| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > tfinds3 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Principle of Transfinite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last three are the basis, the induction step for successors, and the induction step for limit ordinals. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jan-2005.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 21-Jun-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| tfinds3.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| tfinds3.2 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| tfinds3.3 | ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) |
| tfinds3.4 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) |
| tfinds3.5 | ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜓) |
| tfinds3.6 | ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜂 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) |
| tfinds3.7 | ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (𝜂 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| tfinds3 | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝜂 → 𝜏)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | tfinds3.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
| 2 | 1 | imbi2d 343 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜓))) |
| 3 | tfinds3.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 4 | 3 | imbi2d 343 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜒))) |
| 5 | tfinds3.3 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) | |
| 6 | 5 | imbi2d 343 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜃))) |
| 7 | tfinds3.4 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) | |
| 8 | 7 | imbi2d 343 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜏))) |
| 9 | tfinds3.5 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜓) | |
| 10 | tfinds3.6 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜂 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) | |
| 11 | 10 | a2d 30 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → ((𝜂 → 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜃))) |
| 12 | r19.21v 3190 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜂 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜂 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒)) | |
| 13 | tfinds3.7 | . . . 4 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (𝜂 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))) | |
| 14 | 13 | a2d 30 | . . 3 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → ((𝜂 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜑))) |
| 15 | 12, 14 | biimtrid 245 | . 2 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜂 → 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜑))) |
| 16 | 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 15 | tfinds 7852 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝜂 → 𝜏)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2143 ∀wral 3079 ∅c0 4286 Oncon0 6360 Lim wlim 6361 suc csuc 6362 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1825 ax-4 1839 ax-5 1940 ax-6 1997 ax-7 2038 ax-8 2145 ax-9 2153 ax-10 2176 ax-11 2192 ax-12 2213 ax-ext 2735 ax-sep 5257 ax-nul 5269 ax-pr 5404 ax-un 7732 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-or 861 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1810 df-nf 1814 df-sb 2097 df-clab 2742 df-cleq 2755 df-clel 2838 df-nfc 2912 df-ne 2959 df-ral 3080 df-rex 3090 df-rab 3417 df-v 3457 df-dif 3908 df-un 3910 df-in 3912 df-ss 3922 df-pss 3925 df-nul 4287 df-if 4488 df-pw 4564 df-sn 4590 df-pr 4592 df-op 4596 df-uni 4873 df-br 5110 df-opab 5174 df-tr 5219 df-eprel 5561 df-po 5569 df-so 5570 df-fr 5614 df-we 5616 df-ord 6363 df-on 6364 df-lim 6365 df-suc 6366 |
| This theorem is referenced by: oacl 8516 omcl 8517 oecl 8518 oawordri 8531 oaass 8542 oarec 8543 omordi 8547 omwordri 8553 odi 8560 omass 8561 oen0 8568 oewordri 8574 oeworde 8575 oeoelem 8580 omabs 8633 tfindsd 44954 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |