Theorem pliguhgr 28749

Description: Any planar incidence geometry 𝐺 can be regarded as a hypergraph with its points as vertices and its lines as edges. See incistruhgr 27352 for a generalization of this case for arbitrary incidence structures (planar incidence geometries are such incidence structures). (Proposed by Gerard Lang, 24-Nov-2021.) (Contributed by AV, 28-Nov-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
pliguhgr	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ⟨∪ 𝐺, ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟩ ∈ UHGraph)

Proof of Theorem pliguhgr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		f1oi 6737	. . . 4 ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺–1-1-onto→𝐺
2		f1of 6700	. . . 4 ⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺–1-1-onto→𝐺 → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶𝐺)
3		pwuni 4875	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺
4		n0lplig 28746	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐺)
5	4	adantr 480	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺) → ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐺)
6		disjsn 4644	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∩ {∅}) = ∅ ↔ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐺)
7	5, 6	sylibr 233	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺) → (𝐺 ∩ {∅}) = ∅)
8		reldisj 4382	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 → ((𝐺 ∩ {∅}) = ∅ ↔ 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
9	8	adantl 481	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺) → ((𝐺 ∩ {∅}) = ∅ ↔ 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
10	7, 9	mpbid 231	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺) → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
11	3, 10	mpan2 687	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
12		fss 6601	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶𝐺 ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})) → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
13	11, 12	sylan2 592	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶𝐺 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ Plig) → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
14	13	ex 412	. . . 4 ⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶𝐺 → (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
15	1, 2, 14	mp2b 10	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
16	15	ffdmd 6615	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ( I ↾ 𝐺):dom ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
17		uniexg 7571	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ∪ 𝐺 ∈ V)
18		resiexg 7735	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ( I ↾ 𝐺) ∈ V)
19		isuhgrop 27343	. . 3 ⊢ ((∪ 𝐺 ∈ V ∧ ( I ↾ 𝐺) ∈ V) → (⟨∪ 𝐺, ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟩ ∈ UHGraph ↔ ( I ↾ 𝐺):dom ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
20	17, 18, 19	syl2anc 583	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → (⟨∪ 𝐺, ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟩ ∈ UHGraph ↔ ( I ↾ 𝐺):dom ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
21	16, 20	mpbird 256	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ⟨∪ 𝐺, ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟩ ∈ UHGraph)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 205   ∧ wa 395   = wceq 1539   ∈ wcel 2108  Vcvv 3422   ∖ cdif 3880   ∩ cin 3882   ⊆ wss 3883  ∅c0 4253  𝒫 cpw 4530  {csn 4558  ⟨cop 4564  ∪ cuni 4836   I cid 5479  dom cdm 5580   ↾ cres 5582  ⟶wf 6414  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6417  UHGraphcuhgr 27329  Pligcplig 28737

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1799  ax-4 1813  ax-5 1914  ax-6 1972  ax-7 2012  ax-8 2110  ax-9 2118  ax-10 2139  ax-11 2156  ax-12 2173  ax-ext 2709  ax-sep 5218  ax-nul 5225  ax-pow 5283  ax-pr 5347  ax-un 7566

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 206  df-an 396  df-or 844  df-3an 1087  df-tru 1542  df-fal 1552  df-ex 1784  df-nf 1788  df-sb 2069  df-mo 2540  df-eu 2569  df-clab 2716  df-cleq 2730  df-clel 2817  df-nfc 2888  df-ne 2943  df-ral 3068  df-rex 3069  df-reu 3070  df-rab 3072  df-v 3424  df-sbc 3712  df-dif 3886  df-un 3888  df-in 3890  df-ss 3900  df-nul 4254  df-if 4457  df-pw 4532  df-sn 4559  df-pr 4561  df-op 4565  df-uni 4837  df-br 5071  df-opab 5133  df-mpt 5154  df-id 5480  df-xp 5586  df-rel 5587  df-cnv 5588  df-co 5589  df-dm 5590  df-rn 5591  df-res 5592  df-ima 5593  df-iota 6376  df-fun 6420  df-fn 6421  df-f 6422  df-f1 6423  df-fo 6424  df-f1o 6425  df-fv 6426  df-1st 7804  df-2nd 7805  df-vtx 27271  df-iedg 27272  df-uhgr 27331  df-plig 28738

This theorem is referenced by: (None)