Theorem cocan2 7307

Description: A surjection is right-cancelable. (Contributed by FL, 21-Nov-2011.) (Proof shortened by Mario Carneiro, 21-Mar-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cocan2	⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) ↔ 𝐻 = 𝐾))

Proof of Theorem cocan2

Dummy variables 𝑥 𝑦 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fof 6804	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
2	1	3ad2ant1 1151	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
3		fvco3 6993	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)))
4	2, 3	sylan 592	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)))
5		fvco3 6993	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)))
6	2, 5	sylan 592	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)))
7	4, 6	eqeq12d 2779	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐴) → (((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) ↔ (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦))))
8	7	ralbidva 3186	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦))))
9		fveq2 6893	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝑥 → (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐻‘𝑥))
10		fveq2 6893	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝑥 → (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘𝑥))
11	9, 10	eqeq12d 2779	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐹‘𝑦) = 𝑥 → ((𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ↔ (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
12	11	cbvfo 7304	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
13	12	3ad2ant1 1151	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝐻‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) = (𝐾‘(𝐹‘𝑦)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
14	8, 13	bitrd 282	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
15		simp2 1155	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → 𝐻 Fn 𝐵)
16		fnfco 6755	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) → (𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴)
17	15, 2, 16	syl2anc 596	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴)
18		simp3 1156	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → 𝐾 Fn 𝐵)
19		fnfco 6755	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐾 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵) → (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴)
20	18, 2, 19	syl2anc 596	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴)
21		eqfnfv 7037	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴 ∧ (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) Fn 𝐴) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦)))
22	17, 20, 21	syl2anc 596	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦) = ((𝐾 ∘ 𝐹)‘𝑦)))
23		eqfnfv 7037	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (𝐻 = 𝐾 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
24	15, 18, 23	syl2anc 596	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → (𝐻 = 𝐾 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (𝐻‘𝑥) = (𝐾‘𝑥)))
25	14, 22, 24	3bitr4d 314	1 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–onto→𝐵 ∧ 𝐻 Fn 𝐵 ∧ 𝐾 Fn 𝐵) → ((𝐻 ∘ 𝐹) = (𝐾 ∘ 𝐹) ↔ 𝐻 = 𝐾))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2146  ∀wral 3079   ∘ ccom 5658   Fn wfn 6541  ⟶wf 6542  –onto→wfo 6544  ‘cfv 6546

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944  ax-6 2001  ax-7 2042  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2196  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5262  ax-pr 5394

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2101  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3416  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3742  df-csb 3851  df-ss 3900  df-dif 4049  df-in 4093  df-un 4153  df-nul 4281  df-if 4485  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4838  df-uni 4870  df-br 5106  df-opab 5170  df-mpt 5189  df-id 5549  df-xp 5660  df-rel 5661  df-cnv 5662  df-co 5663  df-dm 5664  df-rn 5665  df-res 5666  df-ima 5667  df-iota 6500  df-fun 6548  df-fn 6549  df-f 6550  df-fo 6552  df-fv 6554

This theorem is used by:  mapen  9171  mapfien  9410  hashfacen  14609  setcepi  18275  qtopeu  24047  qtophmeo  24148  fmptco1f1o  33281  1arithidomlem2  34121  derangenlem  36057