P. 404 of Theorem List - Metamath Proof Explorer

Theorem List for Metamath Proof Explorer - 40301-40400   *Has distinct variable group(s)

Type	Label	Description
Statement
Theorem	re1m1e0m0 40301	Equality of two left-additive identities. See resubidaddid1 40299. Uses ax-i2m1 10870. (Contributed by SN, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (1 −ℝ 1) = (0 −ℝ 0)
Theorem	sn-00idlem1 40302	Lemma for sn-00id 40305. (Contributed by SN, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 · (0 −ℝ 0)) = (𝐴 −ℝ 𝐴))
Theorem	sn-00idlem2 40303	Lemma for sn-00id 40305. (Contributed by SN, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ((0 −ℝ 0) ≠ 0 → (0 −ℝ 0) = 1)
Theorem	sn-00idlem3 40304	Lemma for sn-00id 40305. (Contributed by SN, 25-Dec-2023.)
⊢ ((0 −ℝ 0) = 1 → (0 + 0) = 0)
Theorem	sn-00id 40305	00id 11080 proven without ax-mulcom 10866 but using ax-1ne0 10871. (Though note that the current version of 00id 11080 can be changed to avoid ax-icn 10861, ax-addcl 10862, ax-mulcl 10864, ax-i2m1 10870, ax-cnre 10875. Most of this is by using 0cnALT3 40211 instead of 0cn 10898). (Contributed by SN, 25-Dec-2023.) (Proof modification is discouraged.)
⊢ (0 + 0) = 0
Theorem	re0m0e0 40306	Real number version of 0m0e0 12023 proven without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (0 −ℝ 0) = 0
Theorem	readdid2 40307	Real number version of addid2 11088. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	sn-addid2 40308	addid2 11088 without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (0 + 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	remul02 40309	Real number version of mul02 11083 proven without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (0 · 𝐴) = 0)
Theorem	sn-0ne2 40310	0ne2 12110 without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.)
⊢ 0 ≠ 2
Theorem	remul01 40311	Real number version of mul01 11084 proven without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 · 0) = 0)
Theorem	resubid 40312	Subtraction of a real number from itself (compare subid 11170). (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 −ℝ 𝐴) = 0)
Theorem	readdid1 40313	Real number version of addid1 11085, without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴)
Theorem	resubid1 40314	Real number version of subid1 11171, without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 23-Jan-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 −ℝ 0) = 𝐴)
Theorem	renegneg 40315	A real number is equal to the negative of its negative. Compare negneg 11201. (Contributed by SN, 13-Feb-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (0 −ℝ (0 −ℝ 𝐴)) = 𝐴)
Theorem	readdcan2 40316	Commuted version of readdcan 11079 without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 21-Feb-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℝ) → ((𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	renegid2 40317	Commuted version of renegid 40277. (Contributed by SN, 4-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → ((0 −ℝ 𝐴) + 𝐴) = 0)
Theorem	sn-it0e0 40318	Proof of it0e0 12125 without ax-mulcom 10866. Informally, a real number times 0 is 0, and ∃𝑟 ∈ ℝ𝑟 = i · 𝑠 by ax-cnre 10875 and renegid2 40317. (Contributed by SN, 30-Apr-2024.)
⊢ (i · 0) = 0
Theorem	sn-negex12 40319*	A combination of cnegex 11086 and cnegex2 11087, this proof takes cnre 10903 𝐴 = 𝑟 + i · 𝑠 and shows that i · -𝑠 + -𝑟 is both a left and right inverse. (Contributed by SN, 5-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑏 ∈ ℂ ((𝐴 + 𝑏) = 0 ∧ (𝑏 + 𝐴) = 0))
Theorem	sn-negex 40320*	Proof of cnegex 11086 without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 30-Apr-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑏 ∈ ℂ (𝐴 + 𝑏) = 0)
Theorem	sn-negex2 40321*	Proof of cnegex2 11087 without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 5-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → ∃𝑏 ∈ ℂ (𝑏 + 𝐴) = 0)
Theorem	sn-addcand 40322	addcand 11108 without ax-mulcom 10866. Note how the proof is almost identical to addcan 11089. (Contributed by SN, 5-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐵) = (𝐴 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐵 = 𝐶))
Theorem	sn-addid1 40323	addid1 11085 without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 5-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 + 0) = 𝐴)
Theorem	sn-addcan2d 40324	addcan2d 11109 without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 5-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 + 𝐶) = (𝐵 + 𝐶) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	reixi 40325	ixi 11534 without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 5-May-2024.)
⊢ (i · i) = (0 −ℝ 1)
Theorem	rei4 40326	i4 13849 without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 27-May-2024.)
⊢ ((i · i) · (i · i)) = 1
Theorem	sn-addid0 40327	A number that sums to itself is zero. Compare addid0 11324, readdid1addid2d 40215. (Contributed by SN, 5-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐴) = 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 = 0)
Theorem	sn-mul01 40328	mul01 11084 without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 5-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (𝐴 · 0) = 0)
Theorem	sn-subeu 40329*	negeu 11141 without ax-mulcom 10866 and complex number version of resubeu 40281. (Contributed by SN, 5-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ ℂ (𝐴 + 𝑥) = 𝐵)
Theorem	sn-subcl 40330	subcl 11150 without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 5-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℂ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℂ) → (𝐴 − 𝐵) ∈ ℂ)
Theorem	sn-subf 40331	subf 11153 without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 5-May-2024.)
⊢ − :(ℂ × ℂ)⟶ℂ
Theorem	resubeqsub 40332	Equivalence between real subtraction and subtraction. (Contributed by SN, 5-May-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 −ℝ 𝐵) = (𝐴 − 𝐵))
Theorem	subresre 40333	Subtraction restricted to the reals. (Contributed by SN, 5-May-2024.)
⊢ −ℝ = ( − ↾ (ℝ × ℝ))
Theorem	addinvcom 40334	A number commutes with its additive inverse. Compare remulinvcom 40335. (Contributed by SN, 5-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 + 𝐵) = 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 + 𝐴) = 0)
Theorem	remulinvcom 40335	A left multiplicative inverse is a right multiplicative inverse. Proven without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 5-Feb-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) = 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 · 𝐴) = 1)
Theorem	remulid2 40336	Commuted version of ax-1rid 10872 without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 5-Feb-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (1 · 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	sn-1ticom 40337	Lemma for sn-mulid2 40338 and it1ei 40339. (Contributed by SN, 27-May-2024.)
⊢ (1 · i) = (i · 1)
Theorem	sn-mulid2 40338	mulid2 10905 without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 27-May-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (1 · 𝐴) = 𝐴)
Theorem	it1ei 40339	1 is a multiplicative identity for i (see sn-mulid2 40338 for commuted version). (Contributed by SN, 1-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (i · 1) = i
Theorem	ipiiie0 40340	The multiplicative inverse of i (per i4 13849) is also its additive inverse. (Contributed by SN, 30-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (i + (i · (i · i))) = 0
Theorem	remulcand 40341	Commuted version of remulcan2d 40214 without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 21-Feb-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 · 𝐴) = (𝐶 · 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 = 𝐵))
Theorem	sn-0tie0 40342	Lemma for sn-mul02 40343. Commuted version of sn-it0e0 40318. (Contributed by SN, 30-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (0 · i) = 0
Theorem	sn-mul02 40343	mul02 11083 without ax-mulcom 10866. See https://github.com/icecream17/Stuff/blob/main/math/0A%3D0.md 10866 for an outline. (Contributed by SN, 30-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℂ → (0 · 𝐴) = 0)
Theorem	sn-ltaddpos 40344	ltaddpos 11395 without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 13-Feb-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (0 < 𝐴 ↔ 𝐵 < (𝐵 + 𝐴)))
Theorem	reposdif 40345	Comparison of two numbers whose difference is positive. Compare posdif 11398. (Contributed by SN, 13-Feb-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ ℝ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℝ) → (𝐴 < 𝐵 ↔ 0 < (𝐵 −ℝ 𝐴)))
Theorem	relt0neg1 40346	Comparison of a real and its negative to zero. Compare lt0neg1 11411. (Contributed by SN, 13-Feb-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (𝐴 < 0 ↔ 0 < (0 −ℝ 𝐴)))
Theorem	relt0neg2 40347	Comparison of a real and its negative to zero. Compare lt0neg2 11412. (Contributed by SN, 13-Feb-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → (0 < 𝐴 ↔ (0 −ℝ 𝐴) < 0))
Theorem	mulgt0con1dlem 40348	Lemma for mulgt0con1d 40349. Contraposes a positive deduction to a negative deduction. (Contributed by SN, 26-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0 < 𝐴 → 0 < 𝐵))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 = 0 → 𝐵 = 0))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 < 0 → 𝐴 < 0))
Theorem	mulgt0con1d 40349	Counterpart to mulgt0con2d 40350, though not a lemma of anything. This is the first use of ax-pre-mulgt0 10879. (Contributed by SN, 26-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) < 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 < 0)
Theorem	mulgt0con2d 40350	Lemma for mulgt0b2d 40351 and contrapositive of mulgt0 10983. (Contributed by SN, 26-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 · 𝐵) < 0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 < 0)
Theorem	mulgt0b2d 40351	Biconditional, deductive form of mulgt0 10983. The second factor is positive iff the product is. Note that the commuted form cannot be proven since resubdi 40300 does not have a commuted form. (Contributed by SN, 26-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐴)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (0 < 𝐵 ↔ 0 < (𝐴 · 𝐵)))
Theorem	sn-ltmul2d 40352	ltmul2d 12743 without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 26-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 0 < 𝐶)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐶 · 𝐴) < (𝐶 · 𝐵) ↔ 𝐴 < 𝐵))
Theorem	sn-0lt1 40353	0lt1 11427 without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 13-Feb-2024.)
⊢ 0 < 1
Theorem	sn-ltp1 40354	ltp1 11745 without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 13-Feb-2024.)
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ ℝ → 𝐴 < (𝐴 + 1))
Theorem	reneg1lt0 40355	Lemma for sn-inelr 40356. (Contributed by SN, 1-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (0 −ℝ 1) < 0
Theorem	sn-inelr 40356	inelr 11893 without ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 1-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ¬ i ∈ ℝ
Theorem	itrere 40357	i times a real is real iff the real is zero. (Contributed by SN, 27-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ ℝ → ((i · 𝑅) ∈ ℝ ↔ 𝑅 = 0))
Theorem	retire 40358	Commuted version of itrere 40357. (Contributed by SN, 27-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (𝑅 ∈ ℝ → ((𝑅 · i) ∈ ℝ ↔ 𝑅 = 0))
Theorem	cnreeu 40359	The reals in the expression given by cnre 10903 uniquely define a complex number. (Contributed by SN, 27-Jun-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑟 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑠 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑡 ∈ ℝ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑢 ∈ ℝ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝑟 + (i · 𝑠)) = (𝑡 + (i · 𝑢)) ↔ (𝑟 = 𝑡 ∧ 𝑠 = 𝑢)))
Theorem	sn-sup2 40360*	sup2 11861 with exactly the same proof except for using sn-ltp1 40354 instead of ltp1 11745, saving ax-mulcom 10866. (Contributed by SN, 26-Jun-2024.)
⊢ ((𝐴 ⊆ ℝ ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑦 < 𝑥 ∨ 𝑦 = 𝑥)) → ∃𝑥 ∈ ℝ (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ¬ 𝑥 < 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℝ (𝑦 < 𝑥 → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 𝑦 < 𝑧)))
20.26.7  Projective spaces Looking at a corner in 3D space, one can see three right angles. It is impossible to draw three lines in 2D space such that any two of these lines are perpendicular, but a good enough representation is made by casting lines from the 2D surface. Points along the same cast line are collapsed into one point on the 2D surface. In many cases, the 2D surface is smaller than whatever needs to be represented. If the lines cast were perpendicular to the 2D surface, then only areas as small as the 2D surface could be represented. To fix this, the lines need to get further apart as they go farther from the 2D surface. On the other side of the 2D surface the lines will get closer together and intersect at a point. (Because it's defined that way). From this perspective, two parallel lines in 3D space will be represented by two lines that seem to intersect at a point "at infinity". Considering all maximal classes of parallel lines on a 2D plane in 3D space, these classes will all appear to intersect at different points at infinity, forming a line at infinity. Therefore the real projective plane can be thought of as the real affine plane together with the line at infinity. The projective plane takes care of some exceptions that may be found in the affine plane. For example, consider the curve that is the zeroes of 𝑦 = 𝑥↑2. Any line connecting the point (0, 1) to the x-axis intersects with the curve twice, except for the vertical line between (0, 1) and (0, 0). In the projective plane, the curve becomes an ellipse and there is no exception. While it may not seem like it, points at infinity and points corresponding to the affine plane are the same type of point. Consider a line going through the origin in 3D (affine) space. Either it intersects the plane 𝑧 = 1 once, or it is entirely within the plane 𝑧 = 0. If it is entirely within the plane 𝑧 = 0, then it corresponds to the point at infinity intersecting all lines on the plane 𝑧 = 1 with the same slope. Else it corresponds to the point in the 2D plane 𝑧 = 1 that it intersects. So there is a bijection between 3D lines through the origin and points on the real projective plane. The concept of projective spaces generalizes the projective plane to any dimension.
Syntax	cprjsp 40361	Extend class notation with the projective space function.
class ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛
Definition	df-prjsp 40362*	Define the projective space function. In the bijection between 3D lines through the origin and points in the projective plane (see section comment), this is equivalent to making any two 3D points (excluding the origin) equivalent iff one is a multiple of another. This definition does not quite give all the properties needed, since the scalars of a left vector space can be "less dense" than the vectors (for example, equivocating rational multiples of real numbers). Compare df-lsatoms 36917. (Contributed by BJ and SN, 29-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛 = (𝑣 ∈ LVec ↦ ⦋((Base‘𝑣) ∖ {(0g‘𝑣)}) / 𝑏⦌(𝑏 / {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑏) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑣))𝑥 = (𝑙( ·𝑠 ‘𝑣)𝑦))}))
Theorem	prjspval 40363*	Value of the projective space function, which is also known as the projectivization of 𝑉. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 29-Apr-2023.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ LVec → (ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛‘𝑉) = (𝐵 / {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}))
Theorem	prjsprel 40364*	Utility theorem regarding the relation used in ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 29-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑋 ∼ 𝑌 ↔ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑚 ∈ 𝐾 𝑋 = (𝑚 · 𝑌)))
Theorem	prjspertr 40365*	The relation in ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛 is transitive. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-May-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ LMod ∧ (𝑋 ∼ 𝑌 ∧ 𝑌 ∼ 𝑍)) → 𝑋 ∼ 𝑍)
Theorem	prjsperref 40366*	The relation in ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛 is reflexive. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 30-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ LMod → (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ↔ 𝑋 ∼ 𝑋))
Theorem	prjspersym 40367*	The relation in ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛 is symmetric. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-May-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝑋 ∼ 𝑌) → 𝑌 ∼ 𝑋)
Theorem	prjsper 40368*	The relation used to define ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛 is an equivalence relation. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-May-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ LVec → ∼ Er 𝐵)
Theorem	prjspreln0 40369*	Two nonzero vectors are equivalent by a nonzero scalar. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 31-May-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ LVec → (𝑋 ∼ 𝑌 ↔ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑚 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 })𝑋 = (𝑚 · 𝑌))))
Theorem	prjspvs 40370*	A nonzero multiple of a vector is equivalent to the vector. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 6-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑆)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑁 ∈ (𝐾 ∖ { 0 })) → (𝑁 · 𝑋) ∼ 𝑋)
Theorem	prjsprellsp 40371*	Two vectors are equivalent iff their spans are equal. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 31-May-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ LVec ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ∼ 𝑌 ↔ (𝑁‘{𝑋}) = (𝑁‘{𝑌})))
Theorem	prjspeclsp 40372*	The vectors equivalent to a vector 𝑋 are the nonzero vectors in the span of 𝑋. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 6-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝐾 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Scalar‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐾 = (Base‘𝑆)    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑉 ∈ LVec ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → [𝑋] ∼ = ((𝑁‘{𝑋}) ∖ {(0g‘𝑉)}))
Theorem	prjspval2 40373*	Alternate definition of projective space. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jun-2023.)
⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝑉)    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑉) ∖ { 0 })    &   ⊢ 𝑁 = (LSpan‘𝑉)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝑉 ∈ LVec → (ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛‘𝑉) = ∪ 𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 {((𝑁‘{𝑧}) ∖ { 0 })})
Syntax	cprjspn 40374	Extend class notation with the n-dimensional projective space function.
class ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛n
Definition	df-prjspn 40375*	Define the n-dimensional projective space function. A projective space of dimension 1 is a projective line, and a projective space of dimension 2 is a projective plane. Compare df-ehl 24455. This space is considered n-dimensional because the vector space (𝑘 freeLMod (0...𝑛)) is (n+1)-dimensional and the ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛 function returns equivalence classes with respect to a linear (1-dimensional) relation. (Contributed by BJ and Steven Nguyen, 29-Apr-2023.)
⊢ ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛n = (𝑛 ∈ ℕ0, 𝑘 ∈ DivRing ↦ (ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛‘(𝑘 freeLMod (0...𝑛))))
Theorem	prjspnval 40376	Value of the n-dimensional projective space function. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 1-May-2023.)
⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ DivRing) → (𝑁ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛n𝐾) = (ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛‘(𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))))
Theorem	prjspnerlem 40377*	A lemma showing that the equivalence relation used in prjspnval2 40378 and the equivalence relation used in prjspval 40363 are equal, but only with the antecedent 𝐾 ∈ DivRing. (Contributed by SN, 15-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ DivRing → ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ (Base‘(Scalar‘𝑊))𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))})
Theorem	prjspnval2 40378*	Value of the n-dimensional projective space function, expanded. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 15-Jul-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝑁 ∈ ℕ0 ∧ 𝐾 ∈ DivRing) → (𝑁ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛n𝐾) = (𝐵 / ∼ ))
Theorem	prjspner 40379*	The relation used to define ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛 (and indirectly ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛n through df-prjspn 40375) is an equivalence relation. This is a lemma that converts the equivalence relation used in results like prjspertr 40365 and prjspersym 40367 (see prjspnerlem 40377). Several theorems are covered in one thanks to the theorems around df-er 8456. (Contributed by SN, 14-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ∼ Er 𝐵)
Theorem	prjspnvs 40380*	A nonzero multiple of a vector is equivalent to the vector. This converts the equivalence relation used in prjspvs 40370 (see prjspnerlem 40377). (Contributed by SN, 8-Aug-2024.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ 𝑆)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ≠ 0 )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐶 · 𝑋) ∼ 𝑋)
Theorem	0prjspnlem 40381	Lemma for 0prjspn 40386. The given unit vector is a nonzero vector. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 16-Jul-2023.)
⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...0))    &   ⊢ 1 = ((𝐾 unitVec (0...0))‘0)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ DivRing → 1 ∈ 𝐵)
Theorem	prjspnfv01 40382*	Any vector is equivalent to a vector whose zeroth coordinate is 0 or 1 (proof of the value of the zeroth coordinate). (Contributed by SN, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑏‘0) = 0 , 𝑏, ((𝐼‘(𝑏‘0)) · 𝑏)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 1 = (1r‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐹‘𝑋)‘0) = if((𝑋‘0) = 0 , 0 , 1 ))
Theorem	prjspner01 40383*	Any vector is equivalent to a vector whose zeroth coordinate is 0 or 1 (proof of the equivalence). (Contributed by SN, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑏‘0) = 0 , 𝑏, ((𝐼‘(𝑏‘0)) · 𝑏)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∼ (𝐹‘𝑋))
Theorem	prjspner1 40384*	Two vectors whose zeroth coordinate is nonzero are equivalent if and only if they have the same representative in the (n-1)-dimensional affine subspace { x0 = 1 } . For example, vectors in 3D space whose 𝑥 coordinate is nonzero are equivalent iff they intersect at the plane 𝑥 = 1 at the same point (also see section header). (Contributed by SN, 13-Aug-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐹 = (𝑏 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ if((𝑏‘0) = 0 , 𝑏, ((𝐼‘(𝑏‘0)) · 𝑏)))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...𝑁))    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 0 = (0g‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝐼 = (invr‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ DivRing)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋‘0) ≠ 0 )    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌‘0) ≠ 0 )    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑋 ∼ 𝑌 ↔ (𝐹‘𝑋) = (𝐹‘𝑌)))
Theorem	0prjspnrel 40385*	In the zero-dimensional projective space, all vectors are equivalent to the unit vector. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 7-Jun-2023.)
⊢ ∼ = {⟨𝑥, 𝑦⟩ ∣ ((𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ ∃𝑙 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 = (𝑙 · 𝑦))}    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    &   ⊢ · = ( ·𝑠 ‘𝑊)    &   ⊢ 𝑆 = (Base‘𝐾)    &   ⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...0))    &   ⊢ 1 = ((𝐾 unitVec (0...0))‘0)    ⇒   ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ DivRing ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → 𝑋 ∼ 1 )
Theorem	0prjspn 40386	A zero-dimensional projective space has only 1 point. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 9-Jun-2023.)
⊢ 𝑊 = (𝐾 freeLMod (0...0))    &   ⊢ 𝐵 = ((Base‘𝑊) ∖ {(0g‘𝑊)})    ⇒   ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ DivRing → (0ℙ𝕣𝕠𝕛n𝐾) = {𝐵})
20.26.8  Basic reductions for Fermat's Last Theorem
Theorem	dffltz 40387*	Fermat's Last Theorem (FLT) for nonzero integers is equivalent to the original scope of natural numbers. The backwards direction takes (𝑎↑𝑛) + (𝑏↑𝑛) = (𝑐↑𝑛), and adds the negative of any negative term to both sides, thus creating the corresponding equation with only positive integers. There are six combinations of negativity, so the proof is particularly long. (Contributed by Steven Nguyen, 27-Feb-2023.)
⊢ (∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)∀𝑥 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑦 ∈ ℕ ∀𝑧 ∈ ℕ ((𝑥↑𝑛) + (𝑦↑𝑛)) ≠ (𝑧↑𝑛) ↔ ∀𝑛 ∈ (ℤ≥‘3)∀𝑎 ∈ (ℤ ∖ {0})∀𝑏 ∈ (ℤ ∖ {0})∀𝑐 ∈ (ℤ ∖ {0})((𝑎↑𝑛) + (𝑏↑𝑛)) ≠ (𝑐↑𝑛))
Theorem	fltmul 40388	A counterexample to FLT stays valid when scaled. The hypotheses are more general than they need to be for convenience. (There does not seem to be a standard term for Fermat or Pythagorean triples extended to any 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0, so the label is more about the context in which this theorem is used). (Contributed by SN, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝑆 · 𝐴)↑𝑁) + ((𝑆 · 𝐵)↑𝑁)) = ((𝑆 · 𝐶)↑𝑁))
Theorem	fltdiv 40389	A counterexample to FLT stays valid when scaled. The hypotheses are more general than they need to be for convenience. (Contributed by SN, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≠ 0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 / 𝑆)↑𝑁) + ((𝐵 / 𝑆)↑𝑁)) = ((𝐶 / 𝑆)↑𝑁))
Theorem	flt0 40390	A counterexample for FLT does not exist for 𝑁 = 0. (Contributed by SN, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℂ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)
Theorem	fltdvdsabdvdsc 40391	Any factor of both 𝐴 and 𝐵 also divides 𝐶. This establishes the validity of fltabcoprmex 40392. (Contributed by SN, 21-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) ∥ 𝐶)
Theorem	fltabcoprmex 40392	A counterexample to FLT implies a counterexample to FLT with 𝐴, 𝐵 (assigned to 𝐴 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) and 𝐵 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵)) coprime (by divgcdcoprm0 16298). (Contributed by SN, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (((𝐴 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵))↑𝑁) + ((𝐵 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵))↑𝑁)) = ((𝐶 / (𝐴 gcd 𝐵))↑𝑁))
Theorem	fltaccoprm 40393	A counterexample to FLT with 𝐴, 𝐵 coprime also has 𝐴, 𝐶 coprime. (Contributed by SN, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐶) = 1)
Theorem	fltbccoprm 40394	A counterexample to FLT with 𝐴, 𝐵 coprime also has 𝐵, 𝐶 coprime. Proven from fltaccoprm 40393 using commutativity of addition. (Contributed by SN, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ ℕ0)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐵 gcd 𝐶) = 1)
Theorem	fltabcoprm 40395	A counterexample to FLT with 𝐴, 𝐶 coprime also has 𝐴, 𝐵 coprime. Converse of fltaccoprm 40393. (Contributed by SN, 22-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐶) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = (𝐶↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1)
Theorem	infdesc 40396*	Infinite descent. The hypotheses say that 𝑆 is lower bounded, and that if 𝜓 holds for an integer in 𝑆, it holds for a smaller integer in 𝑆. By infinite descent, eventually we cannot go any smaller, therefore 𝜓 holds for no integer in 𝑆. (Contributed by SN, 20-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑥 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜒))    &   ⊢ (𝑦 = 𝑧 → (𝜓 ↔ 𝜃))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ (ℤ≥‘𝑀))    &   ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝜒)) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝑆 (𝜃 ∧ 𝑧 < 𝑥))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → {𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 ∣ 𝜓} = ∅)
Theorem	fltne 40397	If a counterexample to FLT exists, its addends are not equal. (Contributed by SN, 1-Jun-2023.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 ∈ (ℤ≥‘2))    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑𝑁) + (𝐵↑𝑁)) = (𝐶↑𝑁))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ≠ 𝐵)
Theorem	flt4lem 40398	Raising a number to the fourth power is equivalent to squaring it twice. (Contributed by SN, 21-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℂ)    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴↑4) = ((𝐴↑2)↑2))
Theorem	flt4lem1 40399	Satisfy the antecedent used in several pythagtrip 16463 lemmas, with 𝐴, 𝐶 coprime rather than 𝐴, 𝐵. (Contributed by SN, 21-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 ∥ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐶) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = (𝐶↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐵 ∈ ℕ ∧ 𝐶 ∈ ℕ) ∧ ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = (𝐶↑2) ∧ ((𝐴 gcd 𝐵) = 1 ∧ ¬ 2 ∥ 𝐴)))
Theorem	flt4lem2 40400	If 𝐴 is even, 𝐵 is odd. (Contributed by SN, 22-Aug-2024.)
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ ℕ)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → 2 ∥ 𝐴)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐴 gcd 𝐶) = 1)    &   ⊢ (𝜑 → ((𝐴↑2) + (𝐵↑2)) = (𝐶↑2))    ⇒   ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 2 ∥ 𝐵)