P. 396 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 39501-39600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	hlexch1 39501	A Hilbert lattice has the exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 13-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	hlexch2 39502	A Hilbert lattice has the exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑋) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑋)))
Theorem	hlexchb1 39503	A Hilbert lattice has the exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	hlexchb2 39504	A Hilbert lattice has the exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑋) ↔ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑋) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑋)))
Theorem	hlsupr 39505*	A Hilbert lattice has the superposition property. Theorem 13.2 in [Crawley] p. 107. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑟 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	hlsupr2 39506*	A Hilbert lattice has the superposition property. (Contributed by NM, 25-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑃 ∨ 𝑟) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟))
Theorem	hlhgt4 39507*	A Hilbert lattice has a height of at least 4. (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (( 0 < 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦) ∧ (𝑦 < 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 1 )))
Theorem	hlhgt2 39508*	A Hilbert lattice has a height of at least 2. (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ( 0 < 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 < 1 ))
Theorem	hl0lt1N 39509	Lattice 0 is less than lattice 1 in a Hilbert lattice. (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 0 < 1 )
Theorem	hlexch3 39510	A Hilbert lattice has the exchange property. (atexch 32363 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 ) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	hlexch4N 39511	A Hilbert lattice has the exchange property. Part of Definition 7.8 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 32. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 ) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	hlatexchb1 39512	A version of hlexchb1 39503 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	hlatexchb2 39513	A version of hlexchb2 39504 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ↔ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	hlatexch1 39514	Atom exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 7-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	hlatexch2 39515	Atom exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jan-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	hlatmstcOLDN 39516*	An atomic, complete, orthomodular lattice is atomistic i.e. every element is the join of the atoms under it. See remark before Proposition 1 in [Kalmbach] p. 140; also remark in [BeltramettiCassinelli] p. 98. (hatomistici 32344 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑈‘{𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑋}) = 𝑋)
Theorem	hlatle 39517*	The ordering of two Hilbert lattice elements is determined by the atoms under them. (chrelat3 32353 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 → 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌)))
Theorem	hlateq 39518*	The equality of two Hilbert lattice elements is determined by the atoms under them. (chrelat4i 32355 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 24-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	hlrelat1 39519*	An atomistic lattice with 0 is relatively atomic. Part of Lemma 7.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 30. (chpssati 32345, with ∧ swapped, analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌)))
Theorem	hlrelat5N 39520*	An atomistic lattice with 0 is relatively atomic, using the definition in Remark 2 of [Kalmbach] p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋 < (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ∧ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌))
Theorem	hlrelat 39521*	A Hilbert lattice is relatively atomic. Remark 2 of [Kalmbach] p. 149. (chrelati 32346 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Feb-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋 < (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ≤ 𝑌))
Theorem	hlrelat2 39522*	A consequence of relative atomicity. (chrelat2i 32347 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Feb-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (¬ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌)))
Theorem	exatleN 39523	A condition for an atom to be less than or equal to a lattice element. Part of proof of Lemma A in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 28-Apr-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑅 = 𝑃))
Theorem	hl2at 39524*	A Hilbert lattice has at least 2 atoms. (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 𝑝 ≠ 𝑞)
Theorem	atex 39525	At least one atom exists. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jul-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → 𝐴 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	intnatN 39526	If the intersection with a non-majorizing element is an atom, the intersecting element is not an atom. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (¬ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∈ 𝐴)) → ¬ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	2llnne2N 39527	Condition implying that two intersecting lines are different. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ≠ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	2llnneN 39528	Condition implying that two intersecting lines are different. (Contributed by NM, 29-May-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) ≠ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	cvr1 39529	A Hilbert lattice has the covering property. Proposition 1(ii) in [Kalmbach] p. 140 (and its converse). (chcv1 32337 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	cvr2N 39530	Less-than and covers equivalence in a Hilbert lattice. (chcv2 32338 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋 < (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	hlrelat3 39531*	The Hilbert lattice is relatively atomic. Stronger version of hlrelat 39521. (Contributed by NM, 2-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) ≤ 𝑌))
Theorem	cvrval3 39532*	Binary relation expressing 𝑌 covers 𝑋. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) = 𝑌)))
Theorem	cvrval4N 39533*	Binary relation expressing 𝑌 covers 𝑋. (Contributed by NM, 16-Jun-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑋 ∨ 𝑝) = 𝑌)))
Theorem	cvrval5 39534*	Binary relation expressing 𝑋 covers 𝑋 ∧ 𝑌. (Contributed by NM, 7-Dec-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)𝐶𝑋 ↔ ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ (𝑝 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)) = 𝑋)))
Theorem	cvrp 39535	A Hilbert lattice satisfies the covering property of Definition 7.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31 and its converse. (cvp 32357 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) = 0 ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	atcvr1 39536	An atom is covered by its join with a different atom. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	atcvr2 39537	An atom is covered by its join with a different atom. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	cvrexchlem 39538	Lemma for cvrexch 39539. (cvexchlem 32350 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)𝐶𝑌 → 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑌)))
Theorem	cvrexch 39539	A Hilbert lattice satisfies the exchange axiom. Proposition 1(iii) of [Kalmbach] p. 140 and its converse. Originally proved by Garrett Birkhoff in 1933. (cvexchi 32351 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)𝐶𝑌 ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑌)))
Theorem	cvratlem 39540	Lemma for cvrat 39541. (atcvatlem 32367 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑋 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (¬ 𝑃(le‘𝐾)𝑋 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	cvrat 39541	A nonzero Hilbert lattice element less than the join of two atoms is an atom. (atcvati 32368 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 22-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑋 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	ltltncvr 39542	A chained strong ordering is not a covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 < 𝑍) → ¬ 𝑋𝐶𝑍))
Theorem	ltcvrntr 39543	Non-transitive condition for the covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌𝐶𝑍) → ¬ 𝑋𝐶𝑍))
Theorem	cvrntr 39544	The covers relation is not transitive. (cvntr 32274 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋𝐶𝑌 ∧ 𝑌𝐶𝑍) → ¬ 𝑋𝐶𝑍))
Theorem	atcvr0eq 39545	The covers relation is not transitive. (atcv0eq 32361 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → ( 0 𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ 𝑃 = 𝑄))
Theorem	lnnat 39546	A line (the join of two distinct atoms) is not an atom. (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ ¬ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	atcvrj0 39547	Two atoms covering the zero subspace are equal. (atcv1 32362 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑋 = 0 ↔ 𝑃 = 𝑄))
Theorem	cvrat2 39548	A Hilbert lattice element covered by the join of two distinct atoms is an atom. (atcvat2i 32369 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑋𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	atcvrneN 39549	Inequality derived from atom condition. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑅)
Theorem	atcvrj1 39550	Condition for an atom to be covered by the join of two others. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))
Theorem	atcvrj2b 39551	Condition for an atom to be covered by the join of two others. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	atcvrj2 39552	Condition for an atom to be covered by the join of two others. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))
Theorem	atleneN 39553	Inequality derived from atom condition. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑅)
Theorem	atltcvr 39554	An equivalence of less-than ordering and covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → (𝑃 < (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	atle 39555*	Any nonzero element has an atom under it. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 𝑝 ≤ 𝑋)
Theorem	atlt 39556	Two atoms are unequal iff their join is greater than one of them. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2012.)
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄))
Theorem	atlelt 39557	Transfer less-than relation from one atom to another. (Contributed by NM, 7-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑄 < 𝑋)) → 𝑃 < 𝑋)
Theorem	2atlt 39558*	Given an atom less than an element, there is another atom less than the element. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑃 < 𝑋) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑞 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑞 < 𝑋))
Theorem	atexchcvrN 39559	Atom exchange property. Version of hlatexch2 39515 with covers relation. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) → 𝑄𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	atexchltN 39560	Atom exchange property. Version of hlatexch2 39515 with less-than ordering. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 < (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) → 𝑄 < (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	cvrat3 39561	A condition implying that a certain lattice element is an atom. Part of Lemma 3.2.20 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. (atcvat3i 32378 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)) → (𝑋 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)) ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	cvrat4 39562*	A condition implying existence of an atom with the properties shown. Lemma 3.2.20 in [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. Also Lemma 9.2(delta) in [MaedaMaeda] p. 41. (atcvat4i 32379 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 30-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟))))
Theorem	cvrat42 39563*	Commuted version of cvrat4 39562. (Contributed by NM, 28-Jan-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑟 ∨ 𝑄))))
Theorem	2atjm 39564	The meet of a line (expressed with 2 atoms) and a lattice element. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑋) = 𝑃)
Theorem	atbtwn 39565	Property of a 3rd atom 𝑅 on a line 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 intersecting element 𝑋 at 𝑃. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ↔ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ 𝑋))
Theorem	atbtwnexOLDN 39566*	There exists a 3rd atom 𝑟 on a line 𝑃 ∨ 𝑄 intersecting element 𝑋 at 𝑃, such that 𝑟 is different from 𝑄 and not in 𝑋. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	atbtwnex 39567*	Given atoms 𝑃 in 𝑋 and 𝑄 not in 𝑋, there exists an atom 𝑟 not in 𝑋 such that the line 𝑄 ∨ 𝑟 intersects 𝑋 at 𝑃. (Contributed by NM, 1-Aug-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ 𝑋)) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑟 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑟)))
Theorem	3noncolr2 39568	Two ways to express 3 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 2 places). (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	3noncolr1N 39569	Two ways to express 3 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 1 place). (Contributed by NM, 12-Jul-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → (𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	hlatcon3 39570	Atom exchange combined with contraposition. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))
Theorem	hlatcon2 39571	Atom exchange combined with contraposition. (Contributed by NM, 13-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))) → ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄))
Theorem	4noncolr3 39572	A way to express 4 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 3 places). (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)))
Theorem	4noncolr2 39573	A way to express 4 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 2 places). (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑅 ≠ 𝑆 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ ((𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	4noncolr1 39574	A way to express 4 non-colinear atoms (rotated right 1 places). (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑆 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ ¬ 𝑄 ≤ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ ((𝑆 ∨ 𝑃) ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	athgt 39575*	A Hilbert lattice, whose height is at least 4, has a chain of 4 successively covering atom joins. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝𝐶(𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞)𝐶((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟) ∧ ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟)𝐶(((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟) ∨ 𝑠))))
Theorem	3dim0 39576*	There exists a 3-dimensional (height-4) element i.e. a volume. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ HL → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑝 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟)))
Theorem	3dimlem1 39577	Lemma for 3dim1 39586. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)) ∧ 𝑃 = 𝑄) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)))
Theorem	3dimlem2 39578	Lemma for 3dim1 39586. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑆)))
Theorem	3dimlem3a 39579	Lemma for 3dim3 39588. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) → ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))
Theorem	3dimlem3 39580	Lemma for 3dim1 39586. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	3dimlem3OLDN 39581	Lemma for 3dim1 39586. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑇 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	3dimlem4a 39582	Lemma for 3dim3 39588. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆))) → ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))
Theorem	3dimlem4 39583	Lemma for 3dim1 39586. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	3dimlem4OLDN 39584	Lemma for 3dim1 39586. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ ((𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∨ 𝑆)) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ ¬ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	3dim1lem5 39585*	Lemma for 3dim1 39586. (Contributed by NM, 26-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑣 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑢 ∧ ¬ 𝑣 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∧ ¬ 𝑤 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑢) ∨ 𝑣))) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑃 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟)))
Theorem	3dim1 39586*	Construct a 3-dimensional volume (height-4 element) on top of a given atom 𝑃. (Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑃 ≠ 𝑞 ∧ ¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟)))
Theorem	3dim2 39587*	Construct 2 new layers on top of 2 given atoms. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑟 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑟)))
Theorem	3dim3 39588*	Construct a new layer on top of 3 given atoms. (Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑠 ≤ ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∨ 𝑅))
Theorem	2dim 39589*	Generate a height-3 element (2-dimensional plane) from an atom. (Contributed by NM, 3-May-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑟 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑃𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑞)𝐶((𝑃 ∨ 𝑞) ∨ 𝑟)))
Theorem	1dimN 39590*	An atom is covered by a height-2 element (1-dimensional line). (Contributed by NM, 3-May-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 𝑃𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑞))
Theorem	1cvrco 39591	The orthocomplement of an element covered by 1 is an atom. (Contributed by NM, 7-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶 1 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	1cvratex 39592*	There exists an atom less than an element covered by 1. (Contributed by NM, 7-May-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 13-Jun-2014.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋𝐶 1 ) → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 𝑝 < 𝑋)
Theorem	1cvratlt 39593	An atom less than or equal to an element covered by 1 is less than the element. (Contributed by NM, 7-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋𝐶 1 ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋)) → 𝑃 < 𝑋)
Theorem	1cvrjat 39594	An element covered by the lattice unity, when joined with an atom not under it, equals the lattice unity. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋𝐶 1 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋)) → (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) = 1 )
Theorem	1cvrat 39595	Create an atom under an element covered by the lattice unity. Part of proof of Lemma B in [Crawley] p. 112. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑋𝐶 1 ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑋) ∈ 𝐴)
Theorem	ps-1 39596	The join of two atoms 𝑅 ∨ 𝑆 (specifying a projective geometry line) is determined uniquely by any two atoms (specifying two points) less than or equal to that join. Part of Lemma 16.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 69, showing projective space postulate PS1 in [MaedaMaeda] p. 67. (Contributed by NM, 15-Nov-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆) ↔ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆)))
Theorem	ps-2 39597*	Lattice analogue for the projective geometry axiom, "if a line intersects two sides of a triangle at different points then it also intersects the third side." Projective space condition PS2 in [MaedaMaeda] p. 68 and part of Theorem 16.4 in [MaedaMaeda] p. 69. (Contributed by NM, 1-Dec-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑇 ∈ 𝐴)) ∧ ((¬ 𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑆 ≠ 𝑇) ∧ (𝑆 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ∧ 𝑇 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))) → ∃𝑢 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑢 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) ∧ 𝑢 ≤ (𝑆 ∨ 𝑇)))
Theorem	2atjlej 39598	Two atoms are different if their join majorizes the join of two different atoms. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-2013.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆))) → 𝑅 ≠ 𝑆)
Theorem	hlatexch3N 39599	Rearrange join of atoms in an equality. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jul-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑄 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅))) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅))
Theorem	hlatexch4 39600	Exchange 2 atoms. (Contributed by NM, 13-May-2013.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ HL ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑅 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑆 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑅 ∧ 𝑄 ≠ 𝑆 ∧ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑆))) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑆))