Theorem cnvmot 29061

Description: The converse of a motion is a motion. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 15-Dec-2019.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
ismot.p	⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
ismot.m	⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
motgrp.1	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
motco.2	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
cnvmot	⊢ (𝜑 → ◡𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))

Proof of Theorem cnvmot

Dummy variables 𝑎 𝑏 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		ismot.p	. . . 4 ⊢ 𝑃 = (Base‘𝐺)
2		ismot.m	. . . 4 ⊢ − = (dist‘𝐺)
3		motgrp.1	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
4		motco.2	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
5	1, 2, 3, 4	motf1o 29058	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹:𝑃⟶1-1onto𝑃)
6		f1ocnv 6867	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐹:𝑃⟶1-1onto𝑃 → ◡𝐹:𝑃⟶1-1onto𝑃)
7	5, 6	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡𝐹:𝑃⟶1-1onto𝑃)
8	3	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝐺 ∈ 𝑉)
9		f1of 6854	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (◡𝐹:𝑃⟶1-1onto𝑃 → ◡𝐹:𝑃⟶𝑃)
10	7, 9	syl 18	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡𝐹:𝑃⟶𝑃)
11	10	adantr 486	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → ◡𝐹:𝑃⟶𝑃)
12		simprl 783	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝑎 ∈ 𝑃)
13	11, 12	ffvelcdmd 7117	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → (◡𝐹‘𝑎) ∈ 𝑃)
14		simprr 785	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)
15	11, 14	ffvelcdmd 7117	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → (◡𝐹‘𝑏) ∈ 𝑃)
16	4	adantr 486	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → 𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))
17	1, 2, 8, 13, 15, 16	motcgr 29056	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → ((𝐹‘(◡𝐹‘𝑎)) − (𝐹‘(◡𝐹‘𝑏))) = ((◡𝐹‘𝑎) − (◡𝐹‘𝑏)))
18		f1ocnvfv2 7316	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝑃⟶1-1onto𝑃 ∧ 𝑎 ∈ 𝑃) → (𝐹‘(◡𝐹‘𝑎)) = 𝑎)
19	5, 12, 18	syl2an2r 698	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → (𝐹‘(◡𝐹‘𝑎)) = 𝑎)
20		f1ocnvfv2 7316	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝑃⟶1-1onto𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃) → (𝐹‘(◡𝐹‘𝑏)) = 𝑏)
21	5, 14, 20	syl2an2r 698	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → (𝐹‘(◡𝐹‘𝑏)) = 𝑏)
22	19, 21	oveq12d 7469	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → ((𝐹‘(◡𝐹‘𝑎)) − (𝐹‘(◡𝐹‘𝑏))) = (𝑎 − 𝑏))
23	17, 22	eqtr3d 2800	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∧ 𝑏 ∈ 𝑃)) → ((◡𝐹‘𝑎) − (◡𝐹‘𝑏)) = (𝑎 − 𝑏))
24	23	ralrimivva 3209	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ((◡𝐹‘𝑎) − (◡𝐹‘𝑏)) = (𝑎 − 𝑏))
25	1, 2	ismot 29055	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ 𝑉 → (◡𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺) ↔ (◡𝐹:𝑃⟶1-1onto𝑃 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ((◡𝐹‘𝑎) − (◡𝐹‘𝑏)) = (𝑎 − 𝑏))))
26	3, 25	syl 18	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (◡𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺) ↔ (◡𝐹:𝑃⟶1-1onto𝑃 ∧ ∀𝑎 ∈ 𝑃 ∀𝑏 ∈ 𝑃 ((◡𝐹‘𝑎) − (◡𝐹‘𝑏)) = (𝑎 − 𝑏))))
27	7, 24, 26	mpbir2and 726	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ◡𝐹 ∈ (𝐺Ismt𝐺))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2147  ∀wral 3080  ^◡ccnv 5657  ⟶wf 6562  ⟶1-1ontowf1o 6565  ‘cfv 6566  (class class class)co 7451  Basecbs 17431  distcds 17481  Ismtcismt 29052

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5238  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5266  ax-pow 5334  ax-pr 5398  ax-un 7783

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4841  df-uni 4873  df-iun 4958  df-br 5109  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5553  df-xp 5664  df-rel 5665  df-cnv 5666  df-co 5667  df-dm 5668  df-rn 5669  df-res 5670  df-ima 5671  df-iota 6520  df-fun 6568  df-fn 6569  df-f 6570  df-f1 6571  df-fo 6572  df-f1o 6573  df-fv 6574  df-ov 7454  df-oprab 7455  df-mpo 7456  df-map 8887  df-ismt 29053

This theorem is used by:  motgrp  29063