| Metamath Proof Explorer |
< Previous
Next >
Nearby theorems |
||
| Mirrors > Home > MPE Home > Th. List > tglinecom | Structured version Visualization version GIF version | ||
| Description: Commutativity law for lines. Part of theorem 6.17 of [Schwabhauser] p. 45. (Contributed by Thierry Arnoux, 17-May-2019.) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| tglineelsb2.p | ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) |
| tglineelsb2.i | ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) |
| tglineelsb2.l | ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) |
| tglineelsb2.g | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) |
| tglineelsb2.1 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵) |
| tglineelsb2.2 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐵) |
| tglineelsb2.4 | ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) |
| Ref | Expression |
|---|---|
| tglinecom | ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃𝐿𝑄) = (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) |
| Step | Hyp | Ref | Expression |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | tglineelsb2.p | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐵 = (Base‘𝐺) | |
| 2 | tglineelsb2.i | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐼 = (Itv‘𝐺) | |
| 3 | tglineelsb2.l | . . . 4 ⊢ 𝐿 = (LineG‘𝐺) | |
| 4 | tglineelsb2.g | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) | |
| 5 | 4 | adantr 485 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) |
| 6 | tglineelsb2.2 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐵) | |
| 7 | 6 | adantr 485 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐵) |
| 8 | tglineelsb2.1 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵) | |
| 9 | 8 | adantr 485 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵) |
| 10 | tglineelsb2.4 | . . . . . 6 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) | |
| 11 | 1, 3, 2, 4, 8, 6, 10 | tglnssp 28821 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃𝐿𝑄) ⊆ 𝐵) |
| 12 | 11 | sselda 3937 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) |
| 13 | 10 | necomd 3013 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑃) |
| 14 | 13 | adantr 485 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) → 𝑄 ≠ 𝑃) |
| 15 | simpr 489 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) | |
| 16 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 9, 12, 14, 15 | lncom 28895 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) |
| 17 | 4 | adantr 485 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) → 𝐺 ∈ TarskiG) |
| 18 | 8 | adantr 485 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) → 𝑃 ∈ 𝐵) |
| 19 | 6 | adantr 485 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) → 𝑄 ∈ 𝐵) |
| 20 | 1, 3, 2, 4, 6, 8, 13 | tglnssp 28821 | . . . . 5 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑄𝐿𝑃) ⊆ 𝐵) |
| 21 | 20 | sselda 3937 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) → 𝑥 ∈ 𝐵) |
| 22 | 10 | adantr 485 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) → 𝑃 ≠ 𝑄) |
| 23 | simpr 489 | . . . 4 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) | |
| 24 | 1, 2, 3, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23 | lncom 28895 | . . 3 ⊢ ((𝜑 ∧ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) → 𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄)) |
| 25 | 16, 24 | impbida 812 | . 2 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑥 ∈ (𝑃𝐿𝑄) ↔ 𝑥 ∈ (𝑄𝐿𝑃))) |
| 26 | 25 | eqrdv 2761 | 1 ⊢ (𝜑 → (𝑃𝐿𝑄) = (𝑄𝐿𝑃)) |
| Colors of variables: wff setvar class |
| Syntax hints: → wi 4 ∧ wa 400 = wceq 1570 ∈ wcel 2143 ≠ wne 2958 ‘cfv 6536 (class class class)co 7410 Basecbs 17264 TarskiGcstrkg 28696 Itvcitv 28702 LineGclng 28703 |
| This theorem was proved from axioms: ax-mp 5 ax-1 6 ax-2 7 ax-3 8 ax-gen 1825 ax-4 1839 ax-5 1940 ax-6 1997 ax-7 2038 ax-8 2145 ax-9 2153 ax-10 2176 ax-11 2192 ax-12 2213 ax-ext 2735 ax-sep 5257 ax-nul 5269 ax-pr 5404 |
| This theorem depends on definitions: df-bi 210 df-an 401 df-or 861 df-3or 1104 df-3an 1105 df-tru 1573 df-fal 1583 df-ex 1810 df-nf 1814 df-sb 2097 df-mo 2567 df-eu 2597 df-clab 2742 df-cleq 2755 df-clel 2838 df-nfc 2912 df-ne 2959 df-ral 3080 df-rex 3090 df-rab 3417 df-v 3457 df-sbc 3745 df-dif 3908 df-un 3910 df-in 3912 df-ss 3922 df-nul 4287 df-if 4488 df-pw 4564 df-sn 4590 df-pr 4592 df-op 4596 df-uni 4873 df-br 5110 df-opab 5174 df-id 5556 df-xp 5667 df-rel 5668 df-cnv 5669 df-co 5670 df-dm 5671 df-iota 6492 df-fun 6538 df-fv 6544 df-ov 7413 df-oprab 7414 df-mpo 7415 df-trkgc 28717 df-trkgb 28718 df-trkgcb 28719 df-trkg 28722 |
| This theorem is referenced by: tglinethru 28909 coltr3 28922 symquadprlnglem 28970 footeq 29004 colperpexlem3 29013 mideulem2 29015 opphllem 29016 midex 29018 opphllem3 29030 opphllem5 29032 plngrotlem1 29069 plngrotlem2 29070 lnssplnglem 29073 lnssplng 29074 lmicom 29097 lmiisolem 29105 symquadmid 29108 lnperpex 29113 trgcopy 29115 perpeqlem 29150 prlngmid2 29211 symquadprlng 29212 prlngsymquadlem 29213 prlngsymquadopp 29215 quadcgrprlng 29216 tgaltai 29217 |
| Copyright terms: Public domain | W3C validator |