Theorem map0g 6825

Description: Set exponentiation is empty iff the base is empty and the exponent is not empty. Theorem 97 of [Suppes] p. 89. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
map0g	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)))

Proof of Theorem map0g

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fconst6g 5520	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐵 × {𝑓}):𝐵⟶𝐴)
2		elmapg 6798	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐵 × {𝑓}) ∈ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ↔ (𝐵 × {𝑓}):𝐵⟶𝐴))
3	1, 2	imbitrrid 156	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐵 × {𝑓}) ∈ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵)))
4		ne0i 3498	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐵 × {𝑓}) ∈ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ≠ ∅)
5	3, 4	syl6 33	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ≠ ∅))
6	5	exlimdv 1865	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ≠ ∅))
7	6	necon2bd 2458	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅ → ¬ ∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ 𝐴))
8		notm0 3512	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)
9	7, 8	imbitrdi 161	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅ → 𝐴 = ∅))
10		f0 5512	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∅:∅⟶𝐴
11		feq2 5453	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 = ∅ → (∅:𝐵⟶𝐴 ↔ ∅:∅⟶𝐴))
12	10, 11	mpbiri 168	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 = ∅ → ∅:𝐵⟶𝐴)
13		elmapg 6798	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∅ ∈ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ↔ ∅:𝐵⟶𝐴))
14	12, 13	imbitrrid 156	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 = ∅ → ∅ ∈ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵)))
15		ne0i 3498	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∅ ∈ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ≠ ∅)
16	14, 15	syl6 33	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 = ∅ → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ≠ ∅))
17	16	necon2d 2459	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅ → 𝐵 ≠ ∅))
18	9, 17	jcad 307	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)))
19		oveq1 6001	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = (∅ ↑𝑚 𝐵))
20		map0b 6824	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ≠ ∅ → (∅ ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅)
21	19, 20	sylan9eq 2282	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅)
22	18, 21	impbid1 142	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1395  ∃wex 1538   ∈ wcel 2200   ≠ wne 2400  ∅c0 3491  {csn 3666   × cxp 4714  ⟶wf 5310  (class class class)co 5994   ↑_𝑚 cmap 6785

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 617  ax-in2 618  ax-io 714  ax-5 1493  ax-7 1494  ax-gen 1495  ax-ie1 1539  ax-ie2 1540  ax-8 1550  ax-10 1551  ax-11 1552  ax-i12 1553  ax-bndl 1555  ax-4 1556  ax-17 1572  ax-i9 1576  ax-ial 1580  ax-i5r 1581  ax-13 2202  ax-14 2203  ax-ext 2211  ax-sep 4201  ax-nul 4209  ax-pow 4257  ax-pr 4292  ax-un 4521  ax-setind 4626

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1004  df-tru 1398  df-fal 1401  df-nf 1507  df-sb 1809  df-eu 2080  df-mo 2081  df-clab 2216  df-cleq 2222  df-clel 2225  df-nfc 2361  df-ne 2401  df-ral 2513  df-rex 2514  df-v 2801  df-sbc 3029  df-dif 3199  df-un 3201  df-in 3203  df-ss 3210  df-nul 3492  df-pw 3651  df-sn 3672  df-pr 3673  df-op 3675  df-uni 3888  df-br 4083  df-opab 4145  df-mpt 4146  df-id 4381  df-xp 4722  df-rel 4723  df-cnv 4724  df-co 4725  df-dm 4726  df-rn 4727  df-iota 5274  df-fun 5316  df-fn 5317  df-f 5318  df-fv 5322  df-ov 5997  df-oprab 5998  df-mpo 5999  df-map 6787

This theorem is referenced by:  map0  6826