Theorem isubgr0uhgr 48671

Description: The subgraph induced by an empty set of vertices of a hypergraph. (Contributed by AV, 13-May-2025.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isubgr0uhgr	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (𝐺 ISubGr ∅) = ⟨∅, ∅⟩)

Proof of Theorem isubgr0uhgr

Dummy variable 𝑥 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0ss 4357	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ ⊆ (Vtx‘𝐺)
2		eqid 2765	. . . 4 ⊢ (Vtx‘𝐺) = (Vtx‘𝐺)
3		eqid 2765	. . . 4 ⊢ (iEdg‘𝐺) = (iEdg‘𝐺)
4	2, 3	isisubgr 48660	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ ∅ ⊆ (Vtx‘𝐺)) → (𝐺 ISubGr ∅) = ⟨∅, ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ ∅})⟩)
5	1, 4	mpan2 704	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (𝐺 ISubGr ∅) = ⟨∅, ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ ∅})⟩)
6		inrab2 4270	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ ∅} ∩ dom (iEdg‘𝐺)) = {𝑥 ∈ (dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∩ dom (iEdg‘𝐺)) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ ∅}
7		inidm 4179	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∩ dom (iEdg‘𝐺)) = dom (iEdg‘𝐺)
8	7	rabeqi 3431	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ (dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∩ dom (iEdg‘𝐺)) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ ∅} = {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ ∅}
9		ss0b 4358	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ ∅ ↔ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = ∅)
10	8, 9	rabbieq 3426	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ {𝑥 ∈ (dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∩ dom (iEdg‘𝐺)) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ ∅} = {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = ∅}
11	6, 10	eqtri 2788	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ ∅} ∩ dom (iEdg‘𝐺)) = {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = ∅}
12	11	ineqcomi 4164	. . . . 5 ⊢ (dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∩ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ ∅}) = {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = ∅}
13	2, 3	uhgrf 29441	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)⟶(𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}))
14		ffvelcdm 7080	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (((iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)⟶(𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺)) → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}))
15		eldifsni 4760	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ∈ (𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ≠ ∅)
16	14, 15	syl 18	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (((iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)⟶(𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺)) → ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ≠ ∅)
17	16	neneqd 2965	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (((iEdg‘𝐺):dom (iEdg‘𝐺)⟶(𝒫 (Vtx‘𝐺) ∖ {∅}) ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺)) → ¬ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = ∅)
18	13, 17	sylan 592	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ UHGraph ∧ 𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺)) → ¬ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = ∅)
19	18	ralrimiva 3159	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → ∀𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ¬ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = ∅)
20		rabeq0 4345	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ({𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = ∅} = ∅ ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ¬ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = ∅)
21	19, 20	sylibr 237	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) = ∅} = ∅)
22	12, 21	eqtrid 2812	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∩ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ ∅}) = ∅)
23	3	uhgrfun 29445	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → Fun (iEdg‘𝐺))
24	23	funfnd 6571	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (iEdg‘𝐺) Fn dom (iEdg‘𝐺))
25		fnresdisj 6659	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((iEdg‘𝐺) Fn dom (iEdg‘𝐺) → ((dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∩ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ ∅}) = ∅ ↔ ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ ∅}) = ∅))
26	24, 25	syl 18	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → ((dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∩ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ ∅}) = ∅ ↔ ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ ∅}) = ∅))
27	22, 26	mpbid 235	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ ∅}) = ∅)
28	27	opeq2d 4847	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → ⟨∅, ((iEdg‘𝐺) ↾ {𝑥 ∈ dom (iEdg‘𝐺) ∣ ((iEdg‘𝐺)‘𝑥) ⊆ ∅})⟩ = ⟨∅, ∅⟩)
29	5, 28	eqtrd 2800	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ UHGraph → (𝐺 ISubGr ∅) = ⟨∅, ∅⟩)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146   ≠ wne 2960  ∀wral 3081  {crab 3418   ∖ cdif 3903   ∩ cin 3905   ⊆ wss 3906  ∅c0 4286  𝒫 cpw 4564  {csn 4591  ⟨cop 4597  dom cdm 5663   ↾ cres 5665   Fn wfn 6535  ⟶wf 6536  ‘cfv 6540  (class class class)co 7416  Vtxcvtx 29375  iEdgciedg 29376  UHGraphcuhgr 29435   ISubGr cisubgr 48658

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pr 5406

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3747  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-fv 6548  df-ov 7419  df-oprab 7420  df-mpo 7421  df-uhgr 29437  df-isubgr 48659

This theorem is used by: (None)