Theorem dicvalrelN 41590

Description: The value of partial isomorphism C is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dicvalrel.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)
dicvalrel.i	⊢ 𝐼 = ((DIsoC‘𝐾)‘𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dicvalrelN	⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → Rel (𝐼‘𝑋))

Proof of Theorem dicvalrelN

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 𝑝 𝑠 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relopabv 5780	. . . 4 ⊢ Rel {⟨𝑓, 𝑠⟩ ∣ (𝑓 = (𝑠‘(℩𝑔 ∈ ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)(𝑔‘((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊)) = 𝑋)) ∧ 𝑠 ∈ ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊))}
2		eqid 2737	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (le‘𝐾) = (le‘𝐾)
3		eqid 2737	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Atoms‘𝐾) = (Atoms‘𝐾)
4		dicvalrel.h	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)
5		dicvalrel.i	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝐼 = ((DIsoC‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
6	2, 3, 4, 5	dicdmN 41589	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → dom 𝐼 = {𝑝 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∣ ¬ 𝑝(le‘𝐾)𝑊})
7	6	eleq2d 2823	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 ↔ 𝑋 ∈ {𝑝 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∣ ¬ 𝑝(le‘𝐾)𝑊}))
8		breq1 5103	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝑋 → (𝑝(le‘𝐾)𝑊 ↔ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊))
9	8	notbid 318	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝑋 → (¬ 𝑝(le‘𝐾)𝑊 ↔ ¬ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊))
10	9	elrab 3648	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ {𝑝 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∣ ¬ 𝑝(le‘𝐾)𝑊} ↔ (𝑋 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∧ ¬ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊))
11	7, 10	bitrdi 287	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 ↔ (𝑋 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∧ ¬ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊)))
12	11	biimpa 476	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼) → (𝑋 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∧ ¬ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊))
13		eqid 2737	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊) = ((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
14		eqid 2737	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
15		eqid 2737	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊) = ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
16	2, 3, 4, 13, 14, 15, 5	dicval 41581	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∧ ¬ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊)) → (𝐼‘𝑋) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑠⟩ ∣ (𝑓 = (𝑠‘(℩𝑔 ∈ ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)(𝑔‘((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊)) = 𝑋)) ∧ 𝑠 ∈ ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊))})
17	12, 16	syldan 592	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼) → (𝐼‘𝑋) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑠⟩ ∣ (𝑓 = (𝑠‘(℩𝑔 ∈ ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)(𝑔‘((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊)) = 𝑋)) ∧ 𝑠 ∈ ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊))})
18	17	releqd 5738	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼) → (Rel (𝐼‘𝑋) ↔ Rel {⟨𝑓, 𝑠⟩ ∣ (𝑓 = (𝑠‘(℩𝑔 ∈ ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)(𝑔‘((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊)) = 𝑋)) ∧ 𝑠 ∈ ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊))}))
19	1, 18	mpbiri 258	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼) → Rel (𝐼‘𝑋))
20	19	ex 412	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 → Rel (𝐼‘𝑋)))
21		rel0 5758	. . 3 ⊢ Rel ∅
22		ndmfv 6876	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 → (𝐼‘𝑋) = ∅)
23	22	releqd 5738	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 → (Rel (𝐼‘𝑋) ↔ Rel ∅))
24	21, 23	mpbiri 258	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 → Rel (𝐼‘𝑋))
25	20, 24	pm2.61d1 180	1 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → Rel (𝐼‘𝑋))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1542   ∈ wcel 2114  {crab 3401  ∅c0 4287   class class class wbr 5100  {copab 5162  dom cdm 5634  Rel wrel 5639  ‘cfv 6502  ℩crio 7326  lecple 17198  occoc 17199  Atomscatm 39668  LHypclh 40389  LTrncltrn 40506  TEndoctendo 41157  DIsoCcdic 41577

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1912  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2010  ax-8 2116  ax-9 2124  ax-10 2147  ax-11 2163  ax-12 2185  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5226  ax-sep 5245  ax-nul 5255  ax-pow 5314  ax-pr 5381  ax-un 7692

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 849  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1545  df-fal 1555  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2570  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2729  df-clel 2812  df-nfc 2886  df-ne 2934  df-ral 3053  df-rex 3063  df-reu 3353  df-rab 3402  df-v 3444  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-dif 3906  df-un 3908  df-in 3910  df-ss 3920  df-nul 4288  df-if 4482  df-pw 4558  df-sn 4583  df-pr 4585  df-op 4589  df-uni 4866  df-iun 4950  df-br 5101  df-opab 5163  df-mpt 5182  df-id 5529  df-xp 5640  df-rel 5641  df-cnv 5642  df-co 5643  df-dm 5644  df-rn 5645  df-res 5646  df-ima 5647  df-iota 6458  df-fun 6504  df-fn 6505  df-f 6506  df-f1 6507  df-fo 6508  df-f1o 6509  df-fv 6510  df-riota 7327  df-dic 41578

This theorem is referenced by: (None)