Theorem pliguhgr 27954

Description: Any planar incidence geometry 𝐺 can be regarded as a hypergraph with its points as vertices and its lines as edges. See incistruhgr 26547 for a generalization of this case for arbitrary incidence structures (planar incidence geometries are such incidence structures). (Proposed by Gerard Lang, 24-Nov-2021.) (Contributed by AV, 28-Nov-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
pliguhgr	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ⟨∪ 𝐺, ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟩ ∈ UHGraph)

Proof of Theorem pliguhgr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		f1oi 6520	. . . 4 ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺–1-1-onto→𝐺
2		f1of 6483	. . . 4 ⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺–1-1-onto→𝐺 → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶𝐺)
3		pwuni 4781	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺
4		n0lplig 27951	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐺)
5	4	adantr 481	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺) → ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐺)
6		disjsn 4554	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∩ {∅}) = ∅ ↔ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐺)
7	5, 6	sylibr 235	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺) → (𝐺 ∩ {∅}) = ∅)
8		reldisj 4316	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 → ((𝐺 ∩ {∅}) = ∅ ↔ 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
9	8	adantl 482	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺) → ((𝐺 ∩ {∅}) = ∅ ↔ 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
10	7, 9	mpbid 233	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺) → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
11	3, 10	mpan2 687	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
12		fss 6395	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶𝐺 ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})) → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
13	11, 12	sylan2 592	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶𝐺 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ Plig) → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
14	13	ex 413	. . . 4 ⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶𝐺 → (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
15	1, 2, 14	mp2b 10	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
16	15	ffdmd 6405	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ( I ↾ 𝐺):dom ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
17		uniexg 7325	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ∪ 𝐺 ∈ V)
18		resiexg 7475	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ( I ↾ 𝐺) ∈ V)
19		isuhgrop 26538	. . 3 ⊢ ((∪ 𝐺 ∈ V ∧ ( I ↾ 𝐺) ∈ V) → (⟨∪ 𝐺, ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟩ ∈ UHGraph ↔ ( I ↾ 𝐺):dom ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
20	17, 18, 19	syl2anc 584	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → (⟨∪ 𝐺, ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟩ ∈ UHGraph ↔ ( I ↾ 𝐺):dom ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
21	16, 20	mpbird 258	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ⟨∪ 𝐺, ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟩ ∈ UHGraph)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 207   ∧ wa 396   = wceq 1522   ∈ wcel 2081  Vcvv 3437   ∖ cdif 3856   ∩ cin 3858   ⊆ wss 3859  ∅c0 4211  𝒫 cpw 4453  {csn 4472  ⟨cop 4478  ∪ cuni 4745   I cid 5347  dom cdm 5443   ↾ cres 5445  ⟶wf 6221  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6224  UHGraphcuhgr 26524  Pligcplig 27942

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1777  ax-4 1791  ax-5 1888  ax-6 1947  ax-7 1992  ax-8 2083  ax-9 2091  ax-10 2112  ax-11 2126  ax-12 2141  ax-13 2344  ax-ext 2769  ax-sep 5094  ax-nul 5101  ax-pow 5157  ax-pr 5221  ax-un 7319

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 208  df-an 397  df-or 843  df-3an 1082  df-tru 1525  df-ex 1762  df-nf 1766  df-sb 2043  df-mo 2576  df-eu 2612  df-clab 2776  df-cleq 2788  df-clel 2863  df-nfc 2935  df-ne 2985  df-ral 3110  df-rex 3111  df-reu 3112  df-rab 3114  df-v 3439  df-sbc 3707  df-dif 3862  df-un 3864  df-in 3866  df-ss 3874  df-nul 4212  df-if 4382  df-pw 4455  df-sn 4473  df-pr 4475  df-op 4479  df-uni 4746  df-br 4963  df-opab 5025  df-mpt 5042  df-id 5348  df-xp 5449  df-rel 5450  df-cnv 5451  df-co 5452  df-dm 5453  df-rn 5454  df-res 5455  df-ima 5456  df-iota 6189  df-fun 6227  df-fn 6228  df-f 6229  df-f1 6230  df-fo 6231  df-f1o 6232  df-fv 6233  df-1st 7545  df-2nd 7546  df-vtx 26466  df-iedg 26467  df-uhgr 26526  df-plig 27943

This theorem is referenced by: (None)