| Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 434 of 500) | < Previous Next > | |
| Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
|
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
||
| Color key: | (1-30898) |
(30899-32421) |
(32422-49905) |
| Type | Label | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Statement | ||
| Definition | df-toplnd 43301* | A topology is Lindelöf iff every open cover has a countable subcover. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 8-Jan-2015.) |
| ⊢ TopLnd = {𝑥 ∈ Top ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝒫 𝑥(∪ 𝑥 = ∪ 𝑦 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝒫 𝑥(𝑧 ≼ ω ∧ ∪ 𝑥 = ∪ 𝑧))} | ||
| Theorem | r1sssucd 43302 | Deductive form of r1sssuc 9676. (Contributed by Noam Pasman, 19-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ On) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑅1‘𝐴) ⊆ (𝑅1‘suc 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | iocunico 43303 | Split an open interval into two pieces at point B, Co-author TA. (Contributed by Jon Pennant, 8-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶)) → ((𝐴(,]𝐵) ∪ (𝐵[,)𝐶)) = (𝐴(,)𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | iocinico 43304 | The intersection of two sets that meet at a point is that point. (Contributed by Jon Pennant, 12-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ*) ∧ (𝐴 < 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 < 𝐶)) → ((𝐴(,]𝐵) ∩ (𝐵[,)𝐶)) = {𝐵}) | ||
| Theorem | iocmbl 43305 | An open-below, closed-above real interval is measurable. (Contributed by Jon Pennant, 12-Jun-2019.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ* ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴(,]𝐵) ∈ dom vol) | ||
| Theorem | cnioobibld 43306* | A bounded, continuous function on an open bounded interval is integrable. The function must be bounded. For a counterexample, consider 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (0(,)1) ↦ (1 / 𝑥)). See cniccibl 25769 for closed bounded intervals. (Contributed by Jon Pennant, 31-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ ((𝐴(,)𝐵)–cn→ℂ)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ dom 𝐹(abs‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ≤ 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ 𝐿1) | ||
| Theorem | arearect 43307 | The area of a rectangle whose sides are parallel to the coordinate axes in (ℝ × ℝ) is its width multiplied by its height. (Contributed by Jon Pennant, 19-Mar-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐴 ≤ 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐶 ≤ 𝐷 & ⊢ 𝑆 = ((𝐴[,]𝐵) × (𝐶[,]𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ (area‘𝑆) = ((𝐵 − 𝐴) · (𝐷 − 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | areaquad 43308* | The area of a quadrilateral with two sides which are parallel to the y-axis in (ℝ × ℝ) is its width multiplied by the average height of its higher edge minus the average height of its lower edge. Co-author TA. (Contributed by Jon Pennant, 31-May-2019.) |
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐷 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐸 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ ℝ & ⊢ 𝐴 < 𝐵 & ⊢ 𝐶 ≤ 𝐸 & ⊢ 𝐷 ≤ 𝐹 & ⊢ 𝑈 = (𝐶 + (((𝑥 − 𝐴) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)) · (𝐷 − 𝐶))) & ⊢ 𝑉 = (𝐸 + (((𝑥 − 𝐴) / (𝐵 − 𝐴)) · (𝐹 − 𝐸))) & ⊢ 𝑆 = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴[,]𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (𝑈[,]𝑉))} ⇒ ⊢ (area‘𝑆) = ((((𝐹 + 𝐸) / 2) − ((𝐷 + 𝐶) / 2)) · (𝐵 − 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | uniel 43309* | Two ways to say a union is an element of a class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ∈ 𝑦)) | ||
| Theorem | unielss 43310* | Two ways to say the union of a class is an element of a subclass. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → (∪ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | unielid 43311* | Two ways to say the union of a class is an element of that class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | ssunib 43312* | Two ways to say a class is a subclass of a union. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝐵 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦) | ||
| Theorem | rp-intrabeq 43313* | Equality theorem for supremum of sets of ordinals. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥} = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | rp-unirabeq 43314* | Equality theorem for infimum of non-empty classes of ordinals. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 = 𝐵 → ∪ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦} = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | onmaxnelsup 43315* | Two ways to say the maximum element of a class of ordinals is also the supremum of that class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → (¬ 𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | onsupneqmaxlim0 43316 | If the supremum of a class of ordinals is not in that class, then the supremum is a limit ordinal or empty. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → (𝐴 ⊆ ∪ 𝐴 → ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ ∪ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | onsupcl2 43317 | The supremum of a set of ordinals is an ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 On → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ On) | ||
| Theorem | onuniintrab 43318* | The union of a set of ordinals is the intersection of every ordinal greater-than-or-equal to every member of the set. Closed form of uniordint 7734. (Contributed by RP, 28-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ∪ 𝐴 = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | onintunirab 43319* | The intersection of a non-empty class of ordinals is the union of every ordinal less-than-or-equal to every element of that class. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∩ 𝐴 = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | onsupnmax 43320 | If the union of a class of ordinals is not the maximum element of that class, then the union is a limit ordinal or empty. But this isn't a biconditional since 𝐴 could be a non-empty set where a limit ordinal or the empty set happens to be the largest element. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → (¬ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴 → ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ ∪ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | onsupuni 43321 | The supremum of a set of ordinals is the union of that set. Lemma 2.10 of [Schloeder] p. 5. (Contributed by RP, 19-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → sup(𝐴, On, E ) = ∪ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | onsupuni2 43322 | The supremum of a set of ordinals is the union of that set. (Contributed by RP, 22-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 On → sup(𝐴, On, E ) = ∪ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | onsupintrab 43323* | The supremum of a set of ordinals is the intersection of every ordinal greater-than-or-equal to every member of the set. Definition 2.9 of [Schloeder] p. 5. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → sup(𝐴, On, E ) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | onsupintrab2 43324* | The supremum of a set of ordinals is the intersection of every ordinal greater-than-or-equal to every member of the set. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 On → sup(𝐴, On, E ) = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | onsupcl3 43325* | The supremum of a set of ordinals is an ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥} ∈ On) | ||
| Theorem | onsupex3 43326* | The supremum of a set of ordinals exists. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥} ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | onuniintrab2 43327* | The union of a set of ordinals is the intersection of every ordinal greater-than-or-equal to every member of the set. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝒫 On → ∪ 𝐴 = ∩ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥}) | ||
| Theorem | oninfint 43328 | The infimum of a non-empty class of ordinals is the intersection of that class. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → inf(𝐴, On, E ) = ∩ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | oninfunirab 43329* | The infimum of a non-empty class of ordinals is the union of every ordinal less-than-or-equal to every element of that class. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → inf(𝐴, On, E ) = ∪ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦}) | ||
| Theorem | oninfcl2 43330* | The infimum of a non-empty class of ordinals is an ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∪ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦} ∈ On) | ||
| Theorem | onsupmaxb 43331 | The union of a class of ordinals is an element is an element of that class if and only if there is a maximum element of that class under the epsilon relation, which is to say that the domain of the restricted epsilon relation is not the whole class. (Contributed by RP, 25-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → (dom ( E ∩ (𝐴 × 𝐴)) = 𝐴 ↔ ¬ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | onexgt 43332* | For any ordinal, there is always a larger ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 1-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | onexomgt 43333* | For any ordinal, there is always a larger product of omega. (Contributed by RP, 1-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 ∈ (ω ·o 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | omlimcl2 43334 | The product of a limit ordinal with any nonzero ordinal is a limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 8-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ Lim 𝐵)) ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐴) → Lim (𝐵 ·o 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | onexlimgt 43335* | For any ordinal, there is always a larger limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 1-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑥 ∈ On (Lim 𝑥 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | onexoegt 43336* | For any ordinal, there is always a larger power of omega. (Contributed by RP, 1-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃𝑥 ∈ On 𝐴 ∈ (ω ↑o 𝑥)) | ||
| Theorem | oninfex2 43337* | The infimum of a non-empty class of ordinals exists. (Contributed by RP, 23-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∪ {𝑥 ∈ On ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦} ∈ V) | ||
| Theorem | onsupeqmax 43338* | Condition when the supremum of a set of ordinals is the maximum element of that set. (Contributed by RP, 24-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 ⊆ 𝑥 ↔ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | onsupeqnmax 43339* | Condition when the supremum of a class of ordinals is not the maximum element of that class. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ⊆ On → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥 ∈ 𝑦 ↔ (∪ 𝐴 = ∪ ∪ 𝐴 ∧ ¬ ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴))) | ||
| Theorem | onsuplub 43340* | The supremum of a set of ordinals is the least upper bound. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐵 ∈ ∪ 𝐴 ↔ ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝐵 ∈ 𝑧)) | ||
| Theorem | onsupnub 43341* | An upper bound of a set of ordinals is not less than the supremum. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐵 ∈ On ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑧 ⊆ 𝐵)) → ∪ 𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | onfisupcl 43342 | Sufficient condition when the supremum of a set of ordinals is the maximum element of that set. See ordunifi 9174. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝐴 ∈ Fin ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | onelord 43343 | Every element of a ordinal is an ordinal. Lemma 1.3 of [Schloeder] p. 1. Based on onelon 6331 and eloni 6316. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐴) → Ord 𝐵) | ||
| Theorem | onepsuc 43344 | Every ordinal is less than its successor, relationship version. Lemma 1.7 of [Schloeder] p. 1. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝐴 E suc 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | epsoon 43345 | The ordinals are strictly and completely (linearly) ordered. Theorem 1.9 of [Schloeder] p. 1. Based on epweon 7708 and weso 5605. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ E Or On | ||
| Theorem | epirron 43346 | The strict order on the ordinals is irreflexive. Theorem 1.9(i) of [Schloeder] p. 1. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ¬ 𝐴 E 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | oneptr 43347 | The strict order on the ordinals is transitive. Theorem 1.9(ii) of [Schloeder] p. 1. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → ((𝐴 E 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 E 𝐶) → 𝐴 E 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | oneltr 43348 | The elementhood relation on the ordinals is transitive. Theorem 1.9(ii) of [Schloeder] p. 1. See ontr1 6353. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | oneptri 43349 | The strict, complete (linear) order on the ordinals is complete. Theorem 1.9(iii) of [Schloeder] p. 1. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 E 𝐵 ∨ 𝐵 E 𝐴 ∨ 𝐴 = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | ordeldif 43350 | Membership in the difference of ordinals. (Contributed by RP, 15-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | ordeldifsucon 43351 | Membership in the difference of ordinal and successor ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐶 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ suc 𝐵) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | ordeldif1o 43352 | Membership in the difference of ordinal and ordinal one. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (Ord 𝐴 → (𝐵 ∈ (𝐴 ∖ 1o) ↔ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅))) | ||
| Theorem | ordne0gt0 43353 | Ordinal zero is less than every non-zero ordinal. Theorem 1.10 of [Schloeder] p. 2. Closely related to ord0eln0 6362. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → ∅ ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | ondif1i 43354 | Ordinal zero is less than every non-zero ordinal, class difference version. Theorem 1.10 of [Schloeder] p. 2. See ondif1 8416. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) → ∅ ∈ 𝐴) | ||
| Theorem | onsucelab 43355* | The successor of every ordinal is an element of the class of successor ordinals. Definition 1.11 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → suc 𝐴 ∈ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ On 𝑎 = suc 𝑏}) | ||
| Theorem | dflim6 43356* | A limit ordinal is a non-zero ordinal which is not a successor ordinal. Definition 1.11 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (Lim 𝐴 ↔ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ ∃𝑏 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑏)) | ||
| Theorem | limnsuc 43357* | A limit ordinal is not an element of the class of successor ordinals. Definition 1.11 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (Lim 𝐴 → ¬ 𝐴 ∈ {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ On 𝑎 = suc 𝑏}) | ||
| Theorem | onsucss 43358 | If one ordinal is less than another, then the successor of the first is less than or equal to the second. Lemma 1.13 of [Schloeder] p. 2. See ordsucss 7748. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐴 → suc 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | ordnexbtwnsuc 43359* | For any distinct pair of ordinals, if there is no ordinal between the lesser and the greater, the greater is the successor of the lesser. Lemma 1.16 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 16-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → (∀𝑐 ∈ On ¬ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑐 ∧ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐵 = suc 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | orddif0suc 43360 | For any distinct pair of ordinals, if the set difference between the greater and the successor of the lesser is empty, the greater is the successor of the lesser. Lemma 1.16 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 17-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ Ord 𝐵) → ((𝐵 ∖ suc 𝐴) = ∅ → 𝐵 = suc 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | onsucf1lem 43361* | For ordinals, the successor operation is injective, so there is at most one ordinal that a given ordinal could be the successor of. Lemma 1.17 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ∃*𝑏 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑏) | ||
| Theorem | onsucf1olem 43362* | The successor operation is bijective between the ordinals and the class of successor ordinals. Lemma 1.17 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ¬ Lim 𝐴) → ∃!𝑏 ∈ On 𝐴 = suc 𝑏) | ||
| Theorem | onsucrn 43363* | The successor operation is surjective onto its range, the class of successor ordinals. Lemma 1.17 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ On ↦ suc 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ ran 𝐹 = {𝑎 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ On 𝑎 = suc 𝑏} | ||
| Theorem | onsucf1o 43364* | The successor operation is a bijective function between the ordinals and the class of successor ordinals. Lemma 1.17 of [Schloeder] p. 2. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ On ↦ suc 𝑥) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹:On–1-1-onto→{𝑎 ∈ On ∣ ∃𝑏 ∈ On 𝑎 = suc 𝑏} | ||
| Theorem | dflim7 43365* | A limit ordinal is a non-zero ordinal that contains all the successors of its elements. Lemma 1.18 of [Schloeder] p. 2. Closely related to dflim4 7778. (Contributed by RP, 17-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (Lim 𝐴 ↔ (Ord 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 suc 𝑏 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅)) | ||
| Theorem | onov0suclim 43366 | Compactly express rules for binary operations on ordinals. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝐴 ⊗ ∅) = 𝐷) & ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊗ suc 𝐶) = 𝐸) & ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) ∧ Lim 𝐵) → (𝐴 ⊗ 𝐵) = 𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐵 = ∅ → (𝐴 ⊗ 𝐵) = 𝐷) ∧ ((𝐵 = suc 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊗ 𝐵) = 𝐸) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ⊗ 𝐵) = 𝐹))) | ||
| Theorem | oa0suclim 43367* | Closed form expression of the value of ordinal addition for the cases when the second ordinal is zero, a successor ordinal, or a limit ordinal. Definition 2.3 of [Schloeder] p. 4. See oa0 8431, oasuc 8439, and oalim 8447. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐵 = ∅ → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = 𝐴) ∧ ((𝐵 = suc 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = suc (𝐴 +o 𝐶)) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 +o 𝑐)))) | ||
| Theorem | om0suclim 43368* | Closed form expression of the value of ordinal multiplication for the cases when the second ordinal is zero, a successor ordinal, or a limit ordinal. Definition 2.5 of [Schloeder] p. 4. See om0 8432, omsuc 8441, and omlim 8448. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐵 = ∅ → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) = ∅) ∧ ((𝐵 = suc 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ·o 𝐶) +o 𝐴)) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) = ∪ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ·o 𝑐)))) | ||
| Theorem | oe0suclim 43369* | Closed form expression of the value of ordinal exponentiation for the cases when the second ordinal is zero, a successor ordinal, or a limit ordinal. Definition 2.6 of [Schloeder] p. 4. See oe0 8437, oesuc 8442, oe0m1 8436, and oelim 8449. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐵 = ∅ → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) = 1o) ∧ ((𝐵 = suc 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) = ((𝐴 ↑o 𝐶) ·o 𝐴)) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 → (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) = if(∅ ∈ 𝐴, ∪ 𝑐 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐴 ↑o 𝑐), ∅)))) | ||
| Theorem | oaomoecl 43370 | The operations of addition, multiplication, and exponentiation are closed. Remark 2.8 of [Schloeder] p. 5. See oacl 8450, omcl 8451, oecl 8452. (Contributed by RP, 18-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ On ∧ (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ On ∧ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) ∈ On)) | ||
| Theorem | onsupsucismax 43371* | If the union of a set of ordinals is a successor ordinal, then that union is the maximum element of the set. This is not a bijection because sets where the maximum element is zero or a limit ordinal exist. Lemma 2.11 of [Schloeder] p. 5. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → (∃𝑏 ∈ On ∪ 𝐴 = suc 𝑏 → ∪ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | onsssupeqcond 43372* | If for every element of a set of ordinals there is an element of a subset which is at least as large, then the union of the set and the subset is the same. Lemma 2.12 of [Schloeder] p. 5. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ On ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → ((𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 𝑎 ⊆ 𝑏) → ∪ 𝐴 = ∪ 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | limexissup 43373 | An ordinal which is a limit ordinal is equal to its supremum. Lemma 2.13 of [Schloeder] p. 5. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐴 = sup(𝐴, On, E )) | ||
| Theorem | limiun 43374* | A limit ordinal is the union of its elements, indexed union version. Lemma 2.13 of [Schloeder] p. 5. See limuni 6368. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (Lim 𝐴 → 𝐴 = ∪ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝑥) | ||
| Theorem | limexissupab 43375* | An ordinal which is a limit ordinal is equal to the supremum of the class of all its elements. Lemma 2.13 of [Schloeder] p. 5. (Contributed by RP, 27-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((Lim 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐴 = sup({𝑥 ∣ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴}, On, E )) | ||
| Theorem | om1om1r 43376 | Ordinal one is both a left and right identity of ordinal multiplication. Lemma 2.15 of [Schloeder] p. 5. See om1 8457 and om1r 8458 for individual statements. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → ((1o ·o 𝐴) = (𝐴 ·o 1o) ∧ (𝐴 ·o 1o) = 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | oe0rif 43377 | Ordinal zero raised to any non-zero ordinal power is zero and zero to the zeroth power is one. Lemma 2.18 of [Schloeder] p. 6. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (∅ ↑o 𝐴) = if(∅ ∈ 𝐴, ∅, 1o)) | ||
| Theorem | oasubex 43378* | While subtraction can't be a binary operation on ordinals, for any pair of ordinals there exists an ordinal that can be added to the lessor (or equal) one which will sum to the greater. Theorem 2.19 of [Schloeder] p. 6. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ⊆ 𝐴) → ∃𝑐 ∈ On (𝑐 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ (𝐵 +o 𝑐) = 𝐴)) | ||
| Theorem | nnamecl 43379 | Natural numbers are closed under ordinal addition, multiplication, and exponentiation. Theorem 2.20 of [Schloeder] p. 6. See nnacl 8526, nnmcl 8527, nnecl 8528. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ω ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ω) → ((𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ ω ∧ (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ ω ∧ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵) ∈ ω)) | ||
| Theorem | onsucwordi 43380 | The successor operation preserves the less-than-or-equal relationship between ordinals. Lemma 3.1 of [Schloeder] p. 7. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → suc 𝐴 ⊆ suc 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | oalim2cl 43381 | The ordinal sum of any ordinal with a limit ordinal on the right is a limit ordinal. (Contributed by RP, 6-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ Lim 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) → Lim (𝐴 +o 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | oaltublim 43382 | Given 𝐶 is a limit ordinal, the sum of any ordinal with an ordinal less than 𝐶 is less than the sum of the first ordinal with 𝐶. Lemma 3.5 of [Schloeder] p. 7. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ (Lim 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 +o 𝐶)) | ||
| Theorem | oaordi3 43383 | Ordinal addition of the same number on the left preserves the ordering of the numbers on the right. Lemma 3.6 of [Schloeder] p. 8. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 +o 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | oaord3 43384 | When the same ordinal is added on the left, ordering of the sums is equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the right. Theorem 3.7 of [Schloeder] p. 8. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ↔ (𝐴 +o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 +o 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | 1oaomeqom 43385 | Ordinal one plus omega is equal to omega. See oaabs 8563 for the sum of any natural number on the left and ordinal at least as large as omega on the right. Lemma 3.8 of [Schloeder] p. 8. See oaabs2 8564 where a power of omega is the upper bound of the left and a lower bound on the right. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (1o +o ω) = ω | ||
| Theorem | oaabsb 43386 | The right addend absorbs the sum with an ordinal iff that ordinal times omega is less than or equal to the right addend. (Contributed by RP, 19-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → ((𝐴 ·o ω) ⊆ 𝐵 ↔ (𝐴 +o 𝐵) = 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | oaordnrex 43387 | When omega is added on the right to ordinals zero and one, ordering of the sums is not equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the left. Remark 3.9 of [Schloeder] p. 8. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ¬ (∅ ∈ 1o ↔ (∅ +o ω) ∈ (1o +o ω)) | ||
| Theorem | oaordnr 43388* | When the same ordinal is added on the right, ordering of the sums is not equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the left. Remark 3.9 of [Schloeder] p. 8. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ On ∃𝑐 ∈ On ¬ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑎 +o 𝑐) ∈ (𝑏 +o 𝑐)) | ||
| Theorem | omge1 43389 | Any non-zero ordinal product is greater-than-or-equal to the term on the left. Lemma 3.11 of [Schloeder] p. 8. See omword1 8488. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 ·o 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | omge2 43390 | Any non-zero ordinal product is greater-than-or-equal to the term on the right. Lemma 3.12 of [Schloeder] p. 9. See omword2 8489. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) → 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ·o 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | omlim2 43391 | The non-zero product with an limit ordinal on the right is a limit ordinal. Lemma 3.13 of [Schloeder] p. 9. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)) → Lim (𝐴 ·o 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | omord2lim 43392 | Given a limit ordinal, the product of any non-zero ordinal with an ordinal less than that limit ordinal is less than the product of the non-zero ordinal with the limit ordinal . Lemma 3.14 of [Schloeder] p. 9. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ (Lim 𝐶 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 ·o 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | omord2i 43393 | Ordinal multiplication of the same non-zero number on the left preserves the ordering of the numbers on the right. Lemma 3.15 of [Schloeder] p. 9. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅) ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 ·o 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | omord2com 43394 | When the same non-zero ordinal is multiplied on the left, ordering of the products is equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the right. Theorem 3.16 of [Schloeder] p. 9. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐶 ∈ On) → ((𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ ∅ ∈ 𝐴) ↔ (𝐴 ·o 𝐵) ∈ (𝐴 ·o 𝐶))) | ||
| Theorem | 2omomeqom 43395 | Ordinal two times omega is omega. Lemma 3.17 of [Schloeder] p. 10. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (2o ·o ω) = ω | ||
| Theorem | omnord1ex 43396 | When omega is multiplied on the right to ordinals one and two, ordering of the products is not equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the left. Remark 3.18 of [Schloeder] p. 10. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ¬ (1o ∈ 2o ↔ (1o ·o ω) ∈ (2o ·o ω)) | ||
| Theorem | omnord1 43397* | When the same non-zero ordinal is multiplied on the right, ordering of the products is not equivalent to the ordering of the ordinals on the left. Remark 3.18 of [Schloeder] p. 10. (Contributed by RP, 4-Feb-2025.) |
| ⊢ ∃𝑎 ∈ On ∃𝑏 ∈ On ∃𝑐 ∈ (On ∖ 1o) ¬ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑏 ↔ (𝑎 ·o 𝑐) ∈ (𝑏 ·o 𝑐)) | ||
| Theorem | oege1 43398 | Any non-zero ordinal power is greater-than-or-equal to the term on the left. Lemma 3.19 of [Schloeder] p. 10. See oewordi 8506. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → 𝐴 ⊆ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | oege2 43399 | Any power of an ordinal at least as large as two is greater-than-or-equal to the term on the right. Lemma 3.20 of [Schloeder] p. 10. See oeworde 8508. (Contributed by RP, 29-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 1o ∈ 𝐴) ∧ 𝐵 ∈ On) → 𝐵 ⊆ (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵)) | ||
| Theorem | rp-oelim2 43400 | The power of an ordinal at least as large as two with a limit ordinal on thr right is a limit ordinal. Lemma 3.21 of [Schloeder] p. 10. See oelimcl 8515. (Contributed by RP, 30-Jan-2025.) |
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ∈ On ∧ 1o ∈ 𝐴) ∧ (Lim 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉)) → Lim (𝐴 ↑o 𝐵)) | ||
| < Previous Next > |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |