Theorem isnacs2 42662

Description: Express Noetherian-type closure system with fewer quantifiers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
isnacs.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isnacs2	⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))

Proof of Theorem isnacs2

Dummy variables 𝑔 𝑠 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		isnacs.f	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)
2	1	isnacs 42660	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔)))
3		eqcom 2747	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) = 𝑠)
4	3	rexbii 3100	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑔) = 𝑠)
5		acsmre 17710	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → 𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))
6	1	mrcf 17667	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → 𝐹:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝐶)
7		ffn 6747	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐹:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝐶 → 𝐹 Fn 𝒫 𝑋)
8	5, 6, 7	3syl 18	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → 𝐹 Fn 𝒫 𝑋)
9		inss1 4258	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋
10		fvelimab 6994	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝒫 𝑋 ∧ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋) → (𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑔) = 𝑠))
11	8, 9, 10	sylancl 585	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑔) = 𝑠))
12	4, 11	bitr4id 290	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ 𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))))
13	12	ralbidv 3184	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))))
14		dfss3 3997	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)))
15	13, 14	bitr4di 289	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))))
16		imassrn 6100	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ ran 𝐹
17		frn 6754	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐹:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝐶 → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐶)
18	5, 6, 17	3syl 18	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐶)
19	16, 18	sstrid 4020	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝐶)
20	19	biantrurd 532	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ ((𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)))))
21		eqss 4024	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))))
22	20, 21	bitr4di 289	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))
23	15, 22	bitrd 279	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))
24	23	pm5.32i 574	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔)) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))
25	2, 24	bitri 275	1 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1537   ∈ wcel 2108  ∀wral 3067  ∃wrex 3076   ∩ cin 3975   ⊆ wss 3976  𝒫 cpw 4622  ran crn 5701   “ cima 5703   Fn wfn 6568  ⟶wf 6569  ‘cfv 6573  Fincfn 9003  Moorecmre 17640  mrClscmrc 17641  ACScacs 17643  NoeACScnacs 42658

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1793  ax-4 1807  ax-5 1909  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2711  ax-sep 5317  ax-nul 5324  ax-pow 5383  ax-pr 5447  ax-un 7770

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 847  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1540  df-fal 1550  df-ex 1778  df-nf 1782  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2543  df-eu 2572  df-clab 2718  df-cleq 2732  df-clel 2819  df-nfc 2895  df-ne 2947  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3077  df-rab 3444  df-v 3490  df-dif 3979  df-un 3981  df-in 3983  df-ss 3993  df-nul 4353  df-if 4549  df-pw 4624  df-sn 4649  df-pr 4651  df-op 4655  df-uni 4932  df-int 4971  df-br 5167  df-opab 5229  df-mpt 5250  df-id 5593  df-xp 5706  df-rel 5707  df-cnv 5708  df-co 5709  df-dm 5710  df-rn 5711  df-res 5712  df-ima 5713  df-iota 6525  df-fun 6575  df-fn 6576  df-f 6577  df-fv 6581  df-mre 17644  df-mrc 17645  df-acs 17647  df-nacs 42659

This theorem is referenced by:  nacsacs  42665