Theorem gsumval1 18898

Description: Value of the group sum operation when every element being summed is an identity of 𝐺. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 7-Dec-2014.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
gsumval1.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
gsumval1.z	⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)
gsumval1.p	⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺)
gsumval1.o	⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑦 + 𝑥) = 𝑦)}
gsumval1.g	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
gsumval1.a	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊)
gsumval1.f	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑂)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
gsumval1	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) = 0 )

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐵   𝑥, + ,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐴(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐹(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝐺(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝑂(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝑉(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝑊(𝑥, 𝑦)   0 (𝑥, 𝑦)

Proof of Theorem gsumval1

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑚 𝑛 𝑧 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		gsumval1.b	. . 3 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
2		gsumval1.z	. . 3 ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐺)
3		gsumval1.p	. . 3 ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺)
4		gsumval1.o	. . 3 ⊢ 𝑂 = {𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∣ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 + 𝑦) = 𝑦 ∧ (𝑦 + 𝑥) = 𝑦)}
5		eqidd 2764	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)) = (◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)))
6		gsumval1.g	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
7		gsumval1.a	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ 𝑊)
8		gsumval1.f	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑂)
9	4	ssrab3 4010	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑂 ⊆ 𝐵
10		fss 6745	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑂 ∧ 𝑂 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
11	8, 9, 10	sylancl 598	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝐴⟶𝐵)
12	1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 11	gsumval 18892	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) = if(ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑂, 0 , if(𝐴 ∈ ran ..., (℩𝑧∃𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)(𝐴 = (𝑚...𝑛) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq𝑚( + , 𝐹)‘𝑛))), (℩𝑧∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂))))⟶1-1onto(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq1( + , (𝐹 ∘ 𝑓))‘(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)))))))))
13		frn 6736	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴⟶𝑂 → ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑂)
14		iftrue 4491	. . 3 ⊢ (ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑂 → if(ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑂, 0 , if(𝐴 ∈ ran ..., (℩𝑧∃𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)(𝐴 = (𝑚...𝑛) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq𝑚( + , 𝐹)‘𝑛))), (℩𝑧∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂))))⟶1-1onto(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq1( + , (𝐹 ∘ 𝑓))‘(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)))))))) = 0 )
15	8, 13, 14	3syl 19	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → if(ran 𝐹 ⊆ 𝑂, 0 , if(𝐴 ∈ ran ..., (℩𝑧∃𝑚∃𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘𝑚)(𝐴 = (𝑚...𝑛) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq𝑚( + , 𝐹)‘𝑛))), (℩𝑧∃𝑓(𝑓:(1...(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂))))⟶1-1onto(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)) ∧ 𝑧 = (seq1( + , (𝐹 ∘ 𝑓))‘(♯‘(◡𝐹 “ (V ∖ 𝑂)))))))) = 0 )
16	12, 15	eqtrd 2798	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺 Σg 𝐹) = 0 )

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2147  ∀wral 3080  ∃wrex 3090  {crab 3416  Vcvv 3454   ⊆ wss 3900   ∖ cdif 4048  ifcif 4485  ^◡ccnv 5654  ran crn 5656   “ cima 5658   ∘ ccom 5659  ℩cio 6507  ⟶wf 6551  ⟶1-1ontowf1o 6554  ‘cfv 6555  (class class class)co 7440  1c1 11225  ℤ_≥cuz 12989  ...cfz 13663  seqcseq 14168  ♯chash 14498  Basecbs 17413  +_gcplusg 17454  0_gc0g 17636   Σ_g cgsu 17637

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7772

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-pred 6319  df-iota 6509  df-fun 6557  df-fn 6558  df-f 6559  df-f1 6560  df-fo 6561  df-f1o 6562  df-fv 6563  df-ov 7443  df-oprab 7444  df-mpo 7445  df-frecs 8324  df-wrecs 8355  df-recs 8404  df-rdg 8443  df-seq 14169  df-gsum 17639

This theorem is used by:  gsum0  18899  gsumval2  18901  gsumz  19058