Theorem cocan2 7276

Description: A surjection is right-cancelable. (Contributed by FL, 21-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cocan2	⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) ↔ 𝐻 = 𝐾))

Proof of Theorem cocan2

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fof 6778	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
2	1	3ad2ant1 1146	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
3		fvco3 6967	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)))
4	2, 3	sylan 589	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)))
5		fvco3 6967	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)))
6	2, 5	sylan 589	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)))
7	4, 6	eqeq12d 2778	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) ↔ (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦))))
8	7	ralbidva 3183	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦))))
9		fveq2 6867	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝑥 → (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐻‘𝑥))
10		fveq2 6867	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝑥 → (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘𝑥))
11	9, 10	eqeq12d 2778	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝑥 → ((𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ↔ (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
12	11	cbvfo 7273	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
13	12	3ad2ant1 1146	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
14	8, 13	bitrd 281	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
15		simp2 1150	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → 𝐻 Fn 𝐵)
16		fnfco 6729	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) → (𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴)
17	15, 2, 16	syl2anc 593	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴)
18		simp3 1151	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → 𝐾 Fn 𝐵)
19		fnfco 6729	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐾 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) → (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴)
20	18, 2, 19	syl2anc 593	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴)
21		eqfnfv 7011	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴 ∧ (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦)))
22	17, 20, 21	syl2anc 593	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦)))
23		eqfnfv 7011	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (𝐻 = 𝐾 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
24	15, 18, 23	syl2anc 593	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (𝐻 = 𝐾 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
25	14, 22, 24	3bitr4d 313	1 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) ↔ 𝐻 = 𝐾))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 208   ∧ wa 399   ∧ w3a 1098   = wceq 1560   ∈ wcel 2142  ∀wral 3076   ∘ ccom 5651   Fn wfn 6516  ⟶wf 6517  –onto→wfo 6519  ‘cfv 6521

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1815  ax-4 1829  ax-5 1930  ax-6 1987  ax-7 2028  ax-8 2144  ax-9 2152  ax-10 2175  ax-11 2191  ax-12 2212  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5246  ax-nul 5256  ax-pr 5390

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1100  df-tru 1563  df-fal 1573  df-ex 1800  df-nf 1804  df-sb 2091  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-rab 3415  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3745  df-csb 3853  df-dif 3907  df-un 3909  df-in 3911  df-ss 3921  df-nul 4286  df-if 4481  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-op 4589  df-uni 4866  df-br 5101  df-opab 5163  df-mpt 5182  df-id 5542  df-xp 5653  df-rel 5654  df-cnv 5655  df-co 5656  df-dm 5657  df-rn 5658  df-res 5659  df-ima 5660  df-iota 6477  df-fun 6523  df-fn 6524  df-f 6525  df-fo 6527  df-fv 6529

This theorem is referenced by:  mapen  9113  mapfien  9354  hashfacen  14467  setcepi  18121  qtopeu  23773  qtophmeo  23874  fmptco1f1o  32832  1arithidomlem2  33729  derangenlem  35518