Theorem tfinds 7871

Description: Principle of Transfinite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last three are the basis, the induction step for successors, and the induction step for limit ordinals. Theorem Schema 4 of [Suppes] p. 197. Theorem 1.19 of [Schloeder] p. 3. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tfinds.1	⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
tfinds.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
tfinds.3	⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))
tfinds.4	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))
tfinds.5	⊢ 𝜓
tfinds.6	⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜒 → 𝜃))
tfinds.7	⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfinds	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝜏)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝐴   𝜒,𝑥   𝜏,𝑥   𝜑,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜒(𝑦)   𝜃(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜏(𝑦)   𝐴(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem tfinds

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfinds.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
2		tfinds.4	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))
3		dflim3 7858	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 ↔ (Ord 𝑥 ∧ ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
4	3	notbii 323	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ Lim 𝑥 ↔ ¬ (Ord 𝑥 ∧ ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
5		iman 407	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Ord 𝑥 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) ↔ ¬ (Ord 𝑥 ∧ ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
6		eloni 6372	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → Ord 𝑥)
7		pm2.27 43	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Ord 𝑥 → ((Ord 𝑥 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
8	6, 7	syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → ((Ord 𝑥 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
9		tfinds.5	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝜓
10		tfinds.1	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
11	9, 10	mpbiri 261	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → 𝜑)
12	11	a1d 26	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))
13		nfra1 3287	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒
14		nfv 1947	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
15	13, 14	nfim 1929	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)
16		vex 3455	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
17	16	sucid 6447	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝑦
18	1	rspcv 3573	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑 → 𝜒))
19	17, 18	ax-mp 5	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑 → 𝜒)
20		tfinds.6	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜒 → 𝜃))
21	19, 20	syl5 35	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑 → 𝜃))
22		raleq 3317	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑦[𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
23		nfv 1947	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒
24	23, 1	sbiev 2346	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
25		sbequ 2120	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
26	24, 25	bitr3id 288	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜒 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
27	26	cbvralvw 3241	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)
28		cbvralsvw 3314	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑦[𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)
29	22, 27, 28	3bitr4g 317	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑))
30	29	imbi1d 344	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜃) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑 → 𝜃)))
31	21, 30	syl5ibrcom 250	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜃)))
32		tfinds.3	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))
33	32	biimprd 251	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜃 → 𝜑))
34	33	a1i 11	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜃 → 𝜑)))
35	31, 34	syldd 73	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))
36	15, 35	rexlimi 3263	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))
37	12, 36	jaoi 871	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))
38	8, 37	syl6 36	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → ((Ord 𝑥 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))
39	5, 38	biimtrrid 246	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (¬ (Ord 𝑥 ∧ ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))
40	4, 39	biimtrid 245	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (¬ Lim 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))
41		tfinds.7	. . 3 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))
42	40, 41	pm2.61d2 183	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))
43	1, 2, 42	tfis3 7869	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝜏)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   = wceq 1570  [wsb 2099   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3077  ∃wrex 3087  ∅c0 4279  Ord word 6361  Oncon0 6362  Lim wlim 6363  suc csuc 6364

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2733  ax-sep 5249  ax-nul 5260  ax-pr 5391  ax-un 7751

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2740  df-cleq 2753  df-clel 2836  df-nfc 2910  df-ne 2957  df-ral 3078  df-rex 3088  df-rab 3414  df-v 3453  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-pss 3919  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-tr 5213  df-eprel 5551  df-po 5559  df-so 5560  df-fr 5604  df-we 5606  df-ord 6365  df-on 6366  df-lim 6367  df-suc 6368

This theorem is used by:  tfindsg  7872  tfindes  7874  tfinds3  7876  oa0r  8546  om0r  8547  om1r  8551  oe1m  8553  oeoalem  8605  r1sdom  9781  r1tr  9783  alephon  10148  alephcard  10149  alephordi  10153  constrsscn  34372  constr01  34374  constrmon  34376  constrconj  34377  rdgprc  36556