P. 396 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 39501-39600   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	omllaw3 39501	Orthomodular law equivalent. Theorem 2(ii) of [Kalmbach] p. 22. (pjoml 31511 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ (𝑌 ∧ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)) = 0 ) → 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	omllaw4 39502	Orthomodular law equivalent. Remark in [Holland95] p. 223. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → (( ⊥ ‘(( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌)) ∧ 𝑌) = 𝑋))
Theorem	omllaw5N 39503	The orthomodular law. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (pjoml5 31688 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 14-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∨ (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑌))) = (𝑋 ∨ 𝑌))
Theorem	cmtcomlemN 39504	Lemma for cmtcomN 39505. (cmcmlem 31666 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 → 𝑌𝐶𝑋))
Theorem	cmtcomN 39505	Commutation is symmetric. Theorem 2(v) in [Kalmbach] p. 22. (cmcmi 31667 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ 𝑌𝐶𝑋))
Theorem	cmt2N 39506	Commutation with orthocomplement. Theorem 2.3(i) of [Beran] p. 39. (cmcm2i 31668 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ 𝑋𝐶( ⊥ ‘𝑌)))
Theorem	cmt3N 39507	Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (cmcm4i 31670 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)𝐶𝑌))
Theorem	cmt4N 39508	Commutation with orthocomplement. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (cmcm4i 31670 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑋)𝐶( ⊥ ‘𝑌)))
Theorem	cmtbr2N 39509	Alternate definition of the commutes relation. Remark in [Kalmbach] p. 23. (cmbr2i 31671 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌)))))
Theorem	cmtbr3N 39510	Alternate definition for the commutes relation. Lemma 3 of [Kalmbach] p. 23. (cmbr3 31683 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 ∧ (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∨ 𝑌)) = (𝑋 ∧ 𝑌)))
Theorem	cmtbr4N 39511	Alternate definition for the commutes relation. (cmbr4i 31676 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 ∧ (( ⊥ ‘𝑋) ∨ 𝑌)) ≤ 𝑌))
Theorem	lecmtN 39512	Ordered elements commute. (lecmi 31677 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → 𝑋𝐶𝑌))
Theorem	cmtidN 39513	Any element commutes with itself. (cmidi 31685 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑋𝐶𝑋)
Theorem	omlfh1N 39514	Foulis-Holland Theorem, part 1. If any 2 pairs in a triple of orthomodular lattice elements commute, the triple is distributive. Part of Theorem 5 in [Kalmbach] p. 25. (fh1 31693 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑍)) → (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑍)))
Theorem	omlfh3N 39515	Foulis-Holland Theorem, part 3. Dual of omlfh1N 39514. (Contributed by NM, 8-Nov-2011.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑍)) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑍)))
Theorem	omlmod1i2N 39516	Analogue of modular law atmod1i2 40115 that holds in any OML. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (cm‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋 ≤ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑌𝐶𝑍)) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍))
Theorem	omlspjN 39517	Contraction of a Sasaki projection. (Contributed by NM, 6-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌) → ((𝑋 ∨ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌)) ∧ 𝑌) = 𝑋)
21.28.10  Atomic lattices with covering property
Syntax	ccvr 39518	Extend class notation with covers relation.
class ⋖
Syntax	catm 39519	Extend class notation with atoms.
class Atoms
Syntax	cal 39520	Extend class notation with atomic lattices.
class AtLat
Syntax	clc 39521	Extend class notation with lattices with the covering property.
class CvLat
Definition	df-covers 39522*	Define the covers relation ("is covered by") for posets. "𝑎 is covered by 𝑏 " means that 𝑎 is strictly less than 𝑏 and there is nothing in between. See cvrval 39525 for the relation form. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ ⋖ = (𝑝 ∈ V ↦ {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑝) ∧ 𝑏 ∈ (Base‘𝑝)) ∧ 𝑎(lt‘𝑝)𝑏 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑝)(𝑎(lt‘𝑝)𝑧 ∧ 𝑧(lt‘𝑝)𝑏))})
Definition	df-ats 39523*	Define the class of poset atoms. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ Atoms = (𝑝 ∈ V ↦ {𝑎 ∈ (Base‘𝑝) ∣ (0.‘𝑝)( ⋖ ‘𝑝)𝑎})
Theorem	cvrfval 39524*	Value of covers relation "is covered by". (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 < 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑦))})
Theorem	cvrval 39525*	Binary relation expressing 𝐵 covers 𝐴, which means that 𝐵 is larger than 𝐴 and there is nothing in between. Definition 3.2.18 of [PtakPulmannova] p. 68. (cvbr 32357 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ ¬ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑋 < 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑌))))
Theorem	cvrlt 39526	The covers relation implies the less-than relation. (cvpss 32360 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 8-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → 𝑋 < 𝑌)
Theorem	cvrnbtwn 39527	There is no element between the two arguments of the covers relation. (cvnbtwn 32361 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → ¬ (𝑋 < 𝑍 ∧ 𝑍 < 𝑌))
Theorem	ncvr1 39528	No element covers the lattice unity. (Contributed by NM, 8-Jul-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 1 𝐶𝑋)
Theorem	cvrletrN 39529	Property of an element above a covering. (Contributed by NM, 7-Dec-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋𝐶𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑍) → 𝑋 < 𝑍))
Theorem	cvrval2 39530*	Binary relation expressing 𝑌 covers 𝑋. Definition of covers in [Kalmbach] p. 15. (cvbr2 32358 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 < 𝑧 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑌) → 𝑧 = 𝑌))))
Theorem	cvrnbtwn2 39531	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (cvnbtwn2 32362 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → ((𝑋 < 𝑍 ∧ 𝑍 ≤ 𝑌) ↔ 𝑍 = 𝑌))
Theorem	cvrnbtwn3 39532	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. (cvnbtwn3 32363 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑍 < 𝑌) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑍))
Theorem	cvrcon3b 39533	Contraposition law for the covers relation. (cvcon3 32359 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ⊥ = (oc‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋𝐶𝑌 ↔ ( ⊥ ‘𝑌)𝐶( ⊥ ‘𝑋)))
Theorem	cvrle 39534	The covers relation implies the "less than or equal to" relation. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌)
Theorem	cvrnbtwn4 39535	The covers relation implies no in-betweenness. Part of proof of Lemma 7.5.1 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31. (cvnbtwn4 32364 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑍 ∧ 𝑍 ≤ 𝑌) ↔ (𝑋 = 𝑍 ∨ 𝑍 = 𝑌)))
Theorem	cvrnle 39536	The covers relation implies the negation of the converse "less than or equal to" relation. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → ¬ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋)
Theorem	cvrne 39537	The covers relation implies inequality. (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋𝐶𝑌) → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)
Theorem	cvrnrefN 39538	The covers relation is not reflexive. (cvnref 32366 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 1-Nov-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝑋𝐶𝑋)
Theorem	cvrcmp 39539	If two lattice elements that cover a third are comparable, then they are equal. (Contributed by NM, 6-Feb-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑍𝐶𝑋 ∧ 𝑍𝐶𝑌)) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	cvrcmp2 39540	If two lattice elements covered by a third are comparable, then they are equal. (Contributed by NM, 20-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋𝐶𝑍 ∧ 𝑌𝐶𝑍)) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	pats 39541*	The set of atoms in a poset. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐷 → 𝐴 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ 0 𝐶𝑥})
Theorem	isat 39542	The predicate "is an atom". (ela 32414 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐷 → (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 0 𝐶𝑃)))
Theorem	isat2 39543	The predicate "is an atom". (elatcv0 32416 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 0 𝐶𝑃))
Theorem	atcvr0 39544	An atom covers zero. (atcv0 32417 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐷 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → 0 𝐶𝑃)
Theorem	atbase 39545	An atom is a member of the lattice base set (i.e. a lattice element). (atelch 32419 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 10-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	atssbase 39546	The set of atoms is a subset of the base set. (atssch 32418 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵
Theorem	0ltat 39547	An atom is greater than zero. (Contributed by NM, 4-Jul-2012.)
⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → 0 < 𝑃)
Theorem	leatb 39548	A poset element less than or equal to an atom equals either zero or the atom. (atss 32421 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑃 ↔ (𝑋 = 𝑃 ∨ 𝑋 = 0 )))
Theorem	leat 39549	A poset element less than or equal to an atom equals either zero or the atom. (Contributed by NM, 15-Oct-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑃) → (𝑋 = 𝑃 ∨ 𝑋 = 0 ))
Theorem	leat2 39550	A nonzero poset element less than or equal to an atom equals the atom. (Contributed by NM, 6-Mar-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑋 ≠ 0 ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑃)) → 𝑋 = 𝑃)
Theorem	leat3 39551	A poset element less than or equal to an atom is either an atom or zero. (Contributed by NM, 2-Dec-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OP ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑋 ≤ 𝑃) → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐴 ∨ 𝑋 = 0 ))
Theorem	meetat 39552	The meet of any element with an atom is either the atom or zero. (Contributed by NM, 28-Aug-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) = 𝑃 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) = 0 ))
Theorem	meetat2 39553	The meet of any element with an atom is either the atom or zero. (Contributed by NM, 30-Aug-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ OL ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) ∈ 𝐴 ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) = 0 ))
Definition	df-atl 39554*	Define the class of atomic lattices, in which every nonzero element is greater than or equal to an atom. We also ensure the existence of a lattice zero, since a lattice by itself may not have a zero. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) (Revised by NM, 14-Sep-2018.)
⊢ AtLat = {𝑘 ∈ Lat ∣ ((Base‘𝑘) ∈ dom (glb‘𝑘) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)(𝑥 ≠ (0.‘𝑘) → ∃𝑝 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)𝑝(le‘𝑘)𝑥))}
Theorem	isatl 39555*	The predicate "is an atomic lattice." Every nonzero element is less than or equal to an atom. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) (Revised by NM, 14-Sep-2018.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≠ 0 → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥)))
Theorem	atllat 39556	An atomic lattice is a lattice. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
Theorem	atlpos 39557	An atomic lattice is a poset. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)
Theorem	atl0dm 39558	Condition necessary for zero element to exist. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2018.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat → 𝐵 ∈ dom 𝐺)
Theorem	atl0cl 39559	An atomic lattice has a zero element. We can use this in place of op0cl 39440 for lattices without orthocomplements. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat → 0 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	atl0le 39560	Orthoposet zero is less than or equal to any element. (ch0le 31516 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → 0 ≤ 𝑋)
Theorem	atlle0 39561	An element less than or equal to zero equals zero. (chle0 31518 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 0 ↔ 𝑋 = 0 ))
Theorem	atlltn0 39562	A lattice element greater than zero is nonzero. (Contributed by NM, 1-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( 0 < 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ))
Theorem	isat3 39563*	The predicate "is an atom". (elat2 32415 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 27-Apr-2014.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat → (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 0 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑃 → (𝑥 = 𝑃 ∨ 𝑥 = 0 )))))
Theorem	atn0 39564	An atom is not zero. (atne0 32420 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑃 ≠ 0 )
Theorem	atnle0 39565	An atom is not less than or equal to zero. (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 0 )
Theorem	atlen0 39566	A lattice element is nonzero if an atom is under it. (Contributed by NM, 26-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → 𝑋 ≠ 0 )
Theorem	atcmp 39567	If two atoms are comparable, they are equal. (atsseq 32422 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 13-Oct-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≤ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃 = 𝑄))
Theorem	atncmp 39568	Frequently-used variation of atcmp 39567. (Contributed by NM, 29-Jun-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄))
Theorem	atnlt 39569	Two atoms cannot satisfy the less than relation. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝑃 < 𝑄)
Theorem	atcvreq0 39570	An element covered by an atom must be zero. (atcveq0 32423 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑋𝐶𝑃 ↔ 𝑋 = 0 ))
Theorem	atncvrN 39571	Two atoms cannot satisfy the covering relation. (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → ¬ 𝑃𝐶𝑄)
Theorem	atlex 39572*	Every nonzero element of an atomic lattice is greater than or equal to an atom. (hatomic 32435 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 0 ) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ≤ 𝑋)
Theorem	atnle 39573	Two ways of expressing "an atom is not less than or equal to a lattice element." (atnssm0 32451 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 ))
Theorem	atnem0 39574	The meet of distinct atoms is zero. (atnemeq0 32452 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑄) = 0 ))
Theorem	atlatmstc 39575*	An atomic, complete, orthomodular lattice is atomistic i.e. every element is the join of the atoms under it. See remark before Proposition 1 in [Kalmbach] p. 140; also remark in [BeltramettiCassinelli] p. 98. (hatomistici 32437 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝐾 ∈ AtLat) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ( 1 ‘{𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑋}) = 𝑋)
Theorem	atlatle 39576*	The ordering of two Hilbert lattice elements is determined by the atoms under them. (chrelat3 32446 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝐾 ∈ AtLat) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 → 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌)))
Theorem	atlrelat1 39577*	An atomistic lattice with 0 is relatively atomic. Part of Lemma 7.2 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 30. (chpssati 32438, with ∧ swapped, analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝐾 ∈ AtLat) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 → ∃𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 (¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑌)))
Definition	df-cvlat 39578*	Define the class of atomic lattices with the covering property. (This is actually the exchange property, but they are equivalent. The literature usually uses the covering property terminology.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ CvLat = {𝑘 ∈ AtLat ∣ ∀𝑎 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)∀𝑏 ∈ (Atoms‘𝑘)∀𝑐 ∈ (Base‘𝑘)((¬ 𝑎(le‘𝑘)𝑐 ∧ 𝑎(le‘𝑘)(𝑐(join‘𝑘)𝑏)) → 𝑏(le‘𝑘)(𝑐(join‘𝑘)𝑎))}
Theorem	iscvlat 39579*	The predicate "is an atomic lattice with the covering (or exchange) property". (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CvLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((¬ 𝑝 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑞)) → 𝑞 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑝))))
Theorem	iscvlat2N 39580*	The predicate "is an atomic lattice with the covering (or exchange) property". (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CvLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ AtLat ∧ ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (((𝑝 ∧ 𝑥) = 0 ∧ 𝑝 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑞)) → 𝑞 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑝))))
Theorem	cvlatl 39581	An atomic lattice with the covering property is an atomic lattice. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CvLat → 𝐾 ∈ AtLat)
Theorem	cvllat 39582	An atomic lattice with the covering property is a lattice. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CvLat → 𝐾 ∈ Lat)
Theorem	cvlposN 39583	An atomic lattice with the covering property is a poset. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CvLat → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)
Theorem	cvlexch1 39584	An atomic covering lattice has the exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 6-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	cvlexch2 39585	An atomic covering lattice has the exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 6-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑋) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑋)))
Theorem	cvlexchb1 39586	An atomic covering lattice has the exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 16-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	cvlexchb2 39587	An atomic covering lattice has the exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 22-Jun-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑋) ↔ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑋) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑋)))
Theorem	cvlexch3 39588	An atomic covering lattice has the exchange property. (atexch 32456 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 ) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	cvlexch4N 39589	An atomic covering lattice has the exchange property. Part of Definition 7.8 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 32. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑃 ∧ 𝑋) = 0 ) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑋 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	cvlatexchb1 39590	A version of cvlexchb1 39586 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄) ↔ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃) = (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	cvlatexchb2 39591	A version of cvlexchb2 39587 for atoms. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ↔ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	cvlatexch1 39592	Atom exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑄) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑅 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	cvlatexch2 39593	Atom exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) → 𝑄 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	cvlatexch3 39594	Atom exchange property. (Contributed by NM, 29-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑅)) → (𝑃 ≤ (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) → (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄) = (𝑃 ∨ 𝑅)))
Theorem	cvlcvr1 39595	The covering property. Proposition 1(ii) in [Kalmbach] p. 140 (and its converse). (chcv1 32430 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CvLat) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → (¬ 𝑃 ≤ 𝑋 ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	cvlcvrp 39596	A Hilbert lattice satisfies the covering property of Definition 7.4 of [MaedaMaeda] p. 31 and its converse. (cvp 32450 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0.‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CvLat) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑃) = 0 ↔ 𝑋𝐶(𝑋 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	cvlatcvr1 39597	An atom is covered by its join with a different atom. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CvLat) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))
Theorem	cvlatcvr2 39598	An atom is covered by its join with a different atom. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = ( ⋖ ‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ OML ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝐾 ∈ CvLat) ∧ 𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 ↔ 𝑃𝐶(𝑄 ∨ 𝑃)))
Theorem	cvlsupr2 39599	Two equivalent ways of expressing that 𝑅 is a superposition of 𝑃 and 𝑄. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ↔ (𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄))))
Theorem	cvlsupr3 39600	Two equivalent ways of expressing that 𝑅 is a superposition of 𝑃 and 𝑄, which can replace the superposition part of ishlat1 39608, (𝑥 ≠ 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴(𝑧 ≠ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑧 ≠ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑦)) ), with the simpler ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴(𝑥 ∨ 𝑧) = (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧) as shown in ishlat3N 39610. (Contributed by NM, 5-Nov-2012.)
⊢ 𝐴 = (Atoms‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CvLat ∧ (𝑃 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑄 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 ∈ 𝐴)) → ((𝑃 ∨ 𝑅) = (𝑄 ∨ 𝑅) ↔ (𝑃 ≠ 𝑄 → (𝑅 ≠ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑅 ≠ 𝑄 ∧ 𝑅 ≤ (𝑃 ∨ 𝑄)))))