| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > tfinds3 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Principle of Transfinite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last three are the basis, the induction step for successors, and the induction step for limit ordinals. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jan-2005.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 21-Jun-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| tfinds3.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| tfinds3.2 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| tfinds3.3 | ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) |
| tfinds3.4 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) |
| tfinds3.5 | ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜓) |
| tfinds3.6 | ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜂 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) |
| tfinds3.7 | ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (𝜂 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| tfinds3 | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝜂 → 𝜏)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | tfinds3.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
| 2 | 1 | imbi2d 343 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜓))) |
| 3 | tfinds3.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 4 | 3 | imbi2d 343 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜒))) |
| 5 | tfinds3.3 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) | |
| 6 | 5 | imbi2d 343 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜃))) |
| 7 | tfinds3.4 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) | |
| 8 | 7 | imbi2d 343 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜏))) |
| 9 | tfinds3.5 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜓) | |
| 10 | tfinds3.6 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜂 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) | |
| 11 | 10 | a2d 30 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → ((𝜂 → 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜃))) |
| 12 | r19.21v 3196 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜂 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜂 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒)) | |
| 13 | tfinds3.7 | . . . 4 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (𝜂 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))) | |
| 14 | 13 | a2d 30 | . . 3 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → ((𝜂 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜑))) |
| 15 | 12, 14 | biimtrid 245 | . 2 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜂 → 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜑))) |
| 16 | 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 15 | tfinds 7856 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝜂 → 𝜏)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 = wceq 1567 ∈ wcel 2149 ∀wral 3085 ∅c0 4294 Oncon0 6361 Lim wlim 6362 suc csuc 6363 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1822 ax-4 1836 ax-5 1937 ax-6 1994 ax-7 2035 ax-8 2151 ax-9 2159 ax-10 2182 ax-11 2198 ax-12 2219 ax-ext 2741 ax-sep 5261 ax-nul 5271 ax-pr 5405 ax-un 7733 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-or 861 df-3or 1102 df-3an 1103 df-tru 1570 df-fal 1580 df-ex 1807 df-nf 1811 df-sb 2098 df-clab 2748 df-cleq 2761 df-clel 2844 df-nfc 2918 df-ne 2965 df-ral 3086 df-rex 3096 df-rab 3424 df-v 3465 df-dif 3916 df-un 3918 df-in 3920 df-ss 3930 df-pss 3933 df-nul 4295 df-if 4493 df-pw 4569 df-sn 4595 df-pr 4597 df-op 4601 df-uni 4877 df-br 5114 df-opab 5178 df-tr 5223 df-eprel 5562 df-po 5570 df-so 5571 df-fr 5615 df-we 5617 df-ord 6364 df-on 6365 df-lim 6366 df-suc 6367 |
| This theorem is referenced by: oacl 8520 omcl 8521 oecl 8522 oawordri 8535 oaass 8546 oarec 8547 omordi 8551 omwordri 8557 odi 8564 omass 8565 oen0 8572 oewordri 8578 oeworde 8579 oeoelem 8584 omabs 8637 tfindsd 44826 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |