Theorem gsumval1 18785

Description: Value of the group sum operation when every element being summed is an identity of 𝐺. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Dec-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
gsumval1.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
gsumval1.z	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)
gsumval1.p	⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺)
gsumval1.o	⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑦 + 𝑥) = 𝑦)}
gsumval1.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
gsumval1.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊)
gsumval1.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑂)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
gsumval1	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) = 0 )

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐵   𝑥, + ,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐹(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐺(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝑂(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝑉(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝑊(𝑥, 𝑦)   0 (𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem gsumval1

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑚 𝑛 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		gsumval1.b	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
2		gsumval1.z	. . 3 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)
3		gsumval1.p	. . 3 ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺)
4		gsumval1.o	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑦 + 𝑥) = 𝑦)}
5		eqidd 2763	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)) = (◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)))
6		gsumval1.g	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
7		gsumval1.a	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊)
8		gsumval1.f	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑂)
9	4	ssrab3 4033	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑂 ⊆ 𝐵
10		fss 6723	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑂 ∧ 𝑂 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
11	8, 9, 10	sylancl 598	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
12	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11	gsumval 18779	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) = if(ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑂, 0 , if(𝐴 ∈ ran ..., (℩𝑧∃𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)(𝐴 = (𝑚...𝑛) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq𝑚( + , 𝐹)‘𝑛))), (℩𝑧∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂))))–1-1-onto→(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq1( + , (𝐹 ∘ 𝑓))‘(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)))))))))
13		frn 6714	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑂 → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑂)
14		iftrue 4491	. . 3 ⊢ (ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑂 → if(ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑂, 0 , if(𝐴 ∈ ran ..., (℩𝑧∃𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)(𝐴 = (𝑚...𝑛) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq𝑚( + , 𝐹)‘𝑛))), (℩𝑧∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂))))–1-1-onto→(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq1( + , (𝐹 ∘ 𝑓))‘(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)))))))) = 0 )
15	8, 13, 14	3syl 19	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → if(ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑂, 0 , if(𝐴 ∈ ran ..., (℩𝑧∃𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)(𝐴 = (𝑚...𝑛) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq𝑚( + , 𝐹)‘𝑛))), (℩𝑧∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂))))–1-1-onto→(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq1( + , (𝐹 ∘ 𝑓))‘(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)))))))) = 0 )
16	12, 15	eqtrd 2797	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) = 0 )

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3078  ∃wrex 3088  {crab 3414  Vcvv 3453   ∖ cdif 3899   ⊆ wss 3902  ifcif 4485  ^◡ccnv 5658  ran crn 5660   “ cima 5662   ∘ ccom 5663  ℩cio 6491  ⟶wf 6533  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6536  ‘cfv 6537  (class class class)co 7416  1c1 11126  ℤ_≥cuz 12888  ...cfz 13561  seqcseq 14065  ♯chash 14394  Basecbs 17303  +_gcplusg 17344  0_gc0g 17526   Σ_g cgsu 17527

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7739

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3851  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5554  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-pred 6303  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545  df-ov 7419  df-oprab 7420  df-mpo 7421  df-frecs 8283  df-wrecs 8314  df-recs 8363  df-rdg 8402  df-seq 14066  df-gsum 17529

This theorem is used by:  gsum0  18786  gsumval2  18788  gsumz  18944