Theorem nregmodel 46202

Description: The Axiom of Regularity ax-reg 9613 is false in the permutation model defined from 𝐹. Since the other axioms of ZFC hold in all permutation models (permaxext 46190 through permac8prim 46199), we can conclude that Regularity does not follow from those axioms, assuming ZFC is consistent. (If we could prove Regularity from the other axioms, we could prove it in the permutation model and thus obtain a contradiction with this theorem.) Since we also know that Regularity is consistent with the other axioms (wfaxext 46178 through wfac8prim 46187), Regularity is neither provable nor disprovable from the other axioms; i.e., it is independent of them. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 16-Nov-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nregmodel.1	⊢ 𝐹 = (( I ↾ (V ∖ {∅, {∅}})) ∪ {⟨∅, {∅}⟩, ⟨{∅}, ∅⟩})
nregmodel.2	⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nregmodel	⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑅

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑅(𝑦, 𝑧)   𝐹(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)

Proof of Theorem nregmodel

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0ex 5264	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
2	1	snid 4623	. 2 ⊢ ∅ ∈ {∅}
3		eleq1 2852	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → (𝑦 ∈ {∅} ↔ ∅ ∈ {∅}))
4	1, 3, 2	ceqsexv2d 3503	. . . 4 ⊢ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {∅}
5		breq2 5110	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑦𝑅∅))
6		nregmodel.1	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝐹 = (( I ↾ (V ∖ {∅, {∅}})) ∪ {⟨∅, {∅}⟩, ⟨{∅}, ∅⟩})
7		nregmodel.2	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E )
8	6, 7	nregmodellem 46201	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦𝑅∅ ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {∅})
9	5, 8	bitrdi 290	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {∅}))
10	9	exbidv 1956	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (∃𝑦 𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {∅}))
11		breq2 5110	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝑧𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑧𝑅∅))
12	6, 7	nregmodellem 46201	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑧𝑅∅ ↔ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})
13	11, 12	bitrdi 290	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝑧𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))
14	13	notbid 321	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))
15	14	imbi2d 343	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥) ↔ (𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})))
16	15	albidv 1955	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})))
17	9, 16	anbi12d 644	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))))
18	17	exbidv 1956	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))))
19	10, 18	imbi12d 347	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((∃𝑦 𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥))) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {∅} → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})))))
20	1, 19	spcv 3563	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥))) → (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {∅} → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))))
21	4, 20	mpi 21	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥))) → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})))
22		df-ral 3081	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ {∅} ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅} ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ {∅} → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))
23		breq2 5110	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → (𝑧𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑧𝑅∅))
24	23, 12	bitrdi 290	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → (𝑧𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))
25	24	imbi1d 344	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → ((𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ {∅} → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})))
26	25	albidv 1955	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → (∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}) ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ {∅} → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})))
27	1, 26	rexsn 4643	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ {∅}∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}) ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ {∅} → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))
28		df-rex 3091	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ {∅}∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})))
29	22, 27, 28	3bitr2ri 303	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ {∅} ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})
30		eleq1 2852	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = ∅ → (𝑧 ∈ {∅} ↔ ∅ ∈ {∅}))
31	30	notbid 321	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = ∅ → (¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅} ↔ ¬ ∅ ∈ {∅}))
32	1, 31	ralsn 4642	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ {∅} ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅} ↔ ¬ ∅ ∈ {∅})
33	29, 32	bitri 278	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})) ↔ ¬ ∅ ∈ {∅})
34	21, 33	sylib 221	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥))) → ¬ ∅ ∈ {∅})
35	2, 34	mt2 203	1 ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2147  ∀wral 3080  ∃wrex 3090  Vcvv 3454   ∖ cdif 4048   ∪ cun 4152  ∅c0 4281  {csn 4588  {cpr 4590  ⟨cop 4838   class class class wbr 5106   I cid 5549   E cep 5554  ^◡ccnv 5654   ↾ cres 5657   ∘ ccom 5659

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1945  ax-6 2002  ax-7 2043  ax-8 2149  ax-9 2157  ax-10 2180  ax-11 2197  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5252  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5395

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2102  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2839  df-nfc 2913  df-ne 2960  df-ral 3081  df-rex 3091  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3456  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3852  df-ss 3901  df-dif 4050  df-in 4094  df-un 4154  df-nul 4282  df-if 4486  df-sn 4589  df-pr 4591  df-op 4839  df-uni 4871  df-br 5107  df-opab 5171  df-mpt 5190  df-id 5550  df-eprel 5555  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6512  df-fun 6560  df-fn 6561  df-f 6562  df-f1 6563  df-fo 6564  df-f1o 6565  df-fv 6566

This theorem is used by: (None)