P. 396 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 39501-39600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	rsp3 39501*	From a restricted universal statement over 𝐴, specialize to an arbitrary element 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴, cf. rsp 3254. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Feb-2026.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝜓))
Theorem	rsp3eq 39502*	From a restricted universal statement over 𝐴, specialize to an arbitrary element class, cf. rsp3 39501. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 9-Feb-2026.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜓    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    ⇒   ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 → ((𝑦 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝜓))
Theorem	ineccnvmo2 39503*	Equivalence of a double universal quantification restricted to the range and an "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 4-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ ran 𝐹∀𝑦 ∈ ran 𝐹(𝑥 = 𝑦 ∨ ([𝑥]◡𝐹 ∩ [𝑦]◡𝐹) = ∅) ↔ ∀𝑢∃*𝑥 𝑢𝐹𝑥)
Theorem	inecmo3 39504*	Equivalence of a double universal quantification restricted to the domain and an "at most one" inside a universal quantification. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((∀𝑢 ∈ dom 𝑅∀𝑣 ∈ dom 𝑅(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ∧ Rel 𝑅) ↔ (∀𝑥∃*𝑢 𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	moeu2 39505	Uniqueness is equivalent to non-existence or unique existence. Alternate definition of the at-most-one quantifier, in terms of the existential quantifier and the unique existential quantifier. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Nov-2024.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜑 ↔ (¬ ∃𝑥𝜑 ∨ ∃!𝑥𝜑))
Theorem	mopickr 39506	"At most one" picks a variable value, eliminating an existential quantifier. The proof begins with references *2.21 (pm2.21 124) and *14.26 (eupickbi 2664) from [WhiteheadRussell] p. 104 and p. 183. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Nov-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ ((∃*𝑥𝜓 ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓)) → (𝜓 → 𝜑))
Theorem	moantr 39507	Sufficient condition for transitivity of conjunctions inside existential quantifiers. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2018.)
⊢ (∃*𝑥𝜓 → ((∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜓) ∧ ∃𝑥(𝜓 ∧ 𝜒)) → ∃𝑥(𝜑 ∧ 𝜒)))
Theorem	brabidgaw 39508*	The law of concretion for a binary relation. Special case of brabga 5513. Version of brabidga 39509 with a disjoint variable condition, which does not require ax-13 2404. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2018.) (Revised by GG, 2-Apr-2024.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	brabidga 39509	The law of concretion for a binary relation. Special case of brabga 5513. Usage of this theorem is discouraged because it depends on ax-13 2404, see brabidgaw 39508 for a weaker version that does not require it. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2018.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑥𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝜑)
Theorem	inxp2 39510*	Intersection with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥𝑅𝑦)}
Theorem	opabf 39511	A class abstraction of a collection of ordered pairs with a negated wff is the empty set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Oct-2019.) (Proof shortened by Thierry Arnoux, 18-Feb-2022.)
⊢ ¬ 𝜑    ⇒   ⊢ {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ 𝜑} = ∅
Theorem	ec0 39512	The empty-coset of a class is the empty set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-May-2019.)
⊢ [𝐴]∅ = ∅
Theorem	brcnvin 39513	Intersection with a converse, binary relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Mar-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(𝑅 ∩ ◡𝑆)𝐵 ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝐴)))
Theorem	ssdmral 39514*	Subclass of a domain. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Sep-2018.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝑅 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 𝑥𝑅𝑦)
21.28.3  Range Cartesian product
Definition	df-xrn 39515	Define the range Cartesian product of two classes. Definition from [Holmes] p. 40. Membership in this class is characterized by xrnss3v 39516 and brxrn 39518. This is Scott Fenton's df-txp 36807 with a different symbol, see https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/issues/2469 36807. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Mar-2012.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐵) = ((◡(1st ↾ (V × V)) ∘ 𝐴) ∩ (◡(2nd ↾ (V × V)) ∘ 𝐵))
Theorem	xrnss3v 39516	A range Cartesian product is a subset of the class of ordered triples. This is Scott Fenton's txpss3v 36831 with a different symbol, see https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/issues/2469 36831. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Mar-2012.)
⊢ (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐵) ⊆ (V × (V × V))
Theorem	xrnrel 39517	A range Cartesian product is a relation. This is Scott Fenton's txprel 36832 with a different symbol, see https://github.com/metamath/set.mm/issues/2469 36832. (Contributed by Scott Fenton, 31-Mar-2012.)
⊢ Rel (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐵)
Theorem	brxrn 39518	Characterize a ternary relation over a range Cartesian product. Together with xrnss3v 39516, this characterizes elementhood in a range cross. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 27-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ (𝐴𝑅𝐵 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝐶)))
Theorem	brxrn2 39519*	A characterization of the range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑦)))
Theorem	dfxrn2 39520*	Alternate definition of the range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Feb-2022.)
⊢ (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = ◡{⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)}
Theorem	brxrncnvep 39521	The range product with converse epsilon relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Jun-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Nov-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → (𝐴(𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝐵)))
Theorem	dmxrn 39522	Domain of the range product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Apr-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Nov-2025.)
⊢ dom (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = (dom 𝑅 ∩ dom 𝑆)
Theorem	dmcnvep 39523	Domain of converse epsilon relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 30-Jan-2018.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 23-Nov-2025.)
⊢ dom ◡ E = (V ∖ {∅})
Theorem	dmxrncnvep 39524	Domain of the range product with converse epsilon relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Nov-2025.)
⊢ dom (𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) = (dom 𝑅 ∖ {∅})
Theorem	dmcnvepres 39525	Domain of the restricted converse epsilon relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Jan-2026.)
⊢ dom (◡ E ↾ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∖ {∅})
Theorem	dmuncnvepres 39526	Domain of the union with the converse epsilon, restricted. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Jan-2026.)
⊢ dom ((𝑅 ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∩ (dom 𝑅 ∪ (V ∖ {∅})))
Theorem	dmxrnuncnvepres 39527	Domain of the combined relation of two special relations, see blockadjliftmap 39593. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Jan-2026.)
⊢ dom (((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴) = (𝐴 ∖ {∅})
Theorem	ecun 39528	The union coset of 𝐴. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → [𝐴](𝑅 ∪ 𝑆) = ([𝐴]𝑅 ∪ [𝐴]𝑆))
Theorem	ecunres 39529	The restricted union coset of 𝐵. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → [𝐵]((𝑅 ∪ 𝑆) ↾ 𝐴) = ([𝐵](𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∪ [𝐵](𝑆 ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	ecuncnvepres 39530	The restricted union with converse epsilon relation coset of 𝐵. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → [𝐵]((𝑅 ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴) = (𝐵 ∪ [𝐵]𝑅))
Theorem	xrneq1 39531	Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ⋉ 𝐶))
Theorem	xrneq1i 39532	Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product, inference form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Dec-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ⋉ 𝐶)
Theorem	xrneq1d 39533	Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product, deduction form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 7-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ⋉ 𝐶))
Theorem	xrneq2 39534	Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Dec-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐶 ⋉ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ⋉ 𝐵))
Theorem	xrneq2i 39535	Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product, inference form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Dec-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐶 ⋉ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ⋉ 𝐵)
Theorem	xrneq2d 39536	Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product, deduction form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 7-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 ⋉ 𝐴) = (𝐶 ⋉ 𝐵))
Theorem	xrneq12 39537	Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Dec-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 = 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 = 𝐷) → (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ⋉ 𝐷))
Theorem	xrneq12i 39538	Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product, inference form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Dec-2020.)
⊢ 𝐴 = 𝐵    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = 𝐷    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ⋉ 𝐷)
Theorem	xrneq12d 39539	Equality theorem for the range Cartesian product, deduction form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Dec-2021.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 ⋉ 𝐶) = (𝐵 ⋉ 𝐷))
Theorem	elecxrn 39540*	Elementhood in the (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)-coset of 𝐴. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Apr-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ [𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ↔ ∃𝑥∃𝑦(𝐵 = ⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑦)))
Theorem	ecxrn 39541*	The (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)-coset of 𝐴. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 18-Apr-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Sep-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → [𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝐴𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐴𝑆𝑧)})
Theorem	relecxrn 39542	The (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)-coset of a set is a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 15-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → Rel [𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆))
Theorem	ecxrn2 39543	The (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)-coset of a set is the Cartesian product of its 𝑅-coset and 𝑆-coset. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Oct-2020.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → [𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = ([𝐴]𝑅 × [𝐴]𝑆))
Theorem	ecxrncnvep 39544*	The (𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )-coset of a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-May-2021.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → [𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) = {⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∣ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴𝑅𝑦)})
Theorem	ecxrncnvep2 39545	The (𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )-coset of a set is the Cartesian product of its 𝑅-coset and the set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → [𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) = ([𝐴]𝑅 × 𝐴))
Theorem	disjressuc2 39546*	Double restricted quantification over the union of a set and its singleton. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})∀𝑣 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝑣]𝑅) = ∅) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝐴]𝑅) = ∅)))
Theorem	disjecxrn 39547	Two ways of saying that (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)-cosets are disjoint. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Jun-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 21-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)) = ∅ ↔ (([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅ ∨ ([𝐴]𝑆 ∩ [𝐵]𝑆) = ∅)))
Theorem	disjecxrncnvep 39548	Two ways of saying that cosets are disjoint, special case of disjecxrn 39547. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Jul-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 25-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (([𝐴](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅ ↔ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐵) = ∅ ∨ ([𝐴]𝑅 ∩ [𝐵]𝑅) = ∅)))
Theorem	disjsuc2 39549*	Double restricted quantification over the union of a set and its singleton. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 22-Aug-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑢 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})∀𝑣 ∈ (𝐴 ∪ {𝐴})(𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ↔ (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑣 ∨ ([𝑢](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∩ [𝑣](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )) = ∅) ∧ ∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑢 ∩ 𝐴) = ∅ ∨ ([𝑢]𝑅 ∩ [𝐴]𝑅) = ∅))))
Theorem	xrninxp 39550*	Intersection of a range Cartesian product with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 7-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ (𝐴 × (𝐵 × 𝐶))) = ◡{⟨⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩, 𝑢⟩ ∣ ((𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐶) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩))}
Theorem	xrninxp2 39551*	Intersection of a range Cartesian product with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 8-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ (𝐴 × (𝐵 × 𝐶))) = {⟨𝑢, 𝑥⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶) ∧ (𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑢(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝑥))}
Theorem	xrninxpex 39552	Sufficient condition for the intersection of a range Cartesian product with a Cartesian product to be a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋) → ((𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ (𝐴 × (𝐵 × 𝐶))) ∈ V)
Theorem	inxpxrn 39553	Two ways to express the intersection of a range Cartesian product with a Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 10-Apr-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) ⋉ (𝑆 ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐶))) = ((𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ (𝐴 × (𝐵 × 𝐶)))
Theorem	br1cnvxrn2 39554*	The converse of a binary relation over a range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴◡(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)))
Theorem	elec1cnvxrn2 39555*	Elementhood in the converse range Cartesian product coset of 𝐴. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 11-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ [𝐴]◡(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ↔ ∃𝑦∃𝑧(𝐴 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ ∧ 𝐵𝑅𝑦 ∧ 𝐵𝑆𝑧)))
Theorem	rnxrn 39556*	Range of the range Cartesian product of classes. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 1-Jun-2020.)
⊢ ran (𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢(𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)}
Theorem	rnxrnres 39557*	Range of a range Cartesian product with a restricted relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ran (𝑅 ⋉ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴)) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢𝑅𝑥 ∧ 𝑢𝑆𝑦)}
Theorem	rnxrncnvepres 39558*	Range of a range Cartesian product with a restriction of the converse epsilon relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ran (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 ∈ 𝑢 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥)}
Theorem	rnxrnidres 39559*	Range of a range Cartesian product with a restriction of the identity relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 6-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ran (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 = 𝑦 ∧ 𝑢𝑅𝑥)}
Theorem	xrnres 39560	Two ways to express restriction of range Cartesian product, see also xrnres2 39561, xrnres3 39562. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 5-Jun-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ↾ 𝐴) = ((𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ⋉ 𝑆)
Theorem	xrnres2 39561	Two ways to express restriction of range Cartesian product, see also xrnres 39560, xrnres3 39562. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 6-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ↾ 𝐴) = (𝑅 ⋉ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	xrnres3 39562	Two ways to express restriction of range Cartesian product, see also xrnres 39560, xrnres2 39561. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Mar-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ↾ 𝐴) = ((𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ⋉ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	xrnres4 39563	Two ways to express restriction of range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-Dec-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ↾ 𝐴) = ((𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆) ∩ (𝐴 × (ran (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) × ran (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴))))
Theorem	xrnresex 39564	Sufficient condition for a restricted range Cartesian product to be a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Dec-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 7-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴) ∈ 𝑋) → (𝑅 ⋉ (𝑆 ↾ 𝐴)) ∈ V)
Theorem	xrnidresex 39565	Sufficient condition for a range Cartesian product with restricted identity to be a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 31-Dec-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 ⋉ ( I ↾ 𝐴)) ∈ V)
Theorem	xrncnvepresex 39566	Sufficient condition for a range Cartesian product with restricted converse epsilon to be a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 16-Dec-2020.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 23-Sep-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) ∈ V)
Theorem	dmxrncnvepres 39567	Domain of the range product with restricted converse epsilon relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Nov-2025.)
⊢ dom (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) = (dom (𝑅 ↾ 𝐴) ∖ {∅})
Theorem	dmxrncnvepres2 39568	Domain of the range product with restricted converse epsilon relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-Jan-2026.)
⊢ dom (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) = (𝐴 ∩ (dom 𝑅 ∖ {∅}))
Theorem	eldmxrncnvepres 39569	Element of the domain of the range product with restricted converse epsilon relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ dom (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ [𝐵]𝑅 ≠ ∅)))
Theorem	eldmxrncnvepres2 39570*	Element of the domain of the range product with restricted converse epsilon relation. This identifies the domain of the pet 40100 span (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)): a 𝐵 belongs to the domain of the span exactly when 𝐵 is in 𝐴 and has at least one 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 and 𝑦 with 𝐵𝑅𝑦. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Nov-2025.)
⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐵 ∈ dom (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑦 𝐵𝑅𝑦)))
Theorem	eceldmqsxrncnvepres 39571	An (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴))-coset in its domain quotient. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Nov-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑋) → ([𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) ∈ (dom (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) / (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴))) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ [𝐵]𝑅 ≠ ∅)))
Theorem	eceldmqsxrncnvepres2 39572*	An (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴))-coset in its domain quotient. In the pet 40100 span (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)), a block [ B ] lies in the domain quotient exactly when its representative 𝐵 belongs to 𝐴 and actually fires at least one arrow (has some 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 and some 𝑦 with 𝐵𝑅𝑦). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 23-Nov-2025.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝑋) → ([𝐵](𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) ∈ (dom (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) / (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴))) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑦 𝐵𝑅𝑦)))
Theorem	brin2 39573	Binary relation on an intersection is a special case of binary relation on range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Aug-2021.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(𝑅 ∩ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ 𝐴(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆)⟨𝐵, 𝐵⟩))
Theorem	brin3 39574	Binary relation on an intersection is a special case of binary relation on range Cartesian product. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Aug-2021.) (Avoid depending on this detail.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴(𝑅 ∩ 𝑆)𝐵 ↔ 𝐴(𝑅 ⋉ 𝑆){{𝐵}}))
21.28.4  Relations
Definition	df-rels 39575	Define the relations class. Proper class relations (like I, see reli 5811) are not elements of it. The element of this class and the relation predicate are the same when 𝑅 is a set (see elrelsrel 39577). The class of relations is a great tool we can use when we define classes of different relations as nullary class constants as required by the 2. point in our Guidelines https://us.metamath.org/mpeuni/mathbox.html 39577. When we want to define a specific class of relations as a nullary class constant, the appropriate method is the following: 1. We define the specific nullary class constant for general sets (see e.g. df-refs 39725), then 2. we get the required class of relations by the intersection of the class of general sets above with the class of relations df-rels 39575 (see df-refrels 39726 and the resulting dfrefrels2 39728 and dfrefrels3 39729). 3. Finally, in order to be able to work with proper classes (like iprc 7950) as well, we define the predicate of the relation (see df-refrel 39727) so that it is true for the relevant proper classes (see refrelid 39737), and that the element of the class of the required relations (e.g. elrefrels3 39734) and this predicate are the same in case of sets (see elrefrelsrel 39735). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 13-Jun-2018.)
⊢ Rels = 𝒫 (V × V)
Theorem	elrels2 39576	The element of the relations class (df-rels 39575) and the relation predicate (df-rel 5663) are the same when 𝑅 is a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Jun-2018.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ Rels ↔ 𝑅 ⊆ (V × V)))
Theorem	elrelsrel 39577	The element of the relations class (df-rels 39575) and the relation predicate are the same when 𝑅 is a set. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Nov-2018.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ Rels ↔ Rel 𝑅))
Theorem	elrelsrelim 39578	The element of the relations class is a relation. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 20-Jul-2019.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ Rels → Rel 𝑅)
Theorem	elrels5 39579	Equivalent expressions for an element of the relations class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ Rels ↔ (𝑅 ↾ dom 𝑅) = 𝑅))
Theorem	elrels6 39580	Equivalent expressions for an element of the relations class. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 21-Jul-2021.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑅 ∈ Rels ↔ (𝑅 ∩ (dom 𝑅 × ran 𝑅)) = 𝑅))
21.28.5  Quotient map (coset map)
Definition	df-qmap 39581*	Define the quotient map (coset map), see also dfqmap2 39582 and dfqmap3 39583. QMap 𝑅 is the "send a generator / domain element to its 𝑅 -coset" map: it maps each 𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 to the block [𝑥]𝑅. Makes the quotient operation / structurally explicit as the range of a canonical map (see dfqs2 8755, rnqmap 39589). This is crucial for (i) modular "two-layer" characterizations (map layer + carrier layer) such as dfdisjs6 40077 / dfdisjs7 40078, (ii) transport of properties between a relation and its induced quotient-carrier (e.g. "elements are blocks" via rnqmap 39589), and (iii) expressing stability/invariance constraints as ordinary conditions on a graph (e.g. ran QMap 𝑟 ∈ ElDisjs, QMap 𝑟 ∈ Disjs). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Feb-2026.)
⊢ QMap 𝑅 = (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ↦ [𝑥]𝑅)
Theorem	dfqmap2 39582*	Alternate definition of the quotient map: QMap in image-of-singleton form. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Feb-2026.)
⊢ QMap 𝑅 = (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ↦ (𝑅 “ {𝑥}))
Theorem	dfqmap3 39583*	Alternate definition of the quotient map: QMap as ordered-pair class abstraction. Gives the raw set-builder characterization for extensional proofs, Rel proofs (relqmap 39587), and composition/intersection manipulations. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Feb-2026.)
⊢ QMap 𝑅 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ (𝑥 ∈ dom 𝑅 ∧ 𝑦 = [𝑥]𝑅)}
Theorem	ecqmap 39584	QMap fibers are singletons of blocks. Makes QMap behave like a "block constructor function" on dom 𝑅. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 → [𝐴] QMap 𝑅 = {[𝐴]𝑅})
Theorem	ecqmap2 39585	Fiber of QMap equals singleton quotient: a conceptual bridge between "map fibers" and quotients. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 19-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝑅 → [𝐴] QMap 𝑅 = ({𝐴} / 𝑅))
Theorem	qmapex 39586	Quotient map exists if 𝑅 exists. Type-safety: ensures QMap is a set under the standard "relation sethood" hypothesis. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → QMap 𝑅 ∈ V)
Theorem	relqmap 39587	Quotient map is a relation. Guarantees that QMap can be composed, restricted, and used in other relation infrastructure (e.g., membership in Disjs, Rels-based typing). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Feb-2026.)
⊢ Rel QMap 𝑅
Theorem	dmqmap 39588	QMap preserves the domain. Confirms that QMap is defined exactly on the points where cosets [𝑥]𝑅 make sense (those in dom 𝑅). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 14-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ 𝑉 → dom QMap 𝑅 = dom 𝑅)
Theorem	rnqmap 39589	The range of the quotient map is the quotient carrier. It lets us replace quotient-carrier reasoning by map/range reasoning (and conversely) via df-qmap 39581 and dfqs2 8755. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 12-Feb-2026.)
⊢ ran QMap 𝑅 = (dom 𝑅 / 𝑅)
21.28.6  Lifts, shifts, successor, and predecessor
Definition	df-adjliftmap 39590	Define the adjoined lift map. Given a relation 𝑅 and a carrier/set 𝐴, we form the adjoined relation (𝑅 ∪ ◡ E ) (i.e., "follow 𝑅 or follow elements"), restricted to 𝐴, and map each domain element 𝑚 to its coset [𝑚] under that restricted adjoined relation, see its expanded version dfadjliftmap 39591. Thus, for 𝑚 in its domain, we have (𝑚 ∪ [𝑚]𝑅), see dfadjliftmap2 39592. Its key special case is successor: for 𝑅 = I and 𝐴 = dom I, or 𝐴 = V, the adjoined relation is ( I ∪ ◡ E ), and the coset becomes [𝑚]( I ∪ ◡ E ) = (𝑚 ∪ {𝑚}). So ( I AdjLiftMap dom I ) or ( I AdjLiftMap V) (see dfsucmap2 39599 and dfsucmap3 39598) are exactly the successor map 𝑚 ↦ suc 𝑚 (cf. dfsucmap4 39600), which is a prerequisite for accepting the adjoining lift as the right generalization of successor. A maximally generic form would be "( R F LiftMap A )" defined as (𝑚 ∈ dom ((𝑅𝐹◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴) ↦ [𝑚]((𝑅𝐹◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴)) where 𝐹 is an object-level binary operator on relations (used via df-ov 7449). However, ∪ and ⋉ are introduced in set.mm as class constructors (e.g. df-un 4154), not as an object-level binary function symbol 𝐹 that can be passed as a parameter. To make the generic 𝐹-pattern literally usable, we would need to reify union and ⋉ as function-objects, which is additional infrastructure. To avoid introducing operator-as-function objects solely to support 𝐹, we define: AdjLiftMap directly using df-un 4154, and BlockLiftMap directly using the existing ⋉ constructor dfxrn2 39520, so we treat any "generic 𝐹-LiftMap" as optional future generalization, not a dependency. We prefer to avoid defining too many concepts. For this reason, we will not introduce a named "adjoining relation", a named carrier "adjoining lift" "( R AdjLift A )", in place of ran (𝑅 AdjLiftMap 𝐴), which is (dom ((𝑅 ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴) / ((𝑅 ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴)), cf. dfqs2 8755, or the equilibrium condition "AdjLiftFix" , in place of {⟨𝑟, 𝑎⟩ ∣ (dom ((𝑅 ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴) / ((𝑅 ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴)) = 𝑎} (cf. its analog df-blockliftfix 39616). These are definable by simple expansions and/or domain-quotient theorems when needed. A "two-stage" construction is obtained by first forming the block relation (𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) and then adjoining elements as "BlockAdj" . Combined, it uses the relation ((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∪ ◡ E ), which for 𝑚 in its domain (𝐴 ∖ {∅}) gives (𝑚 ∪ [𝑚](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E )), yielding "BlockAdjLiftMap" (cf. blockadjliftmap 39593) and "BlockAdjLiftFix". We only introduce these if a downstream theorem actually requires them. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jan-2026.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 AdjLiftMap 𝐴) = QMap ((𝑅 ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴)
Theorem	dfadjliftmap 39591*	Alternate (expanded) definition of the adjoined lift map. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Jan-2026.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 AdjLiftMap 𝐴) = (𝑚 ∈ dom ((𝑅 ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴) ↦ [𝑚]((𝑅 ∪ ◡ E ) ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	dfadjliftmap2 39592*	Alternate definition of the adjoined lift map. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 AdjLiftMap 𝐴) = (𝑚 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ (dom 𝑅 ∪ (V ∖ {∅}))) ↦ (𝑚 ∪ [𝑚]𝑅))
Theorem	blockadjliftmap 39593*	A "two-stage" construction is obtained by first forming the block relation (𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) and then adjoining elements as "BlockAdj". Combined, it uses the relation ((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) ∪ ◡ E ). (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Jan-2026.)
⊢ ((𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) AdjLiftMap 𝐴) = {⟨𝑚, 𝑛⟩ ∣ (𝑚 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑛 = (𝑚 ∪ ([𝑚]𝑅 × 𝑚)))}
Definition	df-blockliftmap 39594	Define the block lift map. Given a relation 𝑅 and a carrier/set 𝐴, we form the block relation (𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) (i.e., "follow both 𝑅 and element"), restricted to 𝐴 (or, equivalently, "follow both 𝑅 and elements-of-A", cf. xrnres2 39561). Then map each domain element 𝑚 to its coset [𝑚] under that restricted block relation. For 𝑚 in the domain, which requires (𝑚 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑚 ≠ ∅ ∧ [𝑚]𝑅 ≠ ∅) (cf. eldmxrncnvepres 39569), the fiber has the product form [𝑚](𝑅 ⋉ ◡ E ) = ([𝑚]𝑅 × 𝑚), so the block relation lifts a block 𝑚 to the rectangular grid "external labels × internal members", see dfblockliftmap2 39596. Contrast: while the adjoined lift, via (𝑅 ∪ ◡ E ), attaches neighbors and members in a single relation (see dfadjliftmap2 39592), the block lift labels each internal member by each external neighbor. For the general case and a two-stage construction (first block lift, then adjoin membership), see the comments to df-adjliftmap 39590. For the equilibrium condition, see df-blockliftfix 39616. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 24-Jan-2026.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 BlockLiftMap 𝐴) = QMap (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴))
Theorem	dfblockliftmap 39595*	Alternate definition of the block lift map. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-Jan-2026.) (Revised by Peter Mazsa, 22-Feb-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 BlockLiftMap 𝐴) = (𝑚 ∈ dom (𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)) ↦ [𝑚](𝑅 ⋉ (◡ E ↾ 𝐴)))
Theorem	dfblockliftmap2 39596*	Alternate definition of the block lift map. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 29-Jan-2026.)
⊢ (𝑅 BlockLiftMap 𝐴) = (𝑚 ∈ (𝐴 ∩ (dom 𝑅 ∖ {∅})) ↦ ([𝑚]𝑅 × 𝑚))
Definition	df-sucmap 39597*	Define the successor map, directly as the graph of the successor operation, using only elementary set theory (ordered-pair class abstraction). This avoids committing to any particular construction of the successor function/class from other operators (e.g. a union/composition presentation), while remaining provably equivalent to those presentations (cf. dfsucmap2 39599 and dfsucmap3 39598 vs. df-succf 36825 and dfsuccf2 36896). For maximum mappy shape, see dfsucmap4 39600. We also treat the successor relation as the default shift relation for grading/tower arguments (cf. df-shiftstable 39617). Because it is used pervasively in shift-lift infrastructure, we adopt the short name SucMap rather than the fully systematic "SucAdjLiftMap". You may also define the predecessor relation as the converse graph "PreMap" as ◡ SucMap, which reverses successor edges ( cf. cnvopab 6144) and sends each successor to its (unique) predecessor when it exists. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 25-Jan-2026.)
⊢ SucMap = {⟨𝑚, 𝑛⟩ ∣ suc 𝑚 = 𝑛}
Theorem	dfsucmap3 39598	Alternate definition of the successor map. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Jan-2026.)
⊢ SucMap = ( I AdjLiftMap V)
Theorem	dfsucmap2 39599	Alternate definition of the successor map. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Jan-2026.)
⊢ SucMap = ( I AdjLiftMap dom I )
Theorem	dfsucmap4 39600	Alternate definition of the successor map. (Contributed by Peter Mazsa, 28-Jan-2026.)
⊢ SucMap = (𝑚 ∈ V ↦ suc 𝑚)