Theorem tfinds3 7867

Description: Principle of Transfinite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last three are the basis, the induction step for successors, and the induction step for limit ordinals. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jan-2005.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 21-Jun-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tfinds3.1	⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
tfinds3.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
tfinds3.3	⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))
tfinds3.4	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))
tfinds3.5	⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜓)
tfinds3.6	⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜂 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))
tfinds3.7	⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (𝜂 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfinds3	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝜂 → 𝜏))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜑,𝑦   𝜒,𝑥   𝜏,𝑥   𝑥,𝑦,𝜂

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜒(𝑦)   𝜃(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜏(𝑦)   𝐴(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem tfinds3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfinds3.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
2	1	imbi2d 343	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜓)))
3		tfinds3.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
4	3	imbi2d 343	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜒)))
5		tfinds3.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))
6	5	imbi2d 343	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜃)))
7		tfinds3.4	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))
8	7	imbi2d 343	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜏)))
9		tfinds3.5	. 2 ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜓)
10		tfinds3.6	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜂 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))
11	10	a2d 30	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → ((𝜂 → 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜃)))
12		r19.21v 3192	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜂 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜂 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒))
13		tfinds3.7	. . . 4 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (𝜂 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))
14	13	a2d 30	. . 3 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → ((𝜂 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜑)))
15	12, 14	biimtrid 245	. 2 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜂 → 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜑)))
16	2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 15	tfinds 7862	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝜂 → 𝜏))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  ∀wral 3081  ∅c0 4286  Oncon0 6364  Lim wlim 6365  suc csuc 6366

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7742

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-pss 3926  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-tr 5221  df-eprel 5563  df-po 5571  df-so 5572  df-fr 5616  df-we 5618  df-ord 6367  df-on 6368  df-lim 6369  df-suc 6370

This theorem is used by:  oacl  8526  omcl  8527  oecl  8528  oawordri  8541  oaass  8552  oarec  8553  omordi  8557  omwordri  8563  odi  8570  omass  8571  oen0  8578  oewordri  8584  oeworde  8585  oeoelem  8590  omabs  8643  tfindsd  44994