Theorem pliguhgr 30911

Description: Any planar incidence geometry 𝐺 can be regarded as a hypergraph with its points as vertices and its lines as edges. See incistruhgr 29486 for a generalization of this case for arbitrary incidence structures (planar incidence geometries are such incidence structures). (Proposed by Gerard Lang, 24-Nov-2021.) (Contributed by AV, 28-Nov-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
pliguhgr	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ⟨∪ 𝐺, ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟩ ∈ UHGraph)

Proof of Theorem pliguhgr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		f1oi 6863	. . . 4 ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺–1-1-onto→𝐺
2		f1of 6824	. . . 4 ⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺–1-1-onto→𝐺 → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶𝐺)
3		pwuni 4913	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺
4		n0lplig 30908	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐺)
5	4	adantr 486	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺) → ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐺)
6		disjsn 4679	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∩ {∅}) = ∅ ↔ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐺)
7	5, 6	sylibr 237	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺) → (𝐺 ∩ {∅}) = ∅)
8		reldisj 4413	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 → ((𝐺 ∩ {∅}) = ∅ ↔ 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
9	8	adantl 487	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺) → ((𝐺 ∩ {∅}) = ∅ ↔ 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
10	7, 9	mpbid 235	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺) → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
11	3, 10	mpan2 704	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
12		fss 6726	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶𝐺 ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})) → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
13	11, 12	sylan2 605	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶𝐺 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ Plig) → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
14	13	ex 418	. . . 4 ⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶𝐺 → (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
15	1, 2, 14	mp2b 10	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
16	15	ffdmd 6740	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ( I ↾ 𝐺):dom ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
17		uniexg 7748	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ∪ 𝐺 ∈ V)
18		resiexg 7915	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ( I ↾ 𝐺) ∈ V)
19		isuhgrop 29477	. . 3 ⊢ ((∪ 𝐺 ∈ V ∧ ( I ↾ 𝐺) ∈ V) → (⟨∪ 𝐺, ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟩ ∈ UHGraph ↔ ( I ↾ 𝐺):dom ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
20	17, 18, 19	syl2anc 596	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → (⟨∪ 𝐺, ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟩ ∈ UHGraph ↔ ( I ↾ 𝐺):dom ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
21	16, 20	mpbird 260	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ⟨∪ 𝐺, ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟩ ∈ UHGraph)

This proof depends on syntax axioms:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 401   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2146  Vcvv 3457   ∖ cdif 3903   ∩ cin 3905   ⊆ wss 3906  ∅c0 4286  𝒫 cpw 4564  {csn 4591  ⟨cop 4597  ∪ cuni 4874   I cid 5557  dom cdm 5663   ↾ cres 5665  ⟶wf 6536  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6539  UHGraphcuhgr 29463  Pligcplig 30899

This proof depends on axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1828  ax-4 1842  ax-5 1943  ax-6 2000  ax-7 2041  ax-8 2148  ax-9 2156  ax-10 2179  ax-11 2195  ax-12 2216  ax-ext 2737  ax-sep 5259  ax-nul 5271  ax-pow 5338  ax-pr 5406  ax-un 7742

This proof depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 402  df-or 862  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1813  df-nf 1817  df-sb 2100  df-mo 2569  df-eu 2599  df-clab 2744  df-cleq 2757  df-clel 2840  df-nfc 2914  df-ne 2961  df-ral 3082  df-rex 3092  df-rmo 3371  df-reu 3372  df-rab 3419  df-v 3459  df-sbc 3747  df-dif 3909  df-un 3911  df-in 3913  df-ss 3923  df-nul 4287  df-if 4490  df-pw 4566  df-sn 4592  df-pr 4594  df-op 4598  df-uni 4875  df-br 5112  df-opab 5176  df-mpt 5195  df-id 5558  df-xp 5669  df-rel 5670  df-cnv 5671  df-co 5672  df-dm 5673  df-rn 5674  df-res 5675  df-ima 5676  df-iota 6496  df-fun 6542  df-fn 6543  df-f 6544  df-f1 6545  df-fo 6546  df-f1o 6547  df-fv 6548  df-1st 7992  df-2nd 7993  df-vtx 29405  df-iedg 29406  df-uhgr 29465  df-plig 30900

This theorem is used by: (None)