Theorem isst 32284

Description: Property of a state. (Contributed by NM, 23-Oct-1999.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 23-Dec-2013.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
isst	⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States ↔ (𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1) ∧ (𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))))

Distinct variable group:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑆

Proof of Theorem isst

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ovex 7400	. . . 4 ⊢ (0[,]1) ∈ V
2		chex 31297	. . . 4 ⊢ Cℋ ∈ V
3	1, 2	elmap 8819	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ ((0[,]1) ↑m Cℋ ) ↔ 𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1))
4	3	anbi1i 625	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑆 ∈ ((0[,]1) ↑m Cℋ ) ∧ ((𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))) ↔ (𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1) ∧ ((𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))))
5		fveq1 6839	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (𝑓‘ ℋ) = (𝑆‘ ℋ))
6	5	eqeq1d 2738	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → ((𝑓‘ ℋ) = 1 ↔ (𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1))
7		fveq1 6839	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)))
8		fveq1 6839	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (𝑓‘𝑥) = (𝑆‘𝑥))
9		fveq1 6839	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (𝑓‘𝑦) = (𝑆‘𝑦))
10	8, 9	oveq12d 7385	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))
11	7, 10	eqeq12d 2752	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → ((𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦)) ↔ (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))
12	11	imbi2d 340	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → ((𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦))) ↔ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))))
13	12	2ralbidv 3201	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦))) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))))
14	6, 13	anbi12d 633	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑓 = 𝑆 → (((𝑓‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦)))) ↔ ((𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))))
15		df-st 32282	. . 3 ⊢ States = {𝑓 ∈ ((0[,]1) ↑m Cℋ ) ∣ ((𝑓‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑓‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑓‘𝑥) + (𝑓‘𝑦))))}
16	14, 15	elrab2 3637	. 2 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States ↔ (𝑆 ∈ ((0[,]1) ↑m Cℋ ) ∧ ((𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))))
17		3anass 1095	. 2 ⊢ ((𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1) ∧ (𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))) ↔ (𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1) ∧ ((𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦))))))
18	4, 16, 17	3bitr4i 303	1 ⊢ (𝑆 ∈ States ↔ (𝑆: Cℋ ⟶(0[,]1) ∧ (𝑆‘ ℋ) = 1 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ Cℋ ∀𝑦 ∈ Cℋ (𝑥 ⊆ (⊥‘𝑦) → (𝑆‘(𝑥 ∨ℋ 𝑦)) = ((𝑆‘𝑥) + (𝑆‘𝑦)))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   ∧ w3a 1087   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  ∀wral 3051   ⊆ wss 3889  ⟶wf 6494  ‘cfv 6498  (class class class)co 7367   ↑_m cmap 8773  0cc0 11038  1c1 11039   + caddc 11041  [,]cicc 13301   ℋchba 30990   C_ℋ cch 31000  ⊥cort 31001   ∨_ℋ chj 31004  Statescst 31033

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2708  ax-sep 5231  ax-nul 5241  ax-pow 5307  ax-pr 5375  ax-un 7689  ax-hilex 31070

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2539  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2715  df-cleq 2728  df-clel 2811  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2933  df-ral 3052  df-rex 3062  df-rab 3390  df-v 3431  df-sbc 3729  df-dif 3892  df-un 3894  df-in 3896  df-ss 3906  df-nul 4274  df-if 4467  df-pw 4543  df-sn 4568  df-pr 4570  df-op 4574  df-uni 4851  df-br 5086  df-opab 5148  df-id 5526  df-xp 5637  df-rel 5638  df-cnv 5639  df-co 5640  df-dm 5641  df-rn 5642  df-res 5643  df-ima 5644  df-iota 6454  df-fun 6500  df-fn 6501  df-f 6502  df-fv 6506  df-ov 7370  df-oprab 7371  df-mpo 7372  df-map 8775  df-sh 31278  df-ch 31292  df-st 32282

This theorem is referenced by:  sticl  32286  sthil  32305  stj  32306  strlem3a  32323