Theorem joineu 18431

Description: Uniqueness of join of elements in the domain. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
joinval2.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
joinval2.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
joinval2.j	⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
joinval2.k	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
joinval2.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
joinval2.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
joinlem.e	⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∨ )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
joineu	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧,𝐵   𝑥, ∨ ,𝑧   𝑥,𝐾,𝑧   𝑥,𝑋,𝑧   𝑥,𝑌,𝑧   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑧)   ≤ (𝑥,𝑧)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem joineu

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		joinlem.e	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∨ )
2		eqid 2763	. . . 4 ⊢ (lub‘𝐾) = (lub‘𝐾)
3		joinval2.j	. . . 4 ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
4		joinval2.k	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
5		joinval2.x	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
6		joinval2.y	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
7	2, 3, 4, 5, 6	joindef 18425	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∨ ↔ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (lub‘𝐾)))
8		joinval2.b	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
9		joinval2.l	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
10		biid 264	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)) ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)))
11	4	adantr 485	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (lub‘𝐾)) → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
12		simpr 489	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (lub‘𝐾)) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (lub‘𝐾))
13	8, 9, 2, 10, 11, 12	lubeu 18404	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (lub‘𝐾)) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)))
14	13	ex 417	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (lub‘𝐾) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧))))
15	8, 9, 3, 4, 5, 6	joinval2lem 18429	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)) ↔ ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧))))
16	5, 6, 15	syl2anc 595	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)) ↔ ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧))))
17	16	reubidv 3385	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)) ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧))))
18	14, 17	sylibd 242	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (lub‘𝐾) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧))))
19	7, 18	sylbid 243	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∨ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧))))
20	1, 19	mpd 16	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  ∀wral 3079  ∃!wreu 3367  {cpr 4591  ⟨cop 4595   class class class wbr 5109  dom cdm 5661  ‘cfv 6536  Basecbs 17264  lecple 17312  lubclub 18360  joincjn 18362

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5238  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pow 5336  ax-pr 5404  ax-un 7732

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rmo 3369  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3745  df-csb 3854  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-pw 4564  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-iun 4958  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5556  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673  df-ima 5674  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-riota 7367  df-oprab 7414  df-lub 18395  df-join 18397

This theorem is referenced by:  joinlem  18432