Theorem isst 32543

Description: Property of a state. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isst	⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States ↔ (𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1) ∧ (𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑆

Proof of Theorem isst

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ovex 7445	. . . 4 ⊢ (0[,]1) ∈ V
2		chex 31556	. . . 4 ⊢ Cℋ ∈ V
3	1, 2	elmap 8870	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ ((0[,]1) ↑m Cℋ ) ↔ 𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1))
4	3	anbi1i 635	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ ((0[,]1) ↑m Cℋ ) ∧ ((𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))) ↔ (𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1) ∧ ((𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))))
5		fveq1 6882	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (𝑓‘ ℋ) = (𝑆‘ ℋ))
6	5	eqeq1d 2765	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → ((𝑓‘ ℋ) = 1 ↔ (𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1))
7		fveq1 6882	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)))
8		fveq1 6882	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝑆‘𝑥))
9		fveq1 6882	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑆‘𝑦))
10	8, 9	oveq12d 7430	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))
11	7, 10	eqeq12d 2779	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → ((𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦)) ↔ (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))
12	11	imbi2d 343	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → ((𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦))) ↔ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))))
13	12	2ralbidv 3229	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦))) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))))
14	6, 13	anbi12d 643	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (((𝑓‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦)))) ↔ ((𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))))
15		df-st 32541	. . 3 ⊢ States = {𝑓 ∈ ((0[,]1) ↑m Cℋ ) ∣ ((𝑓‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦))))}
16	14, 15	elrab2 3655	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States ↔ (𝑆 ∈ ((0[,]1) ↑m Cℋ ) ∧ ((𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))))
17		3anass 1111	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1) ∧ (𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))) ↔ (𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1) ∧ ((𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))))
18	4, 16, 17	3bitr4i 306	1 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States ↔ (𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1) ∧ (𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∧ w3a 1103   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  ∀wral 3079   ⊆ wss 3906  ⟶wf 6534  ‘cfv 6538  (class class class)co 7412   ↑_m cmap 8825  0cc0 11101  1c1 11102   + caddc 11104  [,]cicc 13376   ℋchba 31249   C_ℋ cch 31259  ⊥cort 31260   ∨_ℋ chj 31263  Statescst 31292

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5258  ax-nul 5270  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7734  ax-hilex 31329

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3746  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4591  df-pr 4593  df-op 4597  df-uni 4874  df-br 5111  df-opab 5175  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fn 6541  df-f 6542  df-fv 6546  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-map 8827  df-sh 31537  df-ch 31551  df-st 32541

This theorem is referenced by:  sticl  32545  sthil  32564  stj  32565  strlem3a  32582