Theorem tfinds 7862

Description: Principle of Transfinite Induction (inference schema), using implicit substitutions. The first four hypotheses establish the substitutions we need. The last three are the basis, the induction step for successors, and the induction step for limit ordinals. Theorem Schema 4 of [Suppes] p. 197. Theorem 1.19 of [Schloeder] p. 3. (Contributed by NM, 16-Apr-1995.) (Proof shortened by Andrew Salmon, 27-Aug-2011.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
tfinds.1	⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
tfinds.2	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
tfinds.3	⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))
tfinds.4	⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))
tfinds.5	⊢ 𝜓
tfinds.6	⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜒 → 𝜃))
tfinds.7	⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))

Assertion

Ref	Expression
tfinds	⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝜏)

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝐴   𝜒,𝑥   𝜏,𝑥   𝜑,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑥)   𝜓(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜒(𝑦)   𝜃(𝑥, 𝑦)   𝜏(𝑦)   𝐴(𝑦)

Proof of Theorem tfinds

Dummy variable 𝑧 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		tfinds.2	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜒))
2		tfinds.4	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 = 𝐴 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜏))
3		dflim3 7849	. . . . 5 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 ↔ (Ord 𝑥 ∧ ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
4	3	notbii 323	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ Lim 𝑥 ↔ ¬ (Ord 𝑥 ∧ ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
5		iman 407	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((Ord 𝑥 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) ↔ ¬ (Ord 𝑥 ∧ ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
6		eloni 6374	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → Ord 𝑥)
7		pm2.27 43	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (Ord 𝑥 → ((Ord 𝑥 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
8	6, 7	syl 18	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → ((Ord 𝑥 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)))
9		tfinds.5	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝜓
10		tfinds.1	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜓))
11	9, 10	mpbiri 261	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → 𝜑)
12	11	a1d 26	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))
13		nfra1 3291	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒
14		nfv 1947	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦𝜑
15	13, 14	nfim 1929	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑦(∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)
16		vex 3461	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ V
17	16	sucid 6449	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ 𝑦 ∈ suc 𝑦
18	1	rspcv 3579	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑 → 𝜒))
19	17, 18	ax-mp 5	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑 → 𝜒)
20		tfinds.6	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝜒 → 𝜃))
21	19, 20	syl5 35	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑 → 𝜃))
22		raleq 3322	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑦[𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
23		nfv 1947	. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 ⊢ Ⅎ𝑥𝜒
24	23, 1	sbiev 2349	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ 𝜒)
25		sbequ 2120	. . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → ([𝑦 / 𝑥]𝜑 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
26	24, 25	bitr3id 288	. . . . . . . . . . . . 13 ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜒 ↔ [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑))
27	26	cbvralvw 3245	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑥 [𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)
28		cbvralsvw 3318	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑 ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ suc 𝑦[𝑧 / 𝑥]𝜑)
29	22, 27, 28	3bitr4g 317	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑))
30	29	imbi1d 344	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → ((∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜃) ↔ (∀𝑥 ∈ suc 𝑦𝜑 → 𝜃)))
31	21, 30	syl5ibrcom 250	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜃)))
32		tfinds.3	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜑 ↔ 𝜃))
33	32	biimprd 251	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜃 → 𝜑))
34	33	a1i 11	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (𝜃 → 𝜑)))
35	31, 34	syldd 73	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 ∈ On → (𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))
36	15, 35	rexlimi 3267	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))
37	12, 36	jaoi 871	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))
38	8, 37	syl6 36	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → ((Ord 𝑥 → (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))
39	5, 38	biimtrrid 246	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (¬ (Ord 𝑥 ∧ ¬ (𝑥 = ∅ ∨ ∃𝑦 ∈ On 𝑥 = suc 𝑦)) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))
40	4, 39	biimtrid 245	. . 3 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (¬ Lim 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑)))
41		tfinds.7	. . 3 ⊢ (Lim 𝑥 → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))
42	40, 41	pm2.61d2 183	. 2 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ On → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑥 𝜒 → 𝜑))
43	1, 2, 42	tfis3 7860	1 ⊢ (𝐴 ∈ On → 𝜏)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   ∨ wo 861   = wceq 1570  [wsb 2099   ∈ wcel 2146  ∀wral 3081  ∃wrex 3091  ∅c0 4286  Ord word 6363  Oncon0 6364  Lim wlim 6365  suc csuc 6366

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7742

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3or 1104  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-pss 3926  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-tr 5221  df-eprel 5563  df-po 5571  df-so 5572  df-fr 5616  df-we 5618  df-ord 6367  df-on 6368  df-lim 6369  df-suc 6370

This theorem is used by:  tfindsg  7863  tfindes  7865  tfinds3  7867  oa0r  8529  om0r  8530  om1r  8534  oe1m  8536  oeoalem  8588  r1sdom  9753  r1tr  9755  alephon  10069  alephcard  10070  alephordi  10074  constrsscn  34198  constr01  34200  constrmon  34202  constrconj  34203  rdgprc  36325