Theorem meeteu 18353

Description: Uniqueness of meet of elements in the domain. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
meetval2.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
meetval2.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
meetval2.m	⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
meetval2.k	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
meetval2.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
meetval2.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
meetlem.e	⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∧ )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
meeteu	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑌) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑧 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑌) → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧,𝐵   𝑥, ∧ ,𝑧   𝑥,𝐾,𝑧   𝑥,𝑋,𝑧   𝑥,𝑌,𝑧   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑧)   ≤ (𝑥,𝑧)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem meeteu

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		meetlem.e	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∧ )
2		eqid 2732	. . . 4 ⊢ (glb‘𝐾) = (glb‘𝐾)
3		meetval2.m	. . . 4 ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
4		meetval2.k	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
5		meetval2.x	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
6		meetval2.y	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
7	2, 3, 4, 5, 6	meetdef 18347	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∧ ↔ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (glb‘𝐾)))
8		meetval2.b	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
9		meetval2.l	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
10		biid 260	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥)) ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥)))
11	4	adantr 481	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (glb‘𝐾)) → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
12		simpr 485	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (glb‘𝐾)) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (glb‘𝐾))
13	8, 9, 2, 10, 11, 12	glbeu 18325	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (glb‘𝐾)) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥)))
14	13	ex 413	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (glb‘𝐾) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥))))
15	8, 9, 3, 4, 5, 6	meetval2lem 18351	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑌) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑧 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑌) → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥))))
16	5, 6, 15	syl2anc 584	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑌) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑧 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑌) → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥))))
17	16	reubidv 3394	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥)) ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑌) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑧 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑌) → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥))))
18	14, 17	sylibd 238	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (glb‘𝐾) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑌) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑧 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑌) → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥))))
19	7, 18	sylbid 239	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∧ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑌) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑧 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑌) → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥))))
20	1, 19	mpd 15	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑌) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑧 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑌) → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1541   ∈ wcel 2106  ∀wral 3061  ∃!wreu 3374  {cpr 4630  ⟨cop 4634   class class class wbr 5148  dom cdm 5676  ‘cfv 6543  Basecbs 17148  lecple 17208  glbcglb 18267  meetcmee 18269

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1797  ax-4 1811  ax-5 1913  ax-6 1971  ax-7 2011  ax-8 2108  ax-9 2116  ax-10 2137  ax-11 2154  ax-12 2171  ax-ext 2703  ax-rep 5285  ax-sep 5299  ax-nul 5306  ax-pow 5363  ax-pr 5427  ax-un 7727

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 397  df-or 846  df-3an 1089  df-tru 1544  df-fal 1554  df-ex 1782  df-nf 1786  df-sb 2068  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2710  df-cleq 2724  df-clel 2810  df-nfc 2885  df-ne 2941  df-ral 3062  df-rex 3071  df-rmo 3376  df-reu 3377  df-rab 3433  df-v 3476  df-sbc 3778  df-csb 3894  df-dif 3951  df-un 3953  df-in 3955  df-ss 3965  df-nul 4323  df-if 4529  df-pw 4604  df-sn 4629  df-pr 4631  df-op 4635  df-uni 4909  df-iun 4999  df-br 5149  df-opab 5211  df-mpt 5232  df-id 5574  df-xp 5682  df-rel 5683  df-cnv 5684  df-co 5685  df-dm 5686  df-rn 5687  df-res 5688  df-ima 5689  df-iota 6495  df-fun 6545  df-fn 6546  df-f 6547  df-f1 6548  df-fo 6549  df-f1o 6550  df-fv 6551  df-riota 7367  df-oprab 7415  df-glb 18304  df-meet 18306

This theorem is referenced by:  meetlem  18354