Theorem map0g 6900

Description: Set exponentiation is empty iff the base is empty and the exponent is not empty. Theorem 97 of [Suppes] p. 89. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
map0g	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)))

Proof of Theorem map0g

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fconst6g 5544	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐵 × {𝑓}):𝐵⟶𝐴)
2		elmapg 6873	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐵 × {𝑓}) ∈ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ↔ (𝐵 × {𝑓}):𝐵⟶𝐴))
3	1, 2	imbitrrid 156	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐵 × {𝑓}) ∈ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵)))
4		ne0i 3503	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐵 × {𝑓}) ∈ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ≠ ∅)
5	3, 4	syl6 33	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ≠ ∅))
6	5	exlimdv 1867	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ≠ ∅))
7	6	necon2bd 2461	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅ → ¬ ∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ 𝐴))
8		notm0 3517	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)
9	7, 8	imbitrdi 161	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅ → 𝐴 = ∅))
10		f0 5536	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∅:∅⟶𝐴
11		feq2 5473	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 = ∅ → (∅:𝐵⟶𝐴 ↔ ∅:∅⟶𝐴))
12	10, 11	mpbiri 168	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 = ∅ → ∅:𝐵⟶𝐴)
13		elmapg 6873	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∅ ∈ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ↔ ∅:𝐵⟶𝐴))
14	12, 13	imbitrrid 156	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 = ∅ → ∅ ∈ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵)))
15		ne0i 3503	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∅ ∈ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ≠ ∅)
16	14, 15	syl6 33	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 = ∅ → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ≠ ∅))
17	16	necon2d 2462	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅ → 𝐵 ≠ ∅))
18	9, 17	jcad 307	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)))
19		oveq1 6035	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = (∅ ↑𝑚 𝐵))
20		map0b 6899	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ≠ ∅ → (∅ ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅)
21	19, 20	sylan9eq 2284	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅)
22	18, 21	impbid1 142	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1398  ∃wex 1541   ∈ wcel 2202   ≠ wne 2403  ∅c0 3496  {csn 3673   × cxp 4729  ⟶wf 5329  (class class class)co 6028   ↑_𝑚 cmap 6860

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-13 2204  ax-14 2205  ax-ext 2213  ax-sep 4212  ax-nul 4220  ax-pow 4270  ax-pr 4305  ax-un 4536  ax-setind 4641

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1007  df-tru 1401  df-fal 1404  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1811  df-eu 2082  df-mo 2083  df-clab 2218  df-cleq 2224  df-clel 2227  df-nfc 2364  df-ne 2404  df-ral 2516  df-rex 2517  df-v 2805  df-sbc 3033  df-dif 3203  df-un 3205  df-in 3207  df-ss 3214  df-nul 3497  df-pw 3658  df-sn 3679  df-pr 3680  df-op 3682  df-uni 3899  df-br 4094  df-opab 4156  df-mpt 4157  df-id 4396  df-xp 4737  df-rel 4738  df-cnv 4739  df-co 4740  df-dm 4741  df-rn 4742  df-iota 5293  df-fun 5335  df-fn 5336  df-f 5337  df-fv 5341  df-ov 6031  df-oprab 6032  df-mpo 6033  df-map 6862

This theorem is referenced by:  map0  6901