P. 472 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 47101-47200   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
21.48.4  Alternative definitions of function and operation values The current definition of the value (𝐹‘𝐴) of a function 𝐹 at an argument 𝐴 (see df-fv 6494) assures that this value is always a set, see fex 7166. This is because this definition can be applied to any classes 𝐹 and 𝐴, and evaluates to the empty set when it is not meaningful (as shown by ndmfv 6859 and fvprc 6818). Although it is very convenient for many theorems on functions and their proofs, there are some cases in which from (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ alone it cannot be decided/derived whether (𝐹‘𝐴) is meaningful (𝐹 is actually a function which is defined for 𝐴 and really has the function value ∅ at 𝐴) or not. Therefore, additional assumptions are required, such as ∅ ∉ ran 𝐹, ∅ ∈ ran 𝐹 or Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 (see, for example, ndmfvrcl 6860). To avoid such an ambiguity, an alternative definition (𝐹'''𝐴) (see df-afv 47105) would be possible which evaluates to the universal class ((𝐹'''𝐴) = V) if it is not meaningful (see afvnfundmuv 47124, ndmafv 47125, afvprc 47129 and nfunsnafv 47127), and which corresponds to the current definition ((𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹'''𝐴)) if it is (see afvfundmfveq 47123). That means (𝐹'''𝐴) = V → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ (see afvpcfv0 47131), but (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V is not generally valid. In the theory of partial functions, it is a common case that 𝐹 is not defined at 𝐴, which also would result in (𝐹'''𝐴) = V. In this context we say (𝐹'''𝐴) "is not defined" instead of "is not meaningful". With this definition the following intuitive equivalence holds: (𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ V <-> "(𝐹'''𝐴) is meaningful/defined". An interesting question would be if (𝐹‘𝐴) could be replaced by (𝐹'''𝐴) in most of the theorems based on function values. If we look at the (currently 19) proofs using the definition df-fv 6494 of (𝐹‘𝐴), we see that analogues for the following 8 theorems can be proven using the alternative definition: fveq1 6825-> afveq1 47119, fveq2 6826-> afveq2 47120, nffv 6836-> nfafv 47121, csbfv12 6872-> csbafv12g , fvres 6845-> afvres 47157, rlimdm 15476-> rlimdmafv 47162, tz6.12-1 6849-> tz6.12-1-afv 47159, fveu 6815-> afveu 47138. Three theorems proved by directly using df-fv 6494 are within a mathbox (fvsb 44425) or not used (isumclim3 15684, avril1 30425). However, the remaining 8 theorems proved by directly using df-fv 6494 are used more or less often: * fvex 6839: used in about 1750 proofs. * tz6.12-1 6849: root theorem of many theorems which have not a strict analogue, and which are used many times: fvprc 6818 (used in about 127 proofs), tz6.12i 6852 (used - indirectly via fvbr0 6853 and fvrn0 6854- in 18 proofs, and in fvclss 7181 used in fvclex 7901 used in fvresex 7902, which is not used!), dcomex 10360 (used in 4 proofs), ndmfv 6859 (used in 86 proofs) and nfunsn 6866 (used by dffv2 6922 which is not used). * fv2 6821: only used by elfv 6824, which is only used by fv3 6844, which is not used. * dffv3 6822: used by dffv4 6823 (the previous "df-fv"), which now is only used in deprecated (usage discouraged) theorems or within mathboxes (csbfv12gALTVD 44872), by shftval 14999 (itself used in 9 proofs), by dffv5 35897 (mathbox) and by fvco2 6924, which has the analogue afvco2 47161. * fvopab5 6967: used only by ajval 30823 (not used) and by adjval 31852 (used - indirectly - in 9 proofs). * zsum 15643: used (via isum 15644, sum0 15646 and fsumsers 15653) in more than 90 proofs. * isumshft 15764: used in pserdv2 26356 and (via logtayl 26585) 4 other proofs. * ovtpos 8181: used in 14 proofs. As a result of this analysis we can say that the current definition of a function value is crucial for Metamath and cannot be exchanged easily with an alternative definition. While fv2 6821, dffv3 6822, fvopab5 6967, zsum 15643, isumshft 15764 and ovtpos 8181 are not critical or are, hopefully, also valid for the alternative definition, fvex 6839 and tz6.12-1 6849 (and the theorems based on them) are essential for the current definition of function values. With the same arguments, an alternative definition of operation values ((𝐴𝑂𝐵)) could be meaningful to avoid ambiguities, see df-aov 47106. For additional details, see https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/cteNUppB6A4 47106.
Syntax	wdfat 47101	Extend the definition of a wff to include the "defined at" predicate. Read: "(the function) 𝐹 is defined at (the argument) 𝐴". In a previous version, the token "def@" was used. However, since the @ is used (informally) as a replacement for $ in commented out sections that may be deleted some day. While there is no violation of any standard to use the @ in a token, it could make the search for such commented-out sections slightly more difficult. (See remark of Norman Megill at https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/cteNUppB6A4).
wff 𝐹 defAt 𝐴
Syntax	cafv 47102	Extend the definition of a class to include the value of a function. Read: "the value of 𝐹 at 𝐴 " or "𝐹 of 𝐴". In a previous version, the symbol " ' " was used. However, since the similarity with the symbol ‘ used for the current definition of a function's value (see df-fv 6494), which, by the way, was intended to visualize that in many cases ‘ and " ' " are exchangeable, makes reading the theorems, especially those which use both definitions as dfafv2 47117, very difficult, 3 apostrophes ''' are used now so that it's easier to distinguish from df-fv 6494 and df-ima 5636. And not three backticks ( three times ‘) since that would be annoying to escape in a comment. (See remark of Norman Megill and Gerard Lang at https://groups.google.com/g/metamath/c/cteNUppB6A4 5636).
class (𝐹'''𝐴)
Syntax	caov 47103	Extend class notation to include the value of an operation 𝐹 (such as +) for two arguments 𝐴 and 𝐵. Note that the syntax is simply three class symbols in a row surrounded by a pair of parentheses in contrast to the current definition, see df-ov 7356.
class ((𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Definition	df-dfat 47104	Definition of the predicate that determines if some class 𝐹 is defined as function for an argument 𝐴 or, in other words, if the function value for some class 𝐹 for an argument 𝐴 is defined. We say that 𝐹 is defined at 𝐴 if a 𝐹 is a function restricted to the member 𝐴 of its domain. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴})))
Definition	df-afv 47105*	Alternative definition of the value of a function, (𝐹'''𝐴), also known as function application. In contrast to (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ (see df-fv 6494 and ndmfv 6859), (𝐹'''𝐴) = V if F is not defined for A! (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.) (Revised by BJ/AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹'''𝐴) = (℩'𝑥𝐴𝐹𝑥)
Definition	df-aov 47106	Define the value of an operation. In contrast to df-ov 7356, the alternative definition for a function value (see df-afv 47105) is used. By this, the value of the operation applied to two arguments is the universal class if the operation is not defined for these two arguments. There are still no restrictions of any kind on what those class expressions may be, although only certain kinds of class expressions - a binary operation 𝐹 and its arguments 𝐴 and 𝐵- will be useful for proving meaningful theorems. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = (𝐹'''⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩)
21.48.4.1  Restricted quantification (extension)
Theorem	ralbinrald 47107*	Elemination of a restricted universal quantification under certain conditions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 2-Aug-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝑥 = 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑋 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))
21.48.4.2  The universal class (extension)
Theorem	nvelim 47108	If a class is the universal class it doesn't belong to any class, generalization of nvel 5258. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 = V → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵)
21.48.4.3  Introduce the Axiom of Power Sets (extension)
Theorem	alneu 47109	If a statement holds for all sets, there is not a unique set for which the statement holds. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 28-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑥𝜑 → ¬ ∃!𝑥𝜑)
Theorem	eu2ndop1stv 47110*	If there is a unique second component in an ordered pair contained in a given set, the first component must be a set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑦⟨𝐴, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
21.48.4.4  Predicate "defined at"
Theorem	dfateq12d 47111	Equality deduction for "defined at". (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ 𝐺 defAt 𝐵))
Theorem	nfdfat 47112	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for "defined at". To prove a deduction version of this theorem is not easily possible because many deduction versions for bound-variable hypothesis builder for constructs the definition of "defined at" is based on are not available (e.g., for Fun/Rel, dom, ⊆, etc.). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 𝐹 defAt 𝐴
Theorem	dfdfat2 47113*	Alternate definition of the predicate "defined at" not using the Fun predicate. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.) (Proof shortened by Peter Mazsa, 2-Oct-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ ∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦))
Theorem	fundmdfat 47114	A function is defined at any element of its domain. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → 𝐹 defAt 𝐴)
Theorem	dfatprc 47115	A function is not defined at a proper class. (Contributed by AV, 1-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → ¬ 𝐹 defAt 𝐴)
Theorem	dfatelrn 47116	The value of a function 𝐹 at a set 𝐴 is in the range of the function 𝐹 if 𝐹 is defined at 𝐴. (Contributed by AV, 1-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐹)
21.48.4.5  Alternative definition of the value of a function
Theorem	dfafv2 47117	Alternative definition of (𝐹'''𝐴) using (𝐹‘𝐴) directly. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.) (Revised by AV, 25-Aug-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹'''𝐴) = if(𝐹 defAt 𝐴, (𝐹‘𝐴), V)
Theorem	afveq12d 47118	Equality deduction for function value, analogous to fveq12d 6833. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐺'''𝐵))
Theorem	afveq1 47119	Equality theorem for function value, analogous to fveq1 6825. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 = 𝐺 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐺'''𝐴))
Theorem	afveq2 47120	Equality theorem for function value, analogous to fveq1 6825. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹'''𝐵))
Theorem	nfafv 47121	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for function value, analogous to nffv 6836. To prove a deduction version of this analogous to nffvd 6838 is not easily possible because a deduction version of nfdfat 47112 cannot be shown easily. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥(𝐹'''𝐴)
Theorem	csbafv12g 47122	Move class substitution in and out of a function value, analogous to csbfv12 6872, with a direct proof proposed by Mario Carneiro, analogous to csbov123 7397. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌(𝐹'''𝐵) = (⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹'''⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵))
Theorem	afvfundmfveq 47123	If a class is a function restricted to a member of its domain, then the function value for this member is equal for both definitions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	afvnfundmuv 47124	If a set is not in the domain of a class or the class is not a function restricted to the set, then the function value for this set is the universe. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V)
Theorem	ndmafv 47125	The value of a class outside its domain is the universe, compare with ndmfv 6859. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V)
Theorem	afvvdm 47126	If the function value of a class for an argument is a set, the argument is contained in the domain of the class. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹)
Theorem	nfunsnafv 47127	If the restriction of a class to a singleton is not a function, its value is the universe, compare with nfunsn 6866. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}) → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V)
Theorem	afvvfunressn 47128	If the function value of a class for an argument is a set, the class restricted to the singleton of the argument is a function. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 → Fun (𝐹 ↾ {𝐴}))
Theorem	afvprc 47129	A function's value at a proper class is the universe, compare with fvprc 6818. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐴 ∈ V → (𝐹'''𝐴) = V)
Theorem	afvvv 47130	If a function's value at an argument is a set, the argument is also a set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ∈ V)
Theorem	afvpcfv0 47131	If the value of the alternative function at an argument is the universe, the function's value at this argument is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) = V → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	afvnufveq 47132	The value of the alternative function at a set as argument equals the function's value at this argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ≠ V → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	afvvfveq 47133	The value of the alternative function at a set as argument equals the function's value at this argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	afv0fv0 47134	If the value of the alternative function at an argument is the empty set, the function's value at this argument is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹'''𝐴) = ∅ → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅)
Theorem	afvfvn0fveq 47135	If the function's value at an argument is not the empty set, it equals the value of the alternative function at this argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹‘𝐴) ≠ ∅ → (𝐹'''𝐴) = (𝐹‘𝐴))
Theorem	afv0nbfvbi 47136	The function's value at an argument is an element of a set if and only if the value of the alternative function at this argument is an element of that set, if the set does not contain the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (∅ ∉ 𝐵 → ((𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐹‘𝐴) ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	afvfv0bi 47137	The function's value at an argument is the empty set if and only if the value of the alternative function at this argument is either the empty set or the universe. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ ↔ ((𝐹'''𝐴) = ∅ ∨ (𝐹'''𝐴) = V))
Theorem	afveu 47138*	The value of a function at a unique point, analogous to fveu 6815. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (∃!𝑥 𝐴𝐹𝑥 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = ∪ {𝑥 ∣ 𝐴𝐹𝑥})
Theorem	fnbrafvb 47139	Equivalence of function value and binary relation, analogous to fnbrfvb 6877. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹'''𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ 𝐵𝐹𝐶))
Theorem	fnopafvb 47140	Equivalence of function value and ordered pair membership, analogous to fnopfvb 6878. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹'''𝐵) = 𝐶 ↔ ⟨𝐵, 𝐶⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
Theorem	funbrafvb 47141	Equivalence of function value and binary relation, analogous to funbrfvb 6880. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → ((𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ 𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	funopafvb 47142	Equivalence of function value and ordered pair membership, analogous to funopfvb 6881. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → ((𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝐵 ↔ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
Theorem	funbrafv 47143	The second argument of a binary relation on a function is the function's value, analogous to funbrfv 6875. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵 → (𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝐵))
Theorem	funbrafv2b 47144	Function value in terms of a binary relation, analogous to funbrfv2b 6884. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → (𝐴𝐹𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 ∧ (𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝐵)))
Theorem	dfafn5a 47145*	Representation of a function in terms of its values, analogous to dffn5 6885 (only one direction of implication!). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐹'''𝑥)))
Theorem	dfafn5b 47146*	Representation of a function in terms of its values, analogous to dffn5 6885 (only if it is assumed that the function value for each x is a set). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹'''𝑥) ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ↔ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ (𝐹'''𝑥))))
Theorem	fnrnafv 47147*	The range of a function expressed as a collection of the function's values, analogous to fnrnfv 6886. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → ran 𝐹 = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 = (𝐹'''𝑥)})
Theorem	afvelrnb 47148*	A member of a function's range is a value of the function, analogous to fvelrnb 6887 with the additional requirement that the member must be a set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹'''𝑥) = 𝐵))
Theorem	afvelrnb0 47149*	A member of a function's range is a value of the function, only one direction of implication of fvelrnb 6887. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 1-Jun-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ ran 𝐹 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹'''𝑥) = 𝐵))
Theorem	dfaimafn 47150*	Alternate definition of the image of a function, analogous to dfimafn 6889. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹 “ 𝐴) = {𝑦 ∣ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹'''𝑥) = 𝑦})
Theorem	dfaimafn2 47151*	Alternate definition of the image of a function as an indexed union of singletons of function values, analogous to dfimafn2 6890. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ⊆ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹 “ 𝐴) = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 {(𝐹'''𝑥)})
Theorem	afvelima 47152*	Function value in an image, analogous to fvelima 6892. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ (𝐹 “ 𝐵)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐹'''𝑥) = 𝐴)
Theorem	afvelrn 47153	A function's value belongs to its range, analogous to fvelrn 7014. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹) → (𝐹'''𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	fnafvelrn 47154	A function's value belongs to its range, analogous to fnfvelrn 7018. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹'''𝐵) ∈ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	fafvelcdm 47155	A function's value belongs to its codomain, analogous to ffvelcdm 7019. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐹'''𝐶) ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	ffnafv 47156*	A function maps to a class to which all values belong, analogous to ffnfv 7057. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 25-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ↔ (𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐹'''𝑥) ∈ 𝐵))
Theorem	afvres 47157	The value of a restricted function, analogous to fvres 6845. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 22-Jul-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 → ((𝐹 ↾ 𝐵)'''𝐴) = (𝐹'''𝐴))
Theorem	tz6.12-afv 47158*	Function value. Theorem 6.12(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27, analogous to tz6.12 6850. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Nov-2017.)
⊢ ((⟨𝐴, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐹 ∧ ∃!𝑦⟨𝐴, 𝑦⟩ ∈ 𝐹) → (𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝑦)
Theorem	tz6.12-1-afv 47159*	Function value (Theorem 6.12(1) of [TakeutiZaring] p. 27, analogous to tz6.12-1 6849. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 29-Nov-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝑦 ∧ ∃!𝑦 𝐴𝐹𝑦) → (𝐹'''𝐴) = 𝑦)
Theorem	dmfcoafv 47160	Domains of a function composition, analogous to dmfco 6923. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((Fun 𝐺 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐺) → (𝐴 ∈ dom (𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) ↔ (𝐺'''𝐴) ∈ dom 𝐹))
Theorem	afvco2 47161	Value of a function composition, analogous to fvco2 6924. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 23-Jul-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐺 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐺)'''𝑋) = (𝐹'''(𝐺'''𝑋)))
Theorem	rlimdmafv 47162	Two ways to express that a function has a limit, analogous to rlimdm 15476. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 27-Nov-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → sup(𝐴, ℝ*, < ) = +∞)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∈ dom ⇝𝑟 ↔ 𝐹 ⇝𝑟 ( ⇝𝑟 '''𝐹)))
21.48.4.6  Alternative definition of the value of an operation
Theorem	aoveq123d 47163	Equality deduction for operation value, analogous to oveq123d 7374. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 = 𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐶)) = ((𝐵𝐺𝐷)) )
Theorem	nfaov 47164	Bound-variable hypothesis builder for operation value, analogous to nfov 7383. To prove a deduction version of this analogous to nfovd 7382 is not quickly possible because many deduction versions for bound-variable hypothesis builder for constructs the definition of alternative operation values is based on are not available (see nfafv 47121). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐴    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐹    &   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝐵    ⇒   ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥 ((𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	csbaovg 47165	Move class substitution in and out of an operation. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝐷 → ⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌ ((𝐵𝐹𝐶)) = ((⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐵⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐹⦋𝐴 / 𝑥⦌𝐶)) )
Theorem	aovfundmoveq 47166	If a class is a function restricted to an ordered pair of its domain, then the value of the operation on this pair is equal for both definitions. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = (𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	aovnfundmuv 47167	If an ordered pair is not in the domain of a class or the class is not a function restricted to the ordered pair, then the operation value for this pair is the universal class. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐹 defAt ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = V)
Theorem	ndmaov 47168	The value of an operation outside its domain, analogous to ndmafv 47125. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom 𝐹 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = V)
Theorem	ndmaovg 47169	The value of an operation outside its domain, analogous to ndmovg 7536. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ((dom 𝐹 = (𝑅 × 𝑆) ∧ ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆)) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = V)
Theorem	aovvdm 47170	If the operation value of a class for an ordered pair is a set, the ordered pair is contained in the domain of the class. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ( ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ 𝐶 → ⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩ ∈ dom 𝐹)
Theorem	nfunsnaov 47171	If the restriction of a class to a singleton is not a function, its operation value is the universal class. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (¬ Fun (𝐹 ↾ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = V)
Theorem	aovvfunressn 47172	If the operation value of a class for an argument is a set, the class restricted to the singleton of the argument is a function. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ( ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ 𝐶 → Fun (𝐹 ↾ {⟨𝐴, 𝐵⟩}))
Theorem	aovprc 47173	The value of an operation when the one of the arguments is a proper class, analogous to ovprc 7391. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ Rel dom 𝐹    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = V)
Theorem	aovrcl 47174	Reverse closure for an operation value, analogous to afvvv 47130. In contrast to ovrcl 7394, elementhood of the operation's value in a set is required, not containing an element. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ Rel dom 𝐹    ⇒   ⊢ ( ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V))
Theorem	aovpcov0 47175	If the alternative value of the operation on an ordered pair is the universal class, the operation's value at this ordered pair is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ( ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = V → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ∅)
Theorem	aovnuoveq 47176	The alternative value of the operation on an ordered pair equals the operation's value at this ordered pair. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ( ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ≠ V → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = (𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	aovvoveq 47177	The alternative value of the operation on an ordered pair equals the operation's value on this ordered pair. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ( ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ 𝐶 → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = (𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	aov0ov0 47178	If the alternative value of the operation on an ordered pair is the empty set, the operation's value at this ordered pair is the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ( ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = ∅ → (𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ∅)
Theorem	aovovn0oveq 47179	If the operation's value at an argument is not the empty set, it equals the value of the alternative operation at this argument. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) ≠ ∅ → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = (𝐴𝐹𝐵))
Theorem	aov0nbovbi 47180	The operation's value on an ordered pair is an element of a set if and only if the alternative value of the operation on this ordered pair is an element of that set, if the set does not contain the empty set. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (∅ ∉ 𝐶 → ( ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴𝐹𝐵) ∈ 𝐶))
Theorem	aovov0bi 47181	The operation's value on an ordered pair is the empty set if and only if the alternative value of the operation on this ordered pair is either the empty set or the universal class. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵) = ∅ ↔ ( ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = ∅ ∨ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = V))
Theorem	rspceaov 47182*	A frequently used special case of rspc2ev 3592 for operation values, analogous to rspceov 7402. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 = ((𝐶𝐹𝐷)) ) → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑆 = ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)) )
Theorem	fnotaovb 47183	Equivalence of operation value and ordered triple membership, analogous to fnopfvb 6878. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐷 ∈ 𝐵) → ( ((𝐶𝐹𝐷)) = 𝑅 ↔ ⟨𝐶, 𝐷, 𝑅⟩ ∈ 𝐹))
Theorem	ffnaov 47184*	An operation maps to a class to which all values belong, analogous to ffnov 7479. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ (𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)⟶𝐶 ↔ (𝐹 Fn (𝐴 × 𝐵) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)) ∈ 𝐶))
Theorem	faovcl 47185	Closure law for an operation, analogous to fovcl 7481. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹:(𝑅 × 𝑆)⟶𝐶    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑅 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ 𝐶)
Theorem	aovmpt4g 47186*	Value of a function given by the maps-to notation, analogous to ovmpt4g 7500. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)) = 𝐶)
Theorem	aoprssdm 47187*	Domain of closure of an operation. In contrast to oprssdm 7534, no additional property for S (¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆) is required! (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝑥𝐹𝑦)) ∈ 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑆 × 𝑆) ⊆ dom 𝐹
Theorem	ndmaovcl 47188	The "closure" of an operation outside its domain, when the operation's value is a set in contrast to ndmovcl 7538 where it is required that the domain contains the empty set (∅ ∈ 𝑆). (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ V    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ 𝑆
Theorem	ndmaovrcl 47189	Reverse closure law, in contrast to ndmovrcl 7539 where it is required that the operation's domain doesn't contain the empty set (¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆), no additional asumption is required. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ( ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) ∈ 𝑆 → (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆))
Theorem	ndmaovcom 47190	Any operation is commutative outside its domain, analogous to ndmovcom 7540. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) = ((𝐵𝐹𝐴)) )
Theorem	ndmaovass 47191	Any operation is associative outside its domain. In contrast to ndmovass 7541 where it is required that the operation's domain doesn't contain the empty set (¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆), no additional assumption is required. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) → (( ((𝐴𝐹𝐵)) 𝐹𝐶)) = ((𝐴𝐹 ((𝐵𝐹𝐶)) )) )
Theorem	ndmaovdistr 47192	Any operation is distributive outside its domain. In contrast to ndmovdistr 7542 where it is required that the operation's domain doesn't contain the empty set (¬ ∅ ∈ 𝑆), no additional assumption is required. (Contributed by Alexander van der Vekens, 26-May-2017.)
⊢ dom 𝐹 = (𝑆 × 𝑆)    &   ⊢ dom 𝐺 = (𝑆 × 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆) → ((𝐴𝐺 ((𝐵𝐹𝐶)) )) = (( ((𝐴𝐺𝐵)) 𝐹 ((𝐴𝐺𝐶)) )) )
21.48.5  Alternative definitions of function values (2) In the following, a second approach is followed to define function values alternately to df-afv 47105. The current definition of the value (𝐹‘𝐴) of a function 𝐹 at an argument 𝐴 (see df-fv 6494) assures that this value is always a set, see fex 7166. This is because this definition can be applied to any classes 𝐹 and 𝐴, and evaluates to the empty set when it is not meaningful (as shown by ndmfv 6859 and fvprc 6818). "(𝐹‘𝐴) is meaningful" means "the class 𝐹 regarded as function is defined at the argument 𝐴" in this context. This is also expressed by 𝐹 defAt 𝐴, see df-dfat 47104. In the theory of partial functions, it is a common case that 𝐹 is not defined at 𝐴. Although it is very convenient for many theorems on functions and their proofs, there are some cases in which from (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ alone it cannot be decided/derived whether (𝐹‘𝐴) is meaningful (𝐹 is actually a function which is defined for 𝐴 and really has the function value ∅ at 𝐴) or not. Therefore, additional assumptions are required, such as ∅ ∉ ran 𝐹, ∅ ∈ ran 𝐹, 𝐹 defAt 𝐴, or Fun 𝐹 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ dom 𝐹 (see, for example, ndmfvrcl 6860). To avoid such an ambiguity, an alternative definition (𝐹''''𝐴) (see df-afv2 47194) would be possible which evaluates to a set not belonging to the range of 𝐹 ((𝐹''''𝐴) = 𝒫 ∪ ran 𝐹) if it is not meaningful (see ndfatafv2 47196). We say "(𝐹''''𝐴) is not defined (or undefined)" if (𝐹''''𝐴) is not in the range of 𝐹 ((𝐹''''𝐴) ∉ ran 𝐹). Because of afv2ndefb 47209, this is equivalent to ((𝐹''''𝐴) = 𝒫 ∪ ran 𝐹. If (𝐹''''𝐴) is in the range of 𝐹 ((𝐹''''𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐹), we say that "(𝐹''''𝐴) is defined". If ran 𝐹 is a set, we can use the symbol Undef to express that (𝐹''''𝐴) is not defined: (𝐹''''𝐴) = (Undef‘ran 𝐹) (see ndfatafv2undef 47197). We could have used this symbol directly to define the alternate value of a function, which would have the advantage that (𝐹''''𝐴) would always be a set. But first this symbol is defined using the original function value, which would not make it possible to replace the original definition by the alternate definition, and second we would have to assume that ran 𝐹 ∈ V in most of the theorems. To summarize, that means (𝐹''''𝐴) ∉ ran 𝐹 → (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ (see afv2ndeffv0 47245), but (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ → (𝐹''''𝐴) ∉ ran 𝐹 is not generally valid, see afv2fv0 47250. The alternate definition, however, corresponds to the current definition ((𝐹‘𝐴) = (𝐹''''𝐴)) if the function 𝐹 is defined at 𝐴 (see dfatafv2eqfv 47246). With this definition the following intuitive equivalence holds: (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 ↔ (𝐹''''𝐴) ∈ ran 𝐹), see dfatafv2rnb 47212. An interesting question would be if (𝐹‘𝐴) could be replaced by (𝐹'''𝐴) in most of the theorems based on function values. If we look at the (currently 24) proofs using the definition df-fv 6494 of (𝐹‘𝐴), we see that analogues for the following 7 theorems can be proven using the alternative definition: fveq1 6825-> afv2eq1 47201, fveq2 6826-> afv2eq2 47202, nffv 6836-> nfafv2 47203, csbfv12 6872-> csbafv212g , rlimdm 15476-> rlimdmafv2 47243, tz6.12-1 6849-> tz6.12-1-afv2 47226, fveu 6815-> afv2eu 47223. Six theorems proved by directly using df-fv 6494 are within a mathbox (fvsb 44425, uncov 37580) or not used (rlimdmafv 47162, avril1 30425) or experimental (dfafv2 47117, dfafv22 47244). However, the remaining 11 theorems proved by directly using df-fv 6494 are used more or less often: * fvex 6839: used in about 1600 proofs: Only if the function is defined at the argument, or the range of the function/class is a set, analog theorems can be proven (dfatafv2ex 47198 resp. afv2ex 47199). All of these 1600 proofs have to be checked if one of these two theorems can be used instead of fvex 6839. * fvres 6845: used in about 400 proofs : Only if the function is defined at the argument, an analog theorem can be proven (afv2res 47224). In the undefined case such a theorem cannot exist (without additional assumptions), because the range of (𝐹 ↾ 𝐵) is mostly different from the range of 𝐹, and therefore also the "undefined" values are different. All of these 400 proofs have to be checked if afv2res 47224 can be used instead of fvres 6845. * tz6.12-2 6814 (-> tz6.12-2-afv2 47222): root theorem of many theorems which have not a strict analogue, and which are used many times: ** fvprc 6818 (-> afv2prc 47211), used in 193 proofs, ** tz6.12i 6852 (-> tz6.12i-afv2 47228), used - indirectly via fvbr0 6853 and fvrn0 6854 - in 19 proofs, and in fvclss 7181 used in fvclex 7901 used in fvresex 7902 (which is not used!) and in dcomex 10360 (used in 4 proofs), ** ndmfv 6859 (-> ndmafv2nrn ), used in 124 proofs ** nfunsn 6866 (-> nfunsnafv2 ), used by fvfundmfvn0 6867 (used in 3 proofs), and dffv2 6922 (not used) ** funpartfv 35918, setrec2lem1 49666 (mathboxes) * fv2 6821: only used by elfv 6824, which is only used by fv3 6844, which is not used. * dffv3 6822 (-> dfafv23 ): used by dffv4 6823 (the previous "df-fv"), which now is only used in mathboxes (csbfv12gALTVD 44872), by shftval 14999 (itself used in 11 proofs), by dffv5 35897 (mathbox) and by fvco2 6924 (-> afv2co2 47242). * fvopab5 6967: used only by ajval 30823 (not used) and by adjval 31852, which is used in adjval2 31853 (not used) and in adjbdln 32045 (used in 7 proofs). * zsum 15643: used (via isum 15644, sum0 15646, sumss 15649 and fsumsers 15653) in 76 proofs. * isumshft 15764: used in pserdv2 26356 (used in logtayl 26585, binomcxplemdvsum 44328) , eftlub 16036 (used in 4 proofs), binomcxplemnotnn0 44329 (used in binomcxp 44330 only) and logtayl 26585 (used in 4 proofs). * ovtpos 8181: used in 16 proofs. * zprod 15862: used in 3 proofs: iprod 15863, zprodn0 15864 and prodss 15872 * iprodclim3 15925: not used! As a result of this analysis we can say that the current definition of a function value is crucial for Metamath and cannot be exchanged easily with an alternative definition. While fv2 6821, dffv3 6822, fvopab5 6967, zsum 15643, isumshft 15764, ovtpos 8181 and zprod 15862 are not critical or are, hopefully, also valid for the alternative definition, fvex 6839, fvres 6845 and tz6.12-2 6814 (and the theorems based on them) are essential for the current definition of function values.
Syntax	cafv2 47193	Extend the definition of a class to include the alternate function value. Read: "the value of 𝐹 at 𝐴 " or "𝐹 of 𝐴". For using several apostrophes as a symbol see comment for cafv 47102.
class (𝐹''''𝐴)
Definition	df-afv2 47194*	Alternate definition of the value of a function, (𝐹''''𝐴), also known as function application (and called "alternate function value" in the following). In contrast to (𝐹‘𝐴) = ∅ (see comment of df-fv 6494, and especially ndmfv 6859), (𝐹''''𝐴) is guaranteed not to be in the range of 𝐹 if 𝐹 is not defined at 𝐴 (whereas ∅ can be a member of ran 𝐹). (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹''''𝐴) = if(𝐹 defAt 𝐴, (℩𝑥𝐴𝐹𝑥), 𝒫 ∪ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	dfatafv2iota 47195*	If a function is defined at a class 𝐴 the alternate function value at 𝐴 is the unique value assigned to 𝐴 by the function (analogously to (𝐹‘𝐴)). (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹''''𝐴) = (℩𝑥𝐴𝐹𝑥))
Theorem	ndfatafv2 47196	The alternate function value at a class 𝐴 if the function is not defined at this set 𝐴. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (¬ 𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹''''𝐴) = 𝒫 ∪ ran 𝐹)
Theorem	ndfatafv2undef 47197	The alternate function value at a class 𝐴 is undefined if the function, whose range is a set, is not defined at 𝐴. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ ((ran 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ ¬ 𝐹 defAt 𝐴) → (𝐹''''𝐴) = (Undef‘ran 𝐹))
Theorem	dfatafv2ex 47198	The alternate function value at a class 𝐴 is always a set if the function/class 𝐹 is defined at 𝐴. (Contributed by AV, 6-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝐹 defAt 𝐴 → (𝐹''''𝐴) ∈ V)
Theorem	afv2ex 47199	The alternate function value is always a set if the range of the function is a set. (Contributed by AV, 2-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (ran 𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐹''''𝐴) ∈ V)
Theorem	afv2eq12d 47200	Equality deduction for function value, analogous to fveq12d 6833. (Contributed by AV, 4-Sep-2022.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 = 𝐺)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹''''𝐴) = (𝐺''''𝐵))