Theorem isnacs2 41492

Description: Express Noetherian-type closure system with fewer quantifiers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Apr-2015.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
isnacs.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isnacs2	⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))

Proof of Theorem isnacs2

Dummy variables 𝑔 𝑠 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		isnacs.f	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶)
2	1	isnacs 41490	. 2 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔)))
3		eqcom 2740	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ (𝐹‘𝑔) = 𝑠)
4	3	rexbii 3095	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑔) = 𝑠)
5		acsmre 17596	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → 𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋))
6	1	mrcf 17553	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → 𝐹:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝐶)
7		ffn 6718	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐹:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝐶 → 𝐹 Fn 𝒫 𝑋)
8	5, 6, 7	3syl 18	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → 𝐹 Fn 𝒫 𝑋)
9		inss1 4229	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋
10		fvelimab 6965	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝒫 𝑋 ∧ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin) ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋) → (𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑔) = 𝑠))
11	8, 9, 10	sylancl 587	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)(𝐹‘𝑔) = 𝑠))
12	4, 11	bitr4id 290	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ 𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))))
13	12	ralbidv 3178	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))))
14		dfss3 3971	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 𝑠 ∈ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)))
15	13, 14	bitr4di 289	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))))
16		imassrn 6071	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ ran 𝐹
17		frn 6725	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐹:𝒫 𝑋⟶𝐶 → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐶)
18	5, 6, 17	3syl 18	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝐶)
19	16, 18	sstrid 3994	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝐶)
20	19	biantrurd 534	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ ((𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)))))
21		eqss 3998	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶 ↔ ((𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin))))
22	20, 21	bitr4di 289	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝐶 ⊆ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) ↔ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))
23	15, 22	bitrd 279	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔) ↔ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))
24	23	pm5.32i 576	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝐶 ∃𝑔 ∈ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)𝑠 = (𝐹‘𝑔)) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))
25	2, 24	bitri 275	1 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (NoeACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑋 ∩ Fin)) = 𝐶))

Syntax hints:   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 397   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2107  ∀wral 3062  ∃wrex 3071   ∩ cin 3948   ⊆ wss 3949  𝒫 cpw 4603  ran crn 5678   “ cima 5680   Fn wfn 6539  ⟶wf 6540  ‘cfv 6544  Fincfn 8939  Moorecmre 17526  mrClscmrc 17527  ACScacs 17529  NoeACScnacs 41488

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-10 2138  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2172  ax-ext 2704  ax-sep 5300  ax-nul 5307  ax-pow 5364  ax-pr 5428  ax-un 7725

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 847  df-3an 1090  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2535  df-eu 2564  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2942  df-ral 3063  df-rex 3072  df-rab 3434  df-v 3477  df-dif 3952  df-un 3954  df-in 3956  df-ss 3966  df-nul 4324  df-if 4530  df-pw 4605  df-sn 4630  df-pr 4632  df-op 4636  df-uni 4910  df-int 4952  df-br 5150  df-opab 5212  df-mpt 5233  df-id 5575  df-xp 5683  df-rel 5684  df-cnv 5685  df-co 5686  df-dm 5687  df-rn 5688  df-res 5689  df-ima 5690  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6546  df-fn 6547  df-f 6548  df-fv 6552  df-mre 17530  df-mrc 17531  df-acs 17533  df-nacs 41489

This theorem is referenced by:  nacsacs  41495