Theorem motco 26901

Description: The composition of two motions is a motion. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ismot.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
ismot.m	⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
motgrp.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
motco.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
motco.3	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
motco	⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))

Proof of Theorem motco

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ismot.p	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
2		ismot.m	. . . 4 ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
3		motgrp.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
4		motco.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
5	1, 2, 3, 4	motf1o 26899	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃)
6		motco.3	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
7	1, 2, 3, 6	motf1o 26899	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃)
8		f1oco 6739	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃 ∧ 𝐻:𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃) → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐻):𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃)
9	5, 7, 8	syl2anc 584	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐻):𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃)
10		f1of 6716	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝐻:𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃 → 𝐻:𝑃⟶𝑃)
11	7, 10	syl 17	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻:𝑃⟶𝑃)
12	11	adantr 481	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝐻:𝑃⟶𝑃)
13		simprl 768	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝑎 ∈ 𝑃)
14		fvco3 6867	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐻:𝑃⟶𝑃 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝑃) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑎)))
15	12, 13, 14	syl2anc 584	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑎) = (𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑎)))
16		simprr 770	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)
17		fvco3 6867	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐻:𝑃⟶𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑏) = (𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑏)))
18	12, 16, 17	syl2anc 584	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑏) = (𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑏)))
19	15, 18	oveq12d 7293	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑎) − ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑏)) = ((𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑎)) − (𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑏))))
20	3	adantr 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
21	12, 13	ffvelrnd 6962	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → (𝐻‘𝑎) ∈ 𝑃)
22	12, 16	ffvelrnd 6962	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → (𝐻‘𝑏) ∈ 𝑃)
23	4	adantr 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
24	1, 2, 20, 21, 22, 23	motcgr 26897	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → ((𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑎)) − (𝐹‘(𝐻‘𝑏))) = ((𝐻‘𝑎) − (𝐻‘𝑏)))
25	6	adantr 481	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝐻 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
26	1, 2, 20, 13, 16, 25	motcgr 26897	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → ((𝐻‘𝑎) − (𝐻‘𝑏)) = (𝑎 − 𝑏))
27	19, 24, 26	3eqtrd 2782	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑎) − ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎 − 𝑏))
28	27	ralrimivva 3123	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑎) − ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎 − 𝑏))
29	1, 2	ismot 26896	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺) ↔ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻):𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑎) − ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎 − 𝑏))))
30	3, 29	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺) ↔ ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻):𝑃–1-1-onto→𝑃 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 (((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑎) − ((𝐹 ∘ 𝐻)‘𝑏)) = (𝑎 − 𝑏))))
31	9, 28, 30	mpbir2and 710	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 ∘ 𝐻) ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2106  ∀wral 3064   ∘ ccom 5593  ⟶wf 6429  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6432  ‘cfv 6433  (class class class)co 7275  Basecbs 16912  distcds 16971  Ismtcismt 26893

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5209  ax-sep 5223  ax-nul 5230  ax-pow 5288  ax-pr 5352  ax-un 7588

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2889  df-ne 2944  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070  df-reu 3072  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-sbc 3717  df-csb 3833  df-dif 3890  df-un 3892  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-nul 4257  df-if 4460  df-pw 4535  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564  df-op 4568  df-uni 4840  df-iun 4926  df-br 5075  df-opab 5137  df-mpt 5158  df-id 5489  df-xp 5595  df-rel 5596  df-cnv 5597  df-co 5598  df-dm 5599  df-rn 5600  df-res 5601  df-ima 5602  df-iota 6391  df-fun 6435  df-fn 6436  df-f 6437  df-f1 6438  df-fo 6439  df-f1o 6440  df-fv 6441  df-ov 7278  df-oprab 7279  df-mpo 7280  df-map 8617  df-ismt 26894

This theorem is referenced by:  motgrp  26904