Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > weisoeq | Structured version Visualization version GIF version |
Description: Thus, there is at most one isomorphism between any two set-like well-ordered classes. Class version of wemoiso 7746. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Jun-2015.) |
Ref | Expression |
---|---|
weisoeq | ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝐹 = 𝐺) |
Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
---|---|---|---|
1 | id 22 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) | |
2 | isocnv 7139 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → ◡𝐹 Isom 𝑆, 𝑅 (𝐵, 𝐴)) | |
3 | isotr 7145 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ ◡𝐹 Isom 𝑆, 𝑅 (𝐵, 𝐴)) → (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) Isom 𝑅, 𝑅 (𝐴, 𝐴)) | |
4 | 1, 2, 3 | syl2anr 600 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) → (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) Isom 𝑅, 𝑅 (𝐴, 𝐴)) |
5 | weniso 7163 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴 ∧ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) Isom 𝑅, 𝑅 (𝐴, 𝐴)) → (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)) | |
6 | 5 | 3expa 1120 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) Isom 𝑅, 𝑅 (𝐴, 𝐴)) → (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)) |
7 | 4, 6 | sylan2 596 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐴)) |
8 | simprl 771 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) | |
9 | isof1o 7132 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) | |
10 | f1of1 6660 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐹:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) | |
11 | 8, 9, 10 | 3syl 18 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) |
12 | simprr 773 | . . . 4 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵)) | |
13 | isof1o 7132 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) → 𝐺:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵) | |
14 | f1of1 6660 | . . . 4 ⊢ (𝐺:𝐴–1-1-onto→𝐵 → 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) | |
15 | 12, 13, 14 | 3syl 18 | . . 3 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) |
16 | f1eqcocnv 7111 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝐹:𝐴–1-1→𝐵 ∧ 𝐺:𝐴–1-1→𝐵) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))) | |
17 | 11, 15, 16 | syl2anc 587 | . 2 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → (𝐹 = 𝐺 ↔ (◡𝐹 ∘ 𝐺) = ( I ↾ 𝐴))) |
18 | 7, 17 | mpbird 260 | 1 ⊢ (((𝑅 We 𝐴 ∧ 𝑅 Se 𝐴) ∧ (𝐹 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵) ∧ 𝐺 Isom 𝑅, 𝑆 (𝐴, 𝐵))) → 𝐹 = 𝐺) |
Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
Syntax hints: → wi 4 ↔ wb 209 ∧ wa 399 = wceq 1543 I cid 5454 Se wse 5507 We wwe 5508 ◡ccnv 5550 ↾ cres 5553 ∘ ccom 5555 –1-1→wf1 6377 –1-1-onto→wf1o 6379 Isom wiso 6381 |
This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1803 ax-4 1817 ax-5 1918 ax-6 1976 ax-7 2016 ax-8 2112 ax-9 2120 ax-10 2141 ax-11 2158 ax-12 2175 ax-ext 2708 ax-sep 5192 ax-nul 5199 ax-pr 5322 |
This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 400 df-or 848 df-3or 1090 df-3an 1091 df-tru 1546 df-fal 1556 df-ex 1788 df-nf 1792 df-sb 2071 df-mo 2539 df-eu 2568 df-clab 2715 df-cleq 2729 df-clel 2816 df-nfc 2886 df-ne 2941 df-ral 3066 df-rex 3067 df-reu 3068 df-rmo 3069 df-rab 3070 df-v 3410 df-sbc 3695 df-csb 3812 df-dif 3869 df-un 3871 df-in 3873 df-ss 3883 df-nul 4238 df-if 4440 df-sn 4542 df-pr 4544 df-op 4548 df-uni 4820 df-br 5054 df-opab 5116 df-mpt 5136 df-id 5455 df-po 5468 df-so 5469 df-fr 5509 df-se 5510 df-we 5511 df-xp 5557 df-rel 5558 df-cnv 5559 df-co 5560 df-dm 5561 df-rn 5562 df-res 5563 df-ima 5564 df-iota 6338 df-fun 6382 df-fn 6383 df-f 6384 df-f1 6385 df-fo 6386 df-f1o 6387 df-fv 6388 df-isom 6389 |
This theorem is referenced by: weisoeq2 7165 wemoiso 7746 oieu 9155 |
Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |