| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > tfinds3 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Principle of Transfinite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last three are the basis, the induction step for successors, and the induction step for limit ordinals. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jan-2005.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 21-Jun-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| tfinds3.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| tfinds3.2 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| tfinds3.3 | ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) |
| tfinds3.4 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) |
| tfinds3.5 | ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜓) |
| tfinds3.6 | ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜂 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) |
| tfinds3.7 | ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (𝜂 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| tfinds3 | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝜂 → 𝜏)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | tfinds3.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
| 2 | 1 | imbi2d 342 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜓))) |
| 3 | tfinds3.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 4 | 3 | imbi2d 342 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜒))) |
| 5 | tfinds3.3 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) | |
| 6 | 5 | imbi2d 342 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜃))) |
| 7 | tfinds3.4 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) | |
| 8 | 7 | imbi2d 342 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜏))) |
| 9 | tfinds3.5 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜓) | |
| 10 | tfinds3.6 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜂 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) | |
| 11 | 10 | a2d 29 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → ((𝜂 → 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜃))) |
| 12 | r19.21v 3187 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜂 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜂 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒)) | |
| 13 | tfinds3.7 | . . . 4 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (𝜂 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))) | |
| 14 | 13 | a2d 29 | . . 3 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → ((𝜂 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜑))) |
| 15 | 12, 14 | biimtrid 244 | . 2 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜂 → 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜑))) |
| 16 | 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 15 | tfinds 7840 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝜂 → 𝜏)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 208 = wceq 1560 ∈ wcel 2142 ∀wral 3076 ∅c0 4285 Oncon0 6346 Lim wlim 6347 suc csuc 6348 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1815 ax-4 1829 ax-5 1930 ax-6 1987 ax-7 2028 ax-8 2144 ax-9 2152 ax-10 2175 ax-11 2191 ax-12 2212 ax-ext 2734 ax-sep 5246 ax-nul 5256 ax-pr 5390 ax-un 7718 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 209 df-an 400 df-or 859 df-3or 1099 df-3an 1100 df-tru 1563 df-fal 1573 df-ex 1800 df-nf 1804 df-sb 2091 df-clab 2741 df-cleq 2754 df-clel 2837 df-nfc 2911 df-ne 2958 df-ral 3077 df-rex 3087 df-rab 3415 df-v 3456 df-dif 3907 df-un 3909 df-in 3911 df-ss 3921 df-pss 3924 df-nul 4286 df-if 4481 df-pw 4557 df-sn 4583 df-pr 4585 df-op 4589 df-uni 4866 df-br 5101 df-opab 5163 df-tr 5208 df-eprel 5547 df-po 5555 df-so 5556 df-fr 5600 df-we 5602 df-ord 6349 df-on 6350 df-lim 6351 df-suc 6352 |
| This theorem is referenced by: oacl 8504 omcl 8505 oecl 8506 oawordri 8519 oaass 8530 oarec 8531 omordi 8535 omwordri 8541 odi 8548 omass 8549 oen0 8556 oewordri 8562 oeworde 8563 oeoelem 8568 omabs 8621 tfindsd 44786 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |