P. 415 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 41401-41500   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	acongeq12d 41401	Substitution deduction for alternating congruence. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = 𝐸)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐷) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐷)) ↔ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − 𝐸) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − -𝐸))))
Theorem	acongrep 41402*	Every integer is alternating-congruent to some number in the first half of the fundamental domain. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ∃𝑎 ∈ (0...𝐴)((2 · 𝐴) ∥ (𝑎 − 𝑁) ∨ (2 · 𝐴) ∥ (𝑎 − -𝑁)))
Theorem	fzmaxdif 41403	Bound on the difference between two integers constrained to two possibly overlapping finite ranges. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐵...𝐶)) ∧ (𝐹 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ (𝐸...𝐹)) ∧ (𝐶 − 𝐸) ≤ (𝐹 − 𝐵)) → (abs‘(𝐴 − 𝐷)) ≤ (𝐹 − 𝐵))
Theorem	fzneg 41404	Reflection of a finite range of integers about 0. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℤ) → (𝐴 ∈ (𝐵...𝐶) ↔ -𝐴 ∈ (-𝐶...-𝐵)))
Theorem	acongeq 41405	Two numbers in the fundamental domain are alternating-congruent iff they are equal. TODO: could be used to shorten jm2.26 41424. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (0...𝐴) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ (0...𝐴)) → (𝐵 = 𝐶 ↔ ((2 · 𝐴) ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∨ (2 · 𝐴) ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶))))
Theorem	dvdsacongtr 41406	Alternating congruence passes from a base to a dividing base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐷 ∥ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶)))) → (𝐷 ∥ (𝐵 − 𝐶) ∨ 𝐷 ∥ (𝐵 − -𝐶)))
21.29.31  Additional theorems on integer divisibility
Theorem	coprmdvdsb 41407	Multiplication by a coprime number does not affect divisibility. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ (𝐾 gcd 𝑀) = 1)) → (𝐾 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ 𝐾 ∥ (𝑀 · 𝑁)))
Theorem	modabsdifz 41408	Divisibility in terms of modular reduction by the absolute value of the base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 0) → ((𝑁 − (𝑁 mod (abs‘𝑀))) / 𝑀) ∈ ℤ)
Theorem	dvdsabsmod0 41409	Divisibility in terms of modular reduction by the absolute value of the base. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Sep-2014.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 3-Jul-2020.)
⊢ ((𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ≠ 0) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (𝑁 mod (abs‘𝑀)) = 0))
21.29.32  X and Y sequences 3: Divisibility properties
Theorem	jm2.18 41410	Theorem 2.18 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 696. Direct relationship of the exponential function to X and Y sequences. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 14-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → ((((2 · 𝐴) · 𝐾) − (𝐾↑2)) − 1) ∥ (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) − ((𝐴 − 𝐾) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁))) − (𝐾↑𝑁)))
Theorem	jm2.19lem1 41411	Lemma for jm2.19 41415. X and Y values are coprime. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Xrm 𝑀) gcd (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)) = 1)
Theorem	jm2.19lem2 41412	Lemma for jm2.19 41415. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 23-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) ↔ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 + 𝑀))))
Theorem	jm2.19lem3 41413	Lemma for jm2.19 41415. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ℕ0) → ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) ↔ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 + (𝐼 · 𝑀)))))
Theorem	jm2.19lem4 41414	Lemma for jm2.19 41415. Extend to ZZ by symmetry. TODO: use zindbi 41368. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) ↔ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 + (𝐼 · 𝑀)))))
Theorem	jm2.19 41415	Lemma 2.19 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 696. Transfer divisibility constraints between Y-values and their indices. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) → (𝑀 ∥ 𝑁 ↔ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)))
Theorem	jm2.21 41416	Lemma for jm2.20nn 41419. Express X and Y values as a binomial. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Xrm (𝑁 · 𝐽)) + ((√‘((𝐴↑2) − 1)) · (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 · 𝐽)))) = (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) + ((√‘((𝐴↑2) − 1)) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)))↑𝐽))
Theorem	jm2.22 41417*	Lemma for jm2.20nn 41419. Applying binomial theorem and taking irrational part. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 · 𝐽)) = Σ𝑖 ∈ {𝑥 ∈ (0...𝐽) ∣ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝑥} ((𝐽C𝑖) · (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁)↑(𝐽 − 𝑖)) · (((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)↑𝑖) · (((𝐴↑2) − 1)↑((𝑖 − 1) / 2))))))
Theorem	jm2.23 41418	Lemma for jm2.20nn 41419. Truncate binomial expansion p-adicly. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 26-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐽 ∈ ℕ) → ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)↑3) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm (𝑁 · 𝐽)) − (𝐽 · (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁)↑(𝐽 − 1)) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)))))
Theorem	jm2.20nn 41419	Lemma 2.20 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 696, the "first step down lemma". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) → (((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)↑2) ∥ (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀) ↔ (𝑁 · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁)) ∥ 𝑀))
Theorem	jm2.25lem1 41420	Lemma for jm2.26 41424. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐶 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝐷 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − 𝐷) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − -𝐷))) → ((𝐴 ∥ (𝐷 − 𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐷 − -𝐵)) ↔ (𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − 𝐵) ∨ 𝐴 ∥ (𝐶 − -𝐵))))
Theorem	jm2.25 41421	Lemma for jm2.26 41424. Remainders mod X(2n) are negaperiodic mod 2n. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑀 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ℤ) → ((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm (𝑀 + (𝐼 · (2 · 𝑁)))) − (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)) ∨ (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm (𝑀 + (𝐼 · (2 · 𝑁)))) − -(𝐴 Yrm 𝑀))))
Theorem	jm2.26a 41422	Lemma for jm2.26 41424. Reverse direction is required to prove forward direction, so do it separately. Induction on difference between K and M, together with the addition formula fact that adding 2N only inverts sign. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℤ) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)) → (((2 · 𝑁) ∥ (𝐾 − 𝑀) ∨ (2 · 𝑁) ∥ (𝐾 − -𝑀)) → ((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)) ∨ (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − -(𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)))))
Theorem	jm2.26lem3 41423	Lemma for jm2.26 41424. Use acongrep 41402 to find K', M' ~ K, M in [ 0,N ]. Thus Y(K') ~ Y(M') and both are small; K' = M' on pain of contradicting 2.24, so K ~ M. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 3-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ (0...𝑁) ∧ 𝑀 ∈ (0...𝑁)) ∧ ((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)) ∨ (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − -(𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)))) → 𝐾 = 𝑀)
Theorem	jm2.26 41424	Lemma 2.26 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 697, the "second step down lemma". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝐾 ∈ ℤ ∧ 𝑀 ∈ ℤ)) → (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − (𝐴 Yrm 𝑀)) ∨ (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝐾) − -(𝐴 Yrm 𝑀))) ↔ ((2 · 𝑁) ∥ (𝐾 − 𝑀) ∨ (2 · 𝑁) ∥ (𝐾 − -𝑀))))
Theorem	jm2.15nn0 41425	Lemma 2.15 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 695. Yrm is a polynomial for fixed N, so has the expected congruence property. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) − (𝐵 Yrm 𝑁)))
Theorem	jm2.16nn0 41426	Lemma 2.16 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 695. This may be regarded as a special case of jm2.15nn0 41425 if Yrm is redefined as described in rmyluc 41359. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝐴 − 1) ∥ ((𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) − 𝑁))
21.29.33  X and Y sequences 4: Diophantine representability of Y
Theorem	jm2.27a 41427	Lemma for jm2.27 41430. Reverse direction after existential quantifiers are expanded. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐷↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐶↑2))) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐸↑2))) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐼↑2) − (((𝐺↑2) − 1) · (𝐻↑2))) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = ((𝐽 + 1) · (2 · (𝐶↑2))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∥ (𝐺 − 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐺 − 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 = (𝐴 Xrm 𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝑃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = (𝐴 Xrm 𝑄))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝑄))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 ∈ ℤ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 = (𝐺 Xrm 𝑅))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 = (𝐺 Yrm 𝑅))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝐵))
Theorem	jm2.27b 41428	Lemma for jm2.27 41430. Expand existential quantifiers for reverse direction. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐽 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐷↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐶↑2))) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐸↑2))) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐼↑2) − (((𝐺↑2) − 1) · (𝐻↑2))) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 = ((𝐽 + 1) · (2 · (𝐶↑2))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∥ (𝐺 − 𝐴))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐺 − 1))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐶))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝐵))
Theorem	jm2.27c 41429	Lemma for jm2.27 41430. Forward direction with substitutions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝐴 Xrm 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐵 · (𝐴 Yrm 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝐴 Yrm (2 · 𝑄))    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝐴 Xrm (2 · 𝑄))    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝐴 + ((𝐹↑2) · ((𝐹↑2) − 𝐴)))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (𝐺 Yrm 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (𝐺 Xrm 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐽 = ((𝐸 / (2 · (𝐶↑2))) − 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐷 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐹 ∈ ℕ0) ∧ (𝐺 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐻 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐼 ∈ ℕ0)) ∧ (𝐽 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ (((((𝐷↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐶↑2))) = 1 ∧ ((𝐹↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐸↑2))) = 1 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) ∧ (((𝐼↑2) − (((𝐺↑2) − 1) · (𝐻↑2))) = 1 ∧ 𝐸 = ((𝐽 + 1) · (2 · (𝐶↑2))) ∧ 𝐹 ∥ (𝐺 − 𝐴))) ∧ (((2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐺 − 1) ∧ 𝐹 ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐶)) ∧ ((2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝐻 − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶))))))
Theorem	jm2.27 41430*	Lemma 2.27 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 697; rmY is a diophantine relation. 0 was excluded from the range of B and the lower limit of G was imposed because the source proof does not seem to work otherwise; quite possible I'm just missing something. The source proof uses both i and I; i has been changed to j to avoid collision. This theorem is basically nothing but substitution instances, all the work is done in jm2.27a 41427 and jm2.27c 41429. Once Diophantine relations have been defined, the content of the theorem is "rmY is Diophantine". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) → (𝐶 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝐵) ↔ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑒 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑔 ∈ ℕ0 ∃ℎ ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑖 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑗 ∈ ℕ0 (((((𝑑↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝐶↑2))) = 1 ∧ ((𝑓↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝑒↑2))) = 1 ∧ 𝑔 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2)) ∧ (((𝑖↑2) − (((𝑔↑2) − 1) · (ℎ↑2))) = 1 ∧ 𝑒 = ((𝑗 + 1) · (2 · (𝐶↑2))) ∧ 𝑓 ∥ (𝑔 − 𝐴))) ∧ (((2 · 𝐶) ∥ (𝑔 − 1) ∧ 𝑓 ∥ (ℎ − 𝐶)) ∧ ((2 · 𝐶) ∥ (ℎ − 𝐵) ∧ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐶)))))
Theorem	jm2.27dlem1 41431*	Lemma for rmydioph 41436. Substitution of a tuple restriction into a projection that doesn't care. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (1...𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑎 = (𝑏 ↾ (1...𝐵)) → (𝑎‘𝐴) = (𝑏‘𝐴))
Theorem	jm2.27dlem2 41432	Lemma for rmydioph 41436. This theorem is used along with the next three to efficiently infer steps like 7 ∈ (1...;10). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (1...𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝐵 + 1)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (1...𝐶)
Theorem	jm2.27dlem3 41433	Lemma for rmydioph 41436. Infer membership of the endpoint of a range. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ (1...𝐴)
Theorem	jm2.27dlem4 41434	Lemma for rmydioph 41436. Infer ℕ-hood of large numbers. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℕ    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (𝐴 + 1)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ
Theorem	jm2.27dlem5 41435	Lemma for rmydioph 41436. Used with sselii 3966 to infer membership of midpoints of range; jm2.27dlem2 41432 is deprecated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (𝐴 + 1)    &   ⊢ (1...𝐵) ⊆ (1...𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (1...𝐴) ⊆ (1...𝐶)
Theorem	rmydioph 41436	jm2.27 41430 restated in terms of Diophantine sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 11-Oct-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...3)) ∣ ((𝑎‘1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑎‘3) = ((𝑎‘1) Yrm (𝑎‘2)))} ∈ (Dioph‘3)
21.29.34  X and Y sequences 5: Diophantine representability of X, ^, _C
Theorem	rmxdiophlem 41437*	X can be expressed in terms of Y, so it is also Diophantine. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 15-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ ℕ0) → (𝑋 = (𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ ℕ0 (𝑦 = (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁) ∧ ((𝑋↑2) − (((𝐴↑2) − 1) · (𝑦↑2))) = 1)))
Theorem	rmxdioph 41438	X is a Diophantine function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.)
⊢ {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...3)) ∣ ((𝑎‘1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑎‘3) = ((𝑎‘1) Xrm (𝑎‘2)))} ∈ (Dioph‘3)
Theorem	jm3.1lem1 41439	Lemma for jm3.1 41442. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 Yrm (𝑁 + 1)) ≤ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾↑𝑁) < 𝐴)
Theorem	jm3.1lem2 41440	Lemma for jm3.1 41442. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 Yrm (𝑁 + 1)) ≤ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾↑𝑁) < ((((2 · 𝐴) · 𝐾) − (𝐾↑2)) − 1))
Theorem	jm3.1lem3 41441	Lemma for jm3.1 41442. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 Yrm (𝑁 + 1)) ≤ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((2 · 𝐴) · 𝐾) − (𝐾↑2)) − 1) ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	jm3.1 41442	Diophantine expression for exponentiation. Lemma 3.1 of [JonesMatijasevic] p. 698. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 16-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐾 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑁 ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝐾 Yrm (𝑁 + 1)) ≤ 𝐴) → (𝐾↑𝑁) = (((𝐴 Xrm 𝑁) − ((𝐴 − 𝐾) · (𝐴 Yrm 𝑁))) mod ((((2 · 𝐴) · 𝐾) − (𝐾↑2)) − 1)))
Theorem	expdiophlem1 41443*	Lemma for expdioph 41445. Fully expanded expression for exponential. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ ℕ0 → (((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) ∧ 𝐶 = (𝐴↑𝐵)) ↔ ∃𝑑 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑒 ∈ ℕ0 ∃𝑓 ∈ ℕ0 ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ) ∧ ((𝐴 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑑 = (𝐴 Yrm (𝐵 + 1))) ∧ ((𝑑 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑒 = (𝑑 Yrm 𝐵)) ∧ ((𝑑 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ 𝑓 = (𝑑 Xrm 𝐵)) ∧ (𝐶 < ((((2 · 𝑑) · 𝐴) − (𝐴↑2)) − 1) ∧ ((((2 · 𝑑) · 𝐴) − (𝐴↑2)) − 1) ∥ ((𝑓 − ((𝑑 − 𝐴) · 𝑒)) − 𝐶))))))))
Theorem	expdiophlem2 41444	Lemma for expdioph 41445. Exponentiation on a restricted domain is Diophantine. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.)
⊢ {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...3)) ∣ (((𝑎‘1) ∈ (ℤ≥‘2) ∧ (𝑎‘2) ∈ ℕ) ∧ (𝑎‘3) = ((𝑎‘1)↑(𝑎‘2)))} ∈ (Dioph‘3)
Theorem	expdioph 41445	The exponential function is Diophantine. This result completes and encapsulates our development using Pell equation solution sequences and is sometimes regarded as Matiyasevich's theorem properly. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 17-Oct-2014.)
⊢ {𝑎 ∈ (ℕ0 ↑m (1...3)) ∣ (𝑎‘3) = ((𝑎‘1)↑(𝑎‘2))} ∈ (Dioph‘3)
21.29.35  Uncategorized stuff not associated with a major project
Theorem	setindtr 41446*	Set induction for sets contained in a transitive set. If we are allowed to assume Infinity, then all sets have a transitive closure and this reduces to setind 9701; however, this version is useful without Infinity. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ 𝐴 → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → (∃𝑦(Tr 𝑦 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑦) → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	setindtrs 41447*	Set induction scheme without Infinity. See comments at setindtr 41446. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜓 → 𝜑)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐵 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))    ⇒   ⊢ (∃𝑧(Tr 𝑧 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑧) → 𝜒)
Theorem	dford3lem1 41448*	Lemma for dford3 41450. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((Tr 𝑁 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑁 Tr 𝑦) → ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑁 (Tr 𝑏 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 Tr 𝑦))
Theorem	dford3lem2 41449*	Lemma for dford3 41450. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
⊢ ((Tr 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 Tr 𝑦) → 𝑥 ∈ On)
Theorem	dford3 41450*	Ordinals are precisely the hereditarily transitive classes. Definition 1.2 of [Schloeder] p. 1. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (Ord 𝑁 ↔ (Tr 𝑁 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑁 Tr 𝑥))
Theorem	dford4 41451*	dford3 41450 expressed in primitives to demonstrate shortness. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 28-Oct-2014.)
⊢ (Ord 𝑁 ↔ ∀𝑎∀𝑏∀𝑐((𝑎 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑎) → (𝑏 ∈ 𝑁 ∧ (𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 → 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎))))
Theorem	wopprc 41452	Unrelated: Wiener pairs treat proper classes symmetrically. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Sep-2014.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) ↔ ¬ 1o ∈ {{{𝐴}, ∅}, {{𝐵}}})
Theorem	rpnnen3lem 41453*	Lemma for rpnnen3 41454. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (((𝑎 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝑏 ∈ ℝ) ∧ 𝑎 < 𝑏) → {𝑐 ∈ ℚ ∣ 𝑐 < 𝑎} ≠ {𝑐 ∈ ℚ ∣ 𝑐 < 𝑏})
Theorem	rpnnen3 41454	Dedekind cut injection of ℝ into 𝒫 ℚ. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ℝ ≼ 𝒫 ℚ
21.29.36  More equivalents of the Axiom of Choice
Theorem	axac10 41455	Characterization of choice similar to dffin1-5 10355. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 6-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ( ≈ “ On) = V
Theorem	harinf 41456	The Hartogs number of an infinite set is at least ω. MOVABLE (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Jul-2015.)
⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin) → ω ⊆ (har‘𝑆))
Theorem	wdom2d2 41457*	Deduction for weak dominance by a Cartesian product. MOVABLE (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Jul-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝑋)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≼* (𝐵 × 𝐶))
Theorem	ttac 41458	Tarski's theorem about choice: infxpidm 10529 is equivalent to ax-ac 10426. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 4-Nov-2014.) (Proof shortened by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Jul-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑐(ω ≼ 𝑐 → (𝑐 × 𝑐) ≈ 𝑐))
Theorem	pw2f1ocnv 41459*	Define a bijection between characteristic functions and subsets. EDITORIAL: extracted from pw2en 9052, which can be easily reproved in terms of this. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 9-Jul-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑥 “ {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹:(2o ↑m 𝐴)–1-1-onto→𝒫 𝐴 ∧ ◡𝐹 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑦, 1o, ∅)))))
Theorem	pw2f1o2 41460*	Define a bijection between characteristic functions and subsets. EDITORIAL: extracted from pw2en 9052, which can be easily reproved in terms of this. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑥 “ {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹:(2o ↑m 𝐴)–1-1-onto→𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	pw2f1o2val 41461*	Function value of the pw2f1o2 41460 bijection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑥 “ {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) → (𝐹‘𝑋) = (◡𝑋 “ {1o}))
Theorem	pw2f1o2val2 41462*	Membership in a mapped set under the pw2f1o2 41460 bijection. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 6-May-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑥 “ {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝑌 ∈ (𝐹‘𝑋) ↔ (𝑋‘𝑌) = 1o))
Theorem	soeq12d 41463	Equality deduction for total orderings. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 Or 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Or 𝐵))
Theorem	freq12d 41464	Equality deduction for founded relations. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 Fr 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 Fr 𝐵))
Theorem	weeq12d 41465	Equality deduction for well-orders. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 = 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅 We 𝐴 ↔ 𝑆 We 𝐵))
Theorem	limsuc2 41466	Limit ordinals in the sense inclusive of zero contain all successors of their members. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝐴) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ suc 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴))
Theorem	wepwsolem 41467*	Transfer an ordering on characteristic functions by isomorphism to the power set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))}    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑥‘𝑧) E (𝑦‘𝑧) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑥‘𝑤) = (𝑦‘𝑤)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑎 ∈ (2o ↑m 𝐴) ↦ (◡𝑎 “ {1o}))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ V → 𝐹 Isom 𝑈, 𝑇 ((2o ↑m 𝐴), 𝒫 𝐴))
Theorem	wepwso 41468*	A well-ordering induces a strict ordering on the power set. EDITORIAL: when well-orderings are set like, this can be strengthened to remove 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝑧 ∈ 𝑦 ∧ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑤𝑅𝑧 → (𝑤 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ 𝑤 ∈ 𝑦)))}    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑅 We 𝐴) → 𝑇 Or 𝒫 𝐴)
Theorem	dnnumch1 41469*	Define an enumeration of a set from a choice function; second part, it restricts to a bijection. EDITORIAL: overlaps dfac8a 9997. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑧))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ On (𝐹 ↾ 𝑥):𝑥–1-1-onto→𝐴)
Theorem	dnnumch2 41470*	Define an enumeration (weak dominance version) of a set from a choice function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑧))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ⊆ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	dnnumch3lem 41471*	Value of the ordinal injection function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑧))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑤 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ∩ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑥}))‘𝑤) = ∩ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑤}))
Theorem	dnnumch3 41472*	Define an injection from a set into the ordinals using a choice function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑧))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ ∩ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑥})):𝐴–1-1→On)
Theorem	dnwech 41473*	Define a well-ordering from a choice function. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ (𝐺‘(𝐴 ∖ ran 𝑧))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴(𝑦 ≠ ∅ → (𝐺‘𝑦) ∈ 𝑦))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = {⟨𝑣, 𝑤⟩ ∣ ∩ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑣}) ∈ ∩ (◡𝐹 “ {𝑤})}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 We 𝐴)
Theorem	fnwe2val 41474*	Lemma for fnwe2 41478. Substitute variables. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝑧 = (𝐹‘𝑥) → 𝑆 = 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑈𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑎𝑇𝑏 ↔ ((𝐹‘𝑎)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑏) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘𝑏) ∧ 𝑎⦋(𝐹‘𝑎) / 𝑧⦌𝑆𝑏)))
Theorem	fnwe2lem1 41475*	Lemma for fnwe2 41478. Substitution in well-ordering hypothesis. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝑧 = (𝐹‘𝑥) → 𝑆 = 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑈𝑦))}    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑈 We {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑥)})    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴) → ⦋(𝐹‘𝑎) / 𝑧⦌𝑆 We {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑎)})
Theorem	fnwe2lem2 41476*	Lemma for fnwe2 41478. An element which is in a minimal fiber and minimal within its fiber is minimal globally; thus 𝑇 is well-founded. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝑧 = (𝐹‘𝑥) → 𝑆 = 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑈𝑦))}    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑈 We {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑥)})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴):𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑎 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑎 ≠ ∅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝑎 ∀𝑐 ∈ 𝑎 ¬ 𝑐𝑇𝑏)
Theorem	fnwe2lem3 41477*	Lemma for fnwe2 41478. Trichotomy. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝑧 = (𝐹‘𝑥) → 𝑆 = 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑈𝑦))}    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑈 We {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑥)})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴):𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑎 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑏 ∈ 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑎𝑇𝑏 ∨ 𝑎 = 𝑏 ∨ 𝑏𝑇𝑎))
Theorem	fnwe2 41478*	A well-ordering can be constructed on a partitioned set by patching together well-orderings on each partition using a well-ordering on the partitions themselves. Similar to fnwe 8091 but does not require the within-partition ordering to be globally well. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝑧 = (𝐹‘𝑥) → 𝑆 = 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝐹‘𝑥)𝑅(𝐹‘𝑦) ∨ ((𝐹‘𝑥) = (𝐹‘𝑦) ∧ 𝑥𝑈𝑦))}    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → 𝑈 We {𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ (𝐹‘𝑦) = (𝐹‘𝑥)})    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ↾ 𝐴):𝐴⟶𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑅 We 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 We 𝐴)
Theorem	aomclem1 41479*	Lemma for dfac11 41487. This is the beginning of the proof that multiple choice is equivalent to choice. Our goal is to construct, by transfinite recursion, a well-ordering of (𝑅1‘𝐴). In what follows, 𝐴 is the index of the rank we wish to well-order, 𝑧 is the collection of well-orderings constructed so far, dom 𝑧 is the set of ordinal indices of constructed ranks i.e. the next rank to construct, and 𝑦 is a postulated multiple-choice function. Successor case 1, define a simple ordering from the well-ordered predecessor. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)((𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ ¬ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎) ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)(𝑑(𝑧‘∪ dom 𝑧)𝑐 → (𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑏)))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 = suc ∪ dom 𝑧)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑧(𝑧‘𝑎) We (𝑅1‘𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 Or (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧))
Theorem	aomclem2 41480*	Lemma for dfac11 41487. Successor case 2, a choice function for subsets of (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧). (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 18-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)((𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ ¬ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎) ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)(𝑑(𝑧‘∪ dom 𝑧)𝑐 → (𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑏)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ sup((𝑦‘𝑎), (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧), 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 = suc ∪ dom 𝑧)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑧(𝑧‘𝑎) We (𝑅1‘𝑎))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝑦‘𝑎) ∈ ((𝒫 𝑎 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝐶‘𝑎) ∈ 𝑎))
Theorem	aomclem3 41481*	Lemma for dfac11 41487. Successor case 3, our required well-ordering. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 19-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)((𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ ¬ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎) ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)(𝑑(𝑧‘∪ dom 𝑧)𝑐 → (𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑏)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ sup((𝑦‘𝑎), (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧), 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = recs((𝑎 ∈ V ↦ (𝐶‘((𝑅1‘dom 𝑧) ∖ ran 𝑎))))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑎}) ∈ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑏})}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 = suc ∪ dom 𝑧)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑧(𝑧‘𝑎) We (𝑅1‘𝑎))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝑦‘𝑎) ∈ ((𝒫 𝑎 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 We (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧))
Theorem	aomclem4 41482*	Lemma for dfac11 41487. Limit case. Patch together well-orderings constructed so far using fnwe2 41478 to cover the limit rank. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((rank‘𝑎) E (rank‘𝑏) ∨ ((rank‘𝑎) = (rank‘𝑏) ∧ 𝑎(𝑧‘suc (rank‘𝑎))𝑏))}    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 = ∪ dom 𝑧)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑧(𝑧‘𝑎) We (𝑅1‘𝑎))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 We (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧))
Theorem	aomclem5 41483*	Lemma for dfac11 41487. Combine the successor case with the limit case. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)((𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ ¬ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎) ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)(𝑑(𝑧‘∪ dom 𝑧)𝑐 → (𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑏)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ sup((𝑦‘𝑎), (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧), 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = recs((𝑎 ∈ V ↦ (𝐶‘((𝑅1‘dom 𝑧) ∖ ran 𝑎))))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑎}) ∈ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑏})}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((rank‘𝑎) E (rank‘𝑏) ∨ ((rank‘𝑎) = (rank‘𝑏) ∧ 𝑎(𝑧‘suc (rank‘𝑎))𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (if(dom 𝑧 = ∪ dom 𝑧, 𝐹, 𝐸) ∩ ((𝑅1‘dom 𝑧) × (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ dom 𝑧(𝑧‘𝑎) We (𝑅1‘𝑎))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑧 ⊆ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝑦‘𝑎) ∈ ((𝒫 𝑎 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 We (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧))
Theorem	aomclem6 41484*	Lemma for dfac11 41487. Transfinite induction, close over 𝑧. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)((𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ ¬ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎) ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)(𝑑(𝑧‘∪ dom 𝑧)𝑐 → (𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑏)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ sup((𝑦‘𝑎), (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧), 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = recs((𝑎 ∈ V ↦ (𝐶‘((𝑅1‘dom 𝑧) ∖ ran 𝑎))))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑎}) ∈ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑏})}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((rank‘𝑎) E (rank‘𝑏) ∨ ((rank‘𝑎) = (rank‘𝑏) ∧ 𝑎(𝑧‘suc (rank‘𝑎))𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (if(dom 𝑧 = ∪ dom 𝑧, 𝐹, 𝐸) ∩ ((𝑅1‘dom 𝑧) × (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ 𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝑦‘𝑎) ∈ ((𝒫 𝑎 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐻‘𝐴) We (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	aomclem7 41485*	Lemma for dfac11 41487. (𝑅1‘𝐴) is well-orderable. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∃𝑐 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)((𝑐 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ ¬ 𝑐 ∈ 𝑎) ∧ ∀𝑑 ∈ (𝑅1‘∪ dom 𝑧)(𝑑(𝑧‘∪ dom 𝑧)𝑐 → (𝑑 ∈ 𝑎 ↔ 𝑑 ∈ 𝑏)))}    &   ⊢ 𝐶 = (𝑎 ∈ V ↦ sup((𝑦‘𝑎), (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧), 𝐵))    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = recs((𝑎 ∈ V ↦ (𝐶‘((𝑅1‘dom 𝑧) ∖ ran 𝑎))))    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑎}) ∈ ∩ (◡𝐷 “ {𝑏})}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = {⟨𝑎, 𝑏⟩ ∣ ((rank‘𝑎) E (rank‘𝑏) ∨ ((rank‘𝑎) = (rank‘𝑏) ∧ 𝑎(𝑧‘suc (rank‘𝑎))𝑏))}    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (if(dom 𝑧 = ∪ dom 𝑧, 𝐹, 𝐸) ∩ ((𝑅1‘dom 𝑧) × (𝑅1‘dom 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = recs((𝑧 ∈ V ↦ 𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝑦‘𝑎) ∈ ((𝒫 𝑎 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑏 𝑏 We (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	aomclem8 41486*	Lemma for dfac11 41487. Perform variable substitutions. This is the most we can say without invoking regularity. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝒫 (𝑅1‘𝐴)(𝑎 ≠ ∅ → (𝑦‘𝑎) ∈ ((𝒫 𝑎 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑏 𝑏 We (𝑅1‘𝐴))
Theorem	dfac11 41487*	The right-hand side of this theorem (compare with ac4 10442), sometimes known as the "axiom of multiple choice", is a choice equivalent. Curiously, this statement cannot be proved without ax-reg 9559, despite not mentioning the cumulative hierarchy in any way as most consequences of regularity do. This is definition (MC) of [Schechter] p. 141. EDITORIAL: the proof is not original with me of course but I lost my reference sometime after writing it. A multiple choice function allows any total order to be extended to a choice function, which in turn defines a well-ordering. Since a well-ordering on a set defines a simple ordering of the power set, this allows the trivial well-ordering of the empty set to be transfinitely bootstrapped up the cumulative hierarchy to any desired level. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 20-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Jun-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑥∃𝑓∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 (𝑧 ≠ ∅ → (𝑓‘𝑧) ∈ ((𝒫 𝑧 ∩ Fin) ∖ {∅})))
Theorem	kelac1 41488*	Kelley's choice, basic form: if a collection of sets can be cast as closed sets in the factors of a topology, and there is a definable element in each topology (which need not be in the closed set - if it were this would be trivial), then compactness (via finite intersection) guarantees that the final product is nonempty. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝑆 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐽 ∈ Top)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐶 ∈ (Clsd‘𝐽))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝐵:𝑆–1-1-onto→𝐶)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝑈 ∈ ∪ 𝐽)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∏t‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ 𝐽)) ∈ Comp)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 𝑆 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	kelac2lem 41489	Lemma for kelac2 41490 and dfac21 41491: knob topologies are compact. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝑆 ∈ 𝑉 → (topGen‘{𝑆, {𝒫 ∪ 𝑆}}) ∈ Comp)
Theorem	kelac2 41490*	Kelley's choice, most common form: compactness of a product of knob topologies recovers choice. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝑆 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐼) → 𝑆 ≠ ∅)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∏t‘(𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 ↦ (topGen‘{𝑆, {𝒫 ∪ 𝑆}}))) ∈ Comp)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → X𝑥 ∈ 𝐼 𝑆 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	dfac21 41491	Tychonoff's theorem is a choice equivalent. Definition AC21 of Schechter p. 461. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 22-Feb-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 27-Aug-2015.)
⊢ (CHOICE ↔ ∀𝑓(𝑓:dom 𝑓⟶Comp → (∏t‘𝑓) ∈ Comp))
21.29.37  Finitely generated left modules
Syntax	clfig 41492	Extend class notation with the class of finitely generated left modules.
class LFinGen
Definition	df-lfig 41493	Define the class of finitely generated left modules. Finite generation of subspaces can be intepreted using ↾s. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Jan-2015.)
⊢ LFinGen = {𝑤 ∈ LMod ∣ (Base‘𝑤) ∈ ((LSpan‘𝑤) “ (𝒫 (Base‘𝑤) ∩ Fin))}
Theorem	islmodfg 41494*	Property of a finitely generated left module. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑊 ∈ LMod → (𝑊 ∈ LFinGen ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵(𝑏 ∈ Fin ∧ (𝑁‘𝑏) = 𝐵)))
Theorem	islssfg 41495*	Property of a finitely generated left (sub)module. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑊 ↾s 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑋 ∈ LFinGen ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝒫 𝑈(𝑏 ∈ Fin ∧ (𝑁‘𝑏) = 𝑈)))
Theorem	islssfg2 41496*	Property of a finitely generated left (sub)module, with a relaxed constraint on the spanning vectors. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑊 ↾s 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝑈 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝑋 ∈ LFinGen ↔ ∃𝑏 ∈ (𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin)(𝑁‘𝑏) = 𝑈))
Theorem	islssfgi 41497	Finitely spanned subspaces are finitely generated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑉 = (Base‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑋 = (𝑊 ↾s (𝑁‘𝐵))    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑊 ∈ LMod ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ Fin) → 𝑋 ∈ LFinGen)
Theorem	fglmod 41498	Finitely generated left modules are left modules. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝑀 ∈ LFinGen → 𝑀 ∈ LMod)
Theorem	lsmfgcl 41499	The sum of two finitely generated submodules is finitely generated. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 24-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝑈 = (LSubSp‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ ⊕ = (LSSum‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑊 ↾s 𝐴)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑊 ↾s 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑊 ↾s (𝐴 ⊕ 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ LMod)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ LFinGen)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ LFinGen)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ LFinGen)
21.29.38  Noetherian left modules I
Syntax	clnm 41500	Extend class notation with the class of Noetherian left modules.
class LNoeM