Theorem List for Intuitionistic Logic Explorer - 6801-6900 *Has distinct variable
group(s)
| Type | Label | Description |
| Statement |
| |
| Definition | df-dom 6801* |
Define the dominance relation. Compare Definition of [Enderton] p. 145.
Typical textbook definitions are derived as brdom 6809 and domen 6810.
(Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ≼ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝑥–1-1→𝑦} |
| |
| Definition | df-fin 6802* |
Define the (proper) class of all finite sets. Similar to Definition
10.29 of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91,
whose "Fin(a)" corresponds to
our "𝑎 ∈ Fin". This definition is
meaningful whether or not we
accept the Axiom of Infinity ax-inf2 15622. (Contributed by NM,
22-Aug-2008.)
|
| ⊢ Fin = {𝑥 ∣ ∃𝑦 ∈ ω 𝑥 ≈ 𝑦} |
| |
| Theorem | relen 6803 |
Equinumerosity is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|
| ⊢ Rel ≈ |
| |
| Theorem | reldom 6804 |
Dominance is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 28-Mar-1998.)
|
| ⊢ Rel ≼ |
| |
| Theorem | encv 6805 |
If two classes are equinumerous, both classes are sets. (Contributed by
AV, 21-Mar-2019.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐵 ∈ V)) |
| |
| Theorem | bren 6806* |
Equinumerosity relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | brdomg 6807* |
Dominance relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | brdomi 6808* |
Dominance relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | brdom 6809* |
Dominance relation. (Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑓 𝑓:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | domen 6810* |
Dominance in terms of equinumerosity. Example 1 of [Enderton] p. 146.
(Contributed by NM, 15-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ≈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | domeng 6811* |
Dominance in terms of equinumerosity, with the sethood requirement
expressed as an antecedent. Example 1 of [Enderton] p. 146.
(Contributed by NM, 24-Apr-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ↔ ∃𝑥(𝐴 ≈ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝐵))) |
| |
| Theorem | ctex 6812 |
A class dominated by ω is a set. See also ctfoex 7184 which says that
a countable class is a set. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2016.)
(Proof shortened by Jim Kingdon, 13-Mar-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ ω → 𝐴 ∈ V) |
| |
| Theorem | f1oen3g 6813 |
The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous.
This variation of f1oeng 6816 does not require the Axiom of Replacement.
(Contributed by NM, 13-Jan-2007.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
10-Sep-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | f1oen2g 6814 |
The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous.
This variation of f1oeng 6816 does not require the Axiom of Replacement.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 10-Sep-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | f1dom2g 6815 |
The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain. This
variation of f1domg 6817 does not require the Axiom of Replacement.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | f1oeng 6816 |
The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous.
(Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | f1domg 6817 |
The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain.
(Contributed by NM, 4-Sep-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝐶 → (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | f1oen 6818 |
The domain and range of a one-to-one, onto function are equinumerous.
(Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | f1dom 6819 |
The domain of a one-to-one function is dominated by its codomain.
(Contributed by NM, 19-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | isfi 6820* |
Express "𝐴 is finite". Definition 10.29
of [TakeutiZaring] p. 91
(whose "Fin " is a predicate instead
of a class). (Contributed by
NM, 22-Aug-2008.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ Fin ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ ω 𝐴 ≈ 𝑥) |
| |
| Theorem | enssdom 6821 |
Equinumerosity implies dominance. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ≈ ⊆ ≼ |
| |
| Theorem | endom 6822 |
Equinumerosity implies dominance. Theorem 15 of [Suppes] p. 94.
(Contributed by NM, 28-May-1998.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | enrefg 6823 |
Equinumerosity is reflexive. Theorem 1 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed
by NM, 18-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | enref 6824 |
Equinumerosity is reflexive. Theorem 1 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed
by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | eqeng 6825 |
Equality implies equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 = 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | domrefg 6826 |
Dominance is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 18-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | en2d 6827* |
Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function.
(Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
12-May-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ V)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐷 ∈ V)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐷))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | en3d 6828* |
Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function.
(Contributed by NM, 27-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
12-May-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ V) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ V) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐶))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | en2i 6829* |
Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function.
(Contributed by NM, 4-Jan-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ V) & ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐷 ∈ V) & ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 = 𝐶) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑥 = 𝐷)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | en3i 6830* |
Equinumerosity inference from an implicit one-to-one onto function.
(Contributed by NM, 19-Jul-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)
& ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝐷 ∈ 𝐴)
& ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑥 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑦 = 𝐶)) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 |
| |
| Theorem | dom2lem 6831* |
A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis)
implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM,
24-Jul-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶):𝐴–1-1→𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | dom2d 6832* |
A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis)
implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by NM,
24-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 ∈ 𝑅 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | dom3d 6833* |
A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis)
implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 20-May-2013.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | dom2 6834* |
A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis)
implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. 𝐶 and 𝐷 can be
read 𝐶(𝑥) and 𝐷(𝑦), as can be inferred from their
distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)
& ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | dom3 6835* |
A mapping (first hypothesis) that is one-to-one (second hypothesis)
implies its domain is dominated by its codomain. 𝐶 and 𝐷 can be
read 𝐶(𝑥) and 𝐷(𝑦), as can be inferred from their
distinct variable conditions. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
20-May-2013.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)
& ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (𝐶 = 𝐷 ↔ 𝑥 = 𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | idssen 6836 |
Equality implies equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM, 30-Apr-1998.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|
| ⊢ I ⊆ ≈ |
| |
| Theorem | ssdomg 6837 |
A set dominates its subsets. Theorem 16 of [Suppes] p. 94. (Contributed
by NM, 19-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐵 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | ener 6838 |
Equinumerosity is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by NM,
19-Mar-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ≈ Er V |
| |
| Theorem | ensymb 6839 |
Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | ensym 6840 |
Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed by
NM, 26-Oct-2003.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 → 𝐵 ≈ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | ensymi 6841 |
Symmetry of equinumerosity. Theorem 2 of [Suppes] p. 92. (Contributed
by NM, 25-Sep-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | ensymd 6842 |
Symmetry of equinumerosity. Deduction form of ensym 6840. (Contributed
by David Moews, 1-May-2017.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≈ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | entr 6843 |
Transitivity of equinumerosity. Theorem 3 of [Suppes] p. 92.
(Contributed by NM, 9-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | domtr 6844 |
Transitivity of dominance relation. Theorem 17 of [Suppes] p. 94.
(Contributed by NM, 4-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
15-Nov-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | entri 6845 |
A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM,
25-Sep-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵
& ⊢ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | entr2i 6846 |
A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM,
25-Sep-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵
& ⊢ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | entr3i 6847 |
A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM,
25-Sep-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵
& ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | entr4i 6848 |
A chained equinumerosity inference. (Contributed by NM,
25-Sep-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐵
& ⊢ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐵 ⇒ ⊢ 𝐴 ≈ 𝐶 |
| |
| Theorem | endomtr 6849 |
Transitivity of equinumerosity and dominance. (Contributed by NM,
7-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | domentr 6850 |
Transitivity of dominance and equinumerosity. (Contributed by NM,
7-Jun-1998.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≼ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | f1imaeng 6851 |
A one-to-one function's image under a subset of its domain is equinumerous
to the subset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-May-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉) → (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ≈ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | f1imaen2g 6852 |
A one-to-one function's image under a subset of its domain is equinumerous
to the subset. (This version of f1imaen 6853 does not need ax-setind 4573.)
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
25-Jun-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑉) ∧ (𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝐶 ∈ 𝑉)) → (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ≈ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | f1imaen 6853 |
A one-to-one function's image under a subset of its domain is
equinumerous to the subset. (Contributed by NM, 30-Sep-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ⊆ 𝐴) → (𝐹 “ 𝐶) ≈ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | en0 6854 |
The empty set is equinumerous only to itself. Exercise 1 of
[TakeutiZaring] p. 88.
(Contributed by NM, 27-May-1998.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅) |
| |
| Theorem | ensn1 6855 |
A singleton is equinumerous to ordinal one. (Contributed by NM,
4-Nov-2002.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ {𝐴} ≈ 1o |
| |
| Theorem | ensn1g 6856 |
A singleton is equinumerous to ordinal one. (Contributed by NM,
23-Apr-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝐴} ≈ 1o) |
| |
| Theorem | enpr1g 6857 |
{𝐴, 𝐴} has only one element.
(Contributed by FL, 15-Feb-2010.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝐴, 𝐴} ≈ 1o) |
| |
| Theorem | en1 6858* |
A set is equinumerous to ordinal one iff it is a singleton.
(Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 1o ↔ ∃𝑥 𝐴 = {𝑥}) |
| |
| Theorem | en1bg 6859 |
A set is equinumerous to ordinal one iff it is a singleton.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Apr-2020.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 ≈ 1o ↔ 𝐴 = {∪ 𝐴})) |
| |
| Theorem | reuen1 6860* |
Two ways to express "exactly one". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
28-Oct-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 𝜑 ↔ {𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∣ 𝜑} ≈ 1o) |
| |
| Theorem | euen1 6861 |
Two ways to express "exactly one". (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
28-Oct-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (∃!𝑥𝜑 ↔ {𝑥 ∣ 𝜑} ≈ 1o) |
| |
| Theorem | euen1b 6862* |
Two ways to express "𝐴 has a unique element".
(Contributed by
Mario Carneiro, 9-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≈ 1o ↔ ∃!𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | en1uniel 6863 |
A singleton contains its sole element. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear,
16-Aug-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝑆 ≈ 1o → ∪ 𝑆
∈ 𝑆) |
| |
| Theorem | 2dom 6864* |
A set that dominates ordinal 2 has at least 2 different members.
(Contributed by NM, 25-Jul-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (2o ≼ 𝐴 → ∃𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 = 𝑦) |
| |
| Theorem | fundmen 6865 |
A function is equinumerous to its domain. Exercise 4 of [Suppes] p. 98.
(Contributed by NM, 28-Jul-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
15-Nov-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (Fun 𝐹 → dom 𝐹 ≈ 𝐹) |
| |
| Theorem | fundmeng 6866 |
A function is equinumerous to its domain. Exercise 4 of [Suppes] p. 98.
(Contributed by NM, 17-Sep-2013.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ Fun 𝐹) → dom 𝐹 ≈ 𝐹) |
| |
| Theorem | cnven 6867 |
A relational set is equinumerous to its converse. (Contributed by Mario
Carneiro, 28-Dec-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ((Rel 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉) → 𝐴 ≈ ◡𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | cnvct 6868 |
If a set is dominated by ω, so is its converse.
(Contributed by
Thierry Arnoux, 29-Dec-2016.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ ω → ◡𝐴 ≼ ω) |
| |
| Theorem | fndmeng 6869 |
A function is equinumerate to its domain. (Contributed by Paul Chapman,
22-Jun-2011.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐹 Fn 𝐴 ∧ 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶) → 𝐴 ≈ 𝐹) |
| |
| Theorem | mapsnen 6870 |
Set exponentiation to a singleton exponent is equinumerous to its base.
Exercise 4.43 of [Mendelson] p. 255.
(Contributed by NM, 17-Dec-2003.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 {𝐵}) ≈ 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | map1 6871 |
Set exponentiation: ordinal 1 to any set is equinumerous to ordinal 1.
Exercise 4.42(b) of [Mendelson] p.
255. (Contributed by NM,
17-Dec-2003.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (1o
↑𝑚 𝐴) ≈ 1o) |
| |
| Theorem | en2sn 6872 |
Two singletons are equinumerous. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2003.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝐶 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷) → {𝐴} ≈ {𝐵}) |
| |
| Theorem | snfig 6873 |
A singleton is finite. For the proper class case, see snprc 3687.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 13-Apr-2020.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → {𝐴} ∈ Fin) |
| |
| Theorem | fiprc 6874 |
The class of finite sets is a proper class. (Contributed by Jeff
Hankins, 3-Oct-2008.)
|
| ⊢ Fin ∉ V |
| |
| Theorem | unen 6875 |
Equinumerosity of union of disjoint sets. Theorem 4 of [Suppes] p. 92.
(Contributed by NM, 11-Jun-1998.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
26-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐶 ≈ 𝐷) ∧ ((𝐴 ∩ 𝐶) = ∅ ∧ (𝐵 ∩ 𝐷) = ∅)) → (𝐴 ∪ 𝐶) ≈ (𝐵 ∪ 𝐷)) |
| |
| Theorem | enpr2d 6876 |
A pair with distinct elements is equinumerous to ordinal two.
(Contributed by Rohan Ridenour, 3-Aug-2023.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝐶)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝐷)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝐴 = 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝐴, 𝐵} ≈ 2o) |
| |
| Theorem | ssct 6877 |
A subset of a set dominated by ω is dominated by
ω.
(Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 31-Jan-2017.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝐵 ≼ ω) → 𝐴 ≼ ω) |
| |
| Theorem | 1domsn 6878 |
A singleton (whether of a set or a proper class) is dominated by one.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon, 1-Mar-2022.)
|
| ⊢ {𝐴} ≼ 1o |
| |
| Theorem | enm 6879* |
A set equinumerous to an inhabited set is inhabited. (Contributed by
Jim Kingdon, 19-May-2020.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ≈ 𝐵 ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐴) → ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | xpsnen 6880 |
A set is equinumerous to its Cartesian product with a singleton.
Proposition 4.22(c) of [Mendelson] p.
254. (Contributed by NM,
4-Jan-2004.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 × {𝐵}) ≈ 𝐴 |
| |
| Theorem | xpsneng 6881 |
A set is equinumerous to its Cartesian product with a singleton.
Proposition 4.22(c) of [Mendelson] p.
254. (Contributed by NM,
22-Oct-2004.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 × {𝐵}) ≈ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | xp1en 6882 |
One times a cardinal number. (Contributed by NM, 27-Sep-2004.) (Revised
by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐴 × 1o) ≈ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | endisj 6883* |
Any two sets are equinumerous to disjoint sets. Exercise 4.39 of
[Mendelson] p. 255. (Contributed by
NM, 16-Apr-2004.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ ∃𝑥∃𝑦((𝑥 ≈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑦 ≈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑥 ∩ 𝑦) = ∅) |
| |
| Theorem | xpcomf1o 6884* |
The canonical bijection from (𝐴 × 𝐵) to (𝐵 × 𝐴).
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 23-Apr-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ ∪
◡{𝑥}) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐹:(𝐴 × 𝐵)–1-1-onto→(𝐵 × 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | xpcomco 6885* |
Composition with the bijection of xpcomf1o 6884 swaps the arguments to a
mapping. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-May-2015.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ↦ ∪
◡{𝑥})
& ⊢ 𝐺 = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ 𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐺 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ 𝐶) |
| |
| Theorem | xpcomen 6886 |
Commutative law for equinumerosity of Cartesian product. Proposition
4.22(d) of [Mendelson] p. 254.
(Contributed by NM, 5-Jan-2004.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≈ (𝐵 × 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | xpcomeng 6887 |
Commutative law for equinumerosity of Cartesian product. Proposition
4.22(d) of [Mendelson] p. 254.
(Contributed by NM, 27-Mar-2006.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴 × 𝐵) ≈ (𝐵 × 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | xpsnen2g 6888 |
A set is equinumerous to its Cartesian product with a singleton on the
left. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 21-Nov-2014.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ({𝐴} × 𝐵) ≈ 𝐵) |
| |
| Theorem | xpassen 6889 |
Associative law for equinumerosity of Cartesian product. Proposition
4.22(e) of [Mendelson] p. 254.
(Contributed by NM, 22-Jan-2004.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V & ⊢ 𝐶 ∈
V ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 × 𝐵) × 𝐶) ≈ (𝐴 × (𝐵 × 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | xpdom2 6890 |
Dominance law for Cartesian product. Proposition 10.33(2) of
[TakeutiZaring] p. 92.
(Contributed by NM, 24-Jul-2004.) (Revised by
Mario Carneiro, 15-Nov-2014.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → (𝐶 × 𝐴) ≼ (𝐶 × 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | xpdom2g 6891 |
Dominance law for Cartesian product. Theorem 6L(c) of [Enderton]
p. 149. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) → (𝐶 × 𝐴) ≼ (𝐶 × 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | xpdom1g 6892 |
Dominance law for Cartesian product. Theorem 6L(c) of [Enderton]
p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 25-Mar-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro,
26-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐴 ≼ 𝐵) → (𝐴 × 𝐶) ≼ (𝐵 × 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | xpdom3m 6893* |
A set is dominated by its Cartesian product with an inhabited set.
Exercise 6 of [Suppes] p. 98.
(Contributed by Jim Kingdon,
15-Apr-2020.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊 ∧ ∃𝑥 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝐴 ≼ (𝐴 × 𝐵)) |
| |
| Theorem | xpdom1 6894 |
Dominance law for Cartesian product. Theorem 6L(c) of [Enderton]
p. 149. (Contributed by NM, 28-Sep-2004.) (Revised by NM,
29-Mar-2006.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 7-May-2015.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐶 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ 𝐵 → (𝐴 × 𝐶) ≼ (𝐵 × 𝐶)) |
| |
| Theorem | pw2f1odclem 6895* |
Lemma for pw2f1odc 6896. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro,
6-Oct-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴DECID 𝑝 ∈ 𝑞) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑆 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ∧ 𝐺 = (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑆, 𝐶, 𝐵))) ↔ (𝐺 ∈ ({𝐵, 𝐶} ↑𝑚 𝐴) ∧ 𝑆 = (◡𝐺 “ {𝐶})))) |
| |
| Theorem | pw2f1odc 6896* |
The power set of a set is equinumerous to set exponentiation with an
unordered pair base of ordinal 2. Generalized from Proposition 10.44 of
[TakeutiZaring] p. 96.
(Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 6-Oct-2014.)
|
| ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑉)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑊)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ≠ 𝐶)
& ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑝 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑞 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴DECID 𝑝 ∈ 𝑞)
& ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝒫 𝐴 ↦ (𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ↦ if(𝑧 ∈ 𝑥, 𝐶, 𝐵))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝒫 𝐴–1-1-onto→({𝐵, 𝐶} ↑𝑚 𝐴)) |
| |
| Theorem | fopwdom 6897 |
Covering implies injection on power sets. (Contributed by Stefan
O'Rear, 6-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 24-Jun-2015.)
|
| ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ V ∧ 𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵) → 𝒫 𝐵 ≼ 𝒫 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | 0domg 6898 |
Any set dominates the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → ∅ ≼ 𝐴) |
| |
| Theorem | dom0 6899 |
A set dominated by the empty set is empty. (Contributed by NM,
22-Nov-2004.)
|
| ⊢ (𝐴 ≼ ∅ ↔ 𝐴 = ∅) |
| |
| Theorem | 0dom 6900 |
Any set dominates the empty set. (Contributed by NM, 26-Oct-2003.)
(Revised by Mario Carneiro, 26-Apr-2015.)
|
| ⊢ 𝐴 ∈ V ⇒ ⊢ ∅ ≼ 𝐴 |