P. 184 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 18301-18400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	hof2val 18301*	The morphism part of the Hom functor, for morphisms ⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩:⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩⟶⟨𝑍, 𝑊⟩ (which since the first argument is contravariant means morphisms 𝑓:𝑍⟶𝑋 and 𝑔:𝑌⟶𝑊), yields a function (a morphism of SetCat) mapping ℎ:𝑋⟶𝑌 to 𝑔 ∘ ℎ ∘ 𝑓:𝑍⟶𝑊. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (HomF‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑊))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(2nd ‘𝑀)⟨𝑍, 𝑊⟩)𝐺) = (ℎ ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌) ↦ ((𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑊)ℎ)(⟨𝑍, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑊)𝐹)))
Theorem	hof2 18302	The morphism part of the Hom functor, for morphisms ⟨𝑓, 𝑔⟩:⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩⟶⟨𝑍, 𝑊⟩ (which since the first argument is contravariant means morphisms 𝑓:𝑍⟶𝑋 and 𝑔:𝑌⟶𝑊), yields a function (a morphism of SetCat) mapping ℎ:𝑋⟶𝑌 to 𝑔 ∘ ℎ ∘ 𝑓:𝑍⟶𝑊. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (HomF‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑊))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑌))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(2nd ‘𝑀)⟨𝑍, 𝑊⟩)𝐺)‘𝐾) = ((𝐺(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ · 𝑊)𝐾)(⟨𝑍, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑊)𝐹))
Theorem	hofcllem 18303	Lemma for hofcl 18304. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (HomF‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ (𝑌𝐻𝑊))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ (𝑆𝐻𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ (𝑊𝐻𝑇))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐾(⟨𝑆, 𝑍⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑋)𝑃)(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(2nd ‘𝑀)⟨𝑆, 𝑇⟩)(𝑄(⟨𝑌, 𝑊⟩(comp‘𝐶)𝑇)𝐿)) = ((𝑃(⟨𝑍, 𝑊⟩(2nd ‘𝑀)⟨𝑆, 𝑇⟩)𝑄)(⟨(𝑋𝐻𝑌), (𝑍𝐻𝑊)⟩(comp‘𝐷)(𝑆𝐻𝑇))(𝐾(⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩(2nd ‘𝑀)⟨𝑍, 𝑊⟩)𝐿)))
Theorem	hofcl 18304	Closure of the Hom functor. Note that the codomain is the category SetCat‘𝑈 for any universe 𝑈 which contains each Hom-set. This corresponds to the assertion that 𝐶 be locally small (with respect to 𝑈). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 15-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑀 = (HomF‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ((𝑂 ×c 𝐶) Func 𝐷))
Theorem	oppchofcl 18305	Closure of the opposite Hom functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (HomF‘𝑂)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ ((𝐶 ×c 𝑂) Func 𝐷))
Theorem	yonval 18306	Value of the Yoneda embedding. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (HomF‘𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 = (⟨𝐶, 𝑂⟩ curryF 𝑀))
Theorem	yoncl 18307	The Yoneda embedding is a functor from the category to the category 𝑄 of presheaves on 𝐶. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝑄))
Theorem	yon1cl 18308	The Yoneda embedding at an object of 𝐶 is a presheaf on 𝐶, also known as the contravariant Hom functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑋) ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆))
Theorem	yon11 18309	Value of the Yoneda embedding at an object. The partially evaluated Yoneda embedding is also the contravariant Hom functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑋))‘𝑍) = (𝑍𝐻𝑋))
Theorem	yon12 18310	Value of the Yoneda embedding at a morphism. The partially evaluated Yoneda embedding is also the contravariant Hom functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑊𝐻𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑍𝐻𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑍(2nd ‘((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑋))𝑊)‘𝐹)‘𝐺) = (𝐺(⟨𝑊, 𝑍⟩ · 𝑋)𝐹))
Theorem	yon2 18311	Value of the Yoneda embedding at a morphism. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (Hom ‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ · = (comp‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑋𝐻𝑍))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑊𝐻𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((𝑋(2nd ‘𝑌)𝑍)‘𝐹)‘𝑊)‘𝐺) = (𝐹(⟨𝑊, 𝑋⟩ · 𝑍)𝐺))
Theorem	hofpropd 18312	If two categories have the same set of objects, morphisms, and compositions, then they have the same Hom functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (HomF‘𝐶) = (HomF‘𝐷))
Theorem	yonpropd 18313	If two categories have the same set of objects, morphisms, and compositions, then they have the same Yoneda functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.)
⊢ (𝜑 → (Homf ‘𝐶) = (Homf ‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (compf‘𝐶) = (compf‘𝐷))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐷 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (Yon‘𝐶) = (Yon‘𝐷))
Theorem	oppcyon 18314	Value of the opposite Yoneda embedding. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝑂)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (HomF‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 = (⟨𝑂, 𝐶⟩ curryF 𝑀))
Theorem	oyoncl 18315	The opposite Yoneda embedding is a functor from oppCat‘𝐶 to the functor category 𝐶 → SetCat. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 26-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝑂)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝐶 FuncCat 𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑄))
Theorem	oyon1cl 18316	The opposite Yoneda embedding at an object of 𝐶 is a functor from 𝐶 to Set, also known as the covariant Hom functor. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 17-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝑂)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑋) ∈ (𝐶 Func 𝑆))
Theorem	yonedalem1 18317	Lemma for yoneda 18328. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑍 ∈ ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) Func 𝑇) ∧ 𝐸 ∈ ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) Func 𝑇)))
Theorem	yonedalem21 18318	Lemma for yoneda 18328. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹(1st ‘𝑍)𝑋) = (((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑋)(𝑂 Nat 𝑆)𝐹))
Theorem	yonedalem3a 18319*	Lemma for yoneda 18328. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑥)(𝑂 Nat 𝑆)𝑓) ↦ ((𝑎‘𝑥)‘( 1 ‘𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹𝑀𝑋) = (𝑎 ∈ (((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑋)(𝑂 Nat 𝑆)𝐹) ↦ ((𝑎‘𝑋)‘( 1 ‘𝑋))) ∧ (𝐹𝑀𝑋):(𝐹(1st ‘𝑍)𝑋)⟶(𝐹(1st ‘𝐸)𝑋)))
Theorem	yonedalem4a 18320*	Lemma for yoneda 18328. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑢 ∈ ((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥) ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑥) ↦ (((𝑥(2nd ‘𝑓)𝑦)‘𝑔)‘𝑢)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹𝑁𝑋)‘𝐴) = (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋) ↦ (((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑦)‘𝑔)‘𝐴))))
Theorem	yonedalem4b 18321*	Lemma for yoneda 18328. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑢 ∈ ((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥) ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑥) ↦ (((𝑥(2nd ‘𝑓)𝑦)‘𝑔)‘𝑢)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑃(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((((𝐹𝑁𝑋)‘𝐴)‘𝑃)‘𝐺) = (((𝑋(2nd ‘𝐹)𝑃)‘𝐺)‘𝐴))
Theorem	yonedalem4c 18322*	Lemma for yoneda 18328. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑢 ∈ ((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥) ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑥) ↦ (((𝑥(2nd ‘𝑓)𝑦)‘𝑔)‘𝑢)))))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ((1st ‘𝐹)‘𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹𝑁𝑋)‘𝐴) ∈ (((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑋)(𝑂 Nat 𝑆)𝐹))
Theorem	yonedalem22 18323	Lemma for yoneda 18328. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐹(𝑂 Nat 𝑆)𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑃(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴(⟨𝐹, 𝑋⟩(2nd ‘𝑍)⟨𝐺, 𝑃⟩)𝐾) = (((𝑃(2nd ‘𝑌)𝑋)‘𝐾)(⟨((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑋), 𝐹⟩(2nd ‘𝐻)⟨((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑃), 𝐺⟩)𝐴))
Theorem	yonedalem3b 18324*	Lemma for yoneda 18328. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (𝐹(𝑂 Nat 𝑆)𝐺))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ (𝑃(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑋))    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑥)(𝑂 Nat 𝑆)𝑓) ↦ ((𝑎‘𝑥)‘( 1 ‘𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐺𝑀𝑃)(⟨(𝐹(1st ‘𝑍)𝑋), (𝐺(1st ‘𝑍)𝑃)⟩(comp‘𝑇)(𝐺(1st ‘𝐸)𝑃))(𝐴(⟨𝐹, 𝑋⟩(2nd ‘𝑍)⟨𝐺, 𝑃⟩)𝐾)) = ((𝐴(⟨𝐹, 𝑋⟩(2nd ‘𝐸)⟨𝐺, 𝑃⟩)𝐾)(⟨(𝐹(1st ‘𝑍)𝑋), (𝐹(1st ‘𝐸)𝑋)⟩(comp‘𝑇)(𝐺(1st ‘𝐸)𝑃))(𝐹𝑀𝑋)))
Theorem	yonedalem3 18325*	Lemma for yoneda 18328. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 28-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑥)(𝑂 Nat 𝑆)𝑓) ↦ ((𝑎‘𝑥)‘( 1 ‘𝑥))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑍((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) Nat 𝑇)𝐸))
Theorem	yonedainv 18326*	The Yoneda Lemma with explicit inverse. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑥)(𝑂 Nat 𝑆)𝑓) ↦ ((𝑎‘𝑥)‘( 1 ‘𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Inv‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑢 ∈ ((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥) ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑥) ↦ (((𝑥(2nd ‘𝑓)𝑦)‘𝑔)‘𝑢)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀(𝑍𝐼𝐸)𝑁)
Theorem	yonffthlem 18327*	Lemma for yonffth 18329. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑥)(𝑂 Nat 𝑆)𝑓) ↦ ((𝑎‘𝑥)‘( 1 ‘𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Inv‘𝑅)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑢 ∈ ((1st ‘𝑓)‘𝑥) ↦ (𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑔 ∈ (𝑦(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑥) ↦ (((𝑥(2nd ‘𝑓)𝑦)‘𝑔)‘𝑢)))))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ((𝐶 Full 𝑄) ∩ (𝐶 Faith 𝑄)))
Theorem	yoneda 18328*	The Yoneda Lemma. There is a natural isomorphism between the functors 𝑍 and 𝐸, where 𝑍(𝐹, 𝑋) is the natural transformations from Yon(𝑋) = Hom ( − , 𝑋) to 𝐹, and 𝐸(𝐹, 𝑋) = 𝐹(𝑋) is the evaluation functor. Here we need two universes to state the claim: the smaller universe 𝑈 is used for forming the functor category 𝑄 = 𝐶 op → SetCat(𝑈), which itself does not (necessarily) live in 𝑈 but instead is an element of the larger universe 𝑉. (If 𝑈 is a Grothendieck universe, then it will be closed under this "presheaf" operation, and so we can set 𝑈 = 𝑉 in this case.) (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 1 = (Id‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑇 = (SetCat‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐻 = (HomF‘𝑄)    &   ⊢ 𝑅 = ((𝑄 ×c 𝑂) FuncCat 𝑇)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑂 evalF 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑍 = (𝐻 ∘func ((⟨(1st ‘𝑌), tpos (2nd ‘𝑌)⟩ ∘func (𝑄 2ndF 𝑂)) ⟨,⟩F (𝑄 1stF 𝑂)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (ran (Homf ‘𝑄) ∪ 𝑈) ⊆ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑀 = (𝑓 ∈ (𝑂 Func 𝑆), 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑎 ∈ (((1st ‘𝑌)‘𝑥)(𝑂 Nat 𝑆)𝑓) ↦ ((𝑎‘𝑥)‘( 1 ‘𝑥))))    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝑅)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑀 ∈ (𝑍𝐼𝐸))
Theorem	yonffth 18329	The Yoneda Lemma. The Yoneda embedding, the curried Hom functor, is full and faithful, and hence is a representation of the category 𝐶 as a full subcategory of the category 𝑄 of presheaves on 𝐶. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ ((𝐶 Full 𝑄) ∩ (𝐶 Faith 𝑄)))
Theorem	yoniso 18330*	If the codomain is recoverable from a hom-set, then the Yoneda embedding is injective on objects, and hence is an isomorphism from 𝐶 into a full subcategory of a presheaf category. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Jan-2017.)
⊢ 𝑌 = (Yon‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑂 = (oppCat‘𝐶)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (SetCat‘𝑈)    &   ⊢ 𝐷 = (CatCat‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (Iso‘𝐷)    &   ⊢ 𝑄 = (𝑂 FuncCat 𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝐸 = (𝑄 ↾s ran (1st ‘𝑌))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑉 ∈ 𝑋)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ran (Homf ‘𝐶) ⊆ 𝑈)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐸 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝐶) ∧ 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝐶))) → (𝐹‘(𝑥(Hom ‘𝐶)𝑦)) = 𝑦)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ (𝐶𝐼𝐸))
PART 9  BASIC ORDER THEORY
9.1  Dual of an order structure
Syntax	codu 18331	Class function defining dual orders.
class ODual
Definition	df-odu 18332	Define the dual of an ordered structure, which replaces the order component of the structure with its reverse. See odubas 18336, oduleval 18334, and oduleg 18335 for its principal properties. EDITORIAL: likely usable to simplify many lattice proofs, as it allows for duality arguments to be formalized; for instance latmass 18540. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ ODual = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 sSet ⟨(le‘ndx), ◡(le‘𝑤)⟩))
Theorem	oduval 18333	Value of an order dual structure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑂 sSet ⟨(le‘ndx), ◡ ≤ ⟩)
Theorem	oduleval 18334	Value of the less-equal relation in an order dual structure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ ◡ ≤ = (le‘𝐷)
Theorem	oduleg 18335	Truth of the less-equal relation in an order dual structure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑂)    &   ⊢ 𝐺 = (le‘𝐷)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴𝐺𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴))
Theorem	odubas 18336	Base set of an order dual structure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 12-Nov-2024.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)
Theorem	odubasOLD 18337	Obsolete version of odubas 18336 as of 12-Nov-2024. Base set of an order dual structure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷)
9.2  Preordered sets and directed sets
Syntax	cproset 18338	Extend class notation with the class of all prosets.
class Proset
Syntax	cdrs 18339	Extend class notation with the class of all directed sets.
class Dirset
Definition	df-proset 18340*	Define the class of preordered sets, or prosets. A proset is a set equipped with a preorder, that is, a transitive and reflexive relation. Preorders are a natural generalization of partial orders which need not be antisymmetric: there may be pairs of elements such that each is "less than or equal to" the other, so that both elements have the same order-theoretic properties (in some sense, there is a "tie" among them). If a preorder is required to be antisymmetric, that is, there is no such "tie", then one obtains a partial order. If a preorder is required to be symmetric, that is, all comparable elements are tied, then one obtains an equivalence relation. Every preorder naturally factors into these two notions: the "tie" relation on a proset is an equivalence relation, and the quotient under that equivalence relation is a partial order. (Contributed by FL, 17-Nov-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ Proset = {𝑓 ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑏][(le‘𝑓) / 𝑟]∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥𝑟𝑥 ∧ ((𝑥𝑟𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑟𝑧) → 𝑥𝑟𝑧))}
Definition	df-drs 18341*	Define the class of directed sets. A directed set is a nonempty preordered set where every pair of elements have some upper bound. Note that it is not required that there exist a least upper bound. There is no consensus in the literature over whether directed sets are allowed to be empty. It is slightly more convenient for us if they are not. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
⊢ Dirset = {𝑓 ∈ Proset ∣ [(Base‘𝑓) / 𝑏][(le‘𝑓) / 𝑟](𝑏 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥𝑟𝑧 ∧ 𝑦𝑟𝑧))}
Theorem	isprs 18342*	Property of being a preordered set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Proset ↔ (𝐾 ∈ V ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧))))
Theorem	prslem 18343	Lemma for prsref 18344 and prstr 18345. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 1-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Proset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑍) → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑍)))
Theorem	prsref 18344	"Less than or equal to" is reflexive in a proset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Proset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑋)
Theorem	prstr 18345	"Less than or equal to" is transitive in a proset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Proset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑍)) → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑍)
Theorem	oduprs 18346	Being a proset is a self-dual property. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 13-Sep-2018.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Proset → 𝐷 ∈ Proset )
Theorem	isdrs 18347*	Property of being a directed set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Dirset ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Proset ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧)))
Theorem	drsdir 18348*	Direction of a directed set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Dirset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑋 ≤ 𝑧 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑧))
Theorem	drsprs 18349	A directed set is a proset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Dirset → 𝐾 ∈ Proset )
Theorem	drsbn0 18350	The base of a directed set is not empty. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Dirset → 𝐵 ≠ ∅)
Theorem	drsdirfi 18351*	Any finite number of elements in a directed set have a common upper bound. Here is where the nonemptiness constraint in df-drs 18341 first comes into play; without it we would need an additional constraint that 𝑋 not be empty. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Dirset ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑋 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦)
Theorem	isdrs2 18352*	Directed sets may be defined in terms of finite subsets. Again, without nonemptiness we would need to restrict to nonempty subsets here. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Dirset ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Proset ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 𝐵 ∩ Fin)∃𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦))
9.3  Partially ordered sets (posets)
Syntax	cpo 18353	Extend class notation with the class of posets.
class Poset
Syntax	cplt 18354	Extend class notation with less-than for posets.
class lt
Syntax	club 18355	Extend class notation with poset least upper bound.
class lub
Syntax	cglb 18356	Extend class notation with poset greatest lower bound.
class glb
Syntax	cjn 18357	Extend class notation with poset join.
class join
Syntax	cmee 18358	Extend class notation with poset meet.
class meet
Definition	df-poset 18359*	Define the class of partially ordered sets (posets). A poset is a set equipped with a partial order, that is, a binary relation which is reflexive, antisymmetric, and transitive. Unlike a total order, in a partial order there may be pairs of elements where neither precedes the other. Definition of poset in [Crawley] p. 1. Note that Crawley-Dilworth require that a poset base set be nonempty, but we follow the convention of most authors who don't make this a requirement. In our formalism of extensible structures, the base set of a poset 𝑓 is denoted by (Base‘𝑓) and its partial order by (le‘𝑓) (for "less than or equal to"). The quantifiers ∃𝑏∃𝑟 provide a notational shorthand to allow to refer to the base and ordering relation as 𝑏 and 𝑟 in the definition rather than having to repeat (Base‘𝑓) and (le‘𝑓) throughout. These quantifiers can be eliminated with ceqsex2v 3536 and related theorems. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-2012.)
⊢ Poset = {𝑓 ∣ ∃𝑏∃𝑟(𝑏 = (Base‘𝑓) ∧ 𝑟 = (le‘𝑓) ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥𝑟𝑥 ∧ ((𝑥𝑟𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑟𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ((𝑥𝑟𝑦 ∧ 𝑦𝑟𝑧) → 𝑥𝑟𝑧)))}
Theorem	ispos 18360*	The predicate "is a poset". (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-2012.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 4-Nov-2013.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Poset ↔ (𝐾 ∈ V ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦) ∧ ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧))))
Theorem	ispos2 18361*	A poset is an antisymmetric proset. EDITORIAL: could become the definition of poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Poset ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Proset ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦)))
Theorem	posprs 18362	A poset is a proset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 1-Feb-2015.)
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Poset → 𝐾 ∈ Proset )
Theorem	posi 18363	Lemma for poset properties. (Contributed by NM, 11-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋) → 𝑋 = 𝑌) ∧ ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑍) → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑍)))
Theorem	posref 18364	A poset ordering is reflexive. (Contributed by NM, 11-Sep-2011.) (Proof shortened by OpenAI, 25-Mar-2020.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑋)
Theorem	posasymb 18365	A poset ordering is asymmetric. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋) ↔ 𝑋 = 𝑌))
Theorem	postr 18366	A poset ordering is transitive. (Contributed by NM, 11-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑍) → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑍))
Theorem	0pos 18367	Technical lemma to simplify the statement of ipopos 18581. The empty set is (rather pathologically) a poset under our definitions, since it has an empty base set (str0 17226) and any relation partially orders an empty set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 13-Oct-2024.)
⊢ ∅ ∈ Poset
Theorem	isposd 18368*	Properties that determine a poset (implicit structure version). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 29-Apr-2014.) (Revised by AV, 26-Apr-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ≤ = (le‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset)
Theorem	isposi 18369*	Properties that determine a poset (implicit structure version). (Contributed by NM, 11-Sep-2011.)
⊢ 𝐾 ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ Poset
Theorem	isposix 18370*	Properties that determine a poset (explicit structure version). Note that the numeric indices of the structure components are not mentioned explicitly in either the theorem or its proof. (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2012.) (Proof shortened by AV, 30-Oct-2024.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ≤ ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐵⟩, ⟨(le‘ndx), ≤ ⟩}    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ Poset
Theorem	isposixOLD 18371*	Obsolete version of isposix 18370 as of 30-Oct-2024. Properties that determine a poset (explicit structure version). Note that the numeric indices of the structure components are not mentioned explicitly in either the theorem or its proof (Remark: That is not true - it becomes true with the new proof!). (Contributed by NM, 9-Nov-2012.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)
⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V    &   ⊢ ≤ ∈ V    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = {⟨(Base‘ndx), 𝐵⟩, ⟨(le‘ndx), ≤ ⟩}    &   ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑥)    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → 𝑥 = 𝑦))    &   ⊢ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵) → ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧))    ⇒   ⊢ 𝐾 ∈ Poset
Theorem	pospropd 18372*	Posethood is determined only by structure components and only by the value of the relation within the base set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(le‘𝐾)𝑦 ↔ 𝑥(le‘𝐿)𝑦))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ Poset ↔ 𝐿 ∈ Poset))
Theorem	odupos 18373	Being a poset is a self-dual property. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ Poset → 𝐷 ∈ Poset)
Theorem	oduposb 18374	Being a poset is a self-dual property. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.)
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑂 ∈ Poset ↔ 𝐷 ∈ Poset))
Definition	df-plt 18375	Define less-than ordering for posets and related structures. Unlike df-base 17248 and df-ple 17317, this is a derived component extractor and not an extensible structure component extractor that defines the poset. (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.)
⊢ lt = (𝑝 ∈ V ↦ ((le‘𝑝) ∖ I ))
Theorem	pltfval 18376	Value of the less-than relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 → < = ( ≤ ∖ I ))
Theorem	pltval 18377	Less-than relation. (df-pss 3971 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 12-Oct-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌)))
Theorem	pltle 18378	"Less than" implies "less than or equal to". (pssss 4098 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Dec-2011.)
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 → 𝑋 ≤ 𝑌))
Theorem	pltne 18379	The "less than" relation is not reflexive. (df-pss 3971 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Dec-2011.)
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐶) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 → 𝑋 ≠ 𝑌))
Theorem	pltirr 18380	The "less than" relation is not reflexive. (pssirr 4103 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 7-Feb-2012.)
⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ 𝑋 < 𝑋)
Theorem	pleval2i 18381	One direction of pleval2 18382. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 → (𝑋 < 𝑌 ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌)))
Theorem	pleval2 18382	"Less than or equal to" in terms of "less than". (sspss 4102 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 17-Oct-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 < 𝑌 ∨ 𝑋 = 𝑌)))
Theorem	pltnle 18383	"Less than" implies not converse "less than or equal to". (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌) → ¬ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋)
Theorem	pltval3 18384	Alternate expression for the "less than" relation. (dfpss3 4089 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 4-Nov-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 ↔ (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ ¬ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑋)))
Theorem	pltnlt 18385	The less-than relation implies the negation of its inverse. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ 𝑋 < 𝑌) → ¬ 𝑌 < 𝑋)
Theorem	pltn2lp 18386	The less-than relation has no 2-cycle loops. (pssn2lp 4104 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ¬ (𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 < 𝑋))
Theorem	plttr 18387	The less-than relation is transitive. (psstr 4107 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 < 𝑍) → 𝑋 < 𝑍))
Theorem	pltletr 18388	Transitive law for chained "less than" and "less than or equal to". (psssstr 4109 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 2-Dec-2011.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 < 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ≤ 𝑍) → 𝑋 < 𝑍))
Theorem	plelttr 18389	Transitive law for chained "less than or equal to" and "less than". (sspsstr 4108 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 2-May-2012.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 < 𝑍) → 𝑋 < 𝑍))
Theorem	pospo 18390	Write a poset structure in terms of the proper-class poset predicate (strict less than version). (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 8-Feb-2015.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐾 ∈ Poset ↔ ( < Po 𝐵 ∧ ( I ↾ 𝐵) ⊆ ≤ )))
Definition	df-lub 18391*	Define the least upper bound (LUB) of a set of (poset) elements. The domain is restricted to exclude sets 𝑠 for which the LUB doesn't exist uniquely. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2011.) (Revised by NM, 6-Sep-2018.)
⊢ lub = (𝑝 ∈ V ↦ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑝) ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑝)(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑠 𝑦(le‘𝑝)𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑝)(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑠 𝑦(le‘𝑝)𝑧 → 𝑥(le‘𝑝)𝑧)))) ↾ {𝑠 ∣ ∃!𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑝)(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑠 𝑦(le‘𝑝)𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑝)(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑠 𝑦(le‘𝑝)𝑧 → 𝑥(le‘𝑝)𝑧))}))
Definition	df-glb 18392*	Define the greatest lower bound (GLB) of a set of (poset) elements. The domain is restricted to exclude sets 𝑠 for which the GLB doesn't exist uniquely. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2011.) (Revised by NM, 6-Sep-2018.)
⊢ glb = (𝑝 ∈ V ↦ ((𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 (Base‘𝑝) ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑝)(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑠 𝑥(le‘𝑝)𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑝)(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑠 𝑧(le‘𝑝)𝑦 → 𝑧(le‘𝑝)𝑥)))) ↾ {𝑠 ∣ ∃!𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑝)(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑠 𝑥(le‘𝑝)𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ (Base‘𝑝)(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑠 𝑧(le‘𝑝)𝑦 → 𝑧(le‘𝑝)𝑥))}))
Definition	df-join 18393*	Define poset join. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2011.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 3-Nov-2015.)
⊢ join = (𝑝 ∈ V ↦ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ {𝑥, 𝑦} (lub‘𝑝)𝑧})
Definition	df-meet 18394*	Define poset meet. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2011.) (Revised by NM, 8-Sep-2018.)
⊢ meet = (𝑝 ∈ V ↦ {⟨⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩, 𝑧⟩ ∣ {𝑥, 𝑦} (glb‘𝑝)𝑧})
Theorem	lubfval 18395*	Value of the least upper bound function of a poset. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2011.) (Revised by NM, 6-Sep-2018.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑠 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑠 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = ((𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ↦ (℩𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)) ↾ {𝑠 ∣ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓}))
Theorem	lubdm 18396*	Domain of the least upper bound function of a poset. (Contributed by NM, 6-Sep-2018.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑠 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑠 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → dom 𝑈 = {𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐵 ∣ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓})
Theorem	lubfun 18397	The LUB is a function. (Contributed by NM, 9-Sep-2018.)
⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    ⇒   ⊢ Fun 𝑈
Theorem	lubeldm 18398*	Member of the domain of the least upper bound function of a poset. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2018.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ dom 𝑈 ↔ (𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)))
Theorem	lubelss 18399	A member of the domain of the least upper bound function is a subset of the base set. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2018.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ dom 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵)
Theorem	lubeu 18400*	Unique existence proper of a member of the domain of the least upper bound function of a poset. (Contributed by NM, 7-Sep-2018.)
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜓 ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧)))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ dom 𝑈)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 𝜓)