Theorem cocan2 7267

Description: A surjection is right-cancelable. (Contributed by FL, 21-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cocan2	⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) ↔ 𝐻 = 𝐾))

Proof of Theorem cocan2

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fof 6772	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
2	1	3ad2ant1 1133	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
3		fvco3 6960	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)))
4	2, 3	sylan 580	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)))
5		fvco3 6960	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)))
6	2, 5	sylan 580	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)))
7	4, 6	eqeq12d 2745	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) ↔ (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦))))
8	7	ralbidva 3154	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦))))
9		fveq2 6858	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝑥 → (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐻‘𝑥))
10		fveq2 6858	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝑥 → (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘𝑥))
11	9, 10	eqeq12d 2745	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝑥 → ((𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ↔ (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
12	11	cbvfo 7264	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
13	12	3ad2ant1 1133	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
14	8, 13	bitrd 279	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
15		simp2 1137	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → 𝐻 Fn 𝐵)
16		fnfco 6725	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) → (𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴)
17	15, 2, 16	syl2anc 584	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴)
18		simp3 1138	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → 𝐾 Fn 𝐵)
19		fnfco 6725	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐾 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) → (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴)
20	18, 2, 19	syl2anc 584	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴)
21		eqfnfv 7003	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴 ∧ (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦)))
22	17, 20, 21	syl2anc 584	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦)))
23		eqfnfv 7003	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (𝐻 = 𝐾 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
24	15, 18, 23	syl2anc 584	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (𝐻 = 𝐾 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
25	14, 22, 24	3bitr4d 311	1 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) ↔ 𝐻 = 𝐾))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1086   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  ∀wral 3044   ∘ ccom 5642   Fn wfn 6506  ⟶wf 6507  –onto→wfo 6509  ‘cfv 6511

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2701  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5261  ax-pr 5387

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2533  df-eu 2562  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2721  df-clel 2803  df-nfc 2878  df-ne 2926  df-ral 3045  df-rex 3054  df-rab 3406  df-v 3449  df-sbc 3754  df-csb 3863  df-dif 3917  df-un 3919  df-in 3921  df-ss 3931  df-nul 4297  df-if 4489  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4872  df-br 5108  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-id 5533  df-xp 5644  df-rel 5645  df-cnv 5646  df-co 5647  df-dm 5648  df-rn 5649  df-res 5650  df-ima 5651  df-iota 6464  df-fun 6513  df-fn 6514  df-f 6515  df-fo 6517  df-fv 6519

This theorem is referenced by:  mapen  9105  mapfien  9359  hashfacen  14419  setcepi  18050  qtopeu  23603  qtophmeo  23704  fmptco1f1o  32557  1arithidomlem2  33507  derangenlem  35158