 𝐷 = ((LDil‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
ltrnset.t	⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isltrn2N	⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑞,𝑝,𝐴   𝐾,𝑝,𝑞   𝑊,𝑝,𝑞   𝐹,𝑝,𝑞

Allowed substitution hints:   𝐵(𝑞,𝑝)   𝐷(𝑞,𝑝)   𝑇(𝑞,𝑝)   𝐻(𝑞,𝑝)   ∨ (𝑞,𝑝)   ≤ (𝑞,𝑝)   ∧ (𝑞,𝑝)

Proof of Theorem isltrn2N

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ltrnset.l	. . 3 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
2		ltrnset.j	. . 3 ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
3		ltrnset.m	. . 3 ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
4		ltrnset.a	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)
5		ltrnset.h	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)
6		ltrnset.d	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐷 = ((LDil‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
7		ltrnset.t	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑇 = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
8	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7	isltrn 38985	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)))))
9		3simpa 1148	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) → (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊))
10	9	imim1i 63	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)) → ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)))
11		3anass 1095	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑝 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) ↔ (𝑝 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊)))
12		3anrot 1100	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑝 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) ↔ (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞))
13		df-ne 2941	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑝 ≠ 𝑞 ↔ ¬ 𝑝 = 𝑞)
14	13	anbi1i 624	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝑝 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊)) ↔ (¬ 𝑝 = 𝑞 ∧ (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊)))
15	11, 12, 14	3bitr3i 300	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) ↔ (¬ 𝑝 = 𝑞 ∧ (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊)))
16	15	imbi1i 349	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)) ↔ ((¬ 𝑝 = 𝑞 ∧ (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊)) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)))
17		impexp 451	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (((¬ 𝑝 = 𝑞 ∧ (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊)) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)) ↔ (¬ 𝑝 = 𝑞 → ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊))))
18	16, 17	bitri 274	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)) ↔ (¬ 𝑝 = 𝑞 → ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊))))
19		id 22	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝑞 → 𝑝 = 𝑞)
20		fveq2 6891	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝑞 → (𝐹‘𝑝) = (𝐹‘𝑞))
21	19, 20	oveq12d 7426	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝑞 → (𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) = (𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)))
22	21	oveq1d 7423	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝑞 → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊))
23	22	a1d 25	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝑞 → ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)))
24		pm2.61 191	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝑝 = 𝑞 → ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊))) → ((¬ 𝑝 = 𝑞 → ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊))) → ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊))))
25	23, 24	ax-mp 5	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((¬ 𝑝 = 𝑞 → ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊))) → ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)))
26	18, 25	sylbi 216	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)) → ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)))
27	10, 26	impbii 208	. . . 4 ⊢ (((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)) ↔ ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)))
28	27	2ralbii 3128	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)) ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)))
29	28	anbi2i 623	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊))) ↔ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊))))
30	8, 29	bitrdi 286	1 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝐹 ∈ 𝑇 ↔ (𝐹 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ ¬ 𝑞 ≤ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞) → ((𝑝 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑊) = ((𝑞 ∨ (𝐹‘𝑞)) ∧ 𝑊)))))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2106   ≠ wne 2940  ∀wral 3061   class class class wbr 5148  ‘cfv 6543  (class class class)co 7408  lecple 17203  joincjn 18263  meetcmee 18264  Atomscatm 38128  LHypclh 38850  LDilcldil 38966  LTrncltrn 38967

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2703  ax-rep 5285  ax-sep 5299  ax-nul 5306  ax-pr 5427

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2724  df-clel 2810  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2941  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-reu 3377  df-rab 3433  df-v 3476  df-sbc 3778  df-csb 3894  df-dif 3951  df-un 3953  df-in 3955  df-ss 3965  df-nul 4323  df-if 4529  df-sn 4629  df-pr 4631  df-op 4635  df-uni 4909  df-iun 4999  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-mpt 5232  df-id 5574  df-xp 5682  df-rel 5683  df-cnv 5684  df-co 5685  df-dm 5686  df-rn 5687  df-res 5688  df-ima 5689  df-iota 6495  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-f1 6548  df-fo 6549  df-f1o 6550  df-fv 6551  df-ov 7411  df-ltrn 38971

This theorem is referenced by: (None)