Theorem tfinds3 7886

Description: Principle of Transfinite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last three are the basis, the induction step for successors, and the induction step for limit ordinals. (Contributed by NM, 6-Jan-2005.) (Revised by David Abernethy, 21-Jun-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tfinds3.1	⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
tfinds3.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
tfinds3.3	⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))
tfinds3.4	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))
tfinds3.5	⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜓)
tfinds3.6	⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜂 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))
tfinds3.7	⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (𝜂 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfinds3	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝜂 → 𝜏))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝐴   𝜑,𝑦   𝜒,𝑥   𝜏,𝑥   𝑥,𝑦,𝜂

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜒(𝑦)   𝜃(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜏(𝑦)   𝐴(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem tfinds3

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfinds3.1	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
2	1	imbi2d 343	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜓)))
3		tfinds3.2	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
4	3	imbi2d 343	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜒)))
5		tfinds3.3	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))
6	5	imbi2d 343	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜃)))
7		tfinds3.4	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))
8	7	imbi2d 343	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → ((𝜂 → 𝜑) ↔ (𝜂 → 𝜏)))
9		tfinds3.5	. 2 ⊢ (𝜂 → 𝜓)
10		tfinds3.6	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜂 → (𝜒 → 𝜃)))
11	10	a2d 30	. 2 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → ((𝜂 → 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜃)))
12		r19.21v 3191	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜂 → 𝜒) ↔ (𝜂 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒))
13		tfinds3.7	. . . 4 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (𝜂 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))
14	13	a2d 30	. . 3 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → ((𝜂 → ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜑)))
15	12, 14	biimtrid 245	. 2 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 (𝜂 → 𝜒) → (𝜂 → 𝜑)))
16	2, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 15	tfinds 7881	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → (𝜂 → 𝜏))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   = wceq 1569   ∈ wcel 2146  ∀wral 3080  ∅c0 4281  Oncon0 6369  Lim wlim 6370  suc csuc 6371

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1827  ax-4 1841  ax-5 1944  ax-6 2001  ax-7 2042  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2196  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5395  ax-un 7761

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1572  df-fal 1582  df-ex 1812  df-nf 1816  df-sb 2101  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-ss 3901  df-pss 4017  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-tr 5216  df-eprel 5555  df-po 5563  df-so 5564  df-fr 5608  df-we 5610  df-ord 6372  df-on 6373  df-lim 6374  df-suc 6375

This theorem is used by:  oacl  8557  omcl  8558  oecl  8559  oawordri  8572  oaass  8583  oarec  8584  omordi  8588  omwordri  8594  odi  8601  omass  8602  oen0  8609  oewordri  8615  oeworde  8616  oeoelem  8621  omabs  8674  tfindsd  45351