Theorem grpsubfvalALT 19052

Description: Shorter proof of grpsubfval 19051 using ax-rep 5239. (Contributed by NM, 31-Mar-2014.) (Revised by Stefan O'Rear, 27-Mar-2015.) (Proof shortened by AV, 19-Feb-2024.) (Proof modification is discouraged.) (New usage is discouraged.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
grpsubval.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
grpsubval.p	⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺)
grpsubval.i	⊢ 𝐼 = (invg‘𝐺)
grpsubval.m	⊢ − = (-g‘𝐺)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
grpsubfvalALT	⊢ − = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 + (𝐼‘𝑦)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐵   𝑥,𝐺,𝑦   𝑥,𝐼,𝑦   𝑥, + ,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   − (𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem grpsubfvalALT

Dummy variable 𝑔 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		grpsubval.m	. . 3 ⊢ − = (-g‘𝐺)
2		fveq2 6883	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (Base‘𝑔) = (Base‘𝐺))
3		grpsubval.b	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺)
4	2, 3	eqtr4di 2816	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (Base‘𝑔) = 𝐵)
5		fveq2 6883	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (+g‘𝑔) = (+g‘𝐺))
6		grpsubval.p	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ + = (+g‘𝐺)
7	5, 6	eqtr4di 2816	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (+g‘𝑔) = + )
8		eqidd 2764	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → 𝑥 = 𝑥)
9		fveq2 6883	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (invg‘𝑔) = (invg‘𝐺))
10		grpsubval.i	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝐼 = (invg‘𝐺)
11	9, 10	eqtr4di 2816	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (invg‘𝑔) = 𝐼)
12	11	fveq1d 6885	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → ((invg‘𝑔)‘𝑦) = (𝐼‘𝑦))
13	7, 8, 12	oveq123d 7433	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (𝑥(+g‘𝑔)((invg‘𝑔)‘𝑦)) = (𝑥 + (𝐼‘𝑦)))
14	4, 4, 13	mpoeq123dv 7487	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑔 = 𝐺 → (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑔), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝑔)((invg‘𝑔)‘𝑦))) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 + (𝐼‘𝑦))))
15		df-sbg 19006	. . . 4 ⊢ -g = (𝑔 ∈ V ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑔), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑔) ↦ (𝑥(+g‘𝑔)((invg‘𝑔)‘𝑦))))
16	3	fvexi 6897	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
17	16, 16	mpoex 8077	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 + (𝐼‘𝑦))) ∈ V
18	14, 15, 17	fvmpt 6991	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ V → (-g‘𝐺) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 + (𝐼‘𝑦))))
19	1, 18	eqtrid 2810	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ V → − = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 + (𝐼‘𝑦))))
20		fvprc 6875	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → (-g‘𝐺) = ∅)
21	1, 20	eqtrid 2810	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → − = ∅)
22		fvprc 6875	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → (Base‘𝐺) = ∅)
23	3, 22	eqtrid 2810	. . . . 5 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → 𝐵 = ∅)
24	23	olcd 887	. . . 4 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → (𝐵 = ∅ ∨ 𝐵 = ∅))
25		0mpo0 7495	. . . 4 ⊢ ((𝐵 = ∅ ∨ 𝐵 = ∅) → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 + (𝐼‘𝑦))) = ∅)
26	24, 25	syl 18	. . 3 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 + (𝐼‘𝑦))) = ∅)
27	21, 26	eqtr4d 2801	. 2 ⊢ (¬ 𝐺 ∈ V → − = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 + (𝐼‘𝑦))))
28	19, 27	pm2.61i 184	1 ⊢ − = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ (𝑥 + (𝐼‘𝑦)))

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   ∨ wo 860   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  Vcvv 3455  ∅c0 4287  ‘cfv 6538  (class class class)co 7412   ∈ cmpo 7414  Basecbs 17270  +_gcplusg 17311  inv_gcminusg 19002  -_gcsg 19003

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-rep 5239  ax-sep 5258  ax-nul 5270  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7734

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3746  df-csb 3855  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4288  df-if 4489  df-pw 4565  df-sn 4591  df-pr 4593  df-op 4597  df-uni 4874  df-iun 4959  df-br 5111  df-opab 5175  df-mpt 5194  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-iota 6494  df-fun 6540  df-fn 6541  df-f 6542  df-f1 6543  df-fo 6544  df-f1o 6545  df-fv 6546  df-ov 7415  df-oprab 7416  df-mpo 7417  df-1st 7987  df-2nd 7988  df-sbg 19006

This theorem is referenced by: (None)