Theorem isnacs2 41907

Description: Express Noetherian-type closure system with fewer quantifiers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
isnacs.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isnacs2	⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))

Proof of Theorem isnacs2

Dummy variables 𝑔 𝑠 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		isnacs.f	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)
2	1	isnacs 41905	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔)))
3		eqcom 2738	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) = 𝑠)
4	3	rexbii 3093	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑔) = 𝑠)
5		acsmre 17603	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → 𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))
6	1	mrcf 17560	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → 𝐹:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝐶)
7		ffn 6717	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐹:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝐶 → 𝐹 Fn 𝒫 𝑋)
8	5, 6, 7	3syl 18	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → 𝐹 Fn 𝒫 𝑋)
9		inss1 4228	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋
10		fvelimab 6964	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝒫 𝑋 ∧ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋) → (𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑔) = 𝑠))
11	8, 9, 10	sylancl 585	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑔) = 𝑠))
12	4, 11	bitr4id 290	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ 𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))))
13	12	ralbidv 3176	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))))
14		dfss3 3970	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)))
15	13, 14	bitr4di 289	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))))
16		imassrn 6070	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ ran 𝐹
17		frn 6724	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐹:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝐶 → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐶)
18	5, 6, 17	3syl 18	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐶)
19	16, 18	sstrid 3993	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝐶)
20	19	biantrurd 532	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ ((𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)))))
21		eqss 3997	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))))
22	20, 21	bitr4di 289	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))
23	15, 22	bitrd 279	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))
24	23	pm5.32i 574	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔)) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))
25	2, 24	bitri 275	1 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2105  ∀wral 3060  ∃wrex 3069   ∩ cin 3947   ⊆ wss 3948  𝒫 cpw 4602  ran crn 5677   “ cima 5679   Fn wfn 6538  ⟶wf 6539  ‘cfv 6543  Fincfn 8945  Moorecmre 17533  mrClscmrc 17534  ACScacs 17536  NoeACScnacs 41903

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1796  ax-4 1810  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1970  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2107  ax-9 2115  ax-10 2136  ax-11 2153  ax-12 2170  ax-ext 2702  ax-sep 5299  ax-nul 5306  ax-pow 5363  ax-pr 5427  ax-un 7729

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1781  df-nf 1785  df-sb 2067  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2723  df-clel 2809  df-nfc 2884  df-ne 2940  df-ral 3061  df-rex 3070  df-rab 3432  df-v 3475  df-dif 3951  df-un 3953  df-in 3955  df-ss 3965  df-nul 4323  df-if 4529  df-pw 4604  df-sn 4629  df-pr 4631  df-op 4635  df-uni 4909  df-int 4951  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-mpt 5232  df-id 5574  df-xp 5682  df-rel 5683  df-cnv 5684  df-co 5685  df-dm 5686  df-rn 5687  df-res 5688  df-ima 5689  df-iota 6495  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-fv 6551  df-mre 17537  df-mrc 17538  df-acs 17540  df-nacs 41904

This theorem is referenced by:  nacsacs  41910