Theorem dicvalrelN 40359

Description: The value of partial isomorphism C is a relation. (Contributed by NM, 8-Mar-2014.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
dicvalrel.h	⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)
dicvalrel.i	⊢ 𝐼 = ((DIsoC‘𝐾)‘𝑊)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
dicvalrelN	⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → Rel (𝐼‘𝑋))

Proof of Theorem dicvalrelN

Dummy variables 𝑓 𝑔 𝑝 𝑠 are mutually distinct and distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		relopabv 5820	. . . 4 ⊢ Rel {⟨𝑓, 𝑠⟩ ∣ (𝑓 = (𝑠‘(℩𝑔 ∈ ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)(𝑔‘((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊)) = 𝑋)) ∧ 𝑠 ∈ ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊))}
2		eqid 2730	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (le‘𝐾) = (le‘𝐾)
3		eqid 2730	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (Atoms‘𝐾) = (Atoms‘𝐾)
4		dicvalrel.h	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝐻 = (LHyp‘𝐾)
5		dicvalrel.i	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ 𝐼 = ((DIsoC‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
6	2, 3, 4, 5	dicdmN 40358	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → dom 𝐼 = {𝑝 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∣ ¬ 𝑝(le‘𝐾)𝑊})
7	6	eleq2d 2817	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 ↔ 𝑋 ∈ {𝑝 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∣ ¬ 𝑝(le‘𝐾)𝑊}))
8		breq1 5150	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝑋 → (𝑝(le‘𝐾)𝑊 ↔ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊))
9	8	notbid 317	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑝 = 𝑋 → (¬ 𝑝(le‘𝐾)𝑊 ↔ ¬ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊))
10	9	elrab 3682	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑋 ∈ {𝑝 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∣ ¬ 𝑝(le‘𝐾)𝑊} ↔ (𝑋 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∧ ¬ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊))
11	7, 10	bitrdi 286	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 ↔ (𝑋 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∧ ¬ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊)))
12	11	biimpa 475	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼) → (𝑋 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∧ ¬ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊))
13		eqid 2730	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊) = ((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
14		eqid 2730	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊) = ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
15		eqid 2730	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊) = ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊)
16	2, 3, 4, 13, 14, 15, 5	dicval 40350	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ (𝑋 ∈ (Atoms‘𝐾) ∧ ¬ 𝑋(le‘𝐾)𝑊)) → (𝐼‘𝑋) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑠⟩ ∣ (𝑓 = (𝑠‘(℩𝑔 ∈ ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)(𝑔‘((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊)) = 𝑋)) ∧ 𝑠 ∈ ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊))})
17	12, 16	syldan 589	. . . . 5 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼) → (𝐼‘𝑋) = {⟨𝑓, 𝑠⟩ ∣ (𝑓 = (𝑠‘(℩𝑔 ∈ ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)(𝑔‘((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊)) = 𝑋)) ∧ 𝑠 ∈ ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊))})
18	17	releqd 5777	. . . 4 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼) → (Rel (𝐼‘𝑋) ↔ Rel {⟨𝑓, 𝑠⟩ ∣ (𝑓 = (𝑠‘(℩𝑔 ∈ ((LTrn‘𝐾)‘𝑊)(𝑔‘((oc‘𝐾)‘𝑊)) = 𝑋)) ∧ 𝑠 ∈ ((TEndo‘𝐾)‘𝑊))}))
19	1, 18	mpbiri 257	. . 3 ⊢ (((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) ∧ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼) → Rel (𝐼‘𝑋))
20	19	ex 411	. 2 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → (𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 → Rel (𝐼‘𝑋)))
21		rel0 5798	. . 3 ⊢ Rel ∅
22		ndmfv 6925	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 → (𝐼‘𝑋) = ∅)
23	22	releqd 5777	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 → (Rel (𝐼‘𝑋) ↔ Rel ∅))
24	21, 23	mpbiri 257	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝑋 ∈ dom 𝐼 → Rel (𝐼‘𝑋))
25	20, 24	pm2.61d1 180	1 ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐻) → Rel (𝐼‘𝑋))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 394   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2104  {crab 3430  ∅c0 4321   class class class wbr 5147  {copab 5209  dom cdm 5675  Rel wrel 5680  ‘cfv 6542  ℩crio 7366  lecple 17208  occoc 17209  Atomscatm 38436  LHypclh 39158  LTrncltrn 39275  TEndoctendo 39926  DIsoCcdic 40346

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1911  ax-6 1969  ax-7 2009  ax-8 2106  ax-9 2114  ax-10 2135  ax-11 2152  ax-12 2169  ax-ext 2701  ax-rep 5284  ax-sep 5298  ax-nul 5305  ax-pow 5362  ax-pr 5426  ax-un 7727

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 395  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2532  df-eu 2561  df-clab 2708  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2808  df-nfc 2883  df-ne 2939  df-ral 3060  df-rex 3069  df-reu 3375  df-rab 3431  df-v 3474  df-sbc 3777  df-csb 3893  df-dif 3950  df-un 3952  df-in 3954  df-ss 3964  df-nul 4322  df-if 4528  df-pw 4603  df-sn 4628  df-pr 4630  df-op 4634  df-uni 4908  df-iun 4998  df-br 5148  df-opab 5210  df-mpt 5231  df-id 5573  df-xp 5681  df-rel 5682  df-cnv 5683  df-co 5684  df-dm 5685  df-rn 5686  df-res 5687  df-ima 5688  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6544  df-fn 6545  df-f 6546  df-f1 6547  df-fo 6548  df-f1o 6549  df-fv 6550  df-riota 7367  df-dic 40347

This theorem is referenced by: (None)