Theorem isnacs2 40444

Description: Express Noetherian-type closure system with fewer quantifiers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
isnacs.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isnacs2	⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))

Proof of Theorem isnacs2

Dummy variables 𝑔 𝑠 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		isnacs.f	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)
2	1	isnacs 40442	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔)))
3		eqcom 2745	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) = 𝑠)
4	3	rexbii 3177	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑔) = 𝑠)
5		acsmre 17278	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → 𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))
6	1	mrcf 17235	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → 𝐹:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝐶)
7		ffn 6584	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐹:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝐶 → 𝐹 Fn 𝒫 𝑋)
8	5, 6, 7	3syl 18	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → 𝐹 Fn 𝒫 𝑋)
9		inss1 4159	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋
10		fvelimab 6823	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝒫 𝑋 ∧ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋) → (𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑔) = 𝑠))
11	8, 9, 10	sylancl 585	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑔) = 𝑠))
12	4, 11	bitr4id 289	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ 𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))))
13	12	ralbidv 3120	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))))
14		dfss3 3905	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)))
15	13, 14	bitr4di 288	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))))
16		imassrn 5969	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ ran 𝐹
17		frn 6591	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐹:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝐶 → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐶)
18	5, 6, 17	3syl 18	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐶)
19	16, 18	sstrid 3928	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝐶)
20	19	biantrurd 532	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ ((𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)))))
21		eqss 3932	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))))
22	20, 21	bitr4di 288	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))
23	15, 22	bitrd 278	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))
24	23	pm5.32i 574	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔)) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))
25	2, 24	bitri 274	1 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  ∀wral 3063  ∃wrex 3064   ∩ cin 3882   ⊆ wss 3883  𝒫 cpw 4530  ran crn 5581   “ cima 5583   Fn wfn 6413  ⟶wf 6414  ‘cfv 6418  Fincfn 8691  Moorecmre 17208  mrClscmrc 17209  ACScacs 17211  NoeACScnacs 40440

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pow 5283  ax-pr 5347  ax-un 7566

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-pw 4532  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-int 4877  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-mpt 5154  df-id 5480  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-rn 5591  df-res 5592  df-ima 5593  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fn 6421  df-f 6422  df-fv 6426  df-mre 17212  df-mrc 17213  df-acs 17215  df-nacs 40441

This theorem is referenced by:  nacsacs  40447