Theorem tfinds 7860

Description: Principle of Transfinite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last three are the basis, the induction step for successors, and the induction step for limit ordinals. Theorem Schema 4 of [Suppes] p. 197. Theorem 1.19 of [Schloeder] p. 3. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tfinds.1	⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
tfinds.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
tfinds.3	⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))
tfinds.4	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))
tfinds.5	⊢ 𝜓
tfinds.6	⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜒 → 𝜃))
tfinds.7	⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfinds	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝜏)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝐴   𝜒,𝑥   𝜏,𝑥   𝜑,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜒(𝑦)   𝜃(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜏(𝑦)   𝐴(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem tfinds

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfinds.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
2		tfinds.4	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))
3		dflim3 7847	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 ↔ (Ord 𝑥 ∧ ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
4	3	notbii 323	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ Lim 𝑥 ↔ ¬ (Ord 𝑥 ∧ ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
5		iman 407	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Ord 𝑥 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) ↔ ¬ (Ord 𝑥 ∧ ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
6		eloni 6371	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → Ord 𝑥)
7		pm2.27 43	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Ord 𝑥 → ((Ord 𝑥 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
8	6, 7	syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → ((Ord 𝑥 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
9		tfinds.5	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝜓
10		tfinds.1	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
11	9, 10	mpbiri 261	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → 𝜑)
12	11	a1d 26	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))
13		nfra1 3288	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒
14		nfv 1947	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
15	13, 14	nfim 1929	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)
16		vex 3457	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
17	16	sucid 6446	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝑦
18	1	rspcv 3575	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑 → 𝜒))
19	17, 18	ax-mp 5	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑 → 𝜒)
20		tfinds.6	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜒 → 𝜃))
21	19, 20	syl5 35	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑 → 𝜃))
22		raleq 3318	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑦[𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
23		nfv 1947	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒
24	23, 1	sbiev 2347	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
25		sbequ 2120	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
26	24, 25	bitr3id 288	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜒 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
27	26	cbvralvw 3242	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)
28		cbvralsvw 3315	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑦[𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)
29	22, 27, 28	3bitr4g 317	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑))
30	29	imbi1d 344	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜃) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑 → 𝜃)))
31	21, 30	syl5ibrcom 250	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜃)))
32		tfinds.3	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))
33	32	biimprd 251	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜃 → 𝜑))
34	33	a1i 11	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜃 → 𝜑)))
35	31, 34	syldd 73	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))
36	15, 35	rexlimi 3264	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))
37	12, 36	jaoi 871	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))
38	8, 37	syl6 36	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → ((Ord 𝑥 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))
39	5, 38	biimtrrid 246	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (¬ (Ord 𝑥 ∧ ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))
40	4, 39	biimtrid 245	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (¬ Lim 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))
41		tfinds.7	. . 3 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))
42	40, 41	pm2.61d2 183	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))
43	1, 2, 42	tfis3 7858	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝜏)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   = wceq 1570  [wsb 2099   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3078  ∃wrex 3088  ∅c0 4282  Ord word 6360  Oncon0 6361  Lim wlim 6362  suc csuc 6363

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pr 5402  ax-un 7740

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-pss 3922  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-pw 4562  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-tr 5217  df-eprel 5559  df-po 5567  df-so 5568  df-fr 5612  df-we 5614  df-ord 6364  df-on 6365  df-lim 6366  df-suc 6367

This theorem is used by:  tfindsg  7861  tfindes  7863  tfinds3  7865  oa0r  8529  om0r  8530  om1r  8534  oe1m  8536  oeoalem  8588  r1sdom  9760  r1tr  9762  alephon  10076  alephcard  10077  alephordi  10081  constrsscn  34258  constr01  34260  constrmon  34262  constrconj  34263  rdgprc  36379