Theorem gsumval1 18745

Description: Value of the group sum operation when every element being summed is an identity of 𝐺. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Dec-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
gsumval1.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
gsumval1.z	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)
gsumval1.p	⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺)
gsumval1.o	⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑦 + 𝑥) = 𝑦)}
gsumval1.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
gsumval1.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊)
gsumval1.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑂)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
gsumval1	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) = 0 )

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐵   𝑥, + ,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐹(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐺(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝑂(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝑉(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝑊(𝑥, 𝑦)   0 (𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem gsumval1

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑚 𝑛 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		gsumval1.b	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
2		gsumval1.z	. . 3 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)
3		gsumval1.p	. . 3 ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺)
4		gsumval1.o	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑦 + 𝑥) = 𝑦)}
5		eqidd 2764	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)) = (◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)))
6		gsumval1.g	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
7		gsumval1.a	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊)
8		gsumval1.f	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑂)
9	4	ssrab3 4036	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑂 ⊆ 𝐵
10		fss 6722	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑂 ∧ 𝑂 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
11	8, 9, 10	sylancl 597	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
12	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11	gsumval 18739	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) = if(ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑂, 0 , if(𝐴 ∈ ran ..., (℩𝑧∃𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)(𝐴 = (𝑚...𝑛) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq𝑚( + , 𝐹)‘𝑛))), (℩𝑧∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂))))–1-1-onto→(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq1( + , (𝐹 ∘ 𝑓))‘(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)))))))))
13		frn 6713	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑂 → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑂)
14		iftrue 4493	. . 3 ⊢ (ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑂 → if(ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑂, 0 , if(𝐴 ∈ ran ..., (℩𝑧∃𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)(𝐴 = (𝑚...𝑛) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq𝑚( + , 𝐹)‘𝑛))), (℩𝑧∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂))))–1-1-onto→(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq1( + , (𝐹 ∘ 𝑓))‘(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)))))))) = 0 )
15	8, 13, 14	3syl 19	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → if(ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑂, 0 , if(𝐴 ∈ ran ..., (℩𝑧∃𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)(𝐴 = (𝑚...𝑛) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq𝑚( + , 𝐹)‘𝑛))), (℩𝑧∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂))))–1-1-onto→(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq1( + , (𝐹 ∘ 𝑓))‘(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)))))))) = 0 )
16	12, 15	eqtrd 2798	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) = 0 )

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1809   ∈ wcel 2143  ∀wral 3079  ∃wrex 3089  {crab 3416  Vcvv 3455   ∖ cdif 3902   ⊆ wss 3905  ifcif 4487  ^◡ccnv 5660  ran crn 5662   “ cima 5664   ∘ ccom 5665  ℩cio 6490  ⟶wf 6532  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6535  ‘cfv 6536  (class class class)co 7410  1c1 11105  ℤ_≥cuz 12866  ...cfz 13539  seqcseq 14042  ♯chash 14371  Basecbs 17273  +_gcplusg 17314  0_gc0g 17496   Σ_g cgsu 17497

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pow 5336  ax-pr 5404  ax-un 7732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3745  df-csb 3854  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-pw 4564  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5556  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673  df-ima 5674  df-pred 6302  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-ov 7413  df-oprab 7414  df-mpo 7415  df-frecs 8274  df-wrecs 8305  df-recs 8354  df-rdg 8393  df-seq 14043  df-gsum 17499

This theorem is used by:  gsum0  18746  gsumval2  18748  gsumz  18899