Theorem linds0 49398

Description: The empty set is always a linearly independent subset. (Contributed by AV, 13-Apr-2019.) (Revised by AV, 27-Apr-2019.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Jul-2019.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
linds0	⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → ∅ linIndS 𝑀)

Proof of Theorem linds0

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑥 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ral0 4454	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (∅‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))
2	1	2a1i 12	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → ((∅ finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (∅( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (∅‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))))
3		0ex 5264	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
4		breq1 5106	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓 = ∅ → (𝑓 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↔ ∅ finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))))
5		oveq1 7421	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓 = ∅ → (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (∅( linC ‘𝑀)∅))
6	5	eqeq1d 2762	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓 = ∅ → ((𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀) ↔ (∅( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)))
7	4, 6	anbi12d 644	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = ∅ → ((𝑓 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) ↔ (∅ finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (∅( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀))))
8		fveq1 6878	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑓 = ∅ → (𝑓‘𝑥) = (∅‘𝑥))
9	8	eqeq1d 2762	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑓 = ∅ → ((𝑓‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↔ (∅‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))))
10	9	ralbidv 3185	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = ∅ → (∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (𝑓‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (∅‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))))
11	7, 10	imbi12d 347	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = ∅ → (((𝑓 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (𝑓‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))) ↔ ((∅ finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (∅( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (∅‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)))))
12	11	ralsng 4636	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (∅ ∈ V → (∀𝑓 ∈ {∅} ((𝑓 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (𝑓‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))) ↔ ((∅ finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (∅( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (∅‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)))))
13	3, 12	mp1i 14	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → (∀𝑓 ∈ {∅} ((𝑓 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (𝑓‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))) ↔ ((∅ finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (∅( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (∅‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)))))
14	2, 13	mpbird 260	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → ∀𝑓 ∈ {∅} ((𝑓 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (𝑓‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))))
15		fvex 6892	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∈ V
16		map0e 8892	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∈ V → ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↑m ∅) = 1o)
17	15, 16	mp1i 14	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↑m ∅) = 1o)
18		df1o2 8465	. . . . 5 ⊢ 1o = {∅}
19	17, 18	eqtrdi 2811	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↑m ∅) = {∅})
20	14, 19	raleqtrrdv 3323	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → ∀𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↑m ∅)((𝑓 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (𝑓‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))))
21		0elpw 5320	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀)
22	20, 21	jctil 529	. 2 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↑m ∅)((𝑓 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (𝑓‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)))))
23		eqid 2760	. . . 4 ⊢ (Base‘𝑀) = (Base‘𝑀)
24		eqid 2760	. . . 4 ⊢ (0g‘𝑀) = (0g‘𝑀)
25		eqid 2760	. . . 4 ⊢ (Scalar‘𝑀) = (Scalar‘𝑀)
26		eqid 2760	. . . 4 ⊢ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) = (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀))
27		eqid 2760	. . . 4 ⊢ (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))
28	23, 24, 25, 26, 27	islininds 49379	. . 3 ⊢ ((∅ ∈ V ∧ 𝑀 ∈ 𝑉) → (∅ linIndS 𝑀 ↔ (∅ ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↑m ∅)((𝑓 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (𝑓‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))))))
29	3, 28	mpan 703	. 2 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → (∅ linIndS 𝑀 ↔ (∅ ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑀) ∧ ∀𝑓 ∈ ((Base‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ↑m ∅)((𝑓 finSupp (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀)) ∧ (𝑓( linC ‘𝑀)∅) = (0g‘𝑀)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ ∅ (𝑓‘𝑥) = (0g‘(Scalar‘𝑀))))))
30	22, 29	mpbird 260	1 ⊢ (𝑀 ∈ 𝑉 → ∅ linIndS 𝑀)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3076  Vcvv 3450  ∅c0 4279  𝒫 cpw 4557  {csn 4584   class class class wbr 5103  ‘cfv 6533  (class class class)co 7414  1_oc1o 8451   ↑_m cmap 8829   finSupp cfsupp 9334  Basecbs 17304  Scalarcsca 17348  0_gc0g 17527   linC clinc 49337   linIndS clininds 49373

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5330  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7737

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3740  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-suc 6363  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-fv 6541  df-ov 7417  df-oprab 7418  df-mpo 7419  df-1o 8458  df-map 8831  df-lininds 49375

This theorem is used by: (None)