Theorem isnacs2 43559

Description: Express Noetherian-type closure system with fewer quantifiers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
isnacs.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isnacs2	⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))

Proof of Theorem isnacs2

Dummy variables 𝑔 𝑠 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		isnacs.f	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)
2	1	isnacs 43557	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔)))
3		eqcom 2769	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) = 𝑠)
4	3	rexbii 3111	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑔) = 𝑠)
5		acsmre 17746	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → 𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))
6	1	mrcf 17703	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → 𝐹:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝐶)
7		ffn 6706	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐹:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝐶 → 𝐹 Fn 𝒫 𝑋)
8	5, 6, 7	3syl 19	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → 𝐹 Fn 𝒫 𝑋)
9		inss1 4185	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋
10		fvelimab 6954	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝒫 𝑋 ∧ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋) → (𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑔) = 𝑠))
11	8, 9, 10	sylancl 598	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑔) = 𝑠))
12	4, 11	bitr4id 293	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ 𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))))
13	12	ralbidv 3187	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))))
14		dfss3 3923	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)))
15	13, 14	bitr4di 292	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))))
16		imassrn 6071	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ ran 𝐹
17		frn 6714	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐹:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝐶 → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐶)
18	5, 6, 17	3syl 19	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐶)
19	16, 18	sstrid 3945	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝐶)
20	19	biantrurd 542	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ ((𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)))))
21		eqss 3949	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))))
22	20, 21	bitr4di 292	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))
23	15, 22	bitrd 282	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))
24	23	pm5.32i 585	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔)) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))
25	2, 24	bitri 278	1 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3078  ∃wrex 3088   ∩ cin 3901   ⊆ wss 3902  𝒫 cpw 4560  ran crn 5660   “ cima 5662   Fn wfn 6532  ⟶wf 6533  ‘cfv 6537  Fincfn 8956  Moorecmre 17672  mrClscmrc 17673  ACScacs 17675  NoeACScnacs 43555

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7740

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-int 4911  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5554  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-fv 6545  df-mre 17676  df-mrc 17677  df-acs 17679  df-nacs 43556

This theorem is used by:  nacsacs  43562