Theorem joineu 18460

Description: Uniqueness of join of elements in the domain. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
joinval2.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
joinval2.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
joinval2.j	⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
joinval2.k	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
joinval2.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
joinval2.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
joinlem.e	⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∨ )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
joineu	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧,𝐵   𝑥, ∨ ,𝑧   𝑥,𝐾,𝑧   𝑥,𝑋,𝑧   𝑥,𝑌,𝑧   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑧)   ≤ (𝑥, 𝑧)   𝑉(𝑥, 𝑧)

Proof of Theorem joineu

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		joinlem.e	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∨ )
2		eqid 2765	. . . 4 ⊢ (lub‘𝐾) = (lub‘𝐾)
3		joinval2.j	. . . 4 ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾)
4		joinval2.k	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
5		joinval2.x	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
6		joinval2.y	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
7	2, 3, 4, 5, 6	joindef 18454	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∨ ↔ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (lub‘𝐾)))
8		joinval2.b	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
9		joinval2.l	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
10		biid 264	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)) ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)))
11	4	adantr 486	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (lub‘𝐾)) → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
12		simpr 490	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (lub‘𝐾)) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (lub‘𝐾))
13	8, 9, 2, 10, 11, 12	lubeu 18433	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (lub‘𝐾)) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)))
14	13	ex 418	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (lub‘𝐾) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧))))
15	8, 9, 3, 4, 5, 6	joinval2lem 18458	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)) ↔ ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧))))
16	5, 6, 15	syl2anc 596	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)) ↔ ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧))))
17	16	reubidv 3387	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)) ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧))))
18	14, 17	sylibd 242	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (lub‘𝐾) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧))))
19	7, 18	sylbid 243	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∨ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧))))
20	1, 19	mpd 16	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑥) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  ∀wral 3081  ∃!wreu 3369  {cpr 4593  ⟨cop 4597   class class class wbr 5111  dom cdm 5663  ‘cfv 6540  Basecbs 17293  lecple 17341  lubclub 18389  joincjn 18391

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-rep 5240  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7742

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rmo 3371  df-reu 3372  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3747  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-iun 4960  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-f1 6545  df-fo 6546  df-f1o 6547  df-fv 6548  df-riota 7376  df-oprab 7423  df-lub 18424  df-join 18426

This theorem is used by:  joinlem  18461