Theorem cocan2 7293

Description: A surjection is right-cancelable. (Contributed by FL, 21-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cocan2	⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) ↔ 𝐻 = 𝐾))

Proof of Theorem cocan2

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fof 6789	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
2	1	3ad2ant1 1151	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
3		fvco3 6978	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)))
4	2, 3	sylan 592	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)))
5		fvco3 6978	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)))
6	2, 5	sylan 592	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)))
7	4, 6	eqeq12d 2776	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) ↔ (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦))))
8	7	ralbidva 3183	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦))))
9		fveq2 6878	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝑥 → (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐻‘𝑥))
10		fveq2 6878	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝑥 → (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘𝑥))
11	9, 10	eqeq12d 2776	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝑥 → ((𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ↔ (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
12	11	cbvfo 7290	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
13	12	3ad2ant1 1151	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
14	8, 13	bitrd 282	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
15		simp2 1155	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → 𝐻 Fn 𝐵)
16		fnfco 6740	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) → (𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴)
17	15, 2, 16	syl2anc 596	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴)
18		simp3 1156	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → 𝐾 Fn 𝐵)
19		fnfco 6740	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐾 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) → (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴)
20	18, 2, 19	syl2anc 596	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴)
21		eqfnfv 7022	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴 ∧ (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦)))
22	17, 20, 21	syl2anc 596	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦)))
23		eqfnfv 7022	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (𝐻 = 𝐾 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
24	15, 18, 23	syl2anc 596	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (𝐻 = 𝐾 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
25	14, 22, 24	3bitr4d 314	1 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) ↔ 𝐻 = 𝐾))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3076   ∘ ccom 5659   Fn wfn 6528  ⟶wf 6529  –onto→wfo 6531  ‘cfv 6533

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5398

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-fo 6539  df-fv 6541

This theorem is used by:  mapen  9139  mapfien  9378  hashfacen  14519  setcepi  18177  qtopeu  23942  qtophmeo  24043  fmptco1f1o  33106  1arithidomlem2  33946  derangenlem  35750