![]() |
Metamath
Proof Explorer Theorem List (p. 178 of 454) | < Previous Next > |
Bad symbols? Try the
GIF version. |
||
Mirrors > Metamath Home Page > MPE Home Page > Theorem List Contents > Recent Proofs This page: Page List |
Color key: | ![]() (1-28701) |
![]() (28702-30224) |
![]() (30225-45333) |
Type | Label | Description |
---|---|---|
Statement | ||
Theorem | latj31 17701 | Swap 2nd and 3rd members of lattice join. Lemma 2.2 in [MegPav2002] p. 362. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∨ 𝑍) = ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑌) ∨ 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | latjrot 17702 | Rotate lattice join of 3 classes. (Contributed by NM, 23-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∨ 𝑍) = ((𝑍 ∨ 𝑋) ∨ 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | latj4 17703 | Rearrangement of lattice join of 4 classes. (chj4 29318 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 14-Jun-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∨ (𝑍 ∨ 𝑊)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑍) ∨ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑊))) | ||
Theorem | latj4rot 17704 | Rotate lattice join of 4 classes. (Contributed by NM, 11-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) ∧ (𝑍 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑊 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∨ (𝑍 ∨ 𝑊)) = ((𝑊 ∨ 𝑋) ∨ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑍))) | ||
Theorem | latjjdi 17705 | Lattice join distributes over itself. (Contributed by NM, 30-Jul-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∨ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑍))) | ||
Theorem | latjjdir 17706 | Lattice join distributes over itself. (Contributed by NM, 2-Aug-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∨ 𝑍) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑍) ∨ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑍))) | ||
Theorem | mod1ile 17707 | The weak direction of the modular law (e.g., pmod1i 37144, atmod1i1 37153) that holds in any lattice. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑍 → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) ≤ ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍))) | ||
Theorem | mod2ile 17708 | The weak direction of the modular law (e.g., pmod2iN 37145) that holds in any lattice. (Contributed by NM, 11-May-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑍 ≤ 𝑋 → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ 𝑍) ≤ (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑍)))) | ||
Syntax | ccla 17709 | Extend class notation with complete lattices. |
class CLat | ||
Definition | df-clat 17710 | Define the class of all complete lattices, where every subset of the base set has an LUB and a GLB. (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-2012.) (Revised by NM, 12-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ CLat = {𝑝 ∈ Poset ∣ (dom (lub‘𝑝) = 𝒫 (Base‘𝑝) ∧ dom (glb‘𝑝) = 𝒫 (Base‘𝑝))} | ||
Theorem | isclat 17711 | The predicate "is a complete lattice." (Contributed by NM, 18-Oct-2012.) (Revised by NM, 12-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ (dom 𝑈 = 𝒫 𝐵 ∧ dom 𝐺 = 𝒫 𝐵))) | ||
Theorem | clatpos 17712 | A complete lattice is a poset. (Contributed by NM, 8-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CLat → 𝐾 ∈ Poset) | ||
Theorem | clatlem 17713 | Lemma for properties of a complete lattice. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → ((𝑈‘𝑆) ∈ 𝐵 ∧ (𝐺‘𝑆) ∈ 𝐵)) | ||
Theorem | clatlubcl 17714 | Any subset of the base set has an LUB in a complete lattice. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑈‘𝑆) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | clatlubcl2 17715 | Any subset of the base set has an LUB in a complete lattice. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑆 ∈ dom 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | clatglbcl 17716 | Any subset of the base set has a GLB in a complete lattice. (Contributed by NM, 14-Sep-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝐺‘𝑆) ∈ 𝐵) | ||
Theorem | clatglbcl2 17717 | Any subset of the base set has a GLB in a complete lattice. (Contributed by NM, 13-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑆 ∈ dom 𝐺) | ||
Theorem | clatl 17718 | A complete lattice is a lattice. (Contributed by NM, 18-Sep-2011.) TODO: use eqrelrdv2 5632 to shorten proof and eliminate joindmss 17609 and meetdmss 17623? |
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ CLat → 𝐾 ∈ Lat) | ||
Theorem | isglbd 17719* | Properties that determine the greatest lower bound of a complete lattice. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 19-Mar-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝐻 ≤ 𝑦) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝐻) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ CLat) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐻 ∈ 𝐵) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑆) = 𝐻) | ||
Theorem | lublem 17720* | Lemma for the least upper bound properties in a complete lattice. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ (𝑈‘𝑆) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → (𝑈‘𝑆) ≤ 𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | lubub 17721 | The LUB of a complete lattice subset is an upper bound. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑋 ≤ (𝑈‘𝑆)) | ||
Theorem | lubl 17722* | The LUB of a complete lattice subset is the least bound. (Contributed by NM, 19-Oct-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑋 → (𝑈‘𝑆) ≤ 𝑋)) | ||
Theorem | lubss 17723 | Subset law for least upper bounds. (chsupss 29125 analog.) (Contributed by NM, 20-Oct-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑇) → (𝑈‘𝑆) ≤ (𝑈‘𝑇)) | ||
Theorem | lubel 17724 | An element of a set is less than or equal to the least upper bound of the set. (Contributed by NM, 21-Oct-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → 𝑋 ≤ (𝑈‘𝑆)) | ||
Theorem | lubun 17725 | The LUB of a union. (Contributed by NM, 5-Mar-2012.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑈‘(𝑆 ∪ 𝑇)) = ((𝑈‘𝑆) ∨ (𝑈‘𝑇))) | ||
Theorem | clatglb 17726* | Properties of greatest lower bound of a complete lattice. (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 (𝐺‘𝑆) ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑆)))) | ||
Theorem | clatglble 17727 | The greatest lower bound is the least element. (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝑆) → (𝐺‘𝑆) ≤ 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | clatleglb 17728* | Two ways of expressing "less than or equal to the greatest lower bound." (Contributed by NM, 5-Dec-2011.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → (𝑋 ≤ (𝐺‘𝑆) ↔ ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑋 ≤ 𝑦)) | ||
Theorem | clatglbss 17729 | Subset law for greatest lower bound. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 16-Apr-2014.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ CLat ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑇) → (𝐺‘𝑇) ≤ (𝐺‘𝑆)) | ||
Syntax | codu 17730 | Class function defining dual orders. |
class ODual | ||
Definition | df-odu 17731 |
Define the dual of an ordered structure, which replaces the order
component of the structure with its reverse. See odubas 17735, oduleval 17733,
and oduleg 17734 for its principal properties.
EDITORIAL: likely usable to simplify many lattice proofs, as it allows for duality arguments to be formalized; for instance latmass 17790. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ ODual = (𝑤 ∈ V ↦ (𝑤 sSet 〈(le‘ndx), ◡(le‘𝑤)〉)) | ||
Theorem | oduval 17732 | Value of an order dual structure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐷 = (𝑂 sSet 〈(le‘ndx), ◡ ≤ 〉) | ||
Theorem | oduleval 17733 | Value of the less-equal relation in an order dual structure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ ◡ ≤ = (le‘𝐷) | ||
Theorem | oduleg 17734 | Truth of the less-equal relation in an order dual structure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝑂) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (le‘𝐷) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝐵 ∈ 𝑊) → (𝐴𝐺𝐵 ↔ 𝐵 ≤ 𝐴)) | ||
Theorem | odubas 17735 | Base set of an order dual structure. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐷) | ||
Theorem | pospropd 17736* | Posethood is determined only by structure components and only by the value of the relation within the base set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐿 ∈ 𝑊) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐿)) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑥(le‘𝐾)𝑦 ↔ 𝑥(le‘𝐿)𝑦)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐾 ∈ Poset ↔ 𝐿 ∈ Poset)) | ||
Theorem | odupos 17737 | Being a poset is a self-dual property. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ Poset → 𝐷 ∈ Poset) | ||
Theorem | oduposb 17738 | Being a poset is a self-dual property. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑂 ∈ Poset ↔ 𝐷 ∈ Poset)) | ||
Theorem | meet0 17739 | Lemma for odujoin 17744. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) TODO (df-riota 7093 update): This proof increased from 152 bytes to 547 bytes after the df-riota 7093 change. Any way to shorten it? join0 17740 also. |
⊢ (meet‘∅) = ∅ | ||
Theorem | join0 17740 | Lemma for odumeet 17742. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (join‘∅) = ∅ | ||
Theorem | oduglb 17741 | Greatest lower bounds in a dual order are least upper bounds in the original order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝑈 = (glb‘𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | odumeet 17742 | Meets in a dual order are joins in the original. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ ∨ = (meet‘𝐷) | ||
Theorem | odulub 17743 | Least upper bounds in a dual order are greatest lower bounds in the original order. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (glb‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐿 = (lub‘𝐷)) | ||
Theorem | odujoin 17744 | Joins in a dual order are meets in the original. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ ∧ = (join‘𝐷) | ||
Theorem | odulatb 17745 | Being a lattice is self-dual. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝑂 ∈ Lat ↔ 𝐷 ∈ Lat)) | ||
Theorem | oduclatb 17746 | Being a complete lattice is self-dual. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ CLat ↔ 𝐷 ∈ CLat) | ||
Theorem | odulat 17747 | Being a lattice is self-dual. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝑂) ⇒ ⊢ (𝑂 ∈ Lat → 𝐷 ∈ Lat) | ||
Theorem | poslubmo 17748* | Least upper bounds in a poset are unique if they exist. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) (Revised by NM, 16-Jun-2017.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑧 → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑧))) | ||
Theorem | posglbmo 17749* | Greatest lower bounds in a poset are unique if they exist. (Contributed by NM, 20-Sep-2018.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Poset ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) → ∃*𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑆 𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | poslubd 17750* | Properties which determine the least upper bound in a poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑇) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → 𝑇 ≤ 𝑦) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈‘𝑆) = 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | poslubdg 17751* | Properties which determine the least upper bound in a poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑈 = (lub‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑥 ≤ 𝑇) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 𝑥 ≤ 𝑦) → 𝑇 ≤ 𝑦) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑈‘𝑆) = 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | posglbd 17752* | Properties which determine the greatest lower bound in a poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐾)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ Poset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝐵) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐵) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑆) → 𝑇 ≤ 𝑥) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑆 𝑦 ≤ 𝑥) → 𝑦 ≤ 𝑇) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐺‘𝑆) = 𝑇) | ||
Syntax | cipo 17753 | Class function defining inclusion posets. |
class toInc | ||
Definition | df-ipo 17754* |
For any family of sets, define the poset of that family ordered by
inclusion. See ipobas 17757, ipolerval 17758, and ipole 17760 for its contract.
EDITORIAL: I'm not thrilled with the name. Any suggestions? (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) (New usage is discouraged.) |
⊢ toInc = (𝑓 ∈ V ↦ ⦋{〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ⊆ 𝑓 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)} / 𝑜⦌({〈(Base‘ndx), 𝑓〉, 〈(TopSet‘ndx), (ordTop‘𝑜)〉} ∪ {〈(le‘ndx), 𝑜〉, 〈(oc‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝑓 ↦ ∪ {𝑦 ∈ 𝑓 ∣ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅})〉})) | ||
Theorem | ipostr 17755 | The structure of df-ipo 17754 is a structure defining indices up to 11. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 25-Oct-2015.) |
⊢ ({〈(Base‘ndx), 𝐵〉, 〈(TopSet‘ndx), 𝐽〉} ∪ {〈(le‘ndx), ≤ 〉, 〈(oc‘ndx), ⊥ 〉}) Struct 〈1, ;11〉 | ||
Theorem | ipoval 17756* | Value of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) & ⊢ ≤ = {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)} ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐼 = ({〈(Base‘ndx), 𝐹〉, 〈(TopSet‘ndx), (ordTop‘ ≤ )〉} ∪ {〈(le‘ndx), ≤ 〉, 〈(oc‘ndx), (𝑥 ∈ 𝐹 ↦ ∪ {𝑦 ∈ 𝐹 ∣ (𝑦 ∩ 𝑥) = ∅})〉})) | ||
Theorem | ipobas 17757 | Base set of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) (Revised by Mario Carneiro, 25-Oct-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → 𝐹 = (Base‘𝐼)) | ||
Theorem | ipolerval 17758* | Relation of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → {〈𝑥, 𝑦〉 ∣ ({𝑥, 𝑦} ⊆ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑥 ⊆ 𝑦)} = (le‘𝐼)) | ||
Theorem | ipotset 17759 | Topology of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Mario Carneiro, 24-Oct-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 → (ordTop‘ ≤ ) = (TopSet‘𝐼)) | ||
Theorem | ipole 17760 | Weak order condition of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) & ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐹) → (𝑋 ≤ 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | ipolt 17761 | Strict order condition of the inclusion poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) & ⊢ < = (lt‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐹 ∈ 𝑉 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ 𝐹 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐹) → (𝑋 < 𝑌 ↔ 𝑋 ⊊ 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | ipopos 17762 | The inclusion poset on a family of sets is actually a poset. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐹) ⇒ ⊢ 𝐼 ∈ Poset | ||
Theorem | isipodrs 17763* | Condition for a family of sets to be directed by inclusion. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((toInc‘𝐴) ∈ Dirset ↔ (𝐴 ∈ V ∧ 𝐴 ≠ ∅ ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐴 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐴 ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 (𝑥 ∪ 𝑦) ⊆ 𝑧)) | ||
Theorem | ipodrscl 17764 | Direction by inclusion as used here implies sethood. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((toInc‘𝐴) ∈ Dirset → 𝐴 ∈ V) | ||
Theorem | ipodrsfi 17765* | Finite upper bound property for directed collections of sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (((toInc‘𝐴) ∈ Dirset ∧ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝐴 ∧ 𝑋 ∈ Fin) → ∃𝑧 ∈ 𝐴 ∪ 𝑋 ⊆ 𝑧) | ||
Theorem | fpwipodrs 17766 | The finite subsets of any set are directed by inclusion. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐴 ∈ 𝑉 → (toInc‘(𝒫 𝐴 ∩ Fin)) ∈ Dirset) | ||
Theorem | ipodrsima 17767* | The monotone image of a directed set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐹 Fn 𝒫 𝐴) & ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ (𝑢 ⊆ 𝑣 ∧ 𝑣 ⊆ 𝐴)) → (𝐹‘𝑢) ⊆ (𝐹‘𝑣)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (toInc‘𝐵) ∈ Dirset) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐵 ⊆ 𝒫 𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝐹 “ 𝐵) ∈ 𝑉) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (toInc‘(𝐹 “ 𝐵)) ∈ Dirset) | ||
Theorem | isacs3lem 17768* | An algebraic closure system satisfies isacs3 17776. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) → (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → ∪ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | acsdrsel 17769 | An algebraic closure system contains all directed unions of closed sets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ (toInc‘𝑌) ∈ Dirset) → ∪ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐶) | ||
Theorem | isacs4lem 17770* | In a closure system in which directed unions of closed sets are closed, closure commutes with directed unions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → ∪ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐶)) → (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑋((toInc‘𝑡) ∈ Dirset → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑡) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑡)))) | ||
Theorem | isacs5lem 17771* | If closure commutes with directed unions, then the closure of a set is the closure of its finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑡 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑋((toInc‘𝑡) ∈ Dirset → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑡) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑡))) → (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋(𝐹‘𝑠) = ∪ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin)))) | ||
Theorem | acsdrscl 17772 | In an algebraic closure system, closure commutes with directed unions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑌 ⊆ 𝒫 𝑋 ∧ (toInc‘𝑌) ∈ Dirset) → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑌) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑌)) | ||
Theorem | acsficl 17773 | A closure in an algebraic closure system is the union of the closures of finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) → (𝐹‘𝑆) = ∪ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin))) | ||
Theorem | isacs5 17774* | A closure system is algebraic iff the closure of a generating set is the union of the closures of its finite subsets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋(𝐹‘𝑠) = ∪ (𝐹 “ (𝒫 𝑠 ∩ Fin)))) | ||
Theorem | isacs4 17775* | A closure system is algebraic iff closure commutes with directed unions. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝒫 𝑋((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → (𝐹‘∪ 𝑠) = ∪ (𝐹 “ 𝑠)))) | ||
Theorem | isacs3 17776* | A closure system is algebraic iff directed unions of closed sets are closed. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 2-Apr-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋) ↔ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝐶((toInc‘𝑠) ∈ Dirset → ∪ 𝑠 ∈ 𝐶))) | ||
Theorem | acsficld 17777 | In an algebraic closure system, the closure of a set is the union of the closures of its finite subsets. Deduction form of acsficl 17773. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = ∪ (𝑁 “ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin))) | ||
Theorem | acsficl2d 17778* | In an algebraic closure system, an element is in the closure of a set if and only if it is in the closure of a finite subset. Alternate form of acsficl 17773. Deduction form. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑆) ↔ ∃𝑥 ∈ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin)𝑌 ∈ (𝑁‘𝑥))) | ||
Theorem | acsfiindd 17779 | In an algebraic closure system, a set is independent if and only if all its finite subsets are independent. Part of Proposition 4.1.3 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 83. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑆 ∈ 𝐼 ↔ (𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin) ⊆ 𝐼)) | ||
Theorem | acsmapd 17780* | In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑇 is contained in the closure of 𝑆, there is a map 𝑓 from 𝑇 into the set of finite subsets of 𝑆 such that the closure of ∪ ran 𝑓 contains 𝑇. This is proven by applying acsficl2d 17778 to each element of 𝑇. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑁‘𝑆)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑇⟶(𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝑇 ⊆ (𝑁‘∪ ran 𝑓))) | ||
Theorem | acsmap2d 17781* | In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure and 𝑆 is independent, then there is a map 𝑓 from 𝑇 into the set of finite subsets of 𝑆 such that 𝑆 equals the union of ran 𝑓. This is proven by taking the map 𝑓 from acsmapd 17780 and observing that, since 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure, the closure of ∪ ran 𝑓 must contain 𝑆. Since 𝑆 is independent, by mrissmrcd 16903, ∪ ran 𝑓 must equal 𝑆. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃𝑓(𝑓:𝑇⟶(𝒫 𝑆 ∩ Fin) ∧ 𝑆 = ∪ ran 𝑓)) | ||
Theorem | acsinfd 17782 | In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure and 𝑆 is infinite independent, then 𝑇 is infinite. This follows from applying unirnffid 8800 to the map given in acsmap2d 17781. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑇 ∈ Fin) | ||
Theorem | acsdomd 17783 | In an algebraic closure system, if 𝑆 and 𝑇 have the same closure and 𝑆 is infinite independent, then 𝑇 dominates 𝑆. This follows from applying acsinfd 17782 and then applying unirnfdomd 9978 to the map given in acsmap2d 17781. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ⊆ 𝑋) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≼ 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | acsinfdimd 17784 | In an algebraic closure system, if two independent sets have equal closure and one is infinite, then they are equinumerous. This is proven by using acsdomd 17783 twice with acsinfd 17782. See Section II.5 in [Cohn] p. 81 to 82. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇)) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ¬ 𝑆 ∈ Fin) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≈ 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | acsexdimd 17785* | In an algebraic closure system whose closure operator has the exchange property, if two independent sets have equal closure, they are equinumerous. See mreexfidimd 16913 for the finite case and acsinfdimd 17784 for the infinite case. This is a special case of Theorem 4.2.2 in [FaureFrolicher] p. 87. (Contributed by David Moews, 1-May-2017.) |
⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐴 ∈ (ACS‘𝑋)) & ⊢ 𝑁 = (mrCls‘𝐴) & ⊢ 𝐼 = (mrInd‘𝐴) & ⊢ (𝜑 → ∀𝑠 ∈ 𝒫 𝑋∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑋 ∀𝑧 ∈ ((𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑦})) ∖ (𝑁‘𝑠))𝑦 ∈ (𝑁‘(𝑠 ∪ {𝑧}))) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑇 ∈ 𝐼) & ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑁‘𝑆) = (𝑁‘𝑇)) ⇒ ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑆 ≈ 𝑇) | ||
Theorem | mrelatglb 17786 | Greatest lower bounds in a Moore space are realized by intersections. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐶 ∧ 𝑈 ≠ ∅) → (𝐺‘𝑈) = ∩ 𝑈) | ||
Theorem | mrelatglb0 17787 | The empty intersection in a Moore space is realized by the base set. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐺 = (glb‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → (𝐺‘∅) = 𝑋) | ||
Theorem | mrelatlub 17788 | Least upper bounds in a Moore space are realized by the closure of the union. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐹 = (mrCls‘𝐶) & ⊢ 𝐿 = (lub‘𝐼) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) ∧ 𝑈 ⊆ 𝐶) → (𝐿‘𝑈) = (𝐹‘∪ 𝑈)) | ||
Theorem | mreclatBAD 17789* | A Moore space is a complete lattice under inclusion. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 31-Jan-2015.) TODO (df-riota 7093 update): Reprove using isclat 17711 instead of the isclatBAD. hypothesis. See commented-out mreclat above. |
⊢ 𝐼 = (toInc‘𝐶) & ⊢ (𝐼 ∈ CLat ↔ (𝐼 ∈ Poset ∧ ∀𝑥(𝑥 ⊆ (Base‘𝐼) → (((lub‘𝐼)‘𝑥) ∈ (Base‘𝐼) ∧ ((glb‘𝐼)‘𝑥) ∈ (Base‘𝐼))))) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐶 ∈ (Moore‘𝑋) → 𝐼 ∈ CLat) | ||
Theorem | latmass 17790 | Lattice meet is associative. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∧ 𝑍) = (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍))) | ||
Theorem | latdisdlem 17791* | Lemma for latdisd 17792. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Lat → (∀𝑢 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑣 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑤 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑢 ∨ (𝑣 ∧ 𝑤)) = ((𝑢 ∨ 𝑣) ∧ (𝑢 ∨ 𝑤)) → ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∧ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)) = ((𝑥 ∧ 𝑦) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑧)))) | ||
Theorem | latdisd 17792* | In a lattice, joins distribute over meets if and only if meets distribute over joins; the distributive property is self-dual. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 29-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ Lat → (∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∨ (𝑦 ∧ 𝑧)) = ((𝑥 ∨ 𝑦) ∧ (𝑥 ∨ 𝑧)) ↔ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∧ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)) = ((𝑥 ∧ 𝑦) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑧)))) | ||
Syntax | cdlat 17793 | The class of distributive lattices. |
class DLat | ||
Definition | df-dlat 17794* | A distributive lattice is a lattice in which meets distribute over joins, or equivalently (latdisd 17792) joins distribute over meets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ DLat = {𝑘 ∈ Lat ∣ [(Base‘𝑘) / 𝑏][(join‘𝑘) / 𝑗][(meet‘𝑘) / 𝑚]∀𝑥 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝑏 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝑏 (𝑥𝑚(𝑦𝑗𝑧)) = ((𝑥𝑚𝑦)𝑗(𝑥𝑚𝑧))} | ||
Theorem | isdlat 17795* | Property of being a distributive lattice. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ DLat ↔ (𝐾 ∈ Lat ∧ ∀𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑦 ∈ 𝐵 ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (𝑥 ∧ (𝑦 ∨ 𝑧)) = ((𝑥 ∧ 𝑦) ∨ (𝑥 ∧ 𝑧)))) | ||
Theorem | dlatmjdi 17796 | In a distributive lattice, meets distribute over joins. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ DLat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ∧ (𝑌 ∨ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∧ 𝑌) ∨ (𝑋 ∧ 𝑍))) | ||
Theorem | dlatl 17797 | A distributive lattice is a lattice. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ (𝐾 ∈ DLat → 𝐾 ∈ Lat) | ||
Theorem | odudlatb 17798 | The dual of a distributive lattice is a distributive lattice and conversely. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐷 = (ODual‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ (𝐾 ∈ 𝑉 → (𝐾 ∈ DLat ↔ 𝐷 ∈ DLat)) | ||
Theorem | dlatjmdi 17799 | In a distributive lattice, joins distribute over meets. (Contributed by Stefan O'Rear, 30-Jan-2015.) |
⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∨ = (join‘𝐾) & ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾) ⇒ ⊢ ((𝐾 ∈ DLat ∧ (𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑍 ∈ 𝐵)) → (𝑋 ∨ (𝑌 ∧ 𝑍)) = ((𝑋 ∨ 𝑌) ∧ (𝑋 ∨ 𝑍))) | ||
Syntax | cps 17800 | Extend class notation with the class of all posets. |
class PosetRel |
< Previous Next > |
Copyright terms: Public domain | < Previous Next > |