Theorem motco 29018

Description: The composition of two motions is a motion. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ismot.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
ismot.m	⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
motgrp.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
motco.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
motco.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
motco	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))

Proof of Theorem motco

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ismot.p	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
2		ismot.m	. . . 4 ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
3		motgrp.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
4		motco.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
5	1, 2, 3, 4	motf1o 29016	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃)
6		motco.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
7	1, 2, 3, 6	motf1o 29016	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃)
8		f1oco 6859	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃 ∧ 𝐻:𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐻):𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃)
9	5, 7, 8	syl2anc 596	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐻):𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃)
10		f1of 6835	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐻:𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃 → 𝐻:𝑃⟶𝑃)
11	7, 10	syl 18	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝑃⟶𝑃)
12	11	adantr 486	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝐻:𝑃⟶𝑃)
13		simprl 783	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝑎 ∈ 𝑃)
14		fvco3 6996	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐻:𝑃⟶𝑃 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝑃) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑎)))
15	12, 13, 14	syl2anc 596	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑎)))
16		simprr 785	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)
17		fvco3 6996	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐻:𝑃⟶𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑏) = (𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑏)))
18	12, 16, 17	syl2anc 596	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑏) = (𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑏)))
19	15, 18	oveq12d 7448	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑎) − ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑏)) = ((𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑎)) − (𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑏))))
20	3	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
21	12, 13	ffvelcdmd 7096	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → (𝐻‘𝑎) ∈ 𝑃)
22	12, 16	ffvelcdmd 7096	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → (𝐻‘𝑏) ∈ 𝑃)
23	4	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
24	1, 2, 20, 21, 22, 23	motcgr 29014	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → ((𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑎)) − (𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑏))) = ((𝐻‘𝑎) − (𝐻‘𝑏)))
25	6	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝐻 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
26	1, 2, 20, 13, 16, 25	motcgr 29014	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → ((𝐻‘𝑎) − (𝐻‘𝑏)) = (𝑎 − 𝑏))
27	19, 24, 26	3eqtrd 2802	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑎) − ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎 − 𝑏))
28	27	ralrimivva 3209	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑎) − ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎 − 𝑏))
29	1, 2	ismot 29013	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺) ↔ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻):𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑎) − ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎 − 𝑏))))
30	3, 29	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺) ↔ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻):𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑎) − ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎 − 𝑏))))
31	9, 28, 30	mpbir2and 726	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2146  ∀wral 3080   ∘ ccom 5659  ⟶wf 6543  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6546  ‘cfv 6547  (class class class)co 7430  Basecbs 17402  distcds 17452  Ismtcismt 29010

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944  ax-6 2001  ax-7 2042  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2196  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5235  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pow 5331  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7761

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2101  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-iun 4956  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-id 5550  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6501  df-fun 6549  df-fn 6550  df-f 6551  df-f1 6552  df-fo 6553  df-f1o 6554  df-fv 6555  df-ov 7433  df-oprab 7434  df-mpo 7435  df-map 8863  df-ismt 29011

This theorem is used by:  motgrp  29021