Theorem isst 31453

Description: Property of a state. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isst	⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States ↔ (𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1) ∧ (𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑆

Proof of Theorem isst

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ovex 7438	. . . 4 ⊢ (0[,]1) ∈ V
2		chex 30466	. . . 4 ⊢ Cℋ ∈ V
3	1, 2	elmap 8861	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ ((0[,]1) ↑m Cℋ ) ↔ 𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1))
4	3	anbi1i 624	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ ((0[,]1) ↑m Cℋ ) ∧ ((𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))) ↔ (𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1) ∧ ((𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))))
5		fveq1 6887	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (𝑓‘ ℋ) = (𝑆‘ ℋ))
6	5	eqeq1d 2734	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → ((𝑓‘ ℋ) = 1 ↔ (𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1))
7		fveq1 6887	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)))
8		fveq1 6887	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝑆‘𝑥))
9		fveq1 6887	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑆‘𝑦))
10	8, 9	oveq12d 7423	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))
11	7, 10	eqeq12d 2748	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → ((𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦)) ↔ (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))
12	11	imbi2d 340	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → ((𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦))) ↔ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))))
13	12	2ralbidv 3218	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦))) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))))
14	6, 13	anbi12d 631	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (((𝑓‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦)))) ↔ ((𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))))
15		df-st 31451	. . 3 ⊢ States = {𝑓 ∈ ((0[,]1) ↑m Cℋ ) ∣ ((𝑓‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦))))}
16	14, 15	elrab2 3685	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States ↔ (𝑆 ∈ ((0[,]1) ↑m Cℋ ) ∧ ((𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))))
17		3anass 1095	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1) ∧ (𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))) ↔ (𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1) ∧ ((𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))))
18	4, 16, 17	3bitr4i 302	1 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States ↔ (𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1) ∧ (𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2106  ∀wral 3061   ⊆ wss 3947  ⟶wf 6536  ‘cfv 6540  (class class class)co 7405   ↑_m cmap 8816  0cc0 11106  1c1 11107   + caddc 11109  [,]cicc 13323   ℋchba 30159   C_ℋ cch 30169  ⊥cort 30170   ∨_ℋ chj 30173  Statescst 30202

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2703  ax-sep 5298  ax-nul 5305  ax-pow 5362  ax-pr 5426  ax-un 7721  ax-hilex 30239

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2724  df-clel 2810  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2941  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rab 3433  df-v 3476  df-sbc 3777  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-in 3954  df-ss 3964  df-nul 4322  df-if 4528  df-pw 4603  df-sn 4628  df-pr 4630  df-op 4634  df-uni 4908  df-br 5148  df-opab 5210  df-id 5573  df-xp 5681  df-rel 5682  df-cnv 5683  df-co 5684  df-dm 5685  df-rn 5686  df-res 5687  df-ima 5688  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-fv 6548  df-ov 7408  df-oprab 7409  df-mpo 7410  df-map 8818  df-sh 30447  df-ch 30461  df-st 31451

This theorem is referenced by:  sticl  31455  sthil  31474  stj  31475  strlem3a  31492