Theorem map0g 6935

Description: Set exponentiation is empty iff the base is empty and the exponent is not empty. Theorem 97 of [Suppes] p. 89. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 30-Apr-2015.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
map0g	⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)))

Proof of Theorem map0g

Dummy variable 𝑓 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		fconst6g 5571	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐵 × {𝑓}):𝐵⟶𝐴)
2		elmapg 6908	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐵 × {𝑓}) ∈ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ↔ (𝐵 × {𝑓}):𝐵⟶𝐴))
3	1, 2	imbitrrid 156	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐵 × {𝑓}) ∈ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵)))
4		ne0i 3519	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐵 × {𝑓}) ∈ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ≠ ∅)
5	3, 4	syl6 33	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ≠ ∅))
6	5	exlimdv 1868	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ≠ ∅))
7	6	necon2bd 2472	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅ → ¬ ∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ 𝐴))
8		notm0 3533	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ ∃𝑓 𝑓 ∈ 𝐴 ↔ 𝐴 = ∅)
9	7, 8	imbitrdi 161	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅ → 𝐴 = ∅))
10		f0 5563	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ∅:∅⟶𝐴
11		feq2 5497	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝐵 = ∅ → (∅:𝐵⟶𝐴 ↔ ∅:∅⟶𝐴))
12	10, 11	mpbiri 168	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐵 = ∅ → ∅:𝐵⟶𝐴)
13		elmapg 6908	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (∅ ∈ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ↔ ∅:𝐵⟶𝐴))
14	12, 13	imbitrrid 156	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 = ∅ → ∅ ∈ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵)))
15		ne0i 3519	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∅ ∈ (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ≠ ∅)
16	14, 15	syl6 33	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐵 = ∅ → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) ≠ ∅))
17	16	necon2d 2473	. . 3 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅ → 𝐵 ≠ ∅))
18	9, 17	jcad 307	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅ → (𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)))
19		oveq1 6065	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐴 = ∅ → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = (∅ ↑𝑚 𝐵))
20		map0b 6934	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐵 ≠ ∅ → (∅ ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅)
21	19, 20	sylan9eq 2287	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅) → (𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅)
22	18, 21	impbid1 142	1 ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → ((𝐴 ↑𝑚 𝐵) = ∅ ↔ (𝐴 = ∅ ∧ 𝐵 ≠ ∅)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 104   ↔ wb 105   = wceq 1398  ∃wex 1541   ∈ wcel 2205   ≠ wne 2414  ∅c0 3512  {csn 3694   × cxp 4752  ⟶wf 5353  (class class class)co 6058   ↑_𝑚 cmap 6895

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-ia1 106  ax-ia2 107  ax-ia3 108  ax-in1 619  ax-in2 620  ax-io 717  ax-5 1496  ax-7 1497  ax-gen 1498  ax-ie1 1542  ax-ie2 1543  ax-8 1553  ax-10 1554  ax-11 1555  ax-i12 1556  ax-bndl 1558  ax-4 1559  ax-17 1575  ax-i9 1579  ax-ial 1583  ax-i5r 1584  ax-13 2207  ax-14 2208  ax-ext 2216  ax-sep 4233  ax-nul 4241  ax-pow 4292  ax-pr 4327  ax-un 4559  ax-setind 4664

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 117  df-3an 1007  df-tru 1401  df-fal 1404  df-nf 1510  df-sb 1812  df-eu 2085  df-mo 2086  df-clab 2221  df-cleq 2227  df-clel 2230  df-nfc 2375  df-ne 2415  df-ral 2527  df-rex 2528  df-v 2817  df-sbc 3046  df-dif 3216  df-un 3218  df-in 3220  df-ss 3227  df-nul 3513  df-pw 3676  df-sn 3700  df-pr 3701  df-op 3703  df-uni 3920  df-br 4115  df-opab 4177  df-mpt 4178  df-id 4419  df-xp 4760  df-rel 4761  df-cnv 4762  df-co 4763  df-dm 4764  df-rn 4765  df-iota 5317  df-fun 5359  df-fn 5360  df-f 5361  df-fv 5365  df-ov 6061  df-oprab 6062  df-mpo 6063  df-map 6897

This theorem is referenced by:  map0  6937