Theorem ablressid 13921

Description: A commutative group restricted to its base set is a commutative group. It will usually be the original group exactly, of course, but to show that needs additional conditions such as those in strressid 13153. (Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 5-May-2025.)

Hypothesis

Ref	Expression
ablressid.b	|- B = ( Base ` G )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
ablressid	|- ( G e. Abel -> ( G ↾s B ) e. Abel )

Proof of Theorem ablressid

Dummy variables x y are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		eqidd 2232	. . 3 |- ( G e. Abel -> ( G ↾s B ) = ( G ↾s B ) )
2		ablressid.b	. . . 4 |- B = ( Base ` G )
3	2	a1i 9	. . 3 |- ( G e. Abel -> B = ( Base ` G ) )
4		id 19	. . 3 |- ( G e. Abel -> G e. Abel )
5		ssidd 3248	. . 3 |- ( G e. Abel -> B C_ B )
6	1, 3, 4, 5	ressbas2d 13150	. 2 |- ( G e. Abel -> B = ( Base ` ( G ↾s B ) ) )
7		eqidd 2232	. . 3 |- ( G e. Abel -> ( +g ` G ) = ( +g ` G ) )
8		basfn 13140	. . . . 5 |- Base Fn _V
9		elex 2814	. . . . 5 |- ( G e. Abel -> G e. _V )
10		funfvex 5656	. . . . . 6 |- ( ( Fun Base /\ G e. dom Base ) -> ( Base ` G ) e. _V )
11	10	funfni 5432	. . . . 5 |- ( ( Base Fn _V /\ G e. _V ) -> ( Base ` G ) e. _V )
12	8, 9, 11	sylancr 414	. . . 4 |- ( G e. Abel -> ( Base ` G ) e. _V )
13	2, 12	eqeltrid 2318	. . 3 |- ( G e. Abel -> B e. _V )
14	1, 7, 13, 9	ressplusgd 13211	. 2 |- ( G e. Abel -> ( +g ` G ) = ( +g ` ( G ↾s B ) ) )
15		ablgrp 13875	. . 3 |- ( G e. Abel -> G e. Grp )
16	2	grpressid 13643	. . 3 |- ( G e. Grp -> ( G ↾s B ) e. Grp )
17	15, 16	syl 14	. 2 |- ( G e. Abel -> ( G ↾s B ) e. Grp )
18		eqid 2231	. . 3 |- ( +g ` G ) = ( +g ` G )
19	2, 18	ablcom 13889	. 2 |- ( ( G e. Abel /\ x e. B /\ y e. B ) -> ( x ( +g ` G ) y ) = ( y ( +g ` G ) x ) )
20	6, 14, 17, 19	isabld 13885	1 |- ( G e. Abel -> ( G ↾s B ) e. Abel )

Syntax hints:   -> wi 4   = wceq 1397   e. wcel 2202   _Vcvv 2802   Fn wfn 5321   ` cfv 5326  (class class class)co 6017   Basecbs 13081   ↾_s cress 13082   +g cplusg 13159   Grpcgrp 13582   Abelcabl 13871

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 716  ax-5 1495  ax-7 1496  ax-gen 1497  ax-ie1 1541  ax-ie2 1542  ax-8 1552  ax-10 1553  ax-11 1554  ax-i12 1555  ax-bndl 1557  ax-4 1558  ax-17 1574  ax-i9 1578  ax-ial 1582  ax-i5r 1583  ax-13 2204  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-coll 4204  ax-sep 4207  ax-pow 4264  ax-pr 4299  ax-un 4530  ax-setind 4635  ax-cnex 8122  ax-resscn 8123  ax-1cn 8124  ax-1re 8125  ax-icn 8126  ax-addcl 8127  ax-addrcl 8128  ax-mulcl 8129  ax-addcom 8131  ax-addass 8133  ax-i2m1 8136  ax-0lt1 8137  ax-0id 8139  ax-rnegex 8140  ax-pre-ltirr 8143  ax-pre-ltadd 8147

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1006  df-tru 1400  df-fal 1403  df-nf 1509  df-sb 1811  df-eu 2082  df-mo 2083  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2363  df-ne 2403  df-nel 2498  df-ral 2515  df-rex 2516  df-reu 2517  df-rmo 2518  df-rab 2519  df-v 2804  df-sbc 3032  df-csb 3128  df-dif 3202  df-un 3204  df-in 3206  df-ss 3213  df-nul 3495  df-pw 3654  df-sn 3675  df-pr 3676  df-op 3678  df-uni 3894  df-int 3929  df-iun 3972  df-br 4089  df-opab 4151  df-mpt 4152  df-id 4390  df-xp 4731  df-rel 4732  df-cnv 4733  df-co 4734  df-dm 4735  df-rn 4736  df-res 4737  df-ima 4738  df-iota 5286  df-fun 5328  df-fn 5329  df-f 5330  df-f1 5331  df-fo 5332  df-f1o 5333  df-fv 5334  df-riota 5970  df-ov 6020  df-oprab 6021  df-mpo 6022  df-pnf 8215  df-mnf 8216  df-ltxr 8218  df-inn 9143  df-2 9201  df-ndx 13084  df-slot 13085  df-base 13087  df-sets 13088  df-iress 13089  df-plusg 13172  df-0g 13340  df-mgm 13438  df-sgrp 13484  df-mnd 13499  df-grp 13585  df-minusg 13586  df-cmn 13872  df-abl 13873

This theorem is referenced by:  rngressid  13966