Theorem pliguhgr 30838

Description: Any planar incidence geometry 𝐺 can be regarded as a hypergraph with its points as vertices and its lines as edges. See incistruhgr 29429 for a generalization of this case for arbitrary incidence structures (planar incidence geometries are such incidence structures). (Proposed by Gerard Lang, 24-Nov-2021.) (Contributed by AV, 28-Nov-2021.)

Assertion

Ref	Expression
pliguhgr	⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ⟨∪ 𝐺, ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟩ ∈ UHGraph)

Proof of Theorem pliguhgr

Step	Hyp	Ref	Expression
1		f1oi 6859	. . . 4 ⊢ ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺–1-1-onto→𝐺
2		f1of 6820	. . . 4 ⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺–1-1-onto→𝐺 → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶𝐺)
3		pwuni 4911	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺
4		n0lplig 30835	. . . . . . . . . 10 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐺)
5	4	adantr 485	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺) → ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐺)
6		disjsn 4677	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∩ {∅}) = ∅ ↔ ¬ ∅ ∈ 𝐺)
7	5, 6	sylibr 237	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺) → (𝐺 ∩ {∅}) = ∅)
8		reldisj 4413	. . . . . . . . 9 ⊢ (𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 → ((𝐺 ∩ {∅}) = ∅ ↔ 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
9	8	adantl 486	. . . . . . . 8 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺) → ((𝐺 ∩ {∅}) = ∅ ↔ 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
10	7, 9	mpbid 235	. . . . . . 7 ⊢ ((𝐺 ∈ Plig ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ 𝒫 ∪ 𝐺) → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
11	3, 10	mpan2 703	. . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
12		fss 6722	. . . . . 6 ⊢ ((( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶𝐺 ∧ 𝐺 ⊆ (𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})) → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
13	11, 12	sylan2 604	. . . . 5 ⊢ ((( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶𝐺 ∧ 𝐺 ∈ Plig) → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
14	13	ex 417	. . . 4 ⊢ (( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶𝐺 → (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
15	1, 2, 14	mp2b 10	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ( I ↾ 𝐺):𝐺⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
16	15	ffdmd 6736	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ( I ↾ 𝐺):dom ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅}))
17		uniexg 7738	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ∪ 𝐺 ∈ V)
18		resiexg 7905	. . 3 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ( I ↾ 𝐺) ∈ V)
19		isuhgrop 29420	. . 3 ⊢ ((∪ 𝐺 ∈ V ∧ ( I ↾ 𝐺) ∈ V) → (⟨∪ 𝐺, ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟩ ∈ UHGraph ↔ ( I ↾ 𝐺):dom ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
20	17, 18, 19	syl2anc 595	. 2 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → (⟨∪ 𝐺, ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟩ ∈ UHGraph ↔ ( I ↾ 𝐺):dom ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟶(𝒫 ∪ 𝐺 ∖ {∅})))
21	16, 20	mpbird 260	1 ⊢ (𝐺 ∈ Plig → ⟨∪ 𝐺, ( I ↾ 𝐺)⟩ ∈ UHGraph)

Syntax hints:  ¬ wn 3   → wi 4   ↔ wb 209   ∧ wa 400   = wceq 1570   ∈ wcel 2143  Vcvv 3455   ∖ cdif 3902   ∩ cin 3904   ⊆ wss 3905  ∅c0 4286  𝒫 cpw 4562  {csn 4589  ⟨cop 4595  ∪ cuni 4872   I cid 5555  dom cdm 5661   ↾ cres 5663  ⟶wf 6532  –1-1-onto→wf1o 6535  UHGraphcuhgr 29406  Pligcplig 30826

This theorem was proved from axioms:  ax-mp 5  ax-1 6  ax-2 7  ax-3 8  ax-gen 1825  ax-4 1839  ax-5 1940  ax-6 1997  ax-7 2038  ax-8 2145  ax-9 2153  ax-10 2176  ax-11 2192  ax-12 2213  ax-ext 2735  ax-sep 5257  ax-nul 5269  ax-pow 5336  ax-pr 5404  ax-un 7732

This theorem depends on definitions:  df-bi 210  df-an 401  df-or 861  df-3an 1105  df-tru 1573  df-fal 1583  df-ex 1810  df-nf 1814  df-sb 2097  df-mo 2567  df-eu 2597  df-clab 2742  df-cleq 2755  df-clel 2838  df-nfc 2912  df-ne 2959  df-ral 3080  df-rex 3090  df-rmo 3369  df-reu 3370  df-rab 3417  df-v 3457  df-sbc 3745  df-dif 3908  df-un 3910  df-in 3912  df-ss 3922  df-nul 4287  df-if 4488  df-pw 4564  df-sn 4590  df-pr 4592  df-op 4596  df-uni 4873  df-br 5110  df-opab 5174  df-mpt 5193  df-id 5556  df-xp 5667  df-rel 5668  df-cnv 5669  df-co 5670  df-dm 5671  df-rn 5672  df-res 5673  df-ima 5674  df-iota 6492  df-fun 6538  df-fn 6539  df-f 6540  df-f1 6541  df-fo 6542  df-f1o 6543  df-fv 6544  df-1st 7982  df-2nd 7983  df-vtx 29348  df-iedg 29349  df-uhgr 29408  df-plig 30827

This theorem is referenced by: (None)