| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > tfinds3 | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Principle of Transfinite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last three are the basis, the induction step for successors, and the induction step for limit ordinals. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jan-2005.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 21-Jun-2011.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| tfinds3.1 | ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) |
| tfinds3.2 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) |
| tfinds3.3 | ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) |
| tfinds3.4 | ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) |
| tfinds3.5 | ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜓) |
| tfinds3.6 | ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜂 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) |
| tfinds3.7 | ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (𝜂 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| tfinds3 | ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝜂 → 𝜏)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | tfinds3.1 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓)) | |
| 2 | 1 | imbi2d 340 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜓))) |
| 3 | tfinds3.2 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)) | |
| 4 | 3 | imbi2d 340 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜒))) |
| 5 | tfinds3.3 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃)) | |
| 6 | 5 | imbi2d 340 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜃))) |
| 7 | tfinds3.4 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏)) | |
| 8 | 7 | imbi2d 340 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜏))) |
| 9 | tfinds3.5 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜓) | |
| 10 | tfinds3.6 | . . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜂 → (𝜒 → 𝜃))) | |
| 11 | 10 | a2d 29 | . 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → ((𝜂 → 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜃))) |
| 12 | r19.21v 3163 | . . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜂 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜂 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒)) | |
| 13 | tfinds3.7 | . . . 4 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (𝜂 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))) | |
| 14 | 13 | a2d 29 | . . 3 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → ((𝜂 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜑))) |
| 15 | 12, 14 | biimtrid 242 | . 2 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜂 → 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜑))) |
| 16 | 2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 15 | tfinds 7812 | 1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝜂 → 𝜏)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 206 = wceq 1542 ∈ wcel 2114 ∀wral 3052 ∅c0 4287 Oncon0 6325 Lim wlim 6326 suc csuc 6327 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1797 ax-4 1811 ax-5 1912 ax-6 1969 ax-7 2010 ax-8 2116 ax-9 2124 ax-10 2147 ax-11 2163 ax-12 2185 ax-ext 2709 ax-sep 5243 ax-nul 5253 ax-pr 5379 ax-un 7690 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 207 df-an 396 df-or 849 df-3or 1088 df-3an 1089 df-tru 1545 df-fal 1555 df-ex 1782 df-nf 1786 df-sb 2069 df-clab 2716 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2812 df-nfc 2886 df-ne 2934 df-ral 3053 df-rex 3063 df-rab 3402 df-v 3444 df-dif 3906 df-un 3908 df-in 3910 df-ss 3920 df-pss 3923 df-nul 4288 df-if 4482 df-pw 4558 df-sn 4583 df-pr 4585 df-op 4589 df-uni 4866 df-br 5101 df-opab 5163 df-tr 5208 df-eprel 5532 df-po 5540 df-so 5541 df-fr 5585 df-we 5587 df-ord 6328 df-on 6329 df-lim 6330 df-suc 6331 |
| This theorem is referenced by: oacl 8472 omcl 8473 oecl 8474 oawordri 8487 oaass 8498 oarec 8499 omordi 8503 omwordri 8509 odi 8516 omass 8517 oen0 8524 oewordri 8530 oeworde 8531 oeoelem 8536 omabs 8589 tfindsd 44570 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |