Theorem ntrneineine0lem 40426

Description: If (pseudo-)interior and (pseudo-)neighborhood functions are related by the operator, 𝐹, then conditions equal to claiming that for every point, at least one (pseudo-)neighborbood exists hold equally. (Contributed by RP, 29-May-2021.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ntrnei.o	⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑖 ∈ V, 𝑗 ∈ V ↦ (𝑘 ∈ (𝒫 𝑗 ↑m 𝑖) ↦ (𝑙 ∈ 𝑗 ↦ {𝑚 ∈ 𝑖 ∣ 𝑙 ∈ (𝑘‘𝑚)})))
ntrnei.f	⊢ 𝐹 = (𝒫 𝐵𝑂𝐵)
ntrnei.r	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼𝐹𝑁)
ntrnei.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ntrneineine0lem	⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵𝑋 ∈ (𝐼‘𝑠) ↔ (𝑁‘𝑋) ≠ ∅))

Distinct variable groups:   𝐵,𝑖,𝑗,𝑘,𝑙,𝑚   𝑘,𝐼,𝑙,𝑚   𝑁,𝑠   𝑋,𝑙,𝑚,𝑠   𝜑,𝑖,𝑗,𝑘,𝑙,𝑠

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑚)   𝐵(𝑠)   𝐹(𝑖,𝑗,𝑘,𝑚,𝑠,𝑙)   𝐼(𝑖,𝑗,𝑠)   𝑁(𝑖,𝑗,𝑘,𝑚,𝑙)   𝑂(𝑖,𝑗,𝑘,𝑚,𝑠,𝑙)   𝑋(𝑖,𝑗,𝑘)

Proof of Theorem ntrneineine0lem

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ntrnei.o	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑂 = (𝑖 ∈ V, 𝑗 ∈ V ↦ (𝑘 ∈ (𝒫 𝑗 ↑m 𝑖) ↦ (𝑙 ∈ 𝑗 ↦ {𝑚 ∈ 𝑖 ∣ 𝑙 ∈ (𝑘‘𝑚)})))
2		ntrnei.f	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝒫 𝐵𝑂𝐵)
3		ntrnei.r	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐼𝐹𝑁)
4	3	adantr 483	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → 𝐼𝐹𝑁)
5		ntrnei.x	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
6	5	adantr 483	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
7		simpr 487	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → 𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵)
8	1, 2, 4, 6, 7	ntrneiel 40424	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵) → (𝑋 ∈ (𝐼‘𝑠) ↔ 𝑠 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑋)))
9	8	rexbidva 3296	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵𝑋 ∈ (𝐼‘𝑠) ↔ ∃𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵𝑠 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑋)))
10	1, 2, 3	ntrneinex 40420	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (𝒫 𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝐵))
11		elmapi 8422	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑁 ∈ (𝒫 𝒫 𝐵 ↑m 𝐵) → 𝑁:𝐵⟶𝒫 𝒫 𝐵)
12	10, 11	syl 17	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁:𝐵⟶𝒫 𝒫 𝐵)
13	12, 5	ffvelrnd 6847	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑋) ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝐵)
14	13	elpwid 4553	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑋) ⊆ 𝒫 𝐵)
15	14	sseld 3966	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑠 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑋) → 𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵))
16	15	pm4.71rd 565	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑠 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑋) ↔ (𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑋))))
17	16	exbidv 1918	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑠 𝑠 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑋) ↔ ∃𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑋))))
18	17	bicomd 225	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑋)) ↔ ∃𝑠 𝑠 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑋)))
19		df-rex 3144	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵𝑠 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑋) ↔ ∃𝑠(𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ 𝑠 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑋)))
20		n0 4310	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝑁‘𝑋) ≠ ∅ ↔ ∃𝑠 𝑠 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑋))
21	18, 19, 20	3bitr4g 316	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵𝑠 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑋) ↔ (𝑁‘𝑋) ≠ ∅))
22	9, 21	bitrd 281	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵𝑋 ∈ (𝐼‘𝑠) ↔ (𝑁‘𝑋) ≠ ∅))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 398   = wceq 1533  ∃wex 1776   ∈ wcel 2110   ≠ wne 3016  ∃wrex 3139  {crab 3142  Vcvv 3495  ∅c0 4291  𝒫 cpw 4539   class class class wbr 5059   ↦ cmpt 5139  ⟶wf 6346  ‘cfv 6350  (class class class)co 7150   ∈ cmpo 7152   ↑_m cmap 8400

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1792  ax-4 1806  ax-5 1907  ax-6 1966  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2112  ax-9 2120  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2172  ax-ext 2793  ax-rep 5183  ax-sep 5196  ax-nul 5203  ax-pow 5259  ax-pr 5322  ax-un 7455

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 399  df-or 844  df-3an 1085  df-tru 1536  df-ex 1777  df-nf 1781  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2618  df-eu 2650  df-clab 2800  df-cleq 2814  df-clel 2893  df-nfc 2963  df-ne 3017  df-ral 3143  df-rex 3144  df-reu 3145  df-rab 3147  df-v 3497  df-sbc 3773  df-csb 3884  df-dif 3939  df-un 3941  df-in 3943  df-ss 3952  df-nul 4292  df-if 4468  df-pw 4541  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564  df-op 4568  df-uni 4833  df-iun 4914  df-br 5060  df-opab 5122  df-mpt 5140  df-id 5455  df-xp 5556  df-rel 5557  df-cnv 5558  df-co 5559  df-dm 5560  df-rn 5561  df-res 5562  df-ima 5563  df-iota 6309  df-fun 6352  df-fn 6353  df-f 6354  df-f1 6355  df-fo 6356  df-f1o 6357  df-fv 6358  df-ov 7153  df-oprab 7154  df-mpo 7155  df-1st 7683  df-2nd 7684  df-map 8402

This theorem is referenced by:  ntrneineine0  40430