Theorem meeteu 18362

Description: Uniqueness of meet of elements in the domain. (Contributed by NM, 12-Sep-2018.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
meetval2.b	⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
meetval2.l	⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
meetval2.m	⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
meetval2.k	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
meetval2.x	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
meetval2.y	⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
meetlem.e	⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∧ )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
meeteu	⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑌) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑧 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑌) → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑧,𝐵   𝑥, ∧ ,𝑧   𝑥,𝐾,𝑧   𝑥,𝑋,𝑧   𝑥,𝑌,𝑧   𝜑,𝑥

Allowed substitution hints:   𝜑(𝑧)   ≤ (𝑥,𝑧)   𝑉(𝑥,𝑧)

Proof of Theorem meeteu

Dummy variable 𝑦 is distinct from all other variables.

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		meetlem.e	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → ⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∧ )
2		eqid 2730	. . . 4 ⊢ (glb‘𝐾) = (glb‘𝐾)
3		meetval2.m	. . . 4 ⊢ ∧ = (meet‘𝐾)
4		meetval2.k	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
5		meetval2.x	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑋 ∈ 𝐵)
6		meetval2.y	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵)
7	2, 3, 4, 5, 6	meetdef 18356	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∧ ↔ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (glb‘𝐾)))
8		meetval2.b	. . . . . 6 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐾)
9		meetval2.l	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ≤ = (le‘𝐾)
10		biid 261	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥)) ↔ (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥)))
11	4	adantr 480	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (glb‘𝐾)) → 𝐾 ∈ 𝑉)
12		simpr 484	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (glb‘𝐾)) → {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (glb‘𝐾))
13	8, 9, 2, 10, 11, 12	glbeu 18334	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ {𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (glb‘𝐾)) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥)))
14	13	ex 412	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (glb‘𝐾) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥))))
15	8, 9, 3, 4, 5, 6	meetval2lem 18360	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((𝑋 ∈ 𝐵 ∧ 𝑌 ∈ 𝐵) → ((∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑌) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑧 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑌) → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥))))
16	5, 6, 15	syl2anc 584	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → ((∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥)) ↔ ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑌) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑧 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑌) → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥))))
17	16	reubidv 3374	. . . 4 ⊢ (𝜑 → (∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑥 ≤ 𝑦 ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 (∀𝑦 ∈ {𝑋, 𝑌}𝑧 ≤ 𝑦 → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥)) ↔ ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑌) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑧 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑌) → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥))))
18	14, 17	sylibd 239	. . 3 ⊢ (𝜑 → ({𝑋, 𝑌} ∈ dom (glb‘𝐾) → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑌) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑧 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑌) → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥))))
19	7, 18	sylbid 240	. 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (⟨𝑋, 𝑌⟩ ∈ dom ∧ → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑌) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑧 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑌) → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥))))
20	1, 19	mpd 15	1 ⊢ (𝜑 → ∃!𝑥 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑥 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑥 ≤ 𝑌) ∧ ∀𝑧 ∈ 𝐵 ((𝑧 ≤ 𝑋 ∧ 𝑧 ≤ 𝑌) → 𝑧 ≤ 𝑥)))

Syntax hints:   → wi 4   ↔ wb 206   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1540   ∈ wcel 2109  ∀wral 3045  ∃!wreu 3354  {cpr 4594  ⟨cop 4598   class class class wbr 5110  dom cdm 5641  ‘cfv 6514  Basecbs 17186  lecple 17234  glbcglb 18278  meetcmee 18280

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1795  ax-4 1809  ax-5 1910  ax-6 1967  ax-7 2008  ax-8 2111  ax-9 2119  ax-10 2142  ax-11 2158  ax-12 2178  ax-ext 2702  ax-rep 5237  ax-sep 5254  ax-nul 5264  ax-pow 5323  ax-pr 5390  ax-un 7714

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 207  df-an 396  df-or 848  df-3an 1088  df-tru 1543  df-fal 1553  df-ex 1780  df-nf 1784  df-sb 2066  df-mo 2534  df-eu 2563  df-clab 2709  df-cleq 2722  df-clel 2804  df-nfc 2879  df-ne 2927  df-ral 3046  df-rex 3055  df-rmo 3356  df-reu 3357  df-rab 3409  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3757  df-csb 3866  df-dif 3920  df-un 3922  df-in 3924  df-ss 3934  df-nul 4300  df-if 4492  df-pw 4568  df-sn 4593  df-pr 4595  df-op 4599  df-uni 4875  df-iun 4960  df-br 5111  df-opab 5173  df-mpt 5192  df-id 5536  df-xp 5647  df-rel 5648  df-cnv 5649  df-co 5650  df-dm 5651  df-rn 5652  df-res 5653  df-ima 5654  df-iota 6467  df-fun 6516  df-fn 6517  df-f 6518  df-f1 6519  df-fo 6520  df-f1o 6521  df-fv 6522  df-riota 7347  df-oprab 7394  df-glb 18313  df-meet 18315

This theorem is referenced by:  meetlem  18363