Theorem dicvalrelN 41814

Description: The value of partial isomorphism C is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dicvalrel.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)
dicvalrel.i	⊢ 𝐼 = ((DIsoC‘𝐾)‘𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dicvalrelN	⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → Rel (𝐼‘𝑋))

Proof of Theorem dicvalrelN

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 𝑝 𝑠 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relopabv 5796	. . . 4 ⊢ Rel {⟨𝑓, 𝑠⟩ ∣ (𝑓 = (𝑠‘(℩𝑔 ∈ ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)(𝑔‘((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊)) = 𝑋)) ∧ 𝑠 ∈ ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊))}
2		eqid 2764	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (le‘𝐾) = (le‘𝐾)
3		eqid 2764	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Atoms‘𝐾) = (Atoms‘𝐾)
4		dicvalrel.h	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)
5		dicvalrel.i	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝐼 = ((DIsoC‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
6	2, 3, 4, 5	dicdmN 41813	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → dom 𝐼 = {𝑝 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∣ ¬ 𝑝(le‘𝐾)𝑊})
7	6	eleq2d 2850	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 ↔ 𝑋 ∈ {𝑝 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∣ ¬ 𝑝(le‘𝐾)𝑊}))
8		breq1 5105	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝑋 → (𝑝(le‘𝐾)𝑊 ↔ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊))
9	8	notbid 320	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝑋 → (¬ 𝑝(le‘𝐾)𝑊 ↔ ¬ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊))
10	9	elrab 3652	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ {𝑝 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∣ ¬ 𝑝(le‘𝐾)𝑊} ↔ (𝑋 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∧ ¬ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊))
11	7, 10	bitrdi 289	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 ↔ (𝑋 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∧ ¬ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊)))
12	11	biimpa 480	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼) → (𝑋 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∧ ¬ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊))
13		eqid 2764	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊) = ((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
14		eqid 2764	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
15		eqid 2764	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊) = ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
16	2, 3, 4, 13, 14, 15, 5	dicval 41805	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∧ ¬ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊)) → (𝐼‘𝑋) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑠⟩ ∣ (𝑓 = (𝑠‘(℩𝑔 ∈ ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)(𝑔‘((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊)) = 𝑋)) ∧ 𝑠 ∈ ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊))})
17	12, 16	syldan 600	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼) → (𝐼‘𝑋) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑠⟩ ∣ (𝑓 = (𝑠‘(℩𝑔 ∈ ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)(𝑔‘((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊)) = 𝑋)) ∧ 𝑠 ∈ ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊))})
18	17	releqd 5753	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼) → (Rel (𝐼‘𝑋) ↔ Rel {⟨𝑓, 𝑠⟩ ∣ (𝑓 = (𝑠‘(℩𝑔 ∈ ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)(𝑔‘((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊)) = 𝑋)) ∧ 𝑠 ∈ ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊))}))
19	1, 18	mpbiri 260	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼) → Rel (𝐼‘𝑋))
20	19	ex 416	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 → Rel (𝐼‘𝑋)))
21		rel0 5773	. . 3 ⊢ Rel ∅
22		ndmfv 6901	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 → (𝐼‘𝑋) = ∅)
23	22	releqd 5753	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 → (Rel (𝐼‘𝑋) ↔ Rel ∅))
24	21, 23	mpbiri 260	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 → Rel (𝐼‘𝑋))
25	20, 24	pm2.61d1 181	1 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → Rel (𝐼‘𝑋))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 399   = wceq 1562   ∈ wcel 2144  {crab 3416  ∅c0 4287   class class class wbr 5102  {copab 5164  dom cdm 5649  Rel wrel 5654  ‘cfv 6523  ℩crio 7354  lecple 17295  occoc 17296  Atomscatm 39892  LHypclh 40613  LTrncltrn 40730  TEndoctendo 41381  DIsoCcdic 41801

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1817  ax-4 1831  ax-5 1932  ax-6 1989  ax-7 2030  ax-8 2146  ax-9 2154  ax-10 2177  ax-11 2193  ax-12 2214  ax-ext 2736  ax-rep 5229  ax-sep 5248  ax-nul 5258  ax-pow 5324  ax-pr 5392  ax-un 7720

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 209  df-an 400  df-or 859  df-3an 1101  df-tru 1565  df-fal 1575  df-ex 1802  df-nf 1806  df-sb 2093  df-mo 2568  df-eu 2598  df-clab 2743  df-cleq 2756  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3458  df-sbc 3747  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4483  df-pw 4559  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-iun 4953  df-br 5103  df-opab 5165  df-mpt 5184  df-id 5544  df-xp 5655  df-rel 5656  df-cnv 5657  df-co 5658  df-dm 5659  df-rn 5660  df-res 5661  df-ima 5662  df-iota 6479  df-fun 6525  df-fn 6526  df-f 6527  df-f1 6528  df-fo 6529  df-f1o 6530  df-fv 6531  df-riota 7355  df-dic 41802

This theorem is referenced by: (None)