Theorem nregmodel 45843

Description: The Axiom of Regularity ax-reg 9567 is false in the permutation model defined from 𝐹. Since the other axioms of ZFC hold in all permutation models (permaxext 45831 through permac8prim 45840), we can conclude that Regularity does not follow from those axioms, assuming ZFC is consistent. (If we could prove Regularity from the other axioms, we could prove it in the permutation model and thus obtain a contradiction with this theorem.) Since we also know that Regularity is consistent with the other axioms (wfaxext 45819 through wfac8prim 45828), Regularity is neither provable nor disprovable from the other axioms; i.e., it is independent of them. (Contributed by Eric Schmidt, 16-Nov-2025.)

Hypotheses

Ref	Expression
nregmodel.1	⊢ 𝐹 = (( I ↾ (V ∖ {∅, {∅}})) ∪ {⟨∅, {∅}⟩, ⟨{∅}, ∅⟩})
nregmodel.2	⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E )

Assertion

Ref	Expression
nregmodel	⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)))

Distinct variable groups:   𝑥,𝑦,𝑧   𝑥,𝑅

Allowed substitution hints:   𝑅(𝑦, 𝑧)   𝐹(𝑥, 𝑦, 𝑧)

Proof of Theorem nregmodel

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		0ex 5264	. . 3 ⊢ ∅ ∈ V
2	1	snid 4623	. 2 ⊢ ∅ ∈ {∅}
3		eleq1 2848	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → (𝑦 ∈ {∅} ↔ ∅ ∈ {∅}))
4	1, 3, 2	ceqsexv2d 3499	. . . 4 ⊢ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {∅}
5		breq2 5107	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑦𝑅∅))
6		nregmodel.1	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝐹 = (( I ↾ (V ∖ {∅, {∅}})) ∪ {⟨∅, {∅}⟩, ⟨{∅}, ∅⟩})
7		nregmodel.2	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ 𝑅 = (◡𝐹 ∘ E )
8	6, 7	nregmodellem 45842	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦𝑅∅ ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {∅})
9	5, 8	bitrdi 290	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑦 ∈ {∅}))
10	9	exbidv 1954	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (∃𝑦 𝑦𝑅𝑥 ↔ ∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {∅}))
11		breq2 5107	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝑧𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑧𝑅∅))
12	6, 7	nregmodellem 45842	. . . . . . . . . . . 12 ⊢ (𝑧𝑅∅ ↔ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})
13	11, 12	bitrdi 290	. . . . . . . . . . 11 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (𝑧𝑅𝑥 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))
14	13	notbid 321	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥 ↔ ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))
15	14	imbi2d 343	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥) ↔ (𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})))
16	15	albidv 1953	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥) ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})))
17	9, 16	anbi12d 644	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)) ↔ (𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))))
18	17	exbidv 1954	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → (∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))))
19	10, 18	imbi12d 347	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑥 = ∅ → ((∃𝑦 𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥))) ↔ (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {∅} → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})))))
20	1, 19	spcv 3559	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥))) → (∃𝑦 𝑦 ∈ {∅} → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))))
21	4, 20	mpi 21	. . 3 ⊢ (∀𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥))) → ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})))
22		df-ral 3077	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ {∅} ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅} ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ {∅} → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))
23		breq2 5107	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → (𝑧𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑧𝑅∅))
24	23, 12	bitrdi 290	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → (𝑧𝑅𝑦 ↔ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))
25	24	imbi1d 344	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → ((𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}) ↔ (𝑧 ∈ {∅} → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})))
26	25	albidv 1953	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑦 = ∅ → (∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}) ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ {∅} → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})))
27	1, 26	rexsn 4643	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ {∅}∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}) ↔ ∀𝑧(𝑧 ∈ {∅} → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}))
28		df-rex 3087	. . . . 5 ⊢ (∃𝑦 ∈ {∅}∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅}) ↔ ∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})))
29	22, 27, 28	3bitr2ri 303	. . . 4 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})) ↔ ∀𝑧 ∈ {∅} ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})
30		eleq1 2848	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝑧 = ∅ → (𝑧 ∈ {∅} ↔ ∅ ∈ {∅}))
31	30	notbid 321	. . . . 5 ⊢ (𝑧 = ∅ → (¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅} ↔ ¬ ∅ ∈ {∅}))
32	1, 31	ralsn 4642	. . . 4 ⊢ (∀𝑧 ∈ {∅} ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅} ↔ ¬ ∅ ∈ {∅})
33	29, 32	bitri 278	. . 3 ⊢ (∃𝑦(𝑦 ∈ {∅} ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧 ∈ {∅})) ↔ ¬ ∅ ∈ {∅})
34	21, 33	sylib 221	. 2 ⊢ (∀𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥))) → ¬ ∅ ∈ {∅})
35	2, 34	mt2 203	1 ⊢ ¬ ∀𝑥(∃𝑦 𝑦𝑅𝑥 → ∃𝑦(𝑦𝑅𝑥 ∧ ∀𝑧(𝑧𝑅𝑦 → ¬ 𝑧𝑅𝑥)))

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ∧ wa 401  ∀wal 1568   = wceq 1570  ∃wex 1812   ∈ wcel 2145  ∀wral 3076  ∃wrex 3086  Vcvv 3450   ∖ cdif 3896   ∪ cun 3897  ∅c0 4279  {csn 4584  {cpr 4586  ⟨cop 4590   class class class wbr 5103   I cid 5549   E cep 5554  ^◡ccnv 5654   ↾ cres 5657   ∘ ccom 5659

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2147  ax-9 2155  ax-10 2178  ax-11 2194  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2732  ax-sep 5251  ax-nul 5263  ax-pr 5398

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2564  df-eu 2594  df-clab 2739  df-cleq 2752  df-clel 2835  df-nfc 2909  df-ne 2956  df-ral 3077  df-rex 3087  df-reu 3366  df-rab 3413  df-v 3452  df-sbc 3740  df-csb 3848  df-dif 3902  df-un 3904  df-in 3906  df-ss 3916  df-nul 4280  df-if 4483  df-sn 4585  df-pr 4587  df-op 4591  df-uni 4868  df-br 5104  df-opab 5168  df-mpt 5187  df-id 5550  df-eprel 5555  df-xp 5661  df-rel 5662  df-cnv 5663  df-co 5664  df-dm 5665  df-rn 5666  df-res 5667  df-ima 5668  df-iota 6489  df-fun 6535  df-fn 6536  df-f 6537  df-f1 6538  df-fo 6539  df-f1o 6540  df-fv 6541

This theorem is used by: (None)