| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > tfinds3 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Principle of Transfinite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last three are the basis, the induction step for successors, and the induction step for limit ordinals. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jan-2005.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 21-Jun-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| tfinds3.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| tfinds3.2 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| tfinds3.3 | ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) |
| tfinds3.4 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) |
| tfinds3.5 | ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜓) |
| tfinds3.6 | ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜂 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) |
| tfinds3.7 | ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (𝜂 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| tfinds3 | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝜂 → 𝜏)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | tfinds3.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
| 2 | 1 | imbi2d 341 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜓))) |
| 3 | tfinds3.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 4 | 3 | imbi2d 341 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜒))) |
| 5 | tfinds3.3 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) | |
| 6 | 5 | imbi2d 341 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜃))) |
| 7 | tfinds3.4 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) | |
| 8 | 7 | imbi2d 341 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜏))) |
| 9 | tfinds3.5 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜓) | |
| 10 | tfinds3.6 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜂 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) | |
| 11 | 10 | a2d 29 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → ((𝜂 → 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜃))) |
| 12 | r19.21v 3164 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜂 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜂 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒)) | |
| 13 | tfinds3.7 | . . . 4 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (𝜂 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))) | |
| 14 | 13 | a2d 29 | . . 3 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → ((𝜂 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜑))) |
| 15 | 12, 14 | biimtrid 243 | . 2 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜂 → 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜑))) |
| 16 | 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 15 | tfinds 7800 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝜂 → 𝜏)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 207 = wceq 1547 ∈ wcel 2119 ∀wral 3053 ∅c0 4261 Oncon0 6310 Lim wlim 6311 suc csuc 6312 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1802 ax-4 1816 ax-5 1917 ax-6 1974 ax-7 2015 ax-8 2121 ax-9 2129 ax-10 2152 ax-11 2168 ax-12 2189 ax-ext 2711 ax-sep 5218 ax-nul 5228 ax-pr 5362 ax-un 7678 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 208 df-an 397 df-or 854 df-3or 1093 df-3an 1094 df-tru 1550 df-fal 1560 df-ex 1787 df-nf 1791 df-sb 2074 df-clab 2718 df-cleq 2731 df-clel 2814 df-nfc 2888 df-ne 2935 df-ral 3054 df-rex 3064 df-rab 3392 df-v 3433 df-dif 3886 df-un 3888 df-in 3890 df-ss 3900 df-pss 3903 df-nul 4262 df-if 4455 df-pw 4531 df-sn 4556 df-pr 4558 df-op 4562 df-uni 4839 df-br 5073 df-opab 5135 df-tr 5180 df-eprel 5518 df-po 5526 df-so 5527 df-fr 5571 df-we 5573 df-ord 6313 df-on 6314 df-lim 6315 df-suc 6316 |
| This theorem is referenced by: oacl 8460 omcl 8461 oecl 8462 oawordri 8475 oaass 8486 oarec 8487 omordi 8491 omwordri 8497 odi 8504 omass 8505 oen0 8512 oewordri 8518 oeworde 8519 oeoelem 8524 omabs 8577 tfindsd 44654 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |