Theorem wdom2d2 43059

Description: Deduction for weak dominance by a Cartesian product. MOVABLE (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 10-Jul-2015.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
wdom2d2.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
wdom2d2.b	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)
wdom2d2.c	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)
wdom2d2.o	⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝑋)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
wdom2d2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≼* (𝐵 × 𝐶))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑋   𝑥,𝐴   𝑥,𝑦,𝐵   𝑥,𝑧,𝐶,𝑦   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑦,𝑧)   𝐴(𝑦,𝑧)   𝐵(𝑧)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝑊(𝑥,𝑦,𝑧)   𝑋(𝑦,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem wdom2d2

Dummy variable 𝑤 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		wdom2d2.a	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
2		wdom2d2.b	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)
3		wdom2d2.c	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑋)
4	2, 3	xpexd 7745	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 × 𝐶) ∈ V)
5		wdom2d2.o	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝑋)
6		nfcsb1v 3898	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦⦋(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑦⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑧⦌𝑋
7	6	nfeq2 2916	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦 𝑥 = ⦋(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑦⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑧⦌𝑋
8		nfcv 2898	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧(1st ‘𝑤)
9		nfcsb1v 3898	. . . . . 6 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧⦋(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑧⦌𝑋
10	8, 9	nfcsbw 3900	. . . . 5 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧⦋(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑦⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑧⦌𝑋
11	10	nfeq2 2916	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑧 𝑥 = ⦋(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑦⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑧⦌𝑋
12		nfv 1914	. . . 4 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑤 𝑥 = 𝑋
13		csbopeq1a 8049	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → ⦋(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑦⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑧⦌𝑋 = 𝑋)
14	13	eqeq2d 2746	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑤 = ⟨𝑦, 𝑧⟩ → (𝑥 = ⦋(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑦⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑧⦌𝑋 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑋))
15	7, 11, 12, 14	rexxpf 5827	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑤 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶)𝑥 = ⦋(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑦⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑧⦌𝑋 ↔ ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐶 𝑥 = 𝑋)
16	5, 15	sylibr 234	. 2 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑤 ∈ (𝐵 × 𝐶)𝑥 = ⦋(1st ‘𝑤) / 𝑦⦌⦋(2nd ‘𝑤) / 𝑧⦌𝑋)
17	1, 4, 16	wdom2d 9594	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≼* (𝐵 × 𝐶))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2108  ∃wrex 3060  Vcvv 3459  ⦋csb 3874  ⟨cop 4607   class class class wbr 5119   × cxp 5652  ‘cfv 6531  1^st c1st 7986  2^nd c2nd 7987   ≼^* cwdom 9578

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2007  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2141  ax-11 2157  ax-12 2177  ax-ext 2707  ax-sep 5266  ax-nul 5276  ax-pow 5335  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7729

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2065  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2568  df-clab 2714  df-cleq 2727  df-clel 2809  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3061  df-rab 3416  df-v 3461  df-sbc 3766  df-csb 3875  df-dif 3929  df-un 3931  df-in 3933  df-ss 3943  df-nul 4309  df-if 4501  df-pw 4577  df-sn 4602  df-pr 4604  df-op 4608  df-uni 4884  df-iun 4969  df-br 5120  df-opab 5182  df-mpt 5202  df-id 5548  df-xp 5660  df-rel 5661  df-cnv 5662  df-co 5663  df-dm 5664  df-rn 5665  df-res 5666  df-ima 5667  df-iota 6484  df-fun 6533  df-fn 6534  df-f 6535  df-f1 6536  df-fo 6537  df-f1o 6538  df-fv 6539  df-1st 7988  df-2nd 7989  df-en 8960  df-dom 8961  df-sdom 8962  df-wdom 9579

This theorem is referenced by: (None)