Theorem nregmodel 45842

Description: The Axiom of Regularity ax-reg 9567 is false in the permutation model defined from 𝐹. Since the other axioms of ZFC hold in all permutation models (permaxext 45830 through permac8prim 45839), we can conclude that Regularity does not follow from those axioms, assuming ZFC is consistent. (If we could prove Regularity from the other axioms, we could prove it in the permutation model and thus obtain a contradiction with this theorem.) Since we also know that Regularity is consistent with the other axioms (wfaxext 45818 through wfac8prim 45827), Regularity is neither provable nor disprovable from the other axioms; i.e., it is independent of them. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 16-Nov-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nregmodel.1	⊢ 𝐹 = (( I ↾ (V ∖ {∅, {∅}})) ∪ {⟨∅, {∅}⟩, ⟨{∅}, ∅⟩})
nregmodel.2	⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nregmodel	⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑅

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑅(𝑦, 𝑧)   𝐹(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)

Proof of Theorem nregmodel

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0ex 5268	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
2	1	snid 4626	. 2 ⊢ ∅ ∈ {∅}
3		eleq1 2850	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → (𝑦 ∈ {∅} ↔ ∅ ∈ {∅}))
4	1, 3, 2	ceqsexv2d 3502	. . . 4 ⊢ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {∅}
5		breq2 5111	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑦𝑅∅))
6		nregmodel.1	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝐹 = (( I ↾ (V ∖ {∅, {∅}})) ∪ {⟨∅, {∅}⟩, ⟨{∅}, ∅⟩})
7		nregmodel.2	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E )
8	6, 7	nregmodellem 45841	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦𝑅∅ ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {∅})
9	5, 8	bitrdi 290	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {∅}))
10	9	exbidv 1954	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (∃𝑦 𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {∅}))
11		breq2 5111	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝑧𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑧𝑅∅))
12	6, 7	nregmodellem 45841	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑧𝑅∅ ↔ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})
13	11, 12	bitrdi 290	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝑧𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))
14	13	notbid 321	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))
15	14	imbi2d 343	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥) ↔ (𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})))
16	15	albidv 1953	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})))
17	9, 16	anbi12d 644	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))))
18	17	exbidv 1954	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))))
19	10, 18	imbi12d 347	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((∃𝑦 𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥))) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {∅} → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})))))
20	1, 19	spcv 3562	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥))) → (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {∅} → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))))
21	4, 20	mpi 21	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥))) → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})))
22		df-ral 3079	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ {∅} ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅} ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ {∅} → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))
23		breq2 5111	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → (𝑧𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑧𝑅∅))
24	23, 12	bitrdi 290	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → (𝑧𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))
25	24	imbi1d 344	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → ((𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ {∅} → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})))
26	25	albidv 1953	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → (∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}) ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ {∅} → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})))
27	1, 26	rexsn 4646	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ {∅}∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}) ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ {∅} → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))
28		df-rex 3089	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ {∅}∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})))
29	22, 27, 28	3bitr2ri 303	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ {∅} ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})
30		eleq1 2850	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = ∅ → (𝑧 ∈ {∅} ↔ ∅ ∈ {∅}))
31	30	notbid 321	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = ∅ → (¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅} ↔ ¬ ∅ ∈ {∅}))
32	1, 31	ralsn 4645	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ {∅} ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅} ↔ ¬ ∅ ∈ {∅})
33	29, 32	bitri 278	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})) ↔ ¬ ∅ ∈ {∅})
34	21, 33	sylib 221	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥))) → ¬ ∅ ∈ {∅})
35	2, 34	mt2 203	1 ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3078  ∃wrex 3088  Vcvv 3453   ∖ cdif 3899   ∪ cun 3900  ∅c0 4282  {csn 4587  {cpr 4589  ⟨cop 4593   class class class wbr 5107   I cid 5553   E cep 5558  ^◡ccnv 5658   ↾ cres 5661   ∘ ccom 5663

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2215  ax-ext 2734  ax-sep 5255  ax-nul 5267  ax-pr 5402

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2566  df-eu 2596  df-clab 2741  df-cleq 2754  df-clel 2837  df-nfc 2911  df-ne 2958  df-ral 3079  df-rex 3089  df-reu 3368  df-rab 3415  df-v 3455  df-sbc 3743  df-csb 3851  df-dif 3905  df-un 3907  df-in 3909  df-ss 3919  df-nul 4283  df-if 4486  df-sn 4588  df-pr 4590  df-op 4594  df-uni 4871  df-br 5108  df-opab 5172  df-mpt 5191  df-id 5554  df-eprel 5559  df-xp 5665  df-rel 5666  df-cnv 5667  df-co 5668  df-dm 5669  df-rn 5670  df-res 5671  df-ima 5672  df-iota 6493  df-fun 6539  df-fn 6540  df-f 6541  df-f1 6542  df-fo 6543  df-f1o 6544  df-fv 6545

This theorem is used by: (None)