Theorem tfinds3 7876

Description: Principle of Transfinite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last three are the basis, the induction step for successors, and the induction step for limit ordinals. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jan-2005.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 21-Jun-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tfinds3.1	⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
tfinds3.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
tfinds3.3	⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))
tfinds3.4	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))
tfinds3.5	⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜓)
tfinds3.6	⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜂 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))
tfinds3.7	⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (𝜂 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfinds3	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝜂 → 𝜏))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜑,𝑦   𝜒,𝑥   𝜏,𝑥   𝑥,𝑦,𝜂

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜒(𝑦)   𝜃(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜏(𝑦)   𝐴(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem tfinds3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfinds3.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
2	1	imbi2d 343	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜓)))
3		tfinds3.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
4	3	imbi2d 343	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜒)))
5		tfinds3.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))
6	5	imbi2d 343	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜃)))
7		tfinds3.4	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))
8	7	imbi2d 343	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜏)))
9		tfinds3.5	. 2 ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜓)
10		tfinds3.6	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜂 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))
11	10	a2d 30	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → ((𝜂 → 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜃)))
12		r19.21v 3188	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜂 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜂 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒))
13		tfinds3.7	. . . 4 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (𝜂 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))
14	13	a2d 30	. . 3 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → ((𝜂 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜑)))
15	12, 14	biimtrid 245	. 2 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜂 → 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜑)))
16	2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 15	tfinds 7871	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝜂 → 𝜏))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3077  ∅c0 4279  Oncon0 6362  Lim wlim 6363  suc csuc 6364

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7751

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-pss 3919  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-tr 5213  df-eprel 5551  df-po 5559  df-so 5560  df-fr 5604  df-we 5606  df-ord 6365  df-on 6366  df-lim 6367  df-suc 6368

This theorem is used by:  oacl  8543  omcl  8544  oecl  8545  oawordri  8558  oaass  8569  oarec  8570  omordi  8574  omwordri  8580  odi  8587  omass  8588  oen0  8595  oewordri  8601  oeworde  8602  oeoelem  8607  omabs  8660  tfindsd  45207