| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > tglinecom | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Commutativity law for lines. Part of theorem 6.17 of [Schwabhauser] p. 45. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-May-2019.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| tglineelsb2.p | ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) |
| tglineelsb2.i | ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) |
| tglineelsb2.l | ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) |
| tglineelsb2.g | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) |
| tglineelsb2.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵) |
| tglineelsb2.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐵) |
| tglineelsb2.4 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| tglinecom | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃𝐿𝑄) = (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | tglineelsb2.p | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) | |
| 2 | tglineelsb2.i | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) | |
| 3 | tglineelsb2.l | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) | |
| 4 | tglineelsb2.g | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) | |
| 5 | 4 | adantr 486 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) |
| 6 | tglineelsb2.2 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐵) | |
| 7 | 6 | adantr 486 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐵) |
| 8 | tglineelsb2.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵) | |
| 9 | 8 | adantr 486 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵) |
| 10 | tglineelsb2.4 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) | |
| 11 | 1, 3, 2, 4, 8, 6, 10 | tglnssp 28874 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃𝐿𝑄) ⊆ 𝐵) |
| 12 | 11 | sselda 3938 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) |
| 13 | 10 | necomd 3015 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑃) |
| 14 | 13 | adantr 486 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑃) |
| 15 | simpr 490 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) | |
| 16 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 14, 15 | lncom 28948 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) |
| 17 | 4 | adantr 486 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) |
| 18 | 8 | adantr 486 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵) |
| 19 | 6 | adantr 486 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐵) |
| 20 | 1, 3, 2, 4, 6, 8, 13 | tglnssp 28874 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑄𝐿𝑃) ⊆ 𝐵) |
| 21 | 20 | sselda 3938 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) |
| 22 | 10 | adantr 486 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) |
| 23 | simpr 490 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) | |
| 24 | 1, 2, 3, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23 | lncom 28948 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) |
| 25 | 16, 24 | impbida 813 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃))) |
| 26 | 25 | eqrdv 2763 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃𝐿𝑄) = (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| This proof depends on syntax axioms: → wi 4 ∧ wa 401 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2146 ≠ wne 2960 ‘cfv 6540 (class class class)co 7419 Basecbs 17293 TarskiGcstrkg 28749 Itvcitv 28755 LineGclng 28756 |
| This proof depends on axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1828 ax-4 1842 ax-5 1943 ax-6 2000 ax-7 2041 ax-8 2148 ax-9 2156 ax-10 2179 ax-11 2195 ax-12 2216 ax-ext 2737 ax-sep 5259 ax-nul 5271 ax-pr 5406 |
| This proof depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 402 df-or 862 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1813 df-nf 1817 df-sb 2100 df-mo 2569 df-eu 2599 df-clab 2744 df-cleq 2757 df-clel 2840 df-nfc 2914 df-ne 2961 df-ral 3082 df-rex 3092 df-rab 3419 df-v 3459 df-sbc 3747 df-dif 3909 df-un 3911 df-in 3913 df-ss 3923 df-nul 4287 df-if 4490 df-pw 4566 df-sn 4592 df-pr 4594 df-op 4598 df-uni 4875 df-br 5112 df-opab 5176 df-id 5558 df-xp 5669 df-rel 5670 df-cnv 5671 df-co 5672 df-dm 5673 df-iota 6496 df-fun 6542 df-fv 6548 df-ov 7422 df-oprab 7423 df-mpo 7424 df-trkgc 28770 df-trkgb 28771 df-trkgcb 28772 df-trkg 28775 |
| This theorem is used by: tglinethru 28962 coltr3 28975 symquadprlnglem 29023 footeq 29057 colperpexlem3 29066 mideulem2 29068 opphllem 29069 midex 29071 opphllem3 29083 opphllem5 29085 plngrotlem1 29122 plngrotlem2 29123 lnssplnglem 29126 lnssplng 29127 lmicom 29150 lmiisolem 29158 symquadmid 29161 lnperpex 29166 trgcopy 29168 perpeqlem 29203 tgaaddcpbllem1 29205 tgaaddcpbl 29208 prlngmid2 29268 symquadprlng 29269 prlngsymquadlem 29270 prlngsymquadopp 29272 quadcgrprlng 29273 tgaltai 29274 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |