![]() |
Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
|
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > weisoeq | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Thus, there is at most one isomorphism between any two set-like well-ordered classes. Class version of wemoiso 7386. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
weisoeq | ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝐹 = 𝐺) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | id 22 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) | |
2 | isocnv 6808 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → ◡𝐹 Isom 𝑆, 𝑅 (𝐵, 𝐴)) | |
3 | isotr 6814 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ ◡𝐹 Isom 𝑆, 𝑅 (𝐵, 𝐴)) → (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) Isom 𝑅, 𝑅 (𝐴, 𝐴)) | |
4 | 1, 2, 3 | syl2anr 591 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) → (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) Isom 𝑅, 𝑅 (𝐴, 𝐴)) |
5 | weniso 6832 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 ∧ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) Isom 𝑅, 𝑅 (𝐴, 𝐴)) → (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)) | |
6 | 5 | 3expa 1148 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) Isom 𝑅, 𝑅 (𝐴, 𝐴)) → (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)) |
7 | 4, 6 | sylan2 587 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)) |
8 | simprl 788 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) | |
9 | isof1o 6801 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) | |
10 | f1of1 6355 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) | |
11 | 8, 9, 10 | 3syl 18 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) |
12 | simprr 790 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) | |
13 | isof1o 6801 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐺:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) | |
14 | f1of1 6355 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) | |
15 | 12, 13, 14 | 3syl 18 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) |
16 | f1eqcocnv 6784 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))) | |
17 | 11, 15, 16 | syl2anc 580 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))) |
18 | 7, 17 | mpbird 249 | 1 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝐹 = 𝐺) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 198 ∧ wa 385 = wceq 1653 I cid 5219 Se wse 5269 We wwe 5270 ◡ccnv 5311 ↾ cres 5314 ∘ ccom 5316 –1-1→wf1 6098 –1-1-onto→wf1o 6100 Isom wiso 6102 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1891 ax-4 1905 ax-5 2006 ax-6 2072 ax-7 2107 ax-8 2159 ax-9 2166 ax-10 2185 ax-11 2200 ax-12 2213 ax-13 2377 ax-ext 2777 ax-sep 4975 ax-nul 4983 ax-pow 5035 ax-pr 5097 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 199 df-an 386 df-or 875 df-3or 1109 df-3an 1110 df-tru 1657 df-ex 1876 df-nf 1880 df-sb 2065 df-mo 2591 df-eu 2609 df-clab 2786 df-cleq 2792 df-clel 2795 df-nfc 2930 df-ne 2972 df-ral 3094 df-rex 3095 df-reu 3096 df-rmo 3097 df-rab 3098 df-v 3387 df-sbc 3634 df-csb 3729 df-dif 3772 df-un 3774 df-in 3776 df-ss 3783 df-nul 4116 df-if 4278 df-sn 4369 df-pr 4371 df-op 4375 df-uni 4629 df-br 4844 df-opab 4906 df-mpt 4923 df-id 5220 df-po 5233 df-so 5234 df-fr 5271 df-se 5272 df-we 5273 df-xp 5318 df-rel 5319 df-cnv 5320 df-co 5321 df-dm 5322 df-rn 5323 df-res 5324 df-ima 5325 df-iota 6064 df-fun 6103 df-fn 6104 df-f 6105 df-f1 6106 df-fo 6107 df-f1o 6108 df-fv 6109 df-isom 6110 |
This theorem is referenced by: weisoeq2 6834 wemoiso 7386 oieu 8686 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |