Theorem invffval 17387

Description: Value of the inverse relation. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 2-Jan-2017.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
invfval.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)
invfval.n	⊢ 𝑁 = (Inv‘𝐶)
invfval.c	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
invfval.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
invfval.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
invfval.s	⊢ 𝑆 = (Sect‘𝐶)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
invffval	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((𝑥𝑆𝑦) ∩ ◡(𝑦𝑆𝑥))))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝐵   𝜑,𝑥,𝑦   𝑥,𝑋,𝑦   𝑥,𝑌,𝑦   𝑥,𝐶,𝑦   𝑥,𝑆,𝑦

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑁(𝑥,𝑦)

Proof of Theorem invffval

Dummy variable 𝑐 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		invfval.n	. 2 ⊢ 𝑁 = (Inv‘𝐶)
2		invfval.c	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐶 ∈ Cat)
3		fveq2 6756	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → (Base‘𝑐) = (Base‘𝐶))
4		invfval.b	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐶)
5	3, 4	eqtr4di 2797	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → (Base‘𝑐) = 𝐵)
6		fveq2 6756	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → (Sect‘𝑐) = (Sect‘𝐶))
7		invfval.s	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ 𝑆 = (Sect‘𝐶)
8	6, 7	eqtr4di 2797	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → (Sect‘𝑐) = 𝑆)
9	8	oveqd 7272	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → (𝑥(Sect‘𝑐)𝑦) = (𝑥𝑆𝑦))
10	8	oveqd 7272	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → (𝑦(Sect‘𝑐)𝑥) = (𝑦𝑆𝑥))
11	10	cnveqd 5773	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → ◡(𝑦(Sect‘𝑐)𝑥) = ◡(𝑦𝑆𝑥))
12	9, 11	ineq12d 4144	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → ((𝑥(Sect‘𝑐)𝑦) ∩ ◡(𝑦(Sect‘𝑐)𝑥)) = ((𝑥𝑆𝑦) ∩ ◡(𝑦𝑆𝑥)))
13	5, 5, 12	mpoeq123dv 7328	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑐 = 𝐶 → (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑐), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ ((𝑥(Sect‘𝑐)𝑦) ∩ ◡(𝑦(Sect‘𝑐)𝑥))) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((𝑥𝑆𝑦) ∩ ◡(𝑦𝑆𝑥))))
14		df-inv 17377	. . . 4 ⊢ Inv = (𝑐 ∈ Cat ↦ (𝑥 ∈ (Base‘𝑐), 𝑦 ∈ (Base‘𝑐) ↦ ((𝑥(Sect‘𝑐)𝑦) ∩ ◡(𝑦(Sect‘𝑐)𝑥))))
15	4	fvexi 6770	. . . . 5 ⊢ 𝐵 ∈ V
16	15, 15	mpoex 7893	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((𝑥𝑆𝑦) ∩ ◡(𝑦𝑆𝑥))) ∈ V
17	13, 14, 16	fvmpt 6857	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ Cat → (Inv‘𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((𝑥𝑆𝑦) ∩ ◡(𝑦𝑆𝑥))))
18	2, 17	syl 17	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (Inv‘𝐶) = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((𝑥𝑆𝑦) ∩ ◡(𝑦𝑆𝑥))))
19	1, 18	eqtrid 2790	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑁 = (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵, 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ↦ ((𝑥𝑆𝑦) ∩ ◡(𝑦𝑆𝑥))))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108   ∩ cin 3882  ^◡ccnv 5579  ‘cfv 6418  (class class class)co 7255   ∈ cmpo 7257  Basecbs 16840  Catccat 17290  Sectcsect 17373  Invcinv 17374

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-rep 5205  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pow 5283  ax-pr 5347  ax-un 7566

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-reu 3070  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-sbc 3712  df-csb 3829  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-pw 4532  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-iun 4923  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-mpt 5154  df-id 5480  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-rn 5591  df-res 5592  df-ima 5593  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fn 6421  df-f 6422  df-f1 6423  df-fo 6424  df-f1o 6425  df-fv 6426  df-ov 7258  df-oprab 7259  df-mpo 7260  df-1st 7804  df-2nd 7805  df-inv 17377

This theorem is referenced by:  invfval  17388  isoval  17394