Theorem isst 31466

Description: Property of a state. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isst	⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States ↔ (𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1) ∧ (𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑆

Proof of Theorem isst

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ovex 7442	. . . 4 ⊢ (0[,]1) ∈ V
2		chex 30479	. . . 4 ⊢ Cℋ ∈ V
3	1, 2	elmap 8865	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ ((0[,]1) ↑m Cℋ ) ↔ 𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1))
4	3	anbi1i 625	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ ((0[,]1) ↑m Cℋ ) ∧ ((𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))) ↔ (𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1) ∧ ((𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))))
5		fveq1 6891	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (𝑓‘ ℋ) = (𝑆‘ ℋ))
6	5	eqeq1d 2735	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → ((𝑓‘ ℋ) = 1 ↔ (𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1))
7		fveq1 6891	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)))
8		fveq1 6891	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝑆‘𝑥))
9		fveq1 6891	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑆‘𝑦))
10	8, 9	oveq12d 7427	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))
11	7, 10	eqeq12d 2749	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → ((𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦)) ↔ (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))
12	11	imbi2d 341	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → ((𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦))) ↔ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))))
13	12	2ralbidv 3219	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦))) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))))
14	6, 13	anbi12d 632	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (((𝑓‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦)))) ↔ ((𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))))
15		df-st 31464	. . 3 ⊢ States = {𝑓 ∈ ((0[,]1) ↑m Cℋ ) ∣ ((𝑓‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦))))}
16	14, 15	elrab2 3687	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States ↔ (𝑆 ∈ ((0[,]1) ↑m Cℋ ) ∧ ((𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))))
17		3anass 1096	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1) ∧ (𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))) ↔ (𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1) ∧ ((𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))))
18	4, 16, 17	3bitr4i 303	1 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States ↔ (𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1) ∧ (𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 397   ∧ w3a 1088   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2107  ∀wral 3062   ⊆ wss 3949  ⟶wf 6540  ‘cfv 6544  (class class class)co 7409   ↑_m cmap 8820  0cc0 11110  1c1 11111   + caddc 11113  [,]cicc 13327   ℋchba 30172   C_ℋ cch 30182  ⊥cort 30183   ∨_ℋ chj 30186  Statescst 30215

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2109  ax-9 2117  ax-10 2138  ax-11 2155  ax-12 2172  ax-ext 2704  ax-sep 5300  ax-nul 5307  ax-pow 5364  ax-pr 5428  ax-un 7725  ax-hilex 30252

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 398  df-or 847  df-3an 1090  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2535  df-eu 2564  df-clab 2711  df-cleq 2725  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2942  df-ral 3063  df-rex 3072  df-rab 3434  df-v 3477  df-sbc 3779  df-dif 3952  df-un 3954  df-in 3956  df-ss 3966  df-nul 4324  df-if 4530  df-pw 4605  df-sn 4630  df-pr 4632  df-op 4636  df-uni 4910  df-br 5150  df-opab 5212  df-id 5575  df-xp 5683  df-rel 5684  df-cnv 5685  df-co 5686  df-dm 5687  df-rn 5688  df-res 5689  df-ima 5690  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6546  df-fn 6547  df-f 6548  df-fv 6552  df-ov 7412  df-oprab 7413  df-mpo 7414  df-map 8822  df-sh 30460  df-ch 30474  df-st 31464

This theorem is referenced by:  sticl  31468  sthil  31487  stj  31488  strlem3a  31505