Theorem linds0 49719

Description: The empty set is always a linearly independent subset. (Contributed by AV, 13-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 27-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Jul-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
linds0	⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → ∅ linIndS 𝑀)

Proof of Theorem linds0

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑥 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ral0 4457	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (∅‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))
2	1	2a1i 12	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → ((∅ finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (∅( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (∅‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))))
3		0ex 5264	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
4		breq1 5109	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓 = ∅ → (𝑓 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↔ ∅ finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))))
5		oveq1 7437	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓 = ∅ → (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (∅( linC ‘𝑀)∅))
6	5	eqeq1d 2765	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓 = ∅ → ((𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀) ↔ (∅( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)))
7	4, 6	anbi12d 644	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = ∅ → ((𝑓 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) ↔ (∅ finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (∅( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀))))
8		fveq1 6895	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓 = ∅ → (𝑓‘𝑥) = (∅‘𝑥))
9	8	eqeq1d 2765	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓 = ∅ → ((𝑓‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↔ (∅‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))))
10	9	ralbidv 3189	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (𝑓‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (∅‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))))
11	7, 10	imbi12d 347	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = ∅ → (((𝑓 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (𝑓‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))) ↔ ((∅ finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (∅( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (∅‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)))))
12	11	ralsng 4636	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∅ ∈ V → (∀𝑓 ∈ {∅} ((𝑓 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (𝑓‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))) ↔ ((∅ finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (∅( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (∅‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)))))
13	3, 12	mp1i 14	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑓 ∈ {∅} ((𝑓 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (𝑓‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))) ↔ ((∅ finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (∅( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (∅‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)))))
14	2, 13	mpbird 260	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → ∀𝑓 ∈ {∅} ((𝑓 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (𝑓‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))))
15		fvex 6909	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∈ V
16		map0e 8924	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∈ V → ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↑m ∅) = 1o)
17	15, 16	mp1i 14	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↑m ∅) = 1o)
18		df1o2 8497	. . . . 5 ⊢ 1o = {∅}
19	17, 18	eqtrdi 2814	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↑m ∅) = {∅})
20	14, 19	raleqtrrdv 3327	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → ∀𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↑m ∅)((𝑓 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (𝑓‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))))
21		0elpw 5321	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)
22	20, 21	jctil 529	. 2 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↑m ∅)((𝑓 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (𝑓‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)))))
23		eqid 2763	. . . 4 ⊢ (Base‘𝑀) = (Base‘𝑀)
24		eqid 2763	. . . 4 ⊢ (0g‘𝑀) = (0g‘𝑀)
25		eqid 2763	. . . 4 ⊢ (Scalar‘𝑀) = (Scalar‘𝑀)
26		eqid 2763	. . . 4 ⊢ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀))
27		eqid 2763	. . . 4 ⊢ (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))
28	23, 24, 25, 26, 27	islininds 49700	. . 3 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑉) → (∅ linIndS 𝑀 ↔ (∅ ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↑m ∅)((𝑓 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (𝑓‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))))))
29	3, 28	mpan 703	. 2 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ linIndS 𝑀 ↔ (∅ ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↑m ∅)((𝑓 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (𝑓‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))))))
30	22, 29	mpbird 260	1 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → ∅ linIndS 𝑀)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2146  ∀wral 3080  Vcvv 3454  ∅c0 4281  𝒫 cpw 4560  {csn 4588   class class class wbr 5106  ‘cfv 6547  (class class class)co 7430  1_oc1o 8483   ↑_m cmap 8861   finSupp cfsupp 9367  Basecbs 17402  Scalarcsca 17446  0_gc0g 17625   linC clinc 49658   linIndS clininds 49694

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944  ax-6 2001  ax-7 2042  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2196  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7761

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2101  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-suc 6375  df-iota 6501  df-fun 6549  df-fn 6550  df-f 6551  df-fv 6555  df-ov 7433  df-oprab 7434  df-mpo 7435  df-1o 8490  df-map 8863  df-lininds 49696

This theorem is used by: (None)