Theorem dicvalrelN 39199

Description: The value of partial isomorphism C is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dicvalrel.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)
dicvalrel.i	⊢ 𝐼 = ((DIsoC‘𝐾)‘𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dicvalrelN	⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → Rel (𝐼‘𝑋))

Proof of Theorem dicvalrelN

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 𝑝 𝑠 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relopabv 5731	. . . 4 ⊢ Rel {⟨𝑓, 𝑠⟩ ∣ (𝑓 = (𝑠‘(℩𝑔 ∈ ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)(𝑔‘((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊)) = 𝑋)) ∧ 𝑠 ∈ ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊))}
2		eqid 2738	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (le‘𝐾) = (le‘𝐾)
3		eqid 2738	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Atoms‘𝐾) = (Atoms‘𝐾)
4		dicvalrel.h	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)
5		dicvalrel.i	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝐼 = ((DIsoC‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
6	2, 3, 4, 5	dicdmN 39198	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → dom 𝐼 = {𝑝 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∣ ¬ 𝑝(le‘𝐾)𝑊})
7	6	eleq2d 2824	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 ↔ 𝑋 ∈ {𝑝 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∣ ¬ 𝑝(le‘𝐾)𝑊}))
8		breq1 5077	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝑋 → (𝑝(le‘𝐾)𝑊 ↔ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊))
9	8	notbid 318	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝑋 → (¬ 𝑝(le‘𝐾)𝑊 ↔ ¬ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊))
10	9	elrab 3624	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ {𝑝 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∣ ¬ 𝑝(le‘𝐾)𝑊} ↔ (𝑋 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∧ ¬ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊))
11	7, 10	bitrdi 287	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 ↔ (𝑋 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∧ ¬ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊)))
12	11	biimpa 477	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼) → (𝑋 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∧ ¬ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊))
13		eqid 2738	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊) = ((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
14		eqid 2738	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
15		eqid 2738	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊) = ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
16	2, 3, 4, 13, 14, 15, 5	dicval 39190	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∧ ¬ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊)) → (𝐼‘𝑋) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑠⟩ ∣ (𝑓 = (𝑠‘(℩𝑔 ∈ ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)(𝑔‘((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊)) = 𝑋)) ∧ 𝑠 ∈ ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊))})
17	12, 16	syldan 591	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼) → (𝐼‘𝑋) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑠⟩ ∣ (𝑓 = (𝑠‘(℩𝑔 ∈ ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)(𝑔‘((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊)) = 𝑋)) ∧ 𝑠 ∈ ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊))})
18	17	releqd 5689	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼) → (Rel (𝐼‘𝑋) ↔ Rel {⟨𝑓, 𝑠⟩ ∣ (𝑓 = (𝑠‘(℩𝑔 ∈ ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)(𝑔‘((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊)) = 𝑋)) ∧ 𝑠 ∈ ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊))}))
19	1, 18	mpbiri 257	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼) → Rel (𝐼‘𝑋))
20	19	ex 413	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 → Rel (𝐼‘𝑋)))
21		rel0 5709	. . 3 ⊢ Rel ∅
22		ndmfv 6804	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 → (𝐼‘𝑋) = ∅)
23	22	releqd 5689	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 → (Rel (𝐼‘𝑋) ↔ Rel ∅))
24	21, 23	mpbiri 257	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 → Rel (𝐼‘𝑋))
25	20, 24	pm2.61d1 180	1 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → Rel (𝐼‘𝑋))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2106  {crab 3068  ∅c0 4256   class class class wbr 5074  {copab 5136  dom cdm 5589  Rel wrel 5594  ‘cfv 6433  ℩crio 7231  lecple 16969  occoc 16970  Atomscatm 37277  LHypclh 37998  LTrncltrn 38115  TEndoctendo 38766  DIsoCcdic 39186

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1798  ax-4 1812  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5209  ax-sep 5223  ax-nul 5230  ax-pow 5288  ax-pr 5352  ax-un 7588

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 845  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1783  df-nf 1787  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2816  df-nfc 2889  df-ne 2944  df-ral 3069  df-rex 3070  df-reu 3072  df-rab 3073  df-v 3434  df-sbc 3717  df-csb 3833  df-dif 3890  df-un 3892  df-in 3894  df-ss 3904  df-nul 4257  df-if 4460  df-pw 4535  df-sn 4562  df-pr 4564  df-op 4568  df-uni 4840  df-iun 4926  df-br 5075  df-opab 5137  df-mpt 5158  df-id 5489  df-xp 5595  df-rel 5596  df-cnv 5597  df-co 5598  df-dm 5599  df-rn 5600  df-res 5601  df-ima 5602  df-iota 6391  df-fun 6435  df-fn 6436  df-f 6437  df-f1 6438  df-fo 6439  df-f1o 6440  df-fv 6441  df-riota 7232  df-dic 39187

This theorem is referenced by: (None)