Theorem motco 29003

Description: The composition of two motions is a motion. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ismot.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
ismot.m	⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
motgrp.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
motco.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
motco.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
motco	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))

Proof of Theorem motco

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ismot.p	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
2		ismot.m	. . . 4 ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
3		motgrp.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
4		motco.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
5	1, 2, 3, 4	motf1o 29001	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃)
6		motco.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
7	1, 2, 3, 6	motf1o 29001	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃)
8		f1oco 6848	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃 ∧ 𝐻:𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐻):𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃)
9	5, 7, 8	syl2anc 596	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐻):𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃)
10		f1of 6824	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐻:𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃 → 𝐻:𝑃⟶𝑃)
11	7, 10	syl 18	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝑃⟶𝑃)
12	11	adantr 486	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝐻:𝑃⟶𝑃)
13		simprl 783	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝑎 ∈ 𝑃)
14		fvco3 6985	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐻:𝑃⟶𝑃 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝑃) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑎)))
15	12, 13, 14	syl2anc 596	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑎)))
16		simprr 785	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)
17		fvco3 6985	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐻:𝑃⟶𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑏) = (𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑏)))
18	12, 16, 17	syl2anc 596	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑏) = (𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑏)))
19	15, 18	oveq12d 7438	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑎) − ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑏)) = ((𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑎)) − (𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑏))))
20	3	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
21	12, 13	ffvelcdmd 7085	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → (𝐻‘𝑎) ∈ 𝑃)
22	12, 16	ffvelcdmd 7085	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → (𝐻‘𝑏) ∈ 𝑃)
23	4	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
24	1, 2, 20, 21, 22, 23	motcgr 28999	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → ((𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑎)) − (𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑏))) = ((𝐻‘𝑎) − (𝐻‘𝑏)))
25	6	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝐻 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
26	1, 2, 20, 13, 16, 25	motcgr 28999	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → ((𝐻‘𝑎) − (𝐻‘𝑏)) = (𝑎 − 𝑏))
27	19, 24, 26	3eqtrd 2800	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑎) − ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎 − 𝑏))
28	27	ralrimivva 3206	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑎) − ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎 − 𝑏))
29	1, 2	ismot 28998	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺) ↔ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻):𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑎) − ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎 − 𝑏))))
30	3, 29	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺) ↔ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻):𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑎) − ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎 − 𝑏))))
31	9, 28, 30	mpbir2and 726	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3077   ∘ ccom 5655  ⟶wf 6534  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6537  ‘cfv 6538  (class class class)co 7420  Basecbs 17387  distcds 17437  Ismtcismt 28995

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-rep 5232  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pow 5327  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7751

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2565  df-eu 2595  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-reu 3367  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5546  df-xp 5657  df-rel 5658  df-cnv 5659  df-co 5660  df-dm 5661  df-rn 5662  df-res 5663  df-ima 5664  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fn 6541  df-f 6542  df-f1 6543  df-fo 6544  df-f1o 6545  df-fv 6546  df-ov 7423  df-oprab 7424  df-mpo 7425  df-map 8849  df-ismt 28996

This theorem is used by:  motgrp  29006