| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > tglinecom | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Commutativity law for lines. Part of theorem 6.17 of [Schwabhauser] p. 45. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-May-2019.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| tglineelsb2.p | ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) |
| tglineelsb2.i | ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) |
| tglineelsb2.l | ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) |
| tglineelsb2.g | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) |
| tglineelsb2.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵) |
| tglineelsb2.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐵) |
| tglineelsb2.4 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| tglinecom | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃𝐿𝑄) = (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | tglineelsb2.p | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) | |
| 2 | tglineelsb2.i | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) | |
| 3 | tglineelsb2.l | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) | |
| 4 | tglineelsb2.g | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) | |
| 5 | 4 | adantr 486 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) |
| 6 | tglineelsb2.2 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐵) | |
| 7 | 6 | adantr 486 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐵) |
| 8 | tglineelsb2.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵) | |
| 9 | 8 | adantr 486 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵) |
| 10 | tglineelsb2.4 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) | |
| 11 | 1, 3, 2, 4, 8, 6, 10 | tglnssp 28897 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃𝐿𝑄) ⊆ 𝐵) |
| 12 | 11 | sselda 3931 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) |
| 13 | 10 | necomd 3010 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑃) |
| 14 | 13 | adantr 486 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑃) |
| 15 | simpr 490 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) | |
| 16 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 14, 15 | lncom 28972 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) |
| 17 | 4 | adantr 486 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) |
| 18 | 8 | adantr 486 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵) |
| 19 | 6 | adantr 486 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐵) |
| 20 | 1, 3, 2, 4, 6, 8, 13 | tglnssp 28897 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑄𝐿𝑃) ⊆ 𝐵) |
| 21 | 20 | sselda 3931 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) |
| 22 | 10 | adantr 486 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) |
| 23 | simpr 490 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) | |
| 24 | 1, 2, 3, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23 | lncom 28972 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) |
| 25 | 16, 24 | impbida 813 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃))) |
| 26 | 25 | eqrdv 2758 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃𝐿𝑄) = (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ∧ wa 401 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2145 ≠ wne 2955 ‘cfv 6533 (class class class)co 7414 Basecbs 17304 TarskiGcstrkg 28771 Itvcitv 28777 LineGclng 28778 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2147 ax-9 2155 ax-10 2178 ax-11 2194 ax-12 2213 ax-ext 2732 ax-sep 5251 ax-nul 5263 ax-pr 5398 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2100 df-mo 2564 df-eu 2594 df-clab 2739 df-cleq 2752 df-clel 2835 df-nfc 2909 df-ne 2956 df-ral 3077 df-rex 3087 df-rab 3413 df-v 3452 df-sbc 3740 df-dif 3902 df-un 3904 df-in 3906 df-ss 3916 df-nul 4280 df-if 4483 df-pw 4559 df-sn 4585 df-pr 4587 df-op 4591 df-uni 4868 df-br 5104 df-opab 5168 df-id 5550 df-xp 5661 df-rel 5662 df-cnv 5663 df-co 5664 df-dm 5665 df-iota 6489 df-fun 6535 df-fv 6541 df-ov 7417 df-oprab 7418 df-mpo 7419 df-trkgc 28792 df-trkgb 28793 df-trkgcb 28794 df-trkg 28797 |
| This theorem is used by: tglinethru 28986 coltr3 28999 symquadprlnglem 29047 footeq 29081 colperpexlem3 29090 mideulem2 29092 opphllem 29093 midex 29095 opphllem3 29107 opphllem5 29109 plngrotlem1 29147 plngrotlem2 29148 lnssplnglem 29151 lnssplng 29152 lmicom 29175 lmiisolem 29183 symquadmid 29186 lnperpex 29191 trgcopy 29193 perpeqlem 29229 tgaaddcpbllem1 29231 tgaaddcpbl 29234 angmgmaddeu1 29261 prlngmid2 29321 symquadprlng 29322 prlngsymquadlem 29323 prlngsymquadopp 29325 quadcgrprlng 29326 tgaltai 29327 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |