Theorem tfinds 7852

Description: Principle of Transfinite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last three are the basis, the induction step for successors, and the induction step for limit ordinals. Theorem Schema 4 of [Suppes] p. 197. Theorem 1.19 of [Schloeder] p. 3. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tfinds.1	⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
tfinds.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
tfinds.3	⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))
tfinds.4	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))
tfinds.5	⊢ 𝜓
tfinds.6	⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜒 → 𝜃))
tfinds.7	⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfinds	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝜏)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝐴   𝜒,𝑥   𝜏,𝑥   𝜑,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜒(𝑦)   𝜃(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜏(𝑦)   𝐴(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem tfinds

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfinds.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
2		tfinds.4	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))
3		dflim3 7839	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 ↔ (Ord 𝑥 ∧ ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
4	3	notbii 323	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ Lim 𝑥 ↔ ¬ (Ord 𝑥 ∧ ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
5		iman 406	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Ord 𝑥 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) ↔ ¬ (Ord 𝑥 ∧ ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
6		eloni 6370	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → Ord 𝑥)
7		pm2.27 43	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Ord 𝑥 → ((Ord 𝑥 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
8	6, 7	syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → ((Ord 𝑥 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
9		tfinds.5	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝜓
10		tfinds.1	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
11	9, 10	mpbiri 261	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → 𝜑)
12	11	a1d 26	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))
13		nfra1 3289	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒
14		nfv 1944	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
15	13, 14	nfim 1926	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)
16		vex 3459	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
17	16	sucid 6445	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝑦
18	1	rspcv 3577	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑 → 𝜒))
19	17, 18	ax-mp 5	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑 → 𝜒)
20		tfinds.6	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜒 → 𝜃))
21	19, 20	syl5 35	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑 → 𝜃))
22		raleq 3320	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑦[𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
23		nfv 1944	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒
24	23, 1	sbiev 2347	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
25		sbequ 2117	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
26	24, 25	bitr3id 288	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜒 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
27	26	cbvralvw 3243	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)
28		cbvralsvw 3316	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑦[𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)
29	22, 27, 28	3bitr4g 317	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑))
30	29	imbi1d 344	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜃) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑 → 𝜃)))
31	21, 30	syl5ibrcom 250	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜃)))
32		tfinds.3	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))
33	32	biimprd 251	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜃 → 𝜑))
34	33	a1i 11	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜃 → 𝜑)))
35	31, 34	syldd 73	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))
36	15, 35	rexlimi 3265	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))
37	12, 36	jaoi 870	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))
38	8, 37	syl6 36	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → ((Ord 𝑥 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))
39	5, 38	biimtrrid 246	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (¬ (Ord 𝑥 ∧ ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))
40	4, 39	biimtrid 245	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (¬ Lim 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))
41		tfinds.7	. . 3 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))
42	40, 41	pm2.61d2 183	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))
43	1, 2, 42	tfis3 7850	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝜏)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   ∨ wo 860   = wceq 1570  [wsb 2096   ∈ wcel 2143  ∀wral 3079  ∃wrex 3089  ∅c0 4286  Ord word 6359  Oncon0 6360  Lim wlim 6361  suc csuc 6362

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pr 5404  ax-un 7732

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-pss 3925  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-pw 4564  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-tr 5219  df-eprel 5561  df-po 5569  df-so 5570  df-fr 5614  df-we 5616  df-ord 6363  df-on 6364  df-lim 6365  df-suc 6366

This theorem is used by:  tfindsg  7853  tfindes  7855  tfinds3  7857  oa0r  8519  om0r  8520  om1r  8524  oe1m  8526  oeoalem  8578  r1sdom  9742  r1tr  9744  alephon  10058  alephcard  10059  alephordi  10063  constrsscn  34139  constr01  34141  constrmon  34143  constrconj  34144  rdgprc  36292